I hope David Schneider starts the deposition the same way Ty Beard did. "Mr. Rekieta, are you a pedophile?" Although Ron could truthfully answer no, Nick might have to answer yes given his favorite porn stars all look and pretend to be 13 year old girls.
Welcome back! We sure missed you posting the same case over and over and over again without understanding a single thing about it!
Obviously different states different rules but in some places the jury selection date isn't included in the trial length calculation and can happen sometimes days or weeks ahead of the trial. A date is typically for picking the jury is selected after its confirmed that there will be no settlement.
It actually isn't that complicated for a defamation case. There's essentially only one defamatory statement, although it was repeated and amplified. Nick said it, it isn't true, he doubled down on it, with knowledge that it had no basis in fact, thus with reckless disregard as to its truth or falsity.
What don't you understand?
Oh, I understand them rather well. The comment was clearly directed at you. But, hey, if you post it a few more times every half a year, maybe you'll accomplish whatever goal is compelling you to spam the same case over and over again (hint hint, your very first link was the most relevant one. It kept getting less and less relevant with each subsequent one)
The case is simple, but the parties are complex weirdos and you can't really separate them from .the case. Any defense Nick puts in is going to require him to get, at least to some extent into ",what the fuck is Nick's deal" and basically everything about him is bizarre and potentially unfairly prejudicial. Ditto for Monty. Any case about personal lives is full of landmines, even for normal people.
I think the judge has a pretty good handle on it. And will change it if it starts getting more gnarly. I'm not sure how much money Nick has left to keep making it gnarly, though.
I don't see the judge letting the case go off the rails and allow hours of completely irrelevant material into the record. Similarly "Nick is a giant douche" isn't the legal issue. If it's not germane to Nick's (lack of) basis for his false and defamatory statements, or that he actually said them, it's not getting in.
Nick's second house has an offer on it, so if he can convince someone to take the Balldo Bunker off his hands, after taxes that buys him another year or two of Randazza and the Satanist. It also helps him by taking away an asset that Montegraph could use to recoup his legal costs.
I didn't realize until right now how much I want to see the Judgement-Proof saga.
Montagraph can always garnish his income from the trust fund. However, I am excited to see this happen because it will put all of Crackets's trust funds on the record so we can point and laugh.
He can't really directly levy on the trust fund itself (unless perhaps Nick controls it himself), but as you said, once any income from it hits a bank account he controls, that can be levied upon. Nick could make that a pain by using different accounts and immediately cashing out, but a) there are ways to get around that and b) this nigga too lazy even to pay a traffic ticket.
In that case, I'm looking forward to Monty mounting Nick's grandparents' sarcophagi in his foyer like Ty's Chinese general statue.
Nick, I know you read everything about you. Get into contact with me. You can totally trust me to help you send that trust money to you. I won't in any way spend it on hookers and cocaine. I mean, who would waste trust fund money on hookers and cocaine right? Only a retarded faggot would do something like that
Unless he runs the trust he can't do that.
