US Babies Being Found in Dumpsters After Texas Abortion Ban

https://futurism.com/neoscope/babies-dumpsters-abortion-ban

https://archive.ph/APadl

Jan 2, 4:51 PM EST / by Frank Landymore

Babies Being Found in Dumpsters After Texas Abortion Ban​

Unbelievably grim.​

Two years on, the consequences of the Texas abortion ban are almost too grim to contemplate: amidst a surge in infant mortality, babies are being found discarded in dumpsters, ditches, curbsides, and garbage trucks, the Washington Post reports.

This year, there have been at least 18 cases of abandoned infants in the state, according to Texas Department of Family and Protective Services figures cited by WaPo. That's more than double the number documented ten years ago, the newspaper notes.

"There apparently has been... a little bit of an epidemic on this," said a sheriff's official for Houston's surrounding county, where the body of an infant was found in a roadside ditch this summer, as quoted by WaPo. The morbid discovery was made by a landscaping crew.

The Texas ban, which went into effect in 2021, is considered the most draconian in the nation. It makes no exceptions even in cases of rape or incest, leaving women with no legal means of stopping unwanted pregnancies.

And according to independent research from the nonprofit Commonwealth Fund, the percentage of women without access to healthcare is the highest in the country, per WaPo. The already desperate circumstances are even worse for pregnant undocumented immigrants, who may avoid going to a clinic to seek care for fear of being deported.

"All of these intersectional things could be leading to this," Blake Rocap, a lawyer with the Sissy Farenthold Reproductive Justice Defense Project at the University of Texas at Austin, told WaPo. The issue is exacerbated by the state's "abysmal" access to prenatal care, he added, "particularly for people without private insurance, particularly for people without immigration status."

In addition to the harrowing rise of infant abandonment, Texas currently has the eighth highest rate of teenage births, per US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention data, with over 20 cases per 1,000 teens aged between 15 and 19, compared to 13.6 nationwide. It also has the 13th worst maternal mortality in the country, with around 28 deaths for every 100,000 live births.

All the while, the state's Republican leadership has slashed funding for women's health and reproductive care.

But the problem isn't only the abortion ban and the poor access to care, according to critics. It's also the lack of education on the issue. State lawmakers have continued to cut funding for an awareness campaign that would inform mothers what to do when they decide they can't keep their baby, the WaPo said, despite enjoying a budget surplus well over $30 billion.

Texas has "safe haven" laws that let mothers anonymously relinquish newborn babies at designated locations without risk of prosecution — measures that are often used to downplay the cruelty of the abortion ban. But little to no effort is being made to let women know that these alternatives exist, let alone fund them.

This is plain even to opponents of abortion.

"Women don't know what to do," Shelley Sekula-Gibbs, a former congresswoman and director of The Woodlands township, told WaPo. "We have to educate, to give them more choices, to give them a chance to provide a loving home for their child."

 

[Netizennameless]

Welp, I guess I can't get an abortion, so I guess I'll do the next best thing: throw my fucking child into a dumpster.

I actually prefer this because the women killing their children now are legally murderers.

 

[Begemot]

Oh wow, evil baby killing sluts will still kill babies out of convenience? Who could have possibly have seen that coming?!



Did you forget you already posted with your alt or something? Also, the lie that babies are being killed due to rape and incest is one of the most bald faced, dishonest tactics that demons trot out to justify killing infants; all evidence shows it barely ever happens. Even when it does, you don't get to kill babies just because the circumstances of their creation are unsavory.

You flogs are so easy to bait. The first post was stuttering when the site wasn't loading so I just copied it.

 

[Deus Exica]

Now it just shows these women for what they really are, unrepentant murderers who enjoy killing their own children. There are accountability free and guiltless ways to put your children up for adoption. There is nothing but pure evil in your intentions to dump an infant where it will assuredly die AFTER you gave birth to it.

May they all burn in Hell.

 

[biglurker]

Alright. What is the race of the women doing this?

WTF is this image supposed to convey? Do they think everyone that stepped into Texas is pro-life? Its obvious that pro-lifers aren't letting their children die in ditches.
Why is it shot like one of those 4/k/ "gun with feet" memes that were big 4 years ago?

 

[God of Nothing]

Alright. What is the race of the women doing this?

