Megathread Tranny Sideshows on Social Media - Any small-time spectacle on Reddit, Tumblr, Twitter, Dating Sites, and other social media.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
1734069014692.jpeg

images.jpeg
this guy draws ghetto sonic bimbofication btw
1734122436181.jpg
 
View attachment 6748692

View attachment 6748694
this guy draws ghetto sonic bimbofication btw
View attachment 6748698
Why, a man upset that women dare infringe upon something that he believes should belong only to men? Stunning! I wonder if this divisive mentality has anything to do with the increasing issues with "transandrophobia" pooners are trying to raise (i.e., misogyny but if you call the victims of it women, they'll stamp their little feet and cry into their hankies like big boys do).

My heart only goes out to the innocent little plush toys being turned into a trans icon; such mutilation of body and character are undeserved for a poor shark plushie. I'm sorry, Blahaj! You belong in the arms of a child who is about to get so invested in oceans that they grow up to be a funky Stephen Hillenberg-tier marine biologist, not stained with tranny cum or stitched up by a clumsy-handed pooner!
 
Finally relocated a classic piece of tranny art by pooner illustrator Quinn Milton, aka @quinnHPM, who describes herself as "interested in children's art, glitter, bisexual lighting, sex, obscenity, alchemy, costumes, defacement, and monsters." Since I couldn't remember if it was already posted, I thought it deserved its time in the Kiwi sun.

I think of this every time I see a tranny complain of a genocide and how banning puberty blockers and pediatric transition is going to "kill trans kids" and how allegations of trannies being groomers is harmful. Well, when you're personally invested in actively grooming children, it makes me believe protecting children was never actually in your game plan. Also, is it even possible to commit genocide against child predators? That implies thinking of them as human enough to be worthy of the term, doesn't it?
Link | Archive
Screenshot 2024-12-13 at 19-58-04 🕳 quinn 🕳 on X a perfect gift for the most vile freak in you...pngScreenshot 2024-12-13 at 20-02-11 image.png (PNG Image 635 × 1667 pixels).png
il_794xN.4972508204_p1js.webp
 
View attachment 6745330

Not seen this one before, but it's about as sensible and realistic as the rest of the cult nonsense...
Holy shit, never did I imagine someone taking one form of BIID and making it a fashion statement. There's a somewhat notorious case from many, many years ago where a woman who blinded herself with drain cleaner for this disorder.
 
Big Red (/u/red666111), the 6'5" sometimes-pagan, sometimes-tradcath, made the brave decision to post a photo.

His photo, where he almost looks female (https://old.reddit.com/r/drawme/comments/1hd3hfg/trans_woman_looking_to_see_how_you_see_me/, https://archive.is/ANtiG):
4w1yvgu6ej6e1.jpeg

In a world where Pim Eyes exists, this might not be such a good idea. Real name is Tyler Mendes, a.k.a. Isabella Mendes, a lecturer in molecular biology at Ohio State University. Imagine being the photographer who took this and not being allowed to laugh:
Mendes.jpg
(https://molgen.osu.edu/people/mendes.29, https://archive.is/VduEz)

And here's one of him blending in seamlessly with his fellow women:
Cosi 3 23_0.jpg
 
Last edited:
Finally relocated a classic piece of tranny art by pooner illustrator Quinn Milton, aka @quinnHPM, who describes herself as "interested in children's art, glitter, bisexual lighting, sex, obscenity, alchemy, costumes, defacement, and monsters." Since I couldn't remember if it was already posted, I thought it deserved its time in the Kiwi sun.

I think of this every time I see a tranny complain of a genocide and how banning puberty blockers and pediatric transition is going to "kill trans kids" and how allegations of trannies being groomers is harmful. Well, when you're personally invested in actively grooming children, it makes me believe protecting children was never actually in your game plan. Also, is it even possible to commit genocide against child predators? That implies thinking of them as human enough to be worthy of the term, doesn't it?
Link | Archive
View attachment 6749389View attachment 6749395
Yeah, that's pretty spot on tbh. I like how she used a Keffals quote there too! Good job, lil dude.
 
