Zoomer doesn't directly make those arguments but I certainly get that impression. Especially because he often passively throws in statements that are verifiably false, amid a video that is largely accurate. Like how he passively says Hitler and the nazis were Christians when they literally planned to edit the bible and were only stopped due to how politically destructive it would have been.Which was to counter ludicrous propaganda from the war years to justify the loss of lives to defend polish independence by handing them over to the USSR.
Zoomer Historian is a bit too far into the David Irving camp of "Hitler did nothing wrong, it was all Himmler and a few rogue generals, Churchill was bribed to go to war!", but the guy making the response video probably still believes the Germans made skin lamps and jew soap
Zoomer Historian will say things that are objectively accurate and then mix in inaccuracies so long as it makes Hitler look more sympathetic.