Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)

[BoomerPrime]

Greer already can't hit his deadlines and is losing his shit at how many emails Hardin is sending him and motions he's filing...and now he wants to add two more lawyers on the other side?

In Greer's mind that's just two more neutral third parties who will convince their clients that Russ is right, and help give him everything he wants.

 

[DavidS877]

statute of limitations

The Internet tells me it's 3 years for copyright. Which means, to me, a moron, that he can't add additional claims at this point for new parties.

The Civil Conspiracy based in Utah, I can't tell, since he didn't cite the code for that one, just the code on how to compute damages. It's likely 3 years or less also based on similar statutes.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

The Civil Conspiracy based in Utah, I can't tell, since he didn't cite the code for that one, just the code on how to compute damages. It's likely 3 years or less also based on similar statutes.

4 years. See Manzanares v. Terry, Case No. 2:14-CV-108 TS (D. Utah Nov. 12, 2014)

 

[FamicomGorby]

4 years. See Manzanares v. Terry, Case No. 2:14-CV-108 TS (D. Utah Nov. 12, 2014)

So since the original complaint was filed September 24, 2020 we're past the statute of limitations and Greer can't add those users as defendants anyway?

 

[Useful_Mistake]

So since the original complaint was filed September 24, 2020 we're past the statute of limitations and Greer can't add those users as defendants anyway?

Would seem that way to me, yeah, though the statute of limitations would start ticking when the act was done, not when the lawsuit was filed.

 

[Kosher Dill]

So since the original complaint was filed September 24, 2020 we're past the statute of limitations and Greer can't add those users as defendants anyway?

This defect in the pro se litigant's filing is harmlessly curable by allowing it anyway.

 

[DavidS877]

4 years. See Manzanares v. Terry, Case No. 2:14-CV-108 TS (D. Utah Nov. 12, 2014)

The timelines seem pretty obvious to me even for 4 years. Depending on how attempting to add new parties with entirely different claims works.

 

[Harvey Danger]

Would seem that way to me, yeah, though the statute of limitations would start ticking when the act was done, not when the lawsuit was filed.

According to Russ, the alleged conspiracy happened in April 2019, so he's now 21 months past the cutoff.




Amusingly, the correct Exhibit R doesn't have the post date included, so Russ has helpfully informed the court he's too late all on his own.

 

[Bogliacci]

So... was this amended complaint anything close to what russ actually needed to provide?

 

[DavidS877]

In 30 seconds on Google the only time I see the statute of limitations being allowed to be exceeded for new claims is when something comes up which brings new information to light.

The original complaint mentions both "Russtard", and "Moseph.Jartelli" so he already knew of their involvement when the case started so he can't claim that he just found out that those were the usernames involved.

 

[Billy Bong]

How do you even respond to this if you're Hardin? Do you just wait for the judge?
It's so, so surreal. Half of his 'exhibits' make him look even nuttier. I wouldn't know where to start.

Hardin's response should be 'Judge, c'mon. What are we even doing here?'

 

[mindlessobserver]

I hope the judge suffers immensely coming back from vacation to have to read these, what? dozens? of insane filings. Karma for letting things drag out this long to try and "Get kiwifarms"

Again, I think he finds it funny. But he will have to do something eventually.

 

[Harvey Danger]

How do you even respond to this if you're Hardin? Do you just wait for the judge?

He probably just objects to the motion to amend itself. If that motion gets denied then Greer's new craziness doesn't need to be addressed. If it gets accepted, then Hardin has to do the sneedful.

Hardin's response should be 'Judge, c'mon. What are we even doing here?'

If the judge knew we wouldn't actually be here.

 

[goblin enby]

He has tried everything. Everything except a phone call. That was just a step too far.

Alternative calculation: you would be lucky to get $1 from 366 streams on Spotify.

 

[Jimmy Dean Bowl]

There was a link to fiverr in one of her posts, but it was flagged as a scammer and is dead now.

That supports his supposed 'evidance' which he claimed to Hardin proves he is discussing Kiwi Farms harassment with Goodreads - the format is very similar to Fiverr DMs.

Stupid tard thought he'd try to hire some pretty lady to suck him his penis do some social media marketing and use the messages to pass off to the Court.
I hope she/the scammer pajeet took all his $$ and provided nothing in return.

 

[Irene and 22 others]

How do you even respond to this if you're Hardin?

With his latest filings, Russ has provided sufficient evidence to support a motion to find Russ as a vexatious litigant. I'd not object to Greer trying to add two additional John Doe's to the lawsuit as it's not his job to defend them and I'd like to see Russ catch the car on this one. Much of the rest has nothing to do with the matter at hand and isn't worth wasting his or the court's time responding to other than objecting to it for that reason.

I don't believe that it would ever happen, but it would be incredibly funny if Null were able to remove himself and his LCC from the case, but the suit were to proceed against the two John Does. Hof managed something to that effect and it would be karmic for the judge to be punished with having to deal with this for as long as Russ wants to keep filing motions.

 

[Emanems]

I don't want to shit up the thread and this has already been debated (the "how will otherwise a working class family sue Microsoft" debate/argument) but it seems draconian, insane and not just (just as in justice) to me that you can just amend a 4 year old complaint and we are discussing pretty much an edition of the first complaint after 209 court dockets

 

[Sexy Senior Citizen]

If the judge knew we wouldn't actually be here.

The judge already knows what he's going to do. He can't because Hardin is too clever to give him that opening.

 

[Sir Dank-a-Lot]

Greer: "Suing Taylor Swift was a publicity stunt."
Farms: Gives Greer publicity.
Greer: "They're giving me bad publicity"

 

[Apteryx Owenii]

Russ may have emailed or even tried to speak on the phone to police and still not have generated a police report if they recognize there's no crime within their jurisdiction to investigate. People call the police for all kinds of stupid internet based shit that doesn't warrant wasting time on writing reports.

@moseph.jartelli is a gimmick poster who hasn't posted since the 19th. @Russtard hasn't logged on in years. More proof that Russell is a spiteful little turd who never lets anything go.

He's probably belatedly trying to establish some kind of evidence that the infringement actually occurred. Including someone like russtard in the lawsuit is an entirely reasonable idea. Well, it would have been, 3 years ago, not now. Now it's just another stall tactic to drag the case along.