Suddenly when it's not in their favor (the Cass Review) they don't trust The Experts™
The difference is that the NHS is heavily motivated to only use treatments with demonstrably provable positive outcomes, because it doesn't profit off of procedures, it's spending public funds to do them. American cows manage, through insurance, to get all sorts of treatments like boob jobs, nose jobs, forehead recontouring, brow lifts, chin shaves, jaw shaves, cheek implants, lip fillers, hair transplants, hairline modification, body sculpting and occasionally even that insane larynx surgery.

The NHS will prescribe hormones and will offer one amhole surgery - if a patient opts for an orchiectomy, they can't later get an amhole, which is at odds with how a lot of American patients approach it (snip now, hole later). But it does not offer any sort of treatment for facial feminisation (barring extreme exceptions). If someone transitions and complains they've got male pattern baldness and a flat chest, the NHS will treat them like a woman who's balding and flat chested - which is to say "that sucks, but that's something that some women experience, so we can offer you counselling but we're not going to give you cosmetic surgery". The rationale is there's no evidence that the surgery actually provides a long term improvement in wellbeing, or that any wellbeing impact from surgery doesn't outweight the risks and costs compared to counselling someone to make them accept that they don't look like a Hollywood starlet. Separately you could have an argument about how overstretched/mismanaged the NHS is, and how it tends to be more interested in getting people to a minimum level of functional rather than truly happy and healthy, but that's not in any way specific to one group of patients.

This causes a lot of seething because it obstructs the typical cope of "well I just need one more surgery and then I'll feel happy!". But in the case of puberty blockers, there's several reasons why Cass happened
  • Trans patient advocacy groups would not shut up about how awful the NHS was, so as soon as the NHS switched from trusts to NHS England being an overall commissioning body, this prompted a lot of specific reviews into transgender healthcare

  • There was no national strategy on how to treat trans people or specifically younger trans people - gender identity clinics tended to emerge independently of each other and have their own approaches, and there was no pathway for transition from youth to adult services (whereas it does exist for things like counselling kids with special needs, like downs syndrome, when they're going to age out of a service) - this is something that trans patient advocacy groups specifically complained about

  • There was an exponential explosion in referrals to gender identity clinics in the space of about a decade, and the services literally couldn't cope - this is something that trans patient advocacy groups specifically complained about

  • There was very little follow up for things like mental health support to patients or analysis of long term outcomes. This is something that trans patient advocacy groups specifically complained about, but only a little bit (the main cause for concern is patients who weren't benefitting from their treatment, but advocacy groups took that as a given)

  • Puberty blockers were originally used following the Dutch protocol, which was a pre-pubertal child with no comorbidities and lifelong gender incongruent behaviour and distress over gender being prescribed puberty blockers, and following review they would be allowed to go on cross-sex hormones after a period of puberty blocking. The Tavistock Clinic took that and turned it into "we have to put you on puberty blockers for a couple of years to allow you to take hormones". Puberty blockers began being a box checking exercise for adolescents, many of whom had comorbidities and late and rapid onset gender dysphoria, as a way to get them to qualify for hormones. This decision was made without considering if the puberty blockers had any benefit to these adolescents beyond "makes them qualify for hormones". This was not something transgender advocacy groups complained about, but many clinicians did.

  • The Tavistock Clinic (and possibly other youth GICs like Nottingham) was dominated by an unusual number of inexperienced junior clinics and had close links to ideological groups like Mermaids, to the point of literally taking instructions from them. This was something transgender advocacy groups praised... but a lot of other people didn't.

