Diseased Bugchasers / Bugchasing / Extreme Kinks / Curious Chaser / Breeding.zone - The discussion of extreme kinks that any normal person would never consider

This is the big thing. Their meds cost a fuckton but all of it is paid for by non degenerates. Straights pay a high price for gays being degenerates who just have to stick their dick in every random asshole.
It's the same way with Troons, unfortunately. They pay almost nothing out-of-pocket for surgeries and hormones while Insurance and the Government cover the majority of it.

But the gays have a far, far stronger angle to keep people paying for their meds:

If they go off meds, they become a highly contagious, mobile petri dish of diseases that their immune systems won't fight off.

And they'd linger in such a state for around a decade or more, getting slowly sicker until it progresses to full-blown AIDS and kills them off. They literally become walking biohazards that are dangerous to society if they don't get their drugs.


They're living by the grace of powerful anti-viral drugs paid for by other people. And the fucking infuriating part is that by spreading the bug and/or overusing PREP, they're going to eventually make the virus resistant or immune to the current drugs.
 
This popped up on my Firefox news feed.
losretardos.png
A heartwarming upcoming film (based on a true story) about a bunch of retards injecting themselves with AIDS to live in commie run care facilities to... escape communism?
hoping to escape political repression by going inside government-run clinics, or sanitariums.
Makes sense to me.
Paco, like other young people, believed he could escape from government repression by entering a sanitarium after injecting himself with HIV. Punk bands started forming at these medical centers, and recorded cassettes inspired hundreds to self-inject.

But many would soon face a rude awakening as they died of AIDS; it would be years before the current treatments that have made it possible to live with HIV as a manageable condition.
I would Lol. Lmao even. were I not concerned that the faggy prefix-punk youth of the modern era may see this as admirable. Forget they did it to escape a communist society because it's convenient for the self imposed political labelings of high schoolers.
 
But the gays have a far, far stronger angle to keep people paying for their meds:

If they go off meds, they become a highly contagious, mobile petri dish of diseases that their immune systems won't fight off.

And they'd linger in such a state for around a decade or more, getting slowly sicker until it progresses to full-blown AIDS and kills them off. They literally become walking biohazards that are dangerous to society if they don't get their drugs.

If anything, letting them live longer would give them more opportunities to spread their pathogens around, seeing that HIV/GRIDS is incurable and pretty much always will be. They don't become less dangerous when on anti-viral drugs, they're still walking biohazards.

We could have solved the AIDS pandemic long ago simply by refusing to normalize homosexuality and drug use. It would be cheaper and easier to just tell fags to break their addiction to other people's buttholes. I assume the reason why we don't do that is for the same reason why we don't try to cure gender identity disorder or at least help people manage it without mutilation or crossdressing: It makes big pharma big bucks.

Bugchasing/gift giving is very profitable to those vultures.

That, and degenerates become violently angry when anyone, especially those in positions of authority, tell them to stop being degenerates for their own sake.

I would Lol. Lmao even. were I not concerned that the faggy prefix-punk youth of the modern era may see this as admirable. Forget they did it to escape a communist society because it's convenient for the self imposed political labelings of high schoolers.

Such behavior would lead any sane person to conclude that the old commies were right about the gays after all.
 
Last edited:
this is from a fucking janny (Archive)
1735138929925.png

of course
1735139011773.png


guys? BBC is bad? (Archive)
I was watching BBC news this summer, when this supposedly "respectable" political reporter woman called Sarah Smith, made a totally weird comment when covering the Republican convention, This was when Vance had just been unveiled as the VP pick. She finished the coverage of his speech by making a comment suggesting that J.D. Vance's wave looked 'gay'.

She didn't say the word but it's clearly what she was implying. There couldn't have been anything else. It's just so lame. She's a Scottish woman the daughter of a former UK party leader, for those of you who don't know (which will be the vast majority)

I don't have a clip of this, I couldn't find it on YouTube and the BBC don't have long-time availability of their news broadcasts, cause they don't want intelligent folk actually analysing their output and being able to complain in the same way people do about other networks.

BBC news is supposed to be the most "respectable" and "mainstream" form of getting your info. But this woman was making playground insults like a nasty 12-year-old girl. So what about that?

