Carbiter
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Nov 13, 2024
This is Dankula's take on the whole thing. Points of note for those not wanting to watch:
- He believes it's not a rightwing groyper
- He finds the idea that Nick was not targeted is stupid, and believes that Nick was targeted
- He thinks that the earlier 3 victims were killed because the guy was dating one of them, and because they broke up, he shot them all. The motive apparently then became attempting to save face by saving Nick Fuentes. Dankula is very skeptical about this
- He believes the guy was trying to kill the neighbors and only accidentally shot the two dogs. He's skeptical about this theory
- He thinks Nick is in the right to pepper spray the woman because the woman could've had a gun and eventually someone did come. He also says that it is most likely to help Nick's case by giving Nick an explanation for why he did what he did
- He suggests that infighting in the right is being engineered. He dislikes the infighting due to the lack of unity
- He states that engaging in political violence is wrong not just because it's immoral but also because it means you're giving up. He also dislikes the rhetoric supportive of Luigi Mangione for this reason.