Not Just Bikes / r/fuckcars / Urbanists / New Urbanism / Car-Free / Anti-Car - People and grifters who hate personal transport, freedom, cars, roads, suburbs, and are obsessed with city planning and urban design

Asian Reddit chimes in to say that everywhere he's lived, people use gas mopeds and he doesn't even remember the last time he saw an electric one. He thinks OP is confused about scooters and those urban novelty vehicles such as electric skateboards and children's scooters.

mopeds3.png
I forgot to mention not only is he assuming that three cities in China having laws about mopeds implies "Asia", it doesn't even apply to China in general. OP is neglecting to even recognize the rural villages in China that are in the middle of bumfuck nowhere. I am 90% sure that those people who don't even cook using electricity aren't exactly reliant on electric mopeds.

But yeah it goes to show if it doesn't exist in their inner city bubble it might as well not exist at all for them. Let them eat cake! Says the urbanist.
 
I use the term moped and scooter interchangeably so that makes sense
I don't and this thread has been triggering my autism for for the past few pages. I live in Taiwan, I have never heard a foreigner or local call a scooter a moped. IDK why NJB calls them mopeds and use that term in his Taiwan video dispite living there for a few years.

Is calling a scooter a moped a euro thing?
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Morshu's Paradise
I don't and this thread has been triggering my autism for for the past few pages. I live in Taiwan, I have never heard a foreigner or local call a scooter a moped. IDK why NJB calls them mopeds and use that term in his Taiwan video dispite living there for a few years.

Is calling a scooter a moped a euro thing?
I've always called these things "mopeds":
1734046080945.png

It's common in the US and presumably in Canada as well:
Wikipedia said:
In some countries, a moped can be any motorcycle with an engine capacity below 100 cc (6.1 cu in) (most commonly 50 cc (3.1 cu in) or lower)

I have never seen one of these in real life:
1734045984507.png
 
If it has pedals it's a moped, legally. If it doesn't it's a scooter. Both are for fags
In most states, they're legally motorcycles unless they're below a certain engine size (usually 50 cc with a max speed of 30 mph), in which case they are mopeds.

They're a lot less popular than they used to be. The stand up electric scooter is what's cool now amongst college students and urban bugmen who never grew up.
1734046514476.png
 
I've always called these things "mopeds":
1734046080945.png

It's common in the US and presumably in Canada as well
Maybe it's a regional thing in the US? I'm Amarican, my family and I always called those scooters and the Canadians I work with call them scooters too.

Literally never heard anyone call that type of motor vehicle a "moped" IRL at all or online even until this thread and watching NJB.
 
Besides, mopeds are for poors, in poorer/third-world countries, they trade up to cars if they can afford it, bicycles and mopeds are for people who can't afford it.
or as an intermediate stage, 125cc motorbikes, which are very popular in western Africa (and were my first motors, before I had a full license)
they're a good entry into motoring, as they're geared like a manual car, run on ordinary petrol, have a lot more power than scooters/mopeds, and even the old ones will typically get 80 miles to the gallon
the only thing they're really bad for is is long-distance travel; travelling at high speeds involves constantly hanging on to the throttle and gunning it to maximum, which soon gets exhausting
 
You do the Right Thing (tm) and move to a city. Its YOUR job to live up to THEIR standards, it's not THEIR job to educate YOU on how to do it best. Just do it or you're a fucking carbrain.

Pardon me for using stupid tankie vernacular - but how very white colonizer of them. They want to eradicate my people's indigenous traditional lifestyle of driving beat up mid-sized sedans to Quiktrip to get chilidogs & scratch off lotto tickets. & to not just eradicate, but to civilize us by forcing all Native Americans to move off the rez and relocate to one of those annoying 15 minute walkable cities, for example an overpriced condo in downtown Boca Raton? 🤬

I'm telling you, it would be battle of Little Bighorn Part 2, if those uppity biketard fucks even think about going after Quiktrip *puts on war bonnet*

No, but seriously - for a bunch of dumb libs, do they realize how, uh...problematic their ideology is? Or is being a racist colonialist okay, if it's being directed at carbrained cultures?
 
