Last edited:
US US Politics General - Discussion of President Biden and other politicians
- Thread starter SeniorFuckFace
- Start date
- Status
- Joined
- Mar 5, 2019
Troons are so insecure with what they have between their legs versus what their mental illness tells them they end up overcompensating.
- Joined
- Mar 23, 2024
A monarchy is always better than a multiheaded hydra of elected parasites. Kings a dickhead fuckup? Kill him. Congress is actively treasonous? Hope you have a plan to kill like 500 people and somehow ensure their replacements aren't just as bad.
Also kings have good motivation to not fuck shit up intentionally seeing as they know they get credit for all things good and bad. Instead of just being able to launder their authority by saying people voted for you so they clearly wanted the political assraping you're giving them.
- Joined
- Dec 12, 2022
All of this is why we have the system that we do. A king only works until it doesn't. All of you are optimistic as fuck.
- Joined
- Oct 3, 2022
- Joined
- Jul 16, 2019
I still think Luigi Mangione is based, but I'm so fucking tired of redditors and normies sucking him off.
- Joined
- Mar 23, 2024
- Joined
- Nov 15, 2021
The kings of Europe had their young men slaughtered by the million for utterly stupid reasons until we put that worthless continent in a permanent chokehold. Democracies have a lot of issues, but we've got a lot less stomach for shedding our sons' blood than monarchies do.
- Joined
- Oct 27, 2017
And what we're doing now is working how?
In what way am I optimistic? I don't think Trump is going to be able do everything he's promising, for many reasons.
I'm just saying I would prefer a benevolent king than "voting" for someone who is going to treat me like shit and be a king in all but name anyway.
UnidentifiedFlyingOrchid
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jul 14, 2024
I find the talk of the Legislative branch being too powerful very odd. The history of the U.S. is the history of the Legislative branch losing and giving away power.
• Marbury v Madison usurped veto power to the Judicial over the Legislative (which it absolutely should not have).
• Hamilton and the Federalists pushed for a strong Executive.
• One of the first things Hamilton did was get the Legislative branch to create the Treasury Department under the Executive branch, with Hamilton as the head, of course.
• Then Hamilton pushed for a Central Bank to remove the Legislative's control of its finances even further.
• The Judiciary continually made tortured interpretations of the Constitution concentrating power into the Executive and itself. Or, weakening the Constitution itself.
• The political parties interceded themselves between citizen voters and the Legislative. Culminating in today, where only preselected candidates are viable.
• Lincoln acted as tyrant over the subjugation of the Legislative.
• Reconstruction disenfranchised the citizens of the U.S.
• The Progressive Era is well known as a time of strengthening the Presidency (beyond even Lincoln's power)
• The Federal Reserve functionally moved the most important power of the government (money creation and financial control) out of the government entirely.
• FDR and WWII solidified the Legislative as little more than a circus show.
Which leaves us today with a Legislative that does not represent the voice of American citizens, because the power of the citizens to choose their elected leaders has been subverted. And even if a voice of the citizens sneaks through, no power can be wielded.
• Marbury v Madison usurped veto power to the Judicial over the Legislative (which it absolutely should not have).
• Hamilton and the Federalists pushed for a strong Executive.
• One of the first things Hamilton did was get the Legislative branch to create the Treasury Department under the Executive branch, with Hamilton as the head, of course.
• Then Hamilton pushed for a Central Bank to remove the Legislative's control of its finances even further.
• The Judiciary continually made tortured interpretations of the Constitution concentrating power into the Executive and itself. Or, weakening the Constitution itself.
• The political parties interceded themselves between citizen voters and the Legislative. Culminating in today, where only preselected candidates are viable.
• Lincoln acted as tyrant over the subjugation of the Legislative.
• Reconstruction disenfranchised the citizens of the U.S.
• The Progressive Era is well known as a time of strengthening the Presidency (beyond even Lincoln's power)
• The Federal Reserve functionally moved the most important power of the government (money creation and financial control) out of the government entirely.
• FDR and WWII solidified the Legislative as little more than a circus show.
Which leaves us today with a Legislative that does not represent the voice of American citizens, because the power of the citizens to choose their elected leaders has been subverted. And even if a voice of the citizens sneaks through, no power can be wielded.
- Joined
- Dec 12, 2022
Your impatience is why the Founders made the executive weak. Makes impulse moves far less impactful. Either the system works together or it doesn't. One does not rule them all
mandatorylurk
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Dec 16, 2019
Let's bully the Danes too, they deserve it. Greenland is now our Wano:
This is fun, I almost feel like Trump is setting up a giant call out that this is what Chyna has been doing for years and no one did anything about it so fuck you, Manifest Destiny Pax Americana.
This is fun, I almost feel like Trump is setting up a giant call out that this is what Chyna has been doing for years and no one did anything about it so fuck you, Manifest Destiny Pax Americana.
- Joined
- Feb 19, 2020
Yes, especially when the President and members of his family are notable sex pests.
95% of them are nepo babies working for minimum wage if that for the privilege of putting "White House" on the resume.
- Joined
- Dec 12, 2022
This is Panamas army. Just a little over 16,000 men. Lmao. It's ours bitch
- Joined
- Nov 22, 2021
Denmark laughed off any effort to acquire Greenland last time so it won't be surprising if it does so again. Maybe exploiting any political rifts between the Danish government and the natives of the island could be beneficial to any American plan to make it part of the country.
- Joined
- Oct 16, 2020
Scared, sissy?
Accounts @AdamKinzinger follows or mentioned can reply
Accounts @AdamKinzinger follows or mentioned can reply
- Joined
- Feb 27, 2019
Does Greenland have the usual Eurohypocrit "At least we're not American!" mentality, or are they just happy to have running water and bread?
I thought Trump was going to start WWIII and invade countless places. Is he admitting Trump is the most peaceful President in history now?
- Joined
- Jan 3, 2017
Yes what a coward not wanting to send others to fight and die.
Wherethereisawhip
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- May 18, 2024
The kings were not in power in at least the 2nd world war. Elective governments as seen by the examples of Athens and Rome are not shy from waging war. Instead it's more the rise of nuclear weapons, popularization of TV, and the movement to destroy the fighting spirit of males.
- Joined
- Mar 21, 2019
It blows my mind that they will do shit like this and not be the least bit embarrassed to do so. I don't know how you can not be humiliated to call someone a sissy and then block anyone from responding who you don't allow and not realize how it makes you look.
Brings me back to when those hackers hacked Sony pictures and released that huge treasure trove of internal communications and there was an internal memo talking about how George Clooney's latest film flopped and how they have to do everything possible to hide all the newspapers and everything from him and prevent George from finding out it has bad reviews because he starts crying if he reads a bad review about one of his movies.
- Status