WTF is this image supposed to convey? Do they think everyone that stepped into Texas is pro-life? Its obvious that pro-lifers aren't letting their children die in ditches.
Why is it shot like one of those 4/k/ "gun with feet" memes that were big 4 years ago?

it's that absolute non sequitur response of
>"If you're really pro-life, you would take care of this baby that isn't yours."
just ignore they're leaving babies to die instead of actually taking them to the people willing to do this

 

[AllieKat]

That's more than double the number documented ten years ago, the newspaper notes.

It's still under 100 a year which is far less than the abortions per year were prior to the law.

Also this is directly correlated to the increased number of illegal beaners who shit out kids like rabbits and the males think the age of consent is 10. Of course you're going to get more third world behavior with the more third worlders you have.

 

[Ravier Xavenblood]

TELL US WHAT COLOR THE DEAD BABIES ARE

The vast majority of them aren't white. Almost a given.

 

[Otterly]

anonymous, punishment-free safe surrender is absolutely a life-saver.

Yeah. There needs to be much better awareness of this among the immigrants and communities doing this. ‘Not letting us kill babies resulting abandoned babies’ isn’t an argument. Healthy babies get adopted, it’s older kids in foster care who don’t. All these surrendered babies will get a chance at a decent life.

How many of these are border hoppers and illegals? This isn’t solvable with ‘abortion on tap.’ It has to be stopping the border invasion, stopping the coyotes who rape women and girls along the way, stopping rampant rape of women and girls in immigrant communities, and much better visibility of safe surrender. Along with a stick, because if you abandon a living baby in a crusher you’re leaving it to die and should face the penalty for that. This is the result of a society where life is devalued, abortion isn’t solving this

 

[Sargon's wife's son]

You know I love how people don't realise that firehouses have programmes like this churches and these have been known about for decades I even had a section in my health class about them

 

[Gef Mongoose]

You flogs are so easy to bait. The first post was stuttering when the site wasn't loading so I just copied it.

No one does that here, you retard.


Surrendering a baby to a fire station or hospital will absolutely bring less shame than leaving it in a dumpster would be. Police departments are using programs like 23 And Me to find out the mothers of these babies. They’re even solving these kinds of cases from 30-40 years ago.

 

[Chandelier]

Now as to the debate on rape? That is where adoption comes into play. Pro-Abort shitheads would like us all to believe that women carrying a rape baby to term is looked down by ALL in society. That couldn't be further from the truth as the vast majority of Non-Costal Elitists aren't shitheads.

You do, though, especially if the baby is mixed race. I've seen plenty of 'based' men drop the ball and then call the woman a 'dumb bitch' who is spoiled now because she's a single mother with a sprog. There was a Lifesite news article shared on Twitter by Harasaka Aryan (sic) about a teenager who was raped by a black teen and decided to continue the pregnancy. The father wanted the abortion, she said no. The article praised her bravery. Half the comments were calling her brave, the rest were calling her a mudshark who would never be wedded by a nice, white religious man because now he has to take on the responsibility of raising another man's child. That is the end result: even if these women do the right thing and keep the child, she's still a mudshark who 'expects' another man to be the father of her child - which you shame in articles where there is no rape and abortion involved. She might have saved the kid, but now she's 'spoiled meat' and a single mother - who bring the downfall of society as I've heard.

No one does that here, you retard.


Surrendering a baby to a fire station or hospital will absolutely bring less shame than leaving it in a dumpster would be. Police departments are using programs like 23 And Me to find out the mothers of these babies. They’re even solving these kinds of cases from 30-40 years ago.

The article states that safe haven laws exist and that there are places to take these kids, but no effort is made to show women this. Whose fault is that when you have pro-lifers complaining? They get a lot of money for their pregnancy crisis centers. Where are they?

 

[Larry David's Opera Cape]

Let's be real, all those babies are probably black

Actually dumpstering the baby looks to be a characteristic beaner behavior. The blacks either find a way to yeetus the fetus anyhow, or keep it and abuse it for welfare bux. The unwanted black kids die later, shaken baby or thrown out a window by Tyrone or beaten to death etc. Whenever they catch someone in the act of dumping a kid, it usually ends up being a case of oprima numero dos para espanol.

 

[ZsaZsaBinks]

Why can’t they leave them at Safe Baby Sites?

 

[Frostnipped Todger]

This year, there have been at least 18 cases of abandoned infants in the state, according to Texas Department of Family and Protective Services figures cited by WaPo. That's more than double the number documented ten years ago, the newspaper notes.