  • High profile detransitioners like Keira Bell spoke about how the Tavistock Clinic pushed kids into transition without asking any questions. She was given puberty blockers age 16 as part of that box checking exercise.
That's why the NHS banned the use of puberty blockers (in Great Britain) following the Cass review. That's not why puberty blockers are wholesale banned, though, because the usual suspects could not help themselves and began filling social media feeds with details of how to get prescriptions from outside the UK, or how to get NHS treatment via going over to Northern Ireland. Finnster even announced he was going to run a project to help kids get puberty blockers from doctors in the EU. There was also a lot of "you can't stop us transing your kids" shitposting, and obviously this would entirely mess up any attempt to do a clinical trial to try and establish an evidence base. Consequently, it is now illegal for any chemist in the UK to dispense puberty blockers.
India Willoughby vouching for puberty blockers and advocating children diy to avoid ban.

View attachment 6748183
Himdia is right, though, this is a remaining loophole. If a British citizen is prescribed a medication by a doctor in the EEC, and goes to any EEC member state, they can have that prescription honoured subject to local laws. There are certain medications illegal in the UK but legal elsewhere in Europe - one example would be the use of flunitrazepam (rohypnol) in the treatment of insomnia. A German doctor might prescribe it to me and I can go to a chemist's in Germany to get it. If I took the prescription back to the UK, I wouldn't be able to get it here because it's banned. I could also arrange to receive a consultation with a German doctor online, get a prescription, then fly to Germany and fill the prescription, although I might struggle bringing that medication back into the country.

This is essentially the loophole that groups are working on right now. Get a kid in touch with an EU doctor, get the doctor to write a puberty blocker prescription, liaise with contacts in any European country to drop off the prescription on their behalf, head to that country once the prescription is in to collect the puberty blockers, do the injection there. It'd be pretty hard to legislate against this, as you'd basically be trying to make a law that British citizens can only take British-approved medications even if they're not in the UK. It's not a situation that's ever come up before, because normally patients aren't so singleminded about getting their hands on a banned medication that they'd regularly take international trips using a network of sympathetic doctors and enablers. It's a pretty expensive option, mind, so I'm sure there'll be some GoFundMes or similar popping up soon.
 
American cows manage, through insurance, to get all sorts of treatments like boob jobs, nose jobs, forehead recontouring, brow lifts, chin shaves, jaw shaves, cheek implants, lip fillers, hair transplants, hairline modification, body sculpting and occasionally even that insane larynx surgery.
Interesting how NHS consolidation and public healthcare managed to say fuck you to these troons, a lot of them leftist/coomunist lmao. Also funny how they basically rely on American runaway capitalism for their delusions here
 
This is essentially the loophole that groups are working on right now. Get a kid in touch with an EU doctor, get the doctor to write a puberty blocker prescription, liaise with contacts in any European country to drop off the prescription on their behalf, head to that country once the prescription is in to collect the puberty blockers, do the injection there. It'd be pretty hard to legislate against this, as you'd basically be trying to make a law that British citizens can only take British-approved medications even if they're not in the UK
What makes that hard to legislate against though?
I don't know UK laws but couldn't they just make it illegal for anyone to aid, assist, or facillitate a minor obtaining cross sex hormones or puberty blockers, either in person or online?

The UK Government already locks people up for free speech on Xitter, which is way more authoritarian and against human rights than a law designed to protect children from themselves or ideologically fanatical adults.
Ok you're never gonna stop every single person, but no laws are 100% effective, I doubt there's many minors with the ability to travel to another country regularly to fill prescriptions, making assisting or facilitating a minor Trooning out would stop most of it at least, and this shit is a social contagion, getting the numbers down and making it less widespread is the goal, banning advertising and promoting it needs to happen too. It's suck fucks in the schools that are spreading this mind virus, that should be illegal at least.
 
I don't know UK laws but couldn't they just make it illegal for anyone to aid, assist, or facilitate a minor obtaining cross sex hormones or puberty blockers, either in person or online?
Very easily.
There are already laws around assisting criminals and criminality in the UK, so this could easily be an extension of that by criminalising the use of hormones or blockers.

I'd also say that the definition of child abuse should be widened. and any child who is found to be using hormones or blockers should be used as evidence against their insane parents and anyone enabling them.
 
Back