"Doxing" in 2025

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
maybe for "doxxing", it would be cool to have one of those 'secret' emojis that replaces a word with an emoji?
 
  • Dumb
Reactions: Mondo Slight
Redefining doxing is cringe in the first place, 'phonebooking' sounds retarded. Keep using doxing, this doesn't need to be changed
Letting retarded people win is retarded, but unfortunately dox is now a legal term. So the retards went crying to the government and the government actually listened. Accept your big Fell For It Again award and enjoy the word filter.
 
I won't support unmasking since it's what the troons use for doxing, and Sunshining reminds me of Ralph's sunsetting (I know the term exists elsewhere). 411 is the catchiest, Receipts is the most straight-forward.
We all know Skeeting is the correct answer, but I digress. Pulling someone's receipts is the most likely to succeed since that's a term already used in online discussion, but 411 would be simple enough to popularize while still being fancy.

...maybe Quiz / Trivia? If you've got someone's info you know enough to take a quiz on them. Calling someone's personal info. Trivia sort of already exists with celebrity fans who memorize the names of their first idol's first dog's plushie.
"Here's some trivia on Nick Fuentes: [info]"
 
Phonebooking is obviously the best term to use if we want something that won't just get realigned to mean what "doxxing" means now.
I don't know. I feel like "phonebooking" or "whitepaging", while they accurately convey what's going on and why it shouldn't be illegal (ie., all the information involved is obtainable through public sources already, so any effort to outlaw compiling it would be absurd), they're unique jargon that would be easy to throw on the euphemism treadmill. I prefer just using normal terms to describe what you're doing, since that's harder to turn into a scary phrase for a newspaper headline. "Deanonymizing" is probably my preferred term, because it conveys an intent that is legally innocent and morally neutral.

You're just revealing who someone is, with publicly available data. There's no further intent to act on that knowledge and it can, in fact, serve other purposes than harassment. Lolcows with their details fully published tend to be involved in behavior that employers, or even potential partners, deserve to know about because it could lead to real-world consequences for anyone getting involved with the cow. Having information to compare makes identification a lot easier.
 
Last edited:
What's the point of adding IRL info of lolcows here anyway? All it does is make the site an easy target.
I get following them through their foibles online, that's the point of the gossip forum, however adding personal information like addresses, workplaces, and other such information can be taken as a tacit approval or a nod and a wink to harass them in real life, even if not meant as such. This site does become an easy target for providing such information, especially since normies won't know doxbin etc., but do know "the notorious doxxing site" Kiwifarms. I mean anyone who wants can find that information but providing it openly does ask the question; Why?
I agree people should use more restraint on it, collecting info purely to prove you can is kind of cringe, and sets an adverserial tone when the goal should be mirth. I only post things I find if they're funny, or add to the narrative of the cow in some significant way, there's no real reason to post what specific house they live in or whatever unless it's amusing they live in a shithole while bragging about living in a mansion like when Dick had an Opsec Accident. I think that should be left up to users though.
 
Back