OK, so an 80% increase... The legal population has increased 17.5% in that time, and God knows how many illegals are in Texas right now.
Plus the aforementioned babies that are brought across the border and then dumped, or who die along the way.
Doesn't seem like abortion laws made a significant difference.

They run the risk of being spotted and confronted if they abandon them in places that may have people around like firehouses, churches or hospitals. Imagine not only being known as an incompetent retard but also as a mother who abandons her baby to die, could even be arrested for it.

This is spectacularly retarded logic. Who is going to see you if you drop a baby off at emergency at 2am on a Tuesday? Also, seeing someone go through a pregnancy, then not be pregnant, and reading about a dead baby in a dumpster is going to raise more eyebrows than being able to say "I gave my baby up for adoption".
Also, you can't be arrested for leaving you baby in the designated "safe" areas. That's why they exist.

All this talk about the women yet I hear nothing about the men who impregnated them or refused to use protection. Condoms are cheap, pulling out is easy. But no, the "I'm gonna cooom I need to do it in a woman" takes over and now you have a pregnancy.

30 years ago, I would have agreed. I've never gotten anyone pregnant, because i grew up in a state without abortion.
30 years ago though, it wasn't considered normal or acceptable to fuck a different person every week,or even two or three times a week to prop up your ego. When you are having (essentially) anonymous sex, the sad fact is that the woman has to take responsibility for her own health. How do you track down "random dude #6" from tinder if he doesn't reply? How can you prove it wasn't "random dude #5, or #4"?
Is it fair? No. Is it reality? Yes.

Edit: speeling.

 

[Toji Suzuhara]

There was a Lifesite news article shared on Twitter by Harasaka Aryan (sic) about a teenager who was raped by a black teen and decided to continue the pregnancy. The father wanted the abortion, she said no. The article praised her bravery. Half the comments were calling her brave, the rest were calling her a mudshark who would never be wedded by a nice, white religious man because now he has to take on the responsibility of raising another man's child. That is the end result: even if these women do the right thing and keep the child, she's still a mudshark who 'expects' another man to be the father of her child - which you shame in articles where there is no rape and abortion involved. She might have saved the kid, but now she's 'spoiled meat' and a single mother - who bring the downfall of society as I've heard.

Hayasaka Aryan is a Twitter groyper anime gimmick account. You are literally using the audience of Twitter groyper anime gimmick accounts as if it were representative of reality

 

[Safir]

Most are too stupid to even understand "close your legs or at least use protection", so really, what's to expect of people like this?

These are not the same, and a lot of anti-abortionists in the thread are wrong, only the Catholics are mostly right. Abstinence+contraception is probably where the line should be legally drawn, but ethically it's unsound. (I pick on you specifically because you wrote "protection", which is whorespeak.)

If to be born is better than to not be born, then it does not matter whether the woman had an abortion or used a contraceptive. (Murdering a born baby is much worse, because it's not her body anymore.) If contraception is not bad, then, when it "fails", it's not evil to "repair" the "wrong" and kill the unborn baby. And the other way around, if killing unborn babies is evil, so's contraception (or rather contraception-aided whoring).

Ethically, the only place where a line can be drawn is after closed legs. Contraception is onanism. Simply looking at the world and observing the consequences of nonstop onanism shows how obviously true this is.

Once you accept that a nonexistent baby and an unborn baby have the same rights, the other corollaries are resolved how most people would like them to be:
- It's evil to cause a woman to miscarry a wanted baby and it's evil to stop a woman from conceiving a wanted baby
- It's OK to abort a rape baby, because the woman didn't spread her legs voluntarily.

 

[Fapcop]

Even assuming that any of this is true, and not the result of something else, like illegals flooding across… HOW IS THIS NOT PROGRESS?!?

Those kids found abandoned in a dumpster and brought to a hospital, would be DEAD if they had been aborted?!

 

[National Defense Advocate]

Women be like "Either you're killing my baby, or I'M killing my baby".
Truly, where have all the good women gone?

 

[Gef Mongoose]

What prevents these women from looking into their options themselves? Unless it’s an actual child, you shouldn’t have to have your hand held through everything in life. You can’t convince me that these same women aren’t walking around with internet access and iPhones.
It’s mongoloid thinking that your only other solution rather than abortion is to throw a baby in the dumpster.

 

[Bakarina]

New Mexico allows abortions up until birth and you still have spics yeeting their freshly born children into trash cans. California too. And pretty much everywhere else.

It doesn't have to do with abortion bans and everything to do with certain individuals not valuing life.