Cartoon Industry thread - Showcasing the Spergery of the Animation Industry

I'm a bit confused. What is this guy trying to say here?

For most gazelle species, its usually the male gazelle's that exhibit horns. Gazelle (yes her name is literally Gazelle; the wiki even states that it's her actual name and not a stage name) has horns despite being female, so that makes her trans-coded or whatever thing that gets the certain crowd up a frenzy. She's based on a Thomson's gazelle from what I know and females usually don't have any horns in that species.

Though, there are some exceptions. The Cuvier's gazelle, for example, has females with horns. The Dorcas gazelle is also another example.
 
Never forget.
Anime or live-action TV drama, didn't matter, it's pretty autistic to explain the joke that every adult understood, and kids tend to laugh at comedic nudity. Zootopia wanted to poke fun of and play straight the buddy-cop crime genre and one of those is the fact every single crime drama tackles some kind of sex-related crime because it's a crime of passion. The most family-friendly way to approach that was with a furry hippie nudist club and it was the funniest scene next to the DMV.

That one comment is all kinds of WTFery though, like holy shit.
 
For most gazelle species, its usually the male gazelle's that exhibit horns. Gazelle (yes her name is literally Gazelle; the wiki even states that it's her actual name and not a stage name) has horns despite being female, so that makes her trans-coded or whatever thing that gets the certain crowd up a frenzy. She's based on a Thomson's gazelle from what I know and females usually don't have any horns in that species.

Though, there are some exceptions. The Cuvier's gazelle, for example, has females with horns. The Dorcas gazelle is also another example.
Honestly, considering that Pixar removed a pro trans small movie, wouldn't these people get angry at Disney for not 100% confirming that this character is trans? Nothing on the Disney wiki confirms anything about her being trans. It never made sense to me that these people think creators of these movies, shows, etc put hidden messages in their shows and movies to signal to certain fans that "This character is so and so". If you were trans then wouldn't you get angry at Disney for not making it canon when the movie came out? Guess these people would rather fantasize about how companies secretly have their back than actually wanting them to have the balls to add a character that's confirmed trans.
 
They'll never understand character styles intentionally breaking over biological design. Not every female with male characteristics and vice versa makes them trans. Again, the only people to make such comparisons are the LGBT crowd themselves. If I have to hear one more trans allegory because of a simple stylistic choice...
And it would still fly over their heads, because they are reality deniers.
View attachment 6770275
The guys in this pic look happy the troon got removed. Topkek
Jeremy Clarkson's "Oh no, anyway!" ring true here. Yet I'm sure there's still poz. These "people" ask too much.
Honestly, considering that Pixar removed a pro trans small movie, wouldn't these people get angry at Disney for not 100% confirming that this character is trans? Nothing on the Disney wiki confirms anything about her being trans. It never made sense to me that these people think creators of these movies, shows, etc put hidden messages in their shows and movies to signal to certain fans that "This character is so and so". If you were trans then wouldn't you get angry at Disney for not making it canon when the movie came out? Guess these people would rather fantasize about how companies secretly have their back than actually wanting them to have the balls to add a character that's confirmed trans.
I would say otherwise: It's Disney saying "cut this shit out, we will not air this crap, not because we can't, but because we won't due to some ambiguous thing here. Not out of principles." You have retards who work through emotion rather than reason, so I don't think they would understand most things.
 
For most gazelle species, its usually the male gazelle's that exhibit horns. Gazelle (yes her name is literally Gazelle; the wiki even states that it's her actual name and not a stage name) has horns despite being female, so that makes her trans-coded or whatever thing that gets the certain crowd up a frenzy. She's based on a Thomson's gazelle from what I know and females usually don't have any horns in that species.

Though, there are some exceptions. The Cuvier's gazelle, for example, has females with horns. The Dorcas gazelle is also another example.
I thought his point was that Zootopia was a bit on the sexually charged side that could be inappropriate for kids and Disney still gave it the OK despite that, but took down the trans shit because of the concerns listed above. Are you sure one of us (blueshitter included) isn't going schizo?
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: didelphigina
1000032813.png
(Archive)
...Fuckin' site won't let me upload the goddamn screenshot. Nevermind, it's fixed now! :)

But yeah. How the fuck is that gonna get Disney to change their minds about the stupid ass storyline?! It wasn't even good to begin with yet these fuckers just can't let it go.

It's like they actually want kids to lop off their dicks and barely developed boobs while getting touched in their no-no zones. It's as if the little assholes have little to no value in legit learning and social skills...
...Well, not like this buttfuck ass generation of children have any of those to begin with, I mean, they got Xitter, Tiktok, Tumblr and other sites in the same vein as their current day states to live off of...

Because NORMALITY BE DAMNED.

In fact, when has a Change.org petitions ever done anything in the animation industry; hell, ANY form of children's entertainment for that fact??
 
