Off-Topic Transgender Legislation and Litigation

Worlds dumbest troon lawyer doesn't seem to know that the Capitol is filled with hundreds of surveillance cameras.

Screenshot 2024-12-11 151704.png
Screenshot 2024-12-11 151641.png
 
1733961465232.png

This is funny.

Conversion therapy BAD - lying to kids and fighting for them to be able to take puberty blockers and HRT isn't conversion though?

Psychotherapy to stop people trooning out - so it is a psychological disorder then?

Trans is an identity - only if everyone accepts it, and the overwhelming majority seems... not to.
 
If you've not already seen it, following a consultation with 60-odd LGBT groups and an array of academics and medical experts, the Commission on Human Medicines published recommendations to the Health Secretary of the UK and the Health Secretary of Northern Ireland. These were agreed to by the ministers, and the use of puberty blockers in treatment of gender dysphoria (excluding clinical trials) are now permanently banned in the UK. This also includes chemists dispensing puberty blockers, stopping people like GenderGP from doctors prescribing the medication from the EEA (although there's a loophole that if they get them prescribed in the EEA and then fly to e.g. Germany and collect the prescription and take them there before flying back, that's still allowed).

This is subject to review following a clinical trial of puberty blockers for gender dysphoria in teenagers, due to start early next year and conclude by around 2027. All of this has been done strictly in line with the Medicines Act 1968, and there appears to be no actual way for anyone to challenge it.
 
If you've not already seen it, following a consultation with 60-odd LGBT groups and an array of academics and medical experts, the Commission on Human Medicines published recommendations to the Health Secretary of the UK and the Health Secretary of Northern Ireland. These were agreed to by the ministers, and the use of puberty blockers in treatment of gender dysphoria (excluding clinical trials) are now permanently banned in the UK. This also includes chemists dispensing puberty blockers, stopping people like GenderGP from doctors prescribing the medication from the EEA (although there's a loophole that if they get them prescribed in the EEA and then fly to e.g. Germany and collect the prescription and take them there before flying back, that's still allowed).

This is subject to review following a clinical trial of puberty blockers for gender dysphoria in teenagers, due to start early next year and conclude by around 2027. All of this has been done strictly in line with the Medicines Act 1968, and there appears to be no actual way for anyone to challenge it.
One can only hope the results are actually published, unlike the absolutely breathtakingly politically-motivated non-release of a study of puberty blockers in the US because it shows that they made no difference to well-being and that the results might be 'weaponised' (by which the shameless doctor means 'people will start spreading truthful statements about the study').

Trans ideology is still in a powerful place and advocated by powerful elites, in the US and elsewhere. They still have a vice-grip on public and private institutions. Children are still being forced to cater to the delusions of other children and even adults in schools. Even the Skrmetti hearings had the supposed 'conservative' justices address Chase Strangio as 'Mr'. These are justices in the highest court in America.
 
One can only hope the results are actually published, unlike the absolutely breathtakingly politically-motivated non-release of a study of puberty blockers in the US because it shows that they made no difference to well-being and that the results might be 'weaponised' (by which the shameless doctor means 'people will start spreading truthful statements about the study').

Trans ideology is still in a powerful place and advocated by powerful elites, in the US and elsewhere. They still have a vice-grip on public and private institutions. Children are still being forced to cater to the delusions of other children and even adults in schools. Even the Skrmetti hearings had the supposed 'conservative' justices address Chase Strangio as 'Mr'. These are justices in the highest court in America.
This has a slightly different context - the legislative changes that have been brought in mean that puberty blockers are banned unless evidence is produced that shows they provide healthcare benefits that outweigh risks. If they memoryhole the study, then puberty blockers stay banned.
 
Troons love their DARVO bullshit. One of the foundations of the Gender Cult is conversion therapy they have taken thousands of homosexuals and gaslighted them into thinking because they're effeminate men or butch women they are really something which they are not. Its no different to the shit they do in Iran.
93% of Troons are disgusting AGP's anyway, the vast majority of the time its just a fetish.

Car Balls go fuck himself. The time of the Troon is over. This shit needs to end. Being nice to these freaks has gotten us nowhere and caused a huge epidemic of this shit.
 
