Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)

  • 🔧 Actively working on site again.

When will the Judge issue a ruling regarding the Motion to Dismiss?

  • This Month

    Votes: 67 14.5%
  • Next Month

    Votes: 56 12.1%
  • This Year

    Votes: 73 15.8%
  • Next Year

    Votes: 155 33.5%
  • Whenever he issues an update to the sanctions

    Votes: 112 24.2%

  • Total voters
    463
do you have the mp3 you used to make that elevenlabs ai?
I'm thinking about making a more stylized version of it, with all the GANGSTER FRANKENSTEIN NIGGER CONTROL, DEADLY nerve GAS and UNFORGIVABLE TRUTHS!
I didn't use 11.ai there, it was TorToiSe (with this webui). I trained a model for this, which I made available here.
Although back in the day I did use 11.ai for these. Here are the sound clips.
 
I think it's a lot closer to the Chewbacca Prosecution,

Like Ariana Grande, Taylor Swift and a handful of less notable sex workers before him, Joshua Moon completely refuses to suck Russell Greer's penis. The man has soft eyes and even softer lips, and those lips really do belong around Greer's penis. They would fit perfectly.

And it's a well established principle of lolcow jurisprudence -- "if the lips would fit, you can NEVER acquit!^

So for all Matthew Hardin's sophisticated attempts to mislead the court by demanding unimportant things like 'evidence', you just need to remember this. Joshua Moon is a farmer. Farmers live on the Kiwifarms. Nobody from the Kiwifarms has EVER sucked Russell Greer's penis -- despite the fact that ALL of their lips would fit around Greer's penis.

The opposite is obviously UNTRUE. Due to a birth defect, Russell Greer has a lip deformity that would NEVER form a tight seal against a Kiwifarmer's penis. The lips don't fit so you MUST acquit. Consequently, all of Greer's motions MUST be granted.

But Moon's soft lips would fit perfectly, therefore his only options are to:

a.) Suck him Russell Greer's penis and arrange for dates with Taylor Swift and Ariana Grande -- both moderators on Kiwifarms, or

b.) The court MUST find for Greer, turn Kiwifarms into a Nevada brothel and put Greer in charge. Kiwifarms posters will be sentenced to work off their prison time in the Nevada Kiwifarm Ranch. As owner, Greer will be forced to sample the merchandise to ensure the quality is high enough to meet his standards.

I rest my case,
Russell Greer.
As you can see dear reader, this is a person who is really afraid that they'll have to "footsie" with Greer as part of a settlement.

Useful_Mistake is obviously Taylor Smith and her legal team. Who else would have access to such a hugh range of legal resources at the drop of a hat? The fundraiser was an attempt to throw people off the scent but Kiwifarms is actually run by a Hollywood cabal who are determined to keep the disabled out of the entertainment industry and out of the beds of the hottest of Hollywood stars. If Hardin was a genuinely objective lawyer who was serving the best interests of his client, he'd be arranging these fellatio sessions instead of messing around with fake witnesses who know nothing at all about Russell Greer's fellatio needs.

If only they bedded a disabled nice guy just once, they'd soon learn how much better he is at lurvemaking than your archetypal Hollywood hunk like Josh Moon.

Unfortunately, none of them are willing to do this voluntarily, so they have to be compelled or coerced into sex with the kind of shit-lipped monster they SHOULD be having sex with.
 
Last edited:
Russ is using the ancient Nippon strategy of folding his own witnesses a thousand times which makes his case stronger and sharper than gaijin pig Null's soft and dull case.
1735308204444.png
Didn't he tell his dad directly to not respond to anything from Hardin? I guess technically that's not telling them to not show up. If only Keffals and Ben Collins were this smart then the site might already be dead.
 
He apparently was somehow under the impression that his witnesses would be HIS witnesses and he could spring them on the court (if it ever went to trial) without them being deposed. He probably would have objected to them being cross-examined, too.

It's like I said previously, he really literally thought his witnesses were HIS witnesses and his alone, to be used as he sees fit and at a time of his choosing only, not to be sullied by pesky things like subpoenas, depositions, or cross-examination.
 
Russ is using the ancient Nippon strategy of folding his own witnesses a thousand times which makes his case stronger and sharper than gaijin pig Null's soft and dull case.
View attachment 6792903
Didn't he tell his dad directly to not respond to anything from Hardin? I guess technically that's not telling them to not show up. If only Keffals and Ben Collins were this smart then the site might already be dead.
Yeah he told him not to agree to anything and called Hardin a crazy person for... trying to actually move the case along.
 
Russ is using the ancient Nippon strategy of folding his own witnesses a thousand times which makes his case stronger and sharper than gaijin pig Null's soft and dull case.
View attachment 6792903
Didn't he tell his dad directly to not respond to anything from Hardin? I guess technically that's not telling them to not show up. If only Keffals and Ben Collins were this smart then the site might already be dead.
This section of his filing really calls into question just what in the heck Russ was taught in paralegal school. I cannot believe that a paralegal, the person who will most likely be drafting a subpoena for a lawyer and getting it filed with the courts on a daily basis, would not understand what, precisely, the subpoena would accomplish. Likewise, a paralegal would probably be the one running and doing menial tasks related to depositions, and again, I cannot imagine any paralegal school wouldn't tell said paralegal about the deposition process and just what it's for. This, along with Sharshorita's first hand knowledge that she really had to learn everything about being a paralegal ON THE JOB rather than at the school that supposedly taught them, tells us, once again, just how poor that school was.

