Culture Churches face growing challenge as polyamory gains acceptance

Article / Archive

Once considered a fringe relationship style among adults, consensual non-monogamy is gaining visibility across age groups. A recent study revealed that nearly 17% of LGBTQ+ youth surveyed identified as polyamorous or open to such relationships.

This, coupled with research showing over 20% of adults have engaged in consensual non-monogamous arrangements, raises a question for houses of worship: are they ready to address the growing acceptance of diverse relationship structures?

According to many within these communities, the answer is a resounding no.

1733426819646.png

“It’s so not ready,” said Kerlin Richter, a former Episcopal priest from Portland. “I think the church is still picturing freelove swingers from the 70s.”

After serving her parish for seven years, she faced a year-long church investigation when she came out as polyamorous, ultimately leading to her renunciation of ordination.

In 2015, after being married for 18 years, she and her husband decided to open up their marriage.

“We did not do it thoughtlessly. We did not do it quickly,” she said. “We made a real, loving choice toward each other.”

She said when they married they took the vows of Ruth and Naomi, “Where you go, I will go; where you lodge, I will lodge; your people shall be my people, and your God my God. Where you die, I will die — there will I be buried.”

“We fully believed that then and we still do now,” Richter said. “We’re still happily married and continue to uphold our vows.”

She said the reasons they opened up their marriage are personal. They decided not to lie about their decision if asked, but also not to broadcast their relationship dynamics unprompted.

Though unaware of Richter’s open marriage, parishioners began confiding in her about their own non-traditional relationships.

‘Crazy Sexy Advent’

She had already challenged traditional boundaries within her congregation by launching “Crazy, Sexy Advent,” a Zoom series that opened frank discussions about sexuality and faith.

One congregant confessed that she feared rejection from the church if they discovered her polyamorous relationship.

“I was able to offer pastoral care and counseling, but it looked like a monogamous person trying to be slightly woke,” Richter recalled.

Everything shifted when Richter, at 44, fell in love with her new partner and they decided to have a baby together, with her husband’s blessing. They opted for third parent adoption and decided to raise the baby together.

She recalled the adoption ceremony, where a Mary Oliver poem was read and the baby was given a stuffed animal by the judge.

“It was an incredibly, affirming, beautiful time for us as a family,” she said.

But her private life was now visible.

Richter went to the bishop for guidance, but was told she needed to either renounce her order or return to monogamy.

In 2023, she was fired from her position as rector.

She fought it at first, but after a year of legal battles she said she realized she couldn’t win.

“I thought I’d be able to explain why the shape of my family was not sinful, why it wasn’t a violation of my marriage or my ordination vows, but there was no space for any of that to actually happen,” Richter said.

She argues that poly relationships are valid and a potentially beneficial family structure that should not be condemned by the church, adding that many non-monogamous relationships are modeled in the Bible.

Definition of marriage

The Episcopal church, like many denominations, defines marriage as a life-long union between two people.

Many theologians remain firm in believing marriage has firm boundaries.

Contemporary theologians like J.I. Packer (who died in 2020) defined biblical marriage as an exclusive relationship between one man and one woman for life. He writes, “The increasing acceptance of polyamory by progressives and (soon-to-be former) evangelicals is a symptom of the state of the church’s witness to God’s normative pattern for sexuality…”

Brian G. Murphy, one of the founders of queertheology.com, said for these reasons many polyamorous clergy remain closeted.

“There’s no Christian denomination that I know of that says it’s OK to be polyamorous,” he said. “They’ve got this handbook about what fidelity or commitment looks like and so to include polyamory, they’d have to reimagine all of that, then also rewrite it.”

Polyamory in houses of worship


Even though several religious institutions made strides in affirming gay marriage and the ordination of gay clergy, Murphy said they are miles away from accepting concensual non-monogamous relationships.

“I think if you read the Bible it’s much easier to see polygamy in the Bible than explicitly queer marriage, but on a practical logistical level, gay marriage is easier to accommodate, because you just remove the gender restrictions and you keep the whole framework intact,” he explained. “So, allowing gays and lesbians and bisexuals into the institution of marriage is a relatively conservative project, whereas figuring out how to make room for non monogamy, totally upends it, right?”

Murphy is a former Evangelical who recently converted to Judaism.

For many, like Richter, his website is one of the only resources for poly people of faith. It offers programs like “Polyamory & Christianity Course” designed to support individuals at the intersection of Christianity and polyamory or open relationships and initiatives like “Poly Possibilities” — an initiative that brings together religious non-monogamous people to explore how polyamory and spirituality enrich one another.