Crosspost:

Child rapist Pierre John Parsons, now a transgender woman, tries and fails to have extended supervision order lifted - Pierre John Parsons abducted and raped a 12-year-old girl in 1995, taking her clothes afterwards to wear for “cross-dressing purposes”.

01.png
A child rapist who is now a transgender woman has gone to the Supreme Court to try and have an extended supervision order lifted, arguing her predilection is now “latent and might only emerge in certain circumstances”.

Pierre John Parsons, now known as PJ, was convicted of abducting a 12-year-old girl from a Dunedin sports stadium bathroom and raping her in 1995.

Parsons, then 18 years old, tied a rope around the girl’s neck, causing her to lose consciousness, and dragged her into another room where he stripped and raped her.

Parsons was jailed for 11 years and since then has either been in prison, on parole, or under an extended supervision order (ESO), which allows probation officers to monitor and manage someone considered a high risk for up to 10 years at a time.

In 2017, High Court Justice Gerald Nation said that stress and frustration associated with “gender issues” had been a factor in Parson’s offending.

Parsons had taken the girl’s clothing to wear for “cross-dressing purposes” in the 1995 attack and subsequently expressed a desire to live as a woman.

A Supreme Court decision just issued says that Parsons is now transgender. It refers to Parsons by the female pronouns she and her. Other court documents say she has been taking hormone treatments.

Extended supervision orders​

Parsons was released on parole for the 1995 offending in 2003 and attended a programme for sexual offenders. She had also done the Kia Marama programme in prison.

But, she was recalled to prison in 2005 when she was found in possession of photographs of children.

Her first ESO was imposed in 2006.

In 2015 and 2016, Parsons twice approached a 15-year-old girl. The first time the girl was wearing school uniform. On the second time, Parsons gave her a note with a phone number requesting that she buy underwear and other items.

While living at a residential facility, Parsons invited a prostitute to the address - a breach of the rules.


A second 10-year ESO was imposed in 2017 and was reviewed five years later.

At that review, the High Court was satisfied that she remained a high risk of committing another sexual offence and confirmed the order would continue.
 
Hilarious recounting of the SCOTUS hearing.


View attachment 6742574
To the purple-haired troon in the video: Did you ever think that this (about 50 seconds in) was said snidely to you because that's all that women have - snideness? What a woman should have done, if she could, was pick you up by the scruff of your jacket and throw you out of what emphatically was the wrong bathroom. That's what I would have done - but I'm a man, and we're built differently to women.

Why it's almost as if there's a difference between men and women.

No woman wanted you in that bathroom but they were frightened the mad troon would punch them if they dared to object. So you got snark as the second best thing.

You also think that troons think if you lose the case US v Skrmetti, nothing matters. You fight back against that. And you're right - if you lose that case, what matters is getting a federal ban through Congress, so kids can't be trooned out in Vermont or Illinois or Oregon or anywhere else,
 
"Transgender minors, their parents, and a doctor challenging North Carolina’s gender-affirming care ban for youths can’t block lawmakers’ request for mental-health records of nonparty adolescents treated by the plaintiff doctor, a federal court said. The minors and parents lacked standing to request an order preventing the University of North Carolina Health System’s release of the documents, and the doctor didn’t show that the records were protected from discovery, the US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina said. UNC wasn’t a party to the action, nor were the patients whose records were sought."

Transgender Minors Unable to Stop Lawmakers' UNC Records Request
 
A couple of cases of tranny inmates suing prisons:

A Trans Woman Was Moved Back To A Men's Prison. Now She's Suing. - Spoiler: other articles just say it was "for an infraction" but this one makes it clear that he was having sex with female inmates.

The first transgender woman to be removed from women’s housing in a Washington state prison filed a lawsuit on Tuesday, alleging that the state Department of Corrections’ decision to forcibly place her in a men’s prison violated the state constitution’s prohibition on cruel punishment.

Amber Kim [power word Bryan Kim], who was transferred back to a men’s prison in June, has chosen to live in solitary confinement, which the United Nations recognizes as a form of torture, rather than live in general population at Monroe Correctional Facility.