From their rules: (Archive)
➤ Certain types of AIDS Fetish are being BANNED

What is still allowed is expressing that you find "AIDSy" looking guys hot. Saying you think they're hot harms no one, and after everything those guys have gone through, it probably helps them to know people still find them sexually attractive.

What is being banned is encouraging other people to progress to stay off meds so long that they progress to AIDS. I know many of you didn't live through the AIDS epidemic, but it was truly horrible. I cared for my lover as he died of AIDS. I wouldn't wish that experience on anyone - even the experience of being a caregiver was pretty horrible. There is a huge difference between being HIV positive and having AIDS. You can live a reasonably healthy life and have a completely normal life expectancy being poz. But the same is not true once you progress to AIDS. Once you progress to AIDS your life expectancy goes down and your quality of life can completely plummet.

In case you don't know, an HIV positive person is considered to have AIDS if they get one of a number of opportunistic infections, or when their CD4 ("t-cell") count drops to 200 (or sometimes 250 - depending on the standard used). Doctors will want you to do on meds before you CD4 drops below 500. But then there's a gray area between ~350 and 500 which is also relatively safe, though you do up your risk of complications slightly.

This ban also applies to encouraging people to become highly drug resistant. Since that's another clear path to AIDS.

Simply put, wanting to progress to AIDS or become highly drug resistant is a form of self harm that's borderline suicidal. Encouraging someone to progress to AIDS or become highly drug resistant borders on encouraging them to kill themselves. It's not OK.


➤ HIV Fetish, Bug Chasing & Gift Giving are still very much ALLOWED

As I mentioned there's a huge difference between being poz and having AIDS. So I have no problem with guys who want to become poz. Simply put, it's right for some guys. I also have no problem with gift giving. Thanks to PrEP, gift givers can't harm guys who don't want to be harmed. And most guys have at least two years before their CD4 drops below 500, so there is a period of time when they can be a gift giver without risking their own health.

But be careful… do not use the word AIDS when you mean HIV or poz. "I wanna give you HIV" or "I wanna poz you" are both fine. "I wanna give you AIDS" is not OK. Fetishizing poz or toxic loads is fine. Fetishing AIDS loads is not OK. Learn to say what you mean. Words matter!

➤ Generally, things that do significant harm to the community are BANNED

Basically I'm banning anything that causes permanent, significant harm to individuals or significant harm to the community as a whole. That said, there's a lot of gray area. In the gray area if it's harm to a real person it will be more likely to trigger an infraction.

So for example - a bottom is getting spit roasted and the top fucking him slips him a booty bump without him knowing. Since drugs wear off after a few hours, that's not permanent harm. In a fictional story that would be allowed provided the story doesn't progress to him becoming a drug addict (which would be significant harm). But encouraging someone to do that to a real person - that wouldn't be allowed.

Or another example - castration. If a bottom is considering castration and you encourage them to go through with it - it all depends on how you encourage them. If you encourage them to take months to fully think it through, and then find a qualified doctor to do the procedure - that would be fine. If you encourage them to take a less careful course of action - that would be a problem and would get an infraction.
 
Last edited:
Genuine question, why do gays have all the weird and (literally) deadly fetishes? You never see lesbians or straight people doing this.
Oh fuck, we DO.

I had a roommate in college, his name was Jason. Jason was by all accounts a pretty nice and normal guy, if you met him you'd like him. Apple pie kind of guy, plays Diablo 2 in his underwear and he plays football with his brothers, not a weird fuck by any stretch of the imagination, he only asked that on Saturdays he could have the apartment to himself for date nights or entertaining parties to make connections outside of college. I said, well, that sounds reasonable I guess, just lower my rent considering I'm not going to be actually using the place 1/7th of the year, I don't give a shit what it's for just make this reasonable for me. I went to my girlfriends anyways, it worked out pretty good.

There came a Saturday about 7 months in, I wanna say. I'm driving with my lady and we drive by my place and there's fucking ambulances everywhere. I tell her to stop because I'm thinking, oh fuck, my roommate is hurt maybe I've gotta see what's going on.