“There’s not a whole lot of places to go when wrestling with those questions,” Richter said.

Polyamory in Spokane


Jac Archer lives in Spokane with their 3-year-old daughter and both of their husbands — one legally recognized by the state, the other bonded through a commitment ceremony. Both men are legal parents to their daughter.

“I feel very blessed to live in a state that allows me to craft the home life and family that I want, without prejudice,” Archer said. “And it’s queer and poly and beautiful.”

Archer grew up Seventh-day Adventist, but left the church long ago.

Now, a local activist and law school student, they said they surround themself with a community that supports them.

That includes Archer’s parents and one of two siblings, who remain faithful Adventists.

“They actually came to my wedding last summer, which was pretty cool,” Archer said.

Last summer was when Archer had a commitment ceremony with their second partner.

They said it was a ceremony that symbolized the melding of their families, and included multiple sets of vows.

Families of the polyamorous

1733426893507.png

Archer said their parents were able to witness the love Archer shares with their partners, though their dad struggles with the concept of polyamory.

“He doesn’t get it because his views around marriage revolve around Christianity, that I don’t fully understand because I don’t remember that ever being heavily discussed,” they said, adding that they never talked about the number of people involved in a marriage.

“That probably wasn’t even a question in people’s minds right? So my dad has these feelings about marriage and monogamy that I don’t fully understand,” they said.

However, Archer said they commend their parents for not throwing out their beliefs for them. They’ve always made it clear that their theological wrestling is theirs, not Archer’s.

“They’ve never put it on me. My mom said something to the effect of she believes she’s called to be my parent and to love and support me and so she’s loving and supporting me, because that’s what God wants her to do,” Archer said.

Archer said when they travel home (near Walla Walla), where their former religious community remains, they are met with “two flavors of acceptance.”

“One is ‘Well, that’s your marriage and your life and I can’t hold you to my standards because you left the church.’ OK, shrug. The other flavor is ‘I will justify this in my head … in the Bible most of the patriarchs had multiple wives, so I will make room for this,’” Archer said.

The second picture, they noted, is less common.

Could Jesus be pan-sexual and polyamorous?

Murphy has written a lot about polyamory in the Bible, even going so far as to say that Jesus is in a “pan-sexual, polyamorous relationship” with the entire body of believers and suggests that God’s love for multiple people can be a model for romantic and sexual relationships, drawing parallels between divine love and polyamorous love.

He argued that Paul uses the word “marriage” to describe Jesus’ relationship with the church and that Jesus is “married” to the entire body of believers, not just one person.

Murphy’s interpretation suggests that Jesus’ love for humanity transcends gender and is shared with multiple individuals simultaneously, and says that faith leaders can do better in serving the poly community.

“Language matters, and representation matters,” he said, adding that clergy also need to be clear in explaining any limitations they have.

While some clergy privately support non-monogamous congregants, they may face losing their jobs if they officiate polyamorous weddings — a reality they must be transparent about, Murphy said.

How houses of worship can move forward in a polyamorous reality

Archer said houses of worship can do things logistically to be more inclusive, too.

For instance, they can plan family events with the understanding that every family looks different.

“Stop assuming you only need two slots on this form for parents,” Archer said, adding that for events, the door should be left open for multiple people to be involved. “Really, all I’m saying is make your forms and programming more inclusive and less dependant on binaries.”

To poly people who don’t feel comfortable going into a house of worship, Murphy reminds them that they are still loved by God.

“God is already dwelling amongst us and in us and in our relationships,” he said. “You are already holy and actually it’s the church that should be knocking on your door because polyamorous people have unique insights into the divine.”

He continues to write about faith and polyamory in his forthcoming book, “Love Beyond Monogamy: How New and Ancient Insights on Polyamory Will Enrich Your Spirituality and Sexuality,” which is expected to be published in 2025.
 
I haven't read much of the bible myself, but I don't know of any mentions of polyamory etc. I highly doubt Jesus was loving all of his followers in that way.
It's not even a natural state for humans either, apes are not polygamous, they are usually males that have harems, or a dominant male who will breed with a dominant female, with lessers breeding between themselves. There is no widespread sharing etc, as its all based on hierarchy (lesser members cannot breed with dominant ones, and their children will always be lower in the pecking order).
 
