Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

When will the Judge issue a ruling regarding the Motion to Dismiss?

  • This Month

    Votes: 67 15.3%
  • Next Month

    Votes: 52 11.8%
  • This Year

    Votes: 71 16.2%
  • Next Year

    Votes: 148 33.7%
  • Whenever he issues an update to the sanctions

    Votes: 101 23.0%

  • Total voters
    439
Something that stuck out to me:
Screenshot 2025-01-02 181404.png
You dumb nigger, then why the hell did you oppose Mr. Hardin's motion to make you do just that?
 
This filing is so retarded I barely know where to begin. This one caught my eye:

1735834049795.png

Except it's not in Exhibit M, which explicitly says there is only the link to Google Drive.

1735834144522.png

It's in Exhibit R. Behold, the entirety of Russ' proof of a civil conspiracy, damages, and willful infringement.

1735834352781.png

That artifacting is not my fault, it's in the original exhibit.
 
I'm wracking my dissolving, pixelized brain trying to figure out what the fuck this exhibit is exhibiting.
View attachment 6813592

That's Exhibit W and It's not referenced anywhere in the complaint. The last Exhibit reference I can find is T.

What the FUCK do meteor showers have to do with copyright infringement?!?
 
That's Exhibit W and It's not referenced anywhere in the complaint. The last Exhibit reference I can find is T.

What the FUCK do meteor showers have to do with copyright infringement?!?
If I'm being generous, I suspect he wanted to complain about the phantom giggler. That's the only thing in that image that I can tie to Russ.

Edit: UM's got it.
 
It's about the laugh emoji. The Phantom Giggler strikes again!

I can't find reference to anything like that anywhere in the doc either. The screenshot doesn't even show that Russ posted the thing being laughed at, it looks like a regular news post.

Why are Exhibits Z, A1, and A4 blank? Is it a commentary on the barren emptiness of the troll's black hearts?

Why are no Exhibits after T referenced? Surely they're not mistakes and "fluff", Russ made sure to diligently delete all that in this amended complaint. Is Russ stealthily creating an ARG for the judge, hoping he wanders down a lolcow rabbit hole?
 
That's Exhibit W and It's not referenced anywhere in the complaint. The last Exhibit reference I can find is T.

What the FUCK do meteor showers have to do with copyright infringement?!?

The multiple screenshots wedged into Exhibit V (also not referenced in the complaint) are even better, especially this one. BOOBIES
1735835268443.png
 
I WITHDRAW ANYTHING NEGATIVE I SAID ABOUT RUSS! THIS MASTERFUL REFERENCE HAS BROKEN ME. HE HAS WON!
Screenshot 2025-01-02 182641.png
Where is reference 1, Russ? WHERE IS IT?
The multiple screenshots wedged into Exhibit V (also not referenced in the complaint) are even better, especially this one. BOOBIES
Is it just me, or do all of his screencaps look to be fake? Were they always so weird looking?
 
I WITHDRAW ANYTHING NEGATIVE I SAID ABOUT RUSS! THIS MASTERFUL REFERENCE HAS BROKEN ME. HE HAS WON!
View attachment 6813647
Where is reference 1, Russ? WHERE IS IT?

Is it just me, or do all of his screencaps look to be fake? Were they always so weird looking?
Maybe he's just copying stuff from something else? In a case like this wouldn't it be prudent to at least provide archive links to all the posts in addition to the screenshots?

Greer woke up and did a nuclear tard rage. This is amazing.

@Russtard mentioned again, hasn't logged in since 2021. Surely this guy will be tracked down!

Finally, after all these years, we know where he got his name from:
View attachment 6813679
He mentioned that in the original complaint, only now has he decided that @Russtard is gonna also be sued.
 
Is it just me, or do all of his screencaps look to be fake? Were they always so weird looking?
Ignoring the quality of the screencaps, pretty sure they look so funky overall is because like artcows Greer randomly keeps fucking up the aspect ratio of every screencap when including them in what he submitted, usually in a different way from the prior images. If it were a more consistent distortion it wouldn't be quite so noticeable, but as it is you'll probably get a migraine just scrolling through them all.
 
If he's admitting that suing Taylor Swift was a publicity stunt then it just demonstrates that he wants attention his complaints are meritless. He's basically shot himself in the foot and is admitting to being vexatious.
So what happens now that he wishes to add two John Does s defendants?
Also the fact that his following on kf is a direct result of his publicity stunt. He wanted attention and he has it.
 
Back