“If I am eventually placed in men’s general population, I will live in constant fear. I am afraid of physical assault, sexual assault, and the constant harassment,” Kim wrote in a declaration. “I will face the ultimate paradox: my continued physical transition helps address my debilitating gender dysphoria, but the more female-presenting I become in appearance, the more unwanted, nonconsensual attention I will receive from the men in prison.”

Trans people, who face disproportionate rates of incarceration, are also disproportionately likely to be victims of violence once locked up. But without access to treatments, trans people with gender dysphoria face higher rates of depression, anxiety, substance abuse and self-harm, including suicide.

Kim was previously the subject of a HuffPost story about her 15-year fight for gender-affirming health care and housing in prison. The story documented Kim’s struggle to access a legal name change, hormone therapy and, eventually, placement in women’s housing. After multiple denials, which included suggestions that Kim posed an inherent threat to female prisoners, Washington’s Department of Corrections finally allowed Kim to move to a women’s prison in 2021.

“Without the emotional burden of facing constant harassment and spending my time avoiding physical violence, I was able to focus on my mental health, plan for the future, and engage with positive programming,” Kim wrote in the declaration.

A team of prison officials, required to review trans prisoners’ housing placement at least every six months, wrote in a July 2021 report that Kim reported feeling ready to give up on life while at the men’s prison but began looking forward to the future after transferring to the women’s facility. A shift supervisor described her as “reliable and dependable.”

In March, Amber was caught having consensual sex with her cisgender roommate in their cell. The following week, the National Review published an inflammatory story about the incident, citing a leaked disciplinary report. The story, which deadnamed and misgendered Kim, included no allegations of assault or non-consensual activity, but described transgender women as “male inmates who identified as women” in order to sexually exploit women in prison.

DOC rules forbid any sexual activity, consensual or otherwise. Both Kim and her roommate were found guilty of a so-called 504 infraction, the act of “engaging in a sex act with another person(s),” and were placed in a more restrictive unit in the women’s prison.
In April, DOC conducted another housing review for Kim and concluded that she should remain in the women’s prison. Although housing reviews typically occur every six months, DOC held another review five weeks later and reversed its decision.

The “sudden reversal … was arbitrary, in bad faith, and lacking a legitimate penological purpose,” Kim’s lawyers, Adrien Leavitt and La Rond Baker of the ACLU-Washington, wrote in her petition, noting that Kim did not receive any additional disciplinary infractions between the two decisions.

“The difference between Ms. Kim’s treatment and that of her cisgender roommate is a stark illustration of DOC’s cruel treatment of Ms. Kim, exposing her to physical violence and serious mental health consequences,” Kim’s lawyers wrote, accusing DOC of “punishing Ms. Kim for her status as a transgender woman.”

In June, guards came to Kim’s cell and told her she was going into solitary confinement, she wrote in the declaration. She “didn’t think much of this” and agreed to be handcuffed. But once the guards started placing her in waist restraints she started to panic, she wrote. As she was led to the intake hallway, she realized she was being taken out of the women’s prison.

She asked to speak with her lawyer and begged the guards not to carry out the transfer. “I stopped walking, but I did not physically resist. The officers slammed me onto the ground. I screamed for help. Multiple officers piled on top of me. I felt like my body was being crushed into the floor,” Kim said in the declaration.

The guards placed Kim in a restraint system called a WRAP, which prevented her “from moving at all,” she wrote, and put her in the back of an SUV. At the time, Wright, the DOC communications director, told HuffPost that Kim “attempted to assault” staff during the transfer, which Kim denies. Asked to provide video footage of the transfer, Wright directed HuffPost to file a formal public records request. HuffPost obtained video of Kim in the WRAP device in the back of the car, but DOC declined to release the earlier footage of prison staff forcibly removing Kim from the prison.

Disability Rights Washington, a legal services group that is designated under federal law to protect the rights of people with disabilities, reviewed all surveillance and video footage related to the transfer. “Contrary to DOC’s statements to the press, DRW found no reliable evidence that Ms. Kim attempted to assault staff during her transferring,” DRW attorney Rachael Seevers wrote in an email to DOC that was filed with Kim’s lawsuit.

