Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 63 15.4%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 6 1.5%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 103 25.2%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 73 17.8%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 164 40.1%

  • Total voters
    409
Write this in blood:

Nick is too scared to ever stream on YouTube or rumble again.
I think because his last stream was what, April's court hearing? And his poor low IQ audience didn't understand why he was streaming some random thot's arraignment for cocaine possession and why said he was on such friendly terms with said thot. Balldo must remain in control of the narrative, but every time he streams about topics he likes such as he and his cult's court cases, he drops damning evidence against himself. And he's too damn lazy to stream Trump'n'Guns, he needs a mountain of cocaine to make that topic interesting so he can go off on tangents about Denny's cops or making jokes about Dearborn Muslims raping his daughter. Just Balldo things, ya know?
Lol I remember that retarded Gump haircut he got to try and trick the hair follicle tests. Funny and weird why he'd do such a thing when the forty papers he read proved that hair follicle testing didn't work. I miss those car livestreams too. Come on Nick, prove your license isn't suspended and you've completed rehab by showing off the Balldomobile!
 
I could be wrong, but I’m pretty sure Nick couldn’t ethically be his attorney even if he did practice. This is a warrant for contempt of court for rebroadcasting a hearing for the man he’s accusing of posting revenge porn of his wife.
As if Nick does anything ethically. You're missing an 'N', as the only 'law' Nick does is ethnic, and by 'law' I mean 'men'.
 
Write this in blood:

Nick is too scared to ever stream on YouTube or rumble again.

Say it ain't so, if that's the case then our furry little friend may never return:

Vengeance.jpg
 
Last edited:
Say it ain't so, if that's the case then our furry little friend may never return:

View attachment 6719836
I get a warm feeling thinking that the complete ruination of Nicks life this past year is a direct karmic consequence of his zoosadism and murder of defenceless raccoons, like some Eldritch Entity out in the Universe heard the struggles of that drowning animal and decided to bend its powers to pushing Nicks shit in to balance the scales...
 
I get a warm feeling thinking that the complete ruination of Nicks life this past year is a direct karmic consequence of his zoosadism and murder of defenceless raccoons, like some Eldritch Entity out in the Universe heard the struggles of that drowning animal and decided to bend its powers to pushing Nicks shit in to balance the scales...
At least according to Balldo, he tortured the SKUNK to death by repeatedly drowning it, not the raccoons, who he murdered by beating them to death with a hammer.
 
I hope Nick does pick April. Kayla and their kids would be better off without him physically present in their lives, and the crack whore deserves to live with her dealer, because that’s the funniest possible outcome. Not even the shittiest, most optimistic Lifetime movie would have that relationship survive, because there is no happy ending.
And they could run away to Mexico to live next door to Ralph and Britney Spears!
 
Josh is moving back to the states, it's high time for him to find somebody to have white babies with.

Come on April, move to Florida and help Josh grow banana peppers and Jim potatoes :heart-full:. Josh has a successful livestream and Internet fame, what more could you want?
Better yet! There's a house for sale in Spicer Minnesota. If I were Null I'd offer 195k* and close at 225k*...if Nick is lucky...because Null would at least need to change every shower and possibly sink in the place.

But....would you really wanna find out the house sits on a Raccoon style Indian grave site? Probably not....so bring that up to the realtor and make an even lower offer....

* (means Nick is desperate for money so rake him over the coals)
 
Pre-brain damaged Nick would definitely be streaming tonight about the United Health CEO that got shot

He'd be making "heh heh just saying" quips about it while waving his arms around "for legal reasons that was a JOKE", pulling up a few twitter memes for people to laugh at, followed eulogizing some boomers dead dog for $30
 
  1. Geno has hated Nick with a passion for some time. On that stream, he (once again) yells from offscreen a bunch of stuff about what a drugged-out disgusting slimeball Nick is.
  2. The "I did everything for a specific reason" statement suggests to me that she was trying to publicly smoke out Nick about controlling April. Keanu was pretty successful if that was the goal. For at least 3-4 days, the conversation here, on Twitter, and in many streams focused on Nick's efforts to isolate her. It's now the going assumption in the public discourse.
Geno is very hard to listen to. He's the opposite of Keanu. She's low-energy boring, while Geno is high-energy boring—he can't finish one story without constantly losing his train of thought. During this clip, Geno maniacally criticizes Rekieta more:


@1:16 Geno: "Nick Rekieta is nuts. He's so whacked out on drugs, and he's ruining April's life. He really thought this was his play. It's like: 'we'll do the revenge porn thing, you know, and then it'll discredit Aaron as a witness.'"

Geno and Keanu's actions should be seen as people acting in their own self-interest. I know some people here may think any info from them should be ignored, but I believe they can still provide some context about what was happening behind the scenes.

Although they seem to have ulterior motives, it also seems to me they noticed they were being used by Nick as weapons in his revenge against Aaron.

What I wonder is: Did Nick directly tell Geno about using the revenge porn to discredit Aaron, or did Geno conclude that from context?

EDIT: Wil Herren also clipped this, adding a bit more context (PreserveTube).
 
Last edited:
Although they seem to have ulterior motives, it also seems to me they noticed they were being used by Nick as weapons in his revenge against Aaron.
They waited from May until July to tell Nick (via April) about the text. There's no way that they weren't running their own agenda in doing that and hoping that Nick would go after Aaron.
 
I’d honestly pay good money for a reality show with DSP and Nick living together.

The fat, grifting, low energy scammer, vs trustfund, high on coke Nick.

What hilarious shenanigans will the two get up to?

An hour long begging stream from Phil where he talks about how he can’t sleep at night because Nick’s Dorito munching and hijinks keep him up at all hours, so PLEASE donate. Only to be interrupted by Nick: “HEYA ROOMY WHACHA DOING?! Streaming? Oh! Lemme join in, I got my setup right here!”

/boozefumbles lands headfirst into Phil’s PlayStation setup.
 
They waited from May until July to tell Nick (via April) about the text. There's no way that they weren't running their own agenda in doing that and hoping that Nick would go after Aaron.
Wasn't it a viewer who alerted Nick to the whole, "isn't it illegal to send nudes?" well after the fact?

Pretty sure Nick's take on the law is so shaky that he didn't immediately pick that up the first time he watched Aaron do that. Just like it somehow didn't register that spying on Aaron through his Google account was against the law.
 
At least according to Balldo, he tortured the SKUNK to death by repeatedly drowning it, not the raccoons, who he murdered by beating them to death with a hammer.
He drowned that skunk because he shot a previous skunk and it sprayed into his house, so that's two murdered skunks.
The timeline doesn't make sense.
He says he killed the raccoons with a hammer because he didn't have a gun yet. Are the skunks after he killed the raccoons or before?
It's funnier to me to think that he beat the raccoons to death despite having guns because he's a sadist who must kill by his own hand, and he lies about why he did it that way.
 
Back