- Joined
- May 16, 2019
With Hardin and KF he's seeking to be left alone and given some money as punitive damages because KF is ontologically evil and the super murder doxxxxxing website. He cannot grasp why anyone would defend it zealously when paid to do so and he didn't even really budge on that in his groveling filing. He reneged on the accusation Hardin is a fire nation sympathizer or otherwise a poster but he still held firm with "BUT it's pretty odd that a lawyer would host and allow the evil website to crowdfund for a legal warchest HMMMM?!"
He seems to think lawyering is purely mercenary. "Everyone" agrees that KF is the worst thing ever, so this lawyer must be here only because he's getting paid. He must hate his client, and he must want to do everything possible to get an outcome every Good Right-Thinking Person would approve of, not what his client would approve of.
You can see a different version of this in his Taylor Swift lawsuit. He accused managers and lawyers of getting in the way of what's best for him and Taylor. He couldn't comprehend that they were getting in the way because that was in Swift's best interests. He seemed to think they were just chasing billable hours or commissions. To be fair, many lawyers do, but they generally do that in service to their client, not against their client... because they are legally required to do so.
No lawyer representing a client would claim to be billing them hours as a "neutral third party", it's incomprehensible how you'd even logic your way to that idea.