Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 62 15.6%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 5 1.3%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 101 25.4%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 70 17.6%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 160 40.2%

  • Total voters
    398
I'm intrigued by the psychological dynamics at play when content creators experience a public downward spiral, yet maintain a devoted following despite clear misconduct.
What cognitive mechanisms enable such steadfast loyalty in the face of mounting evidence to the contrary?
Does this phenomenon have a name?
It basically always comes from ignorance, largely just out of happenstance.
- People don't follow a creator closely enough (they don't watch that regularly, just listen in the background, etc.), so they don't notice the creator's changes in behavior.

- People just aren't that invested and they just don't care that much about this online stuff, so they can't be bothered to investigate anything that gets said about a creator beyond what they can see for themselves. If it doesn't come up obviously in the show, then it doesn't exist, and they've already forgotten what was alleged.

- People don't have any experience in their own lives with alcoholics or drug addicts, so they aren't able to recognize what's going on with the creator.

- People don't follow the creator on other sites, and/or they don't follow adjacent communities online, so they don't ever hear about news or rumors related to the creator.

- People can't reconcile a rumor that they hear with all that they've seen from the creator over the years and all that they think they know about the guy—and since the rumor is just a sliver of information compared to everything that they've seen from watching the creator, they just dismiss the rumor (it must just be another creator's jealousy, slander, shitposting, etc.), and they don't look into it any further.

- People dismiss issues that come up with a creator over a long period of time, one by one, thinking that each of them is just an unsubstantiated rumor, a one-off thing, or a minor quirk where, sure, it's weird (like the bottle-sniffing), but you can look past it—so they just don't notice the overall pattern that well, since half of the evidence for it is stuff that wasn't sufficiently proven at the time and got filed away in their mind as "excused." The more slowly a person encounters bits of evidence and excuses them one-by-one, the more any new piece of evidence will seem like "just another attack against this poor guy whom people are always persecuting."

- Some people are just too nice and guileless, so much so that they can't even imagine some of the stuff that's being accused, and they just don't want to believe that a creator could be as bad as people say—so they reject the rumors out of hand, they listen to the creator when he denies it because they want to believe that version of reality, and they don't double-check any of it.

I know that "mental illness" and "retardation" are the fun meme answers, but I think that, for the overwhelming majority of stragglers in an audience like Nick's, they just haven't yet noticed or understood the stuff that people like us know about. Whatever it was that finally pushed you over the edge, they just haven't come across that stuff yet.

Sure, there are the "sunk cost" people in an audience who have just invested too much in a creator, either emotionally or through superchats, to ever believe what's being alleged—but I don't think that this can account for that much of Nick's remaining audience. Superchat whales are rare, and so are insane people who will outright deny reality even when they're forced to confront it.

Even for the people who have just been drip-fed rumors and are primed to disbelieve them now, or for the nice soccer moms who have never even seen drugs in their life and can't imagine that a good Christian man would bring them into his family's home, *gasp*, I think that even they could be convinced if you just sat them down and showed them enough evidence. It's not impossible for them to come around. But it would take a long fucking time, if it ever happens. Most people are normies, perfectly content to never look into any of this shit.
 
What was the context of his kiwifags quip?
He was gloating about how he was totally getting another gorillion dollars when his Rumble deal got renewed, while we were dumbly saying that obviously it wasn't going to get renewed.

(It didn't get renewed.)

It's basically emblematic of the Retardkieta policy of prematurely and smugly gloating about future victories he's absolutely certain about, which Kiwis point out are obviously not going to happen, then he gets curbstomped by reality (while smugly and skeletally eating a single Dorito).
 
Last edited:
Nick doesn't have a way to "come back" to streaming, the moment he does there will be at least two shows much bigger than his 70-retard strong audience which will scrutinize his every movement and word; it has been established he cannot handle the scrutiny and will sperg out when it happens and, more importantly, will often times do so in a way that is contrary to whatever 'principles' he still claims to espouse, losing him even more of his already famelic support --the time he turned into a flaggot and started threatening people over a fucking locals post comes to mind.

The only reason some of you perceive he could potentially make a comeback and holds any form of an audience is because this nigger has spent the better part of the year not streaming, he has not had a chance to further piss off whatever paltry support he has and spiral into an even bigger public spectacle because he has been hiding like the little scared bitch that he is.

Any attempt at a comeback is going to explode in his face, his internet career and fame remains only feasible in the realm of cowdom.
 
Last edited:
Last night proved to me that Nick will have a medium-successful comeback.
Nick used to do an absurd amount of streaming because he was lonely, bored and attention-starved. He stopped when partying provided him with a better fix. If that's not an option for a couple years, he'll probably be back to more regular streaming.

His success will be limited by how much of an audience there is for The Nick Rekieta Show. It's unlikely he can bring himself to consistently talk about topics that are not Nick Rekieta. Two years ago he was already spazzing out over having to do trial coverage, and he's only deteriorated since then.

 
Last edited:
Is 'JF' the Canadian killer?
JF Gariepy has thread here. But to summarize he is French Canadian autist. Who married woman that was on mental level of 10 year old child. One day his wife vanished and JF claims he dropped her in middle of wilderness without any survival gear. And according to him his wife left her young children to live undercover life. Last time anyone seen her was summer 2023. JF is being investigated , by Cucknadian police and did and said lot of sus stuff. That convinced lot people that he murdered her.
 
ALERT ALERT ALERT! Missive From The Court Of Balldo!

Paypig-only Locals post:

1736073777692.png
 
Last edited by a moderator:
ALERT ALERT ALERT! Missive From The Court Of Balldo!

Paypig-only Locals post:

View attachment 6822670
My fuck he vague-posts more than a teenage girl. Even worse, he always backs out of actually saying anything. We still don't know about his "worst day ever", "corruption in the courts", or the "real story he can't tell".

Originally I was thinking this had to do with his computer access crimes, although that seems unlikely to have any updates on a Saturday night. For now, I'm going to assume he was diagnosed with AIDS, since he is such an insufferable faggot.
 
My fuck he vague-posts more than a teenage girl. Even worse, he always backs out of actually saying anything.
I couldn't agree more.

I feel like he may not realize that people fill in the blanks and come up with things that may be worse than the truth, although the truth is usually pretty bad with him.
 
I feel like he may not realize that people fill in the blanks and come up with things that may be worse than the truth, although the truth is usually pretty bad with him.
I used to think the same, then experience showed in his case the truth is always worse, no matter what wild flight of fancy some sped here does.
 
ALERT ALERT ALERT! Missive From The Court Of Balldo!

Paypig-only Locals post:

View attachment 6822670

So what has the last year been for you rackets? 5 days ago it was something that almost made you kill yourself while the courts kicked you while you were down. Today, you call it just some weird surreal bullshit that continuously surprises you.

My guess is still that he's eventually going to admit that half the bad shit that has been accused is 90% accurate, but you see actually it's not his fault because X was actually done by Y, and he only just found out about it wow how crazy anyway lets stream and leave the past in the past haha am i right guys.
 
Back