Russ really and truly thinks that the 10th circuit essentially said that he wins and that everything is just going to lead down the garden path to him getting what he wants. It's just Hardin being a big meanie pants and not letting him get his way. Yeah, these were supposed to be his witnesses, but you don't need to do anything with them you know because I WON! Why won't you give me a settlement because I WON!

Russ really is pulling for LCOTY with this stuff. I'm here for it!
 
This section of his filing really calls into question just what in the heck Russ was taught in paralegal school.
The bare minimum is how to lay out legal documents, but Russ can't even figure out pagination. It's possible he was pity-passed to get him out of the building and stop him drooling on everything.
 
This section of his filing really calls into question just what in the heck Russ was taught in paralegal school. I cannot believe that a paralegal, the person who will most likely be drafting a subpoena for a lawyer and getting it filed with the courts on a daily basis, would not understand what, precisely, the subpoena would accomplish. Likewise, a paralegal would probably be the one running and doing menial tasks related to depositions, and again, I cannot imagine any paralegal school wouldn't tell said paralegal about the deposition process and just what it's for.
He's a complete dunce and it's pretty clear he bullshitted his way through paralegal school somehow. No self respecting person would write the way he does in his filings in a draft for an assessment. Hell, I would be embarrassed if I wrote an email to a professor in that way.
 
I cannot imagine any paralegal school wouldn't tell said paralegal about the deposition process and just what it's for
Can confirm. We were told what discovery entails, what disclosures were and how to answer them. However, it's been years since he was in school and it took him five years to complete a two year degree. He also hasn't worked in the field in years. I know I've forgotten a lot about what I learned in school since I haven't used it.

But lest you think I'm being nice to Russ, he had to read rule 26 recently to know what to quote, was told to watch the videos on the subjects, therefore he knew or should have known what he was doing. I believe his failure was 100% willful.
 
He can let it slide insofar as he doesn't impose case ending sanctions, but I don't see how anything Russ has done will help him avoid the sanctions that the judge already telegraphed he would impose, something that would only further drive shitlips to deeper depths of insanity.
At this point, every sanction would be case ending. The bare minimum sanction that the judge would be required to bring for Rusty's lack of disclosure is limiting him to the witness he disclosed or enforcing the stipulation as fully binding. Meaning that Rusty cannot call any witnesses. Because he cannot call any witnesses, he cannot get any exhibits admitted to the record. He cannot call any witnesses to identify and authenticate documents so they can be admitted into the record. He cannot call himself, he cannot call Null, he can only call who he as disclosed: no one.

I don't know how the tenth circuit could remedy that, but their bleeding heart clerks will somehow perform the greatest mental gymnastics ever seen to somehow revive Rusty's dogshit case.
 
However, it's been years since he was in school and it took him five years to complete a two year degree. He also hasn't worked in the field in years. I know I've forgotten a lot about what I learned in school since I haven't used it.
I don't believe he has gone a week since Taylor Swift, in which he has not been engaging in litigation.
 
I’d pay any amount of money to hear the phone call between Russel and his dad, the sounds of his slobbering begging and pleading into the phone, but dad I neeeeeed you, oh and you have to hire a lawyer too for this bullshit case you want no part of.

It just warms my little black heart. I wonder when his family will finally disown him.
 
Because if he doesn't let it slide, he knows everyone will be back in a year after the Tenth Circuit says he didn't give the little pro-se retard enough slack in his fight against satan Kiwi Farms, a hardship.
I don't think so only because the grifters at the digital justice foundation won't swoop in to save his appeal again. If he tried another appeal he would crash and burn.
 
He cannot call himself
Can't he just add more witnesses though, as long as he follows all those pesky rules about disclosure while doing so?
I'm no lawyer, but I read the "stipulation" more as "We'll consider the matter of the family witnesses closed", than "No more witnesses ever".

Not that Greer is ever going to properly name, disclose, depose, and call a witness, but still.
 
Can't he just add more witnesses though, as long as he follows all those pesky rules about disclosure while doing so?
I'm no lawyer, but I read the "stipulation" more as "We'll consider the matter of the family witnesses closed", than "No more witnesses ever".

Not that Greer is ever going to properly name, disclose, depose, and call a witness, but still.

The thing about legal documents is that you generally are not allowed to decide what they basically mean. If people were allowed to do that, the legal landscape of our nation would be a wildly different place, with a lot more crayons and drooling.

The stipulation says, "If Plaintiff attempts to disclose any additional witness, or to call any witness other than Nathan Greer and Scott Greer at trial, or to offer any testimony by any other individual than Nathan Greer and Scott Greer in support of any claim at issue in this case, this stipulation shall be null and void and have no further effect." It says what it says. It won't stop him from trying, to be sure, and he will undoubtedly find out "pronto" after fucking around thereby. But our whole system teeters on the precarious ledge of the premise that a legal document says what it means and means what it says.
 
I cannot imagine any paralegal school wouldn't tell said paralegal about the deposition process and just what it's for.
Perhaps this may be persuasive to the Mormon Utahn Judge.
"Greer received his paralegal certificate from LDS Business College, now Ensign College, an accredited school. So to believe he is so utterly ignorant of any and every part of the legal process and "this is all French to me" is to accuse Ensign Business College of being a meritless diploma mill scam committed directly by the Jesus Christ Church of Latter-day Saints!"
 
Back