Seevers asked DOC to retract its claim and remove references to the attempted assault from its internal reports, which the agency agreed to do, according to Kim’s petition.

Once at the men’s prison, Kim learned she was set to be placed in a unit that houses people convicted of sex offenses, former gang members, and a small number of transgender women. “I knew I would not be safe,” Kim wrote. She began a hunger strike that lasted for 17 days, only suspending her protest action when DOC indicated she would be denied access to an upcoming surgery, she wrote.

“I felt that DOC was trying to force me to choose between safe housing or a gender affirming surgery that would allow me to live my life more fully,” Kim wrote.

In August, Kim was transferred to another prison for the procedure. She was placed in a cage in a bus, several rows in front of incarcerated men. For “ten hours, I heard them yelling sexually suggestive comments and anti-gay slurs at me, and even debating the very existence of transgender people,” Kim wrote. “I felt emotionally exhausted and traumatized. It reinforced my fear of what would happen if I was in prison with men.”
Bryan Kim is in prison for brutally murdering his own parents, by the way:
2008 story on conviction (archive)

SPOKANE, Wash. - 19-year-old former Mount Spokane High School student Bryan Kim was sentenced to life in prison without possiblity of parole Thursday, for murdering his parents.

Kim was found guilty on two charges of Aggravated First-Degree Murder in the deaths of his parents Richard and Teresa Kim. Investigators say Richard Kim died as a result of stabbing, and Teresa Kim was strangled to death.

Detectives said that when they arrested Bryan, he had two debit cards, one belonging to himself, and another presumably belonging to his father. Right next to the cards was a deposit slip showing a $1,000 deposit into Bryan Kim's bank account the day after his father died. Bank records obtained through Jessica Kim, the Kim's daughter, show that $1,000 was taken out of Richard Kim's bank account on December 6th.

According to court documents, investigators also found that a gun was missing from the Kim's safe. A gun believed to have come from that safe was located in Bryan Kim's bedroom.

Another clue came from Bryan Kim's girlfriend, who said Kim told her that he and his parents had a fight the night before they died. The girlfriend said Kim said Richard and Teresa went out for a walk and never came back. That was after they told him that he needed to find another place to live after the first of the year.

After his arrest, Kim "showed no emotions of grief and never showed any emotion of grief during the execution of the warrant on his person", according to court documents. Detectives say Kim said unsolicited, "Go on with what you're gonna do. Book me. I'm gonna cry myself to sleep later. Let's get this going.".

Kim told jail personnel who booked him that he is bi-polar, suffers from depression and takes medication for both disorders.

Pronoun use at center of rape case involving former Chowchilla prisoner - A complex criminal case is now playing out in Madera County.

CHOWCHILLA, Calif. (KFSN) -- A convicted criminal who served time at the women's prison in Chowchilla is charged with raping fellow inmates.

A Madera County judge ruled this week 52-year-old state prisoner Tremaine Carroll must be referred to with she/her pronouns because Carroll identifies as a woman.

But the district attorney believes the defendant is abusing the system.

"This is a person who is not a woman in any sense of the word," says Madera County District Attorney Sally Moreno.

In March DA Sally Moreno, charged Carroll for rape allegedly committed while incarcerated at the Central California Women's Facility in Chowchilla.

"After his first cellmate became pregnant and was moved to Los Angeles, two other cellmates of his had complained that he had raped them, so we have filed rape charges against this inmate," said Moreno.

Moreno says the ruling regarding pronouns impacts her ability to prosecute the case.

"This is a particular issue in this case because it's confusing to the jury. In California, rape is a crime that has to be accomplished by a man," said Moreno.

Supervising Deputy District Attorney Eric Dutemple says it's also unfair to the victims.

"Its just absolutely insane that a victim would have to get on the stand and police their pronoun usage when trying to recite one of the scariest times of their lives," said Dutemple.


Carroll was allowed to serve time in a women's prison despite being a biological male because of Senate Bill 132, The Transgender Respect, Agency and Dignity Act, which took effect in 2021.

It allows inmates to be housed with the gender they identify as.

"There's no psychological evaluation that needs to be done. This person does not need to be on cross gender hormones, they don't need to be signed up for transgender surgery, they don't need to be a psychological evaluation regarding gender confusion, the mere statement is enough," said Moreno.

