State of Minnesota v. Nicholas Rekieta, Kayla Rekieta, April Imholte

Will Nicholas Rekieta take the plea deal offered to him?


  • Total voters
    1,268
  • Poll closed .
Today there were only paralegals on the Kiwi Farms Law Couch, rare Rackets W. That´s not the ruling, as it was pointed out already. Informative either way.
Nevertheless, we all know it's gonna be denied.

If he wants to be smug for a week or so because some Kiwis jumped the gun and assumed this was the ruling from the bench, let him.

The celebration may be premature, but I think it's hardly off base.

Also, I must say this is WAAAAY better than what Kayla's attorney wrote.
 
Nevertheless, we all know it's gonna be denied.

If he wants to be smug for a week or so because some Kiwis jumped the gun and assumed this was the ruling from the bench, let him.

The celebration may be premature, but I think it's hardly off base.

Also, I must say this is WAAAAY better than what Kayla's attorney wrote.
Nick can celebrate when the warrant is tossed.

Right?
 
Nevertheless, we all know it's gonna be denied.

If he wants to be smug for a week or so because some Kiwis jumped the gun and assumed this was the ruling from the bench, let him.

The celebration may be premature, but I think it's hardly off base.

Also, I must say this is WAAAAY better than what Kayla's attorney wrote.
Oh yeah, but his Ls are so common that it would be funny if he took a victory lap in a meaningless mistake and got cocky. We need kahntent badly.
 
The prosecutor really dropped the ball here, it's meant to be a bolded and capitalised like so: DENIED. Based on my understanding of Rekieta Law (the highest law of the land), this makes their entire argument invalid, nah nah nah, you lose, bye bye etc.
Only the judge gets to use that voodoo. The prosecutor is merely asking for it. The one with the gavel is the one who actually does it.
 
Nick can celebrate when the warrant is tossed.

Right?
Technically, sure, but the warrant is valid for him. Wentzell ruled on it. The Appeals Court refused to grant interlocutory appeal. At this point he's taking a plea deal, or going to trial. He's out of pre-trial fuck-fuck games to play.

Meaning that, yes, it's possible for the unusual situation where the warrant is invalid for Kayla, but valid for Nick. I don't think that'll happen though. I think Wentzell will rule it's valid for Kayla too.

With both sides of the argument now submitted, Wentzell should make a decision soon.
 
Back