I haven't read much of the bible myself, but I don't know of any mentions of polyamory etc. I highly doubt Jesus was loving all of his followers in that way.
It's not even a natural state for humans either, apes are not polygamous, they are usually males that have harems, or a dominant male who will breed with a dominant female, with lessers breeding between themselves. There is no widespread sharing etc, as its all based on hierarchy (lesser members cannot breed with dominant ones, and their children will always be lower in the pecking order).
Polyamory is not even a real concept anyways, it's just one of the party's way to cope with being a cuck. All "polyamorous" relationships either end with the party that was sleeping around deserting their partner, or the cuck growing a spine and cutting their losses
 
That's only a problem for prots. The Catechism of the Catholic Church is clear and forbids polygamy:
"Polygamy is not in accord with the moral law. Conjugal communion is radically contradicted by polygamy; this is because it is contrary to the equal personal dignity of men and women who in matrimony give themselves with a love that is total and therefore unique and exclusive." — CCC 2387
Marriage is an exclusive union between one man and one woman:
"Marriage is a covenant, by which a man and a woman establish between themselves a partnership of the whole of life and which is ordered by its nature to the good of the spouses and the procreation and education of children" — CCC 1601
"The intimate community of life and love which constitutes the married state has been established by the Creator and endowed by him with its own proper laws." — CCC 1642
Anything else is considered adultery:
"When two partners, of whom at least one is married to another party, have sexual relations – even transient ones – they commit adultery. Christ condemns even adultery of mere desire. The sixth commandment and the New Testament forbid adultery absolutely. The prophets denounce the gravity of adultery; they see it as an image of the sin of idolatry. Adultery is an injustice. He who commits adultery fails in his commitment. He does injury to the sign of the covenant which the marriage bond is, transgresses the rights of the other spouse, and undermines the institution of marriage by breaking the contract on which it is based. He compromises the good of human generation and the welfare of children who need their parents’ stable union." — CCC 2380-2381

This is the Church's teaching. It has never changed and will never change. Good luck, faggots.
 
There is none. These so-called relationships will collapse catastrophically and in record time.

When people say they want an open relationship what they actually want is it to just be open one way. The true ideal situation for a person is as many high class partners as possible that they can freely pick and choose from but at the same time all the partners are exclusive to them alone. Rather than solve any of the issues of monogamy (which admittedly there are some), most polyamory as its practiced simply switches up which facet of this it ignores.

What often pushes it from a tradeoff to being worse is if the partners are significantly not equal in how good they are at attracting others which is almost always the case. One partner (usually the man) often ends up not getting any exclusive or open relationships at all and becomes an incel watching their more successful 'partner'. Its extremely corrosive.
 
Last edited:
There’s a lot of pushing of polyamory recently isn’t there?
I saw a TikTok a few days ago where a polyamorous woman was talking about how she's seeing 6 or 7 other guys while she's already married and with a little kid :wow:

she had some supportive comments (probably all her boyfriends) but most were just making fun of her, and she was defending her life in the comments :story:

but yeah, it definitely feels like something or someone is starting to try to push this polyamorous shit. that TikTok I got was just too out of place for what I usually get on my For You page
 
Wait what? That seems way too high
Yes, they're deliberately asking the question this way to count one-time lays, which are by definition consensual non-monogamous arrangements. It serves to both appear more influential and preach to the audience.
"Where on the scale from barbie to GI Joe are you? See, you're also somewhat of a troon."
"Have you ever fucked a woman without expecting her to be faithful to you? See, you're also a bit of a cuck."
 
There’s a lot of pushing of polyamory recently isn’t there?
Yeah, it's really picked up pace. My loopy acquaintance circle think monogamy is prudish now. I've been trying to reintroduce the concept of friendship into my stories as "people you like, but don't actually want to have sex with, I know, what a weird orientation where you don't constantly want to fuck anything that's moving."

I also knew a girl who wanted to be the third wheel in a marriage. She wanted that guy more than anything, and his wife eventually relented to the polyamory.

Now former wifey is on her own, pushed out by her younger, prettier replacement. I am wondering how many years it will take for history to repeat.
I can get wanting to live with your friend group, especially in this economy because hopefully they will be more likeable than strangers as roomies, but adding sex to every relationship seems like a great way to ruin long term bonds.
 
It won't be surprising if the only church who approves of this is the Church of Satan. Seems that the people pushing this shit just want to exercise their mental gymnastics. Haven't they also read what God thinks of faggots in the first place?
 
ain't nothing wrong with having multiple wives, in fact it's very biblical

This whole article is some kind of "look at the fags" thing though, it doesn't really have anything to do with "marriage", a word that has literally no meaning when applied to anything other than a male/female reproductive coupling
 
ain't nothing wrong with having multiple wives, in fact it's very biblical

This whole article is some kind of "look at the fags" thing though, it doesn't really have anything to do with "marriage", a word that has literally no meaning when applied to anything other than a male/female reproductive coupling
Very quranic, more like it
 
Back