Carroll has since been relocated to Salinas Valley State Prison for men.

The CDCR sent Action News a statement about the case, writing:

CDCR is committed to providing a safe, humane, respectful and rehabilitative environment for all incarcerated people. Senate Bill 132, The Transgender Respect, Agency and Dignity Act, became effective on January 1, 2021. It allows incarcerated transgender, non-binary and intersex people to request to be housed and searched in a manner consistent with their gender identity. CDCR reviews every request to be transferred under Senate Bill 132 to determine whether that move, based on the individual's case factors, would present a safety and management concern. At all our institutions, CDCR thoroughly investigates all allegations of sexual abuse, sexual misconduct, and sexual harassment pursuant to our zero-tolerance policy and as mandated by the federal Prison Rape Elimination Act. CDCR does not comment on cases in litigation.

Moreno says Carroll fired the defense attorney handling the case and has chosen to move forward with self-representation in court.

Carroll's next court date is set for January 14th.
 
TALLAHASSEE — A federal judge has dismissed a Broward County teen's challenge to the constitutionality of a 2021 Florida law that bars transgender female students from playing on women's and girls' sports teams.

U.S. District Judge Roy Altman on Thursday issued a 32-page decision rejecting arguments that the law violated the equal-protection rights of the student, identified by the initials D.N. Altman said the student needed to show the Legislature had a discriminatory purpose in passing the law (SB 1028).

The lawsuit, in part, cited statements made by legislators that it said showed such discrimination. But Altman wrote that the student "hasn't plausibly alleged" that the Legislature was motivated by a discriminatory purpose.

"At best, D.N. has suggested that SB 1028 impacts transgender girls differently than it does other students and that one or two legislators may have been motivated by improper animus when they voted for the law," Altman wrote. "As we've shown, however, we cannot impute the motivations of a couple legislators to the Florida Legislature as a whole."

He added that he concluded that the lawsuit's "allegations — even when viewed in the light most favorable to D.N. — fail to show that, in enacting SB 1028, the Florida Legislature acted with a discriminatory purpose."

Local News Federal judge dismisses Broward County transgender teen athlete's challenge to Florida law on female sports

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton (R) sued the NCAA on Sunday, accusing the organization of engaging in “false, deceptive, and misleading practices” by allowing transgender women to participate in athletic events it markets as women’s competitions.

Paxton said the NCAA, which oversees college sports at more than 1,000 colleges and universities nationwide, is duping women’s sports fans in violation of Texas’s Deceptive Trade Practices Act, a state law that shields consumers against businesses that falsely advertise their products.

“Consumers purchase goods and services associated with women’s college sports because they enjoy watching women compete against women—not men competing against women,” Paxton wrote in the lawsuit, filed Sunday in a Texas district court. The lawsuit does not mention transgender men who compete in men’s sports.

Paxton said the NCAA is further misleading college sports fans by not identifying which athletes are transgender. The organization is also “jeopardizing the safety and wellbeing of women,” he said, by permitting trans women to compete against cisgender, or non-transgender, women.

“Men competing in women’s sports is inherently unfair and unsafe due to their physiological advantages,” Paxton wrote in the lawsuit, which repeatedly refers to transgender women as “men.”

He added in a news release that “radical ‘gender theory’ has no place in college sports.”

Texas AG Paxton sues NCAA for allowing transgender women to compete
 
The lawsuit does not mention transgender men who compete in men’s sports.

Paxton said the NCAA is further misleading college sports fans by not identifying which athletes are transgender. The organization is also “jeopardizing the safety and wellbeing of women,” he said, by permitting trans women to compete against cisgender, or non-transgender, women.

“Men competing in women’s sports is inherently unfair and unsafe due to their physiological advantages,” Paxton wrote in the lawsuit, which repeatedly refers to transgender women as “men.”

He added in a news release that “radical ‘gender theory’ has no place in college sports.”
I just love when you can feel the seethe of the “neutral ‘journalist‘“ :story:

Also, no shit women don’t compete in men’s sports. That tells me everything I need to know about how knowledgeable this writer is about trannies.
 
Back