Last edited:
View attachment 6774095
(Archive)
...Fuckin' site won't let me upload the goddamn screenshot. Nevermind, it's fixed now! :)

But yeah. How the fuck is that gonna get Disney to change their minds about the stupid ass storyline?! It wasn't even good to begin with yet these fuckers just can't let it go.

It's like they actually want kids to lop off their dicks and barely developed boobs while getting touched in their no-no zones. It's as if the little assholes have little to no value in legit learning and social skills...
...Well, not like this buttfuck ass generation of children have any of those to begin with, I mean, they got Xitter, Tiktok, Tumblr and other sites in the same vein as their current day states to live off of...

Because NORMALITY BE DAMNED.

In fact, when has a Change.org petitions ever done anything in the animation industry; hell, ANY form of children's entertainment for that fact??
The designs still haven't changed. It's the same garbage beanmouth clone regenerators. If I was growing up with this I would fucking hate it! All these people care doing is try to hide every "white" form of writing and just allow black , fag spic and tranny foolery among others. Cause they want that top spot on some activist notice.
 
The designs still haven't changed. It's the same garbage beanmouth clone regenerators. If I was growing up with this I would fucking hate it!
rate me optimistic but I have faith that eventually the pendulum will swing back and the next gen of animators will be less faggy and blobby than this one. Every "era" is a reaction to the one before it; the 50s-early 80s TV animation was episodic and aimed at parents/families, mid 80s was inoffensive and made to sell toys, 90s was when TV cartoons really picked up steam and started getting dramatic and comic book-y, the 2000s harkened back to UPA inspired styles and episodic stories, and the modern day went all-in on simplification and drawn out stories over the entire show. The next era so far is anime-inspired with series-long story arcs since everybody's big on anime, so that could be the defining "style" for the next wave.
 
rate me optimistic but I have faith that eventually the pendulum will swing back and the next gen of animators will be less faggy and blobby than this one. Every "era" is a reaction to the one before it; the 50s-early 80s TV animation was episodic and aimed at parents/families, mid 80s was inoffensive and made to sell toys, 90s was when TV cartoons really picked up steam and started getting dramatic and comic book-y, the 2000s harkened back to UPA inspired styles and episodic stories, and the modern day went all-in on simplification and drawn out stories over the entire show. The next era so far is anime-inspired with series-long story arcs since everybody's big on anime, so that could be the defining "style" for the next wave.
It might also be part of the idea of "strong men create good times, good times create weak men." Maybe the next generation will be disappointed at how shit cartoons were when they were kids and end up doing stuff based on Newgrounds or indie animation stuff.
 
I know people here talk about the overlap with cartoon review YouTube and breadtube. But do they both only hate the minions because the studio took an apolitical stance and mission statement to appeal to kids over adults? Matt Ammar at least admits he hates minions because conservative baby boomers like them and the studio's apolitical stance.
People hated Illumination because they make movies for normies and only normies. Pretentious progressives in the animation community (and adjacent) see their favorite forms of entertainment as an art form, and seeing companies like Illumination make "normie slop" comes off as an insult to them. Even if it ultimately helped Illumination in the long run to stay away from trying to appeal to said progressives, at least in terms of the box office.
 
I know people here talk about the overlap with cartoon review YouTube and breadtube. But do they both only hate the minions because the studio took an apolitical stance and mission statement to appeal to kids over adults? Matt Ammar at least admits he hates minions because conservative baby boomers like them and the studio's apolitical stance.
This guy seems like a retard and has a punchable face.
 
Since it's Christmas, I thought of specific moments from a particular show, Santa Inc.

Yes, that show is a pile shit that was made by people who despised Christmas, yet there is one good moment that the show had, the scene where Santa perfectly explained why Candy was woefully not qualified to be Santa, and funny enough, it's not because she is a woman.
 
People hated Illumination because they make movies for normies and only normies. Pretentious progressives in the animation community (and adjacent) see their favorite forms of entertainment as an art form, and seeing companies like Illumination make "normie slop" comes off as an insult to them. Even if it ultimately helped Illumination in the long run to stay away from trying to appeal to said progressives, at least in terms of the box office.

It's stuff like these that shows that the animation community really doesn't know their audience. Not everyone views media as a piece of high literature or art. Some people prefer watching movies as long as it's interesting and doesn't have anything pretentious shoved in their faces. The point of a movie, show, game, etc. is to entertain. If you want to send a message, do it right and do it efficiently. If the game's more of the developers shoving their political stances on strangers than the fact it's a game to enjoy, then the game's bound to become obsolete if all that's known of it is that "it's the game with the political yapping", and the only people who'll even mildly remember it are the people who are equal in the same stances as them.

This is why Illumination is so successful. Their movies wildly appeal to the broad audience, and while that can suck and lead to being as corporate and basic as possible (no one's gonna remember despicable me 4 lol), but for an entertainment industry, it's kind of a must if they want the profits to keep rolling. That's basic capitalism, everyone. Money is money and if more money is available, who wouldn't take the chances?

Because in the end, who knew appealing to a majority is financially better than to a minority? I mean, who would've thunk it?
 
Back