AI Derangement Syndrome / Anti-AI artists / Pro-AI technocultists / AI "debate" communities - The Natural Retardation in the Artificial Intelligence communities

Made a bluesky account and its a whole new treasure trove of anti-ai retards!
1734728014051.png
1734728054577.png
1734728078660.png

This one is proof they realize that AI art isn't actually bad, they just hate it because its better than they are at making art.
1734728196510.png
 
Made a bluesky account and its a whole new treasure trove of anti-ai retards!
View attachment 6773202
View attachment 6773208
View attachment 6773211
This one is proof they realize that AI art isn't actually bad, they just hate it because its better than they are at making art.
View attachment 6773218
It's hilarious seeing all the fags that go "It's not okay to use AI, even as a JOKE!" I'll bet you these niggers never had any issue with something like a YTP that blatantly remixes existing material.
 
What these people need to understand is that not everyone owes you work. No one's entitled to pay you for your services. You're not struggling to get commissions or payments because of the EVIL AI, you're struggling because that's just how it is. With the advancements of AI becoming more accessible for the average joe, less people have to worry about blowing hundreds of dollars for something AI can do in seconds. Of course, AI can never truly replicate everything.

But there's a difference between a random dude using AI for his lil project and a multi million dollar company using AI. The company has the resources, the one individual with probably $15 in his pocket does not. Generative AI's getting better than ever, while stuff like img2vid and txt2vid are still having a lot - and I mean a lot - of tinkering and fine tuning to do. It's gradually improving but it still has many, many limitations. Don't let the examples from their advertisements or starting page fool you.

In the end, I don't hate you artists/writers/graphic designs/voice actors - I just don't want to blow hundreds on you. I have my needed resources and while they may not be perfect, it's better than getting a service I may not be pleased with and probably won't get refunded over.

You guys aren't losing service anytime soon. Despite what it may seem, not that many people really use generative AI. The ones who do most of the time lose interest anyway because most of them aren't really knowledgable how AI works and expect literal Mona Lisa's, they probably won't know how to install A111 or ComfyUI, or know how the CivitAI remix button works. Most just see it as some random shiny thing and either grift on it or use it for a bit and lose interest after. You artists are killing yourselves more than AI could ever do. If you worry about AI ruining artists, worry about the companies who don't do anything to combat or separate it from actual artists. But it's not that simple and that's just how it is.

I'll say it again, if you let generative noise challenge your confidence as an artist or whatever creative you're in, it says more about you as an artist than anything else.


last image

> i'd rather see antizionist art from palestinian artists
> i'd rather see trans affirming art from trans artists
> i'd rather see antiracist art from black and indigenous artists


This person couldn't get any more leftist, everyone. The ultimate savior for all marginalized groups out there. There's totally competition between the oh so creative sphere majority of "X character says trans rights! / X says NO to transphobes! / white people BAD! / free palestine! #94949696" art vs "1girl, standing, smiling / masterpiece, HDR, 4k, blender, unity / amazing detail, godly detail, intricate details, perfect hands, perfect anatomy" generative noise.
 
Last edited:
No, child. Neither large language models nor Stable Diffusion models rely on code to function. The former generate new text through inference of context. The latter convert text into a numerical representation and use it to denoise an image. This is why your understanding of machine learning is already over.
AI magically functions without any code

Sounds legit :null:
 
This one is proof they realize that AI art isn't actually bad, they just hate it because its better than they are at making art.
This is why I have absolute contempt for these vermin. They "produce" garbage that is even worse than what a subhuman AI can create. They should be put against a wall. They have no rights. They are scum who are parasitically existing on society by failing to do as well as what a machine can do.

We should just get rid of them.
 
I'm Anti-AI in a way. When I pay an artist to produce something for me, I expect it to not be generated by AI. Whenever I hire someone now on fiver, even if the price is high. Think $100. I just get a shitty AI generated image. The other day I hired someone for two images at $50 a pop. Just shitty vector art GAG style. I ended up with 2 AI generated images of low quality lacking any effort. I think selling me something that I can get for free off of bing is a fucking scam, and people should put in the bare amount of effort or charge an honest price.
 
