"Doxing" in 2025

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
'Tabloiding' someone seems like the most normie friendly word to use, as it conveys an immediately identifiable concept. You're just using a person as a form of gossip and discussion, as any other celebrity featured in the checkout line.
Idk. Tabloids have a trashy connotation to them. I prefer sunshining, like someone mentioned above us
 
In 2025 I need the community at large to stop using the word "doxing" to describe legal information gathering and switch to anything else. The following terms have been suggested, including both verbs which describe the act of looking something up, and the noun which describes a compilation of this information.
This is the same level as YouTube self-censorship (unalive, sewerslide, corn, etc.). I’m sorry but I thought free speech was one of the foundations of this site.
 
I didn't notice the definition change, I just thought that others take it more seriously when you share someone's private information such as real name and home address.
The term deanonymize already exists, though phonebooking has a nice ring to it.
Yeah, that's the term we used to use on Russian imageboards. Or "deanon" for short.
 
The use of a word, which now describes a crime, to describe things which are not criminal, is detrimental to our interests and long-term prospects.
I want to argue with this, and in a rational world I would, but things being what they are I kind of see it. Sucks, but I see it.

FWIW, something Dong Gone posted was the first time I had ever seen "unmasking" used.

Edit:
My thought at the time:

Phantom Of The Opera - Unmasking Scene (1925)
 
Phonebooking
I like "whitepaging"

A reminder that this information was once understood to be publicly accessible, and by using the word White it implies Goodness

Hard to believe back in the 80s killer robots could dox people at public phonebooths
 

Attachments

  • smqnwdxsrms51.png
    smqnwdxsrms51.png
    810.3 KB · Views: 41
I'm still not convinced word filters are as non-risky as people generally think. Filtering is plausibly an editorial action.

If a mod deletes a post, or edits it in a way that's very clear that that's what they did, sure, everyone already knows the status of those actions. Direct word filtering may be harder to argue for if someone shows up asking why what they typed didn't show up as they intended it.
 
Back