They want to eradicate my people's indigenous traditional lifestyle of driving
Ummm sweaty??? Yikes, do better!
Jokes aside- they don't care. It doesn't matter if you're a native, from a family of farmers or just want to live in a homestead. You must move to the bughive and if you want to pursue any cultural activities you will able to do them in a highly structured "third places".
Or just go to a museum/ theater- online urbanists constantly mention those two places for some reason
 
if you want to pursue any cultural activities you will able to do them in a highly structured "third places".
Or just go to a museum/ theater- online urbanists constantly mention those two places for some reason
In a weird way I think I sort of understand what they feel, but I think they're misidentifying what's making them feel that way. From what I understand they want something like high school where they can have opportunities to socialize with people and they think that by getting rid of cars on the roads and walk everywhere it makes it easier to make friends I guess?

Weirdly enough I think if they lived in a small rural town where everyone knows everyone else they'd fix that problem in their lives. But for obvious reasons they'll never give that a try.
 
No, but seriously - for a bunch of dumb libs, do they realize how, uh...problematic their ideology is? Or is being a racist colonialist okay, if it's being directed at carbrained cultures?
For left-wing types, racism/colonialism/whateverism only exists when it's done by an opponent. Colonialism, for example, is "right-wing," so "by definition" left-wing policies cannot be colonialism. This same kind of logic is how you'll occasionally see lefties who unironically argue that Stalin, Lenin, or even Marx were right-wingers. Because those guys did bad things, ergo were right-wing.

So no, they can't see how "problematic" their ideology is. Because they're left-wing, and thus anything they push "by definition cannot be problematic."
 
Pardon me for using stupid tankie vernacular - but how very white colonizer of them. They want to eradicate my people's indigenous traditional lifestyle of driving beat up mid-sized sedans to Quiktrip to get chilidogs & scratch off lotto tickets. & to not just eradicate, but to civilize us by forcing all Native Americans to move off the rez and relocate to one of those annoying 15 minute walkable cities, for example an overpriced condo in downtown Boca Raton? 🤬

I'm telling you, it would be battle of Little Bighorn Part 2, if those uppity biketard fucks even think about going after Quiktrip *puts on war bonnet*

No, but seriously - for a bunch of dumb libs, do they realize how, uh...problematic their ideology is? Or is being a racist colonialist okay, if it's being directed at carbrained cultures?
Don't worry, they'll mandate a land acknowledgement before any event.
 
Don't worry, they'll mandate a land acknowledgement before any event.
Now I want to become the HOA leader of a redevelopment project so I can start the meeting off with “our homes are built on the occupied land of the former Walmart parking lot, let us remember the white people we took it from”
 
For left-wing types, racism/colonialism/whateverism only exists when it's done by an opponent. Colonialism, for example, is "right-wing," so "by definition" left-wing policies cannot be colonialism. This same kind of logic is how you'll occasionally see lefties who unironically argue that Stalin, Lenin, or even Marx were right-wingers. Because those guys did bad things, ergo were right-wing.

So no, they can't see how "problematic" their ideology is. Because they're left-wing, and thus anything they push "by definition cannot be problematic."
Also why leftists don't consider Foreign worker programs to be slavery.
 
pro car-ists think car based cities are a substitute for good policing.
That'd be a misunderstanding of what is going on. Yes, part of the reason why cars are better than buses and so forth are better is because it helps insulate from crime. That is not because cars are replacing the police, however, but because in our current society, good policing does not exist.
 
This chart is kinda funky (aside from citing from Wikipedia).
  • Why is there a sizeable dip in the Obama era?
  • Why does the chart go back to pre-2007 levels during the pandemic when the lockdowns should make casualties drop significantly because of work from home made people drive less?
 
Back