Made a bluesky account and its a whole new treasure trove of anti-ai retards!
View attachment 6773202
View attachment 6773208
View attachment 6773211
This one is proof they realize that AI art isn't actually bad, they just hate it because its better than they are at making art.
View attachment 6773218
Decided to check it out myself and, io and behold, there's people trying to beef with 4chan about ai-related stuff
Screenshot_20241221_134859_Chrome.jpgScreenshot_20241221_134913_Chrome.jpg
Meanwhile, on said boards:
Screenshot_20241221_135855_Chrome.jpg
Screenshot_20241221_140015_Chrome.jpgScreenshot_20241221_135654_Chrome.jpgScreenshot_20241221_141058_Chrome.jpg
 
Last edited:
That one anti-AI subreddit is now mostly anti-public domain. The reason? This seems to have started less than 2 weeks ago in reaction to a model being trained solely on public domain images.

1734771398199.png

1734771524206.png

1734771594485.png



Just goes to show that you cannot placate the loud minority that screeches about AI online all day. If you fix one of the issues they have with AI, they will cry even more because they just lost one argument against it.

And to edit a side note in, who do those people expect me to ask for permission before I use a public domain work? Do we never use them anymore or do we create e.g. a Homer Estate of rich dudes who don't give a shit about him and give them a monopoly on the Illiad, like what copyright inevitably degrades to with time after the artist's death anyway?
 
Last edited:
"allow training only on content which the author explicitly allowed for AI training, thus excluding all currently dead authors"

Has anything else ever worked like that? While I generally disagree with the copyright arguments, there's at least some kind of logic behind them and a potential legal argument to be made. But this is just asking for a special legal and ethical carve-out for AI image generation in particular.

crime-against-the-soul.png

"Thou shalt not make a machine in the likeness of a man's mind."
 
I don't know how much straws their grasping when reddit atheists are now appealing to the concept of a soul.

A good deal of arguments that Reddit "atheists" are making these days (or rather, the past decade or so) appeal to the concept of a soul or the metaphysical in general, but if I list them out and sperg about them, I'll derail the thread.
 
A good deal of arguments that Reddit "atheists" are making these days (or rather, the past decade or so) appeal to the concept of a soul or the metaphysical in general, but if I list them out and sperg about them, I'll derail the thread.
People have trouble getting over this barrier of not assuming their own emotions, precepts, etc are intrinsic to any being's existence. Frankly it doesn't matter if AI is somehow conscious or not because a conscious AI with no self preservation or concept of fear or death like a living being equipped for survival has wouldn't have any objections to dying. The simple fact of the matter however is that all animal and seemingly most human behavior can now be understood as their brains behaving autonomously as biological AIs. That doesn't change that you are experiencing all of that firsthand in a subjective experience unique to yourself. You are effectively omniscient over your domain, your brain and by extent your body. It's even possible human intelligence has nothing to do with your qualia, that you are effectively viewing a deterministic video being rendered in real time. Same difference. There isn't any actual answer because it's entirely conjecture. We are trying to apply the logic that we use to navigate this logical world to explain something that isn't physically present in it. In a world of objective realities, your qualia is only subjective.

Basically what I'm trying to say is that it's funny that these retards are so irrationally enraged by AI that they are basically trying to invoke God's wrath upon it despite claiming to be atheistic.
 
I just draw because I like drawing. If you don't like doing it and don't like improving for the sake of improving then you're missing the point of it. Money is nice, but you should like the craft for the sake of it. Maybe that's just me speaking as an 'artist' who frankly sucks, but until the terminators are busting down your door and taking your sketchpads and utensils I don't see why you ought to freak out.
 
It's even possible human intelligence has nothing to do with your qualia, that you are effectively viewing a deterministic video being rendered in real time. Same difference.
If so, it's been a pretty good decades-long movie so far. Await my forthcoming review at its conclusion.
 
  • Feels
Reactions: Inco G. Nito
Of all the companies that moved into embracing AI, I'm shocked that it's Britannica.
1735077655277.png

This was a big resource supported by my school my whole life and it puts into perspective how AI as a market is affecting education. Not to sound naive, since by principle they are an educational resource that provides vast and free information, but I suppose I didn't expect something like Britannica, a resource that sounds so archaic and traditional to be the first to open its arms to rising technology like generative AI. I do wonder what educational tools this will bring because of this.
 
Back