I come into the house and there's blood all over the carpet and all these faggot sex swing things. This retard was using the place as a BDSM fuck party house where they regularly engaged in Knife Play and apparently someone cut someone's leg and they almost bled to death in my apartment. Jason wasn't there and frankly I didn't give a fuck, I assumed he was at the police station so I packed up all my shit the next morning after staying at my GFs place and I never spoke to him again.

Straight people play with fucking knives and beat the shit out of each other for fun, my dear.
 
Reminder that many sexually transmitted and bloodborne diseases affect regular vulnerable patients like haemophiliac and chemo patients and your hatred of gays doesn't change that and there is no such thing as a gay disease gays are simply indicators for stis because they are more promiscuous all diseases have an initial indicator group killing gays won't stop the disease it just means it skips them as an indicator and hits everyone else with no in-between so enjoy aids faggots
 
Reminder that many sexually transmitted and bloodborne diseases affect regular vulnerable patients like haemophiliac and chemo patients and your hatred of gays doesn't change that and there is no such thing as a gay disease gays are simply indicators for stis because they are more promiscuous all diseases have an initial indicator group killing gays won't stop the disease it just means it skips them as an indicator and hits everyone else with no in-between so enjoy aids faggots
Certain patients are at increased risk because they're immunocompromised. That isn't rocket science. Faggots in particular however go out of their way to catch this shit and also have sexual practices that increase their risk for something like HIV/AIDs that even other groups (straights and lesbians) do not have the magnitudes of risk for when promiscuous. HIV/AIDs was spread throughout the developing world specifically because faggots fucked Africans/Haitians who got it from eating bushmeat. To say it's just big mean to associate fags with HIV/AIDs is just dishonest. It's something you really only have a risk for if you're getting fucked unprotected in the ass and using needles in a homeless encampment. Straight women only need to worry about it insofar if they're sleeping around with bisexual men (they shouldn't) and straight men shouldn't need to worry about contracting it at all, knife play parties notwithstanding lmao
I enjoy pondering the psychological motives behind bizarre shit like this. I think it's to satisfy a desire to impregnate/be impregnated, which is hilariously fucked up if true.
I think some have mentioned this before and it's truly bizarre. But I also don't entirely buy it. There has to be better ways to balance a natural human desire to procreate with the fact you have sexual encounters that are biological dead ends. How do you jump from "ooga booga monke brain want give baby" to pozzing negholes?
 
Reminder that many sexually transmitted and bloodborne diseases affect regular vulnerable patients like haemophiliac and chemo patients and your hatred of gays doesn't change that and there is no such thing as a gay disease gays are simply indicators for stis because they are more promiscuous all diseases have an initial indicator group killing gays won't stop the disease it just means it skips them as an indicator and hits everyone else with no in-between so enjoy aids faggots
Feel free to contribute some straight hemophiliacs and cancer enjoyers having pozparties, faggot enabler.
I enjoy pondering the psychological motives behind bizarre shit like this. I think it's to satisfy a desire to impregnate/be impregnated, which is hilariously fucked up if true.
It comes up fairly frequently in these documentaries, it seems to mostly be the case that they know their degenerate lifestyle will end up getting them infected at some point and getting it over with sooner rather than later means they won't have to worry about it anymore.
 
I enjoy pondering the psychological motives behind bizarre shit like this. I think it's to satisfy a desire to impregnate/be impregnated, which is hilariously fucked up if true.

It comes up fairly frequently in these documentaries, it seems to mostly be the case that they know their degenerate lifestyle will end up getting them infected at some point and getting it over with sooner rather than later means they won't have to worry about it anymore.

You'd think that either celibacy or at least having no sexual relationships with anyone but your spouse would ensure that you don't have to worry about it ever...
 
Reminder that many sexually transmitted and bloodborne diseases affect regular vulnerable patients like haemophiliac and chemo patients and your hatred of gays doesn't change that and there is no such thing as a gay disease gays are simply indicators for stis because they are more promiscuous all diseases have an initial indicator group killing gays won't stop the disease it just means it skips them as an indicator and hits everyone else with no in-between so enjoy aids faggots
This person has aids.
 
You'd think that either celibacy or at least having no sexual relationships with anyone but your spouse would ensure that you don't have to worry about it ever...
Asking homosexuals not to get barebacked by multiple strangers a day is like asking the average person to hold their breath for 10 minutes.
 
Back