- Joined
- May 26, 2020
Whatever the replacement term for doxing may be, I feel LFJ and co will redefine the definition to that of hate and harassment.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Just as they always do. There's no working with them and any attempt at capitulation is cucking out.Whatever the replacement term for doxing may be, I feel LFJ and co will redefine the definition to that of hate and harassment.
EXPLICITLY not adding wordfilters dudewordfilters
It's to keep people in line. Sad to say it, but the implied threat of "something bad" happening if you step outside of the established social framework has been a remarkably effective means of ensuring that society doesn't just spiral into a state where the common man or woman has to worry about looking out their window and seeing somebody picking up dog turds off the sidewalk and eating them with a huge grin on their face.Realistically, there’s no valid justification for having the home address on a thread—it almost always serves malicious purposes, and even if we are not the ones fucking with people, they can always point finger at us because we are the ones that have their addresses on the website, i have always wondered, if we are not gonna fuck with people, why do we need to know where they currently live?
I think you should delete all wordfilters that let the post still go up. In an altered form. You can add filters that hold a post for moderator review or delete it, but see touc\hing th\e p\o\op pozloading my negholep and 8\)EXPLICITLY not adding wordfilters dude
Its a legal precaution element. Kiwi farms is not new to dealing with defamation and lies against it, but if KIWI FARMS posts say "doxing", and legal functions see doxing as "harassment", then a guy who says "lets dox pedodograpist557" is essentially also saying "lets harass pedodograpist557" under some arguments. And while nobody empathizes with the person, that would open up legal scrutiny. Even if hidden behind a filter, if anyone could sluthe out the filterthose who hate the website would likely continue labeling it as a hub for "doxxing and harassment." or the "tranny killing website"
For your average person, sharing private information like home addresses or phone numbers, (even if publicly accessible) is universally regarded as a bad thing.
how can we pretend to be a harmless website made to laugh at retards when we are intimidating people then?It's to keep people in line. Sad to say it, but the implied threat of "something bad" happening if you step outside of the established social framework has been a remarkably effective means of ensuring that society doesn't just spiral into a state where the common man or woman has to worry about looking out their window and seeing somebody picking up dog turds off the sidewalk and eating them with a huge grin on their face.
You think I'm joking, but I'm not.
Intimidation isn't a thing JUST because someone feels intimidated. And its public informationhow can we pretend to be a harmless website made to laugh at retards when we are intimidating people then?
A lot of the website is gossip/tabloid stuff. Some sections have high quality content, and even in weaker threads there are usually a few good research posts, but it isn't on the whole super high brow.how can we pretend to be a harmless website made to laugh at retards when we are intimidating people then?
Try typing 8\) and touc\hing th\e p\o\op without the slashes.Why did the word filters get deleted? I thought they were funny.
To nig / got nigged would definitely work, and would also likely be obfuscated by the other mature and well-adjusted banter on the forum.but personally, I'm using 'powerword'
(keeping 'nigger' as a personal favorite, though)
Places like the Farms aren't meant to intimidate people in an active way; the entirety of showing that there are consequences to certain actions is merely a side-effect.how can we pretend to be a harmless website made to laugh at retards when we are intimidating people then?
This isn't the early 2000's anymore- the internet, and the United States in general now are infinitely shittier places now. Just forbit the use of anything that could be construed as dox or "personal information" (regardless as to how publicly available it might be) and focus discussion of lolcows and individuals of interest to gossip and shitposting. How you define and enforce that is outside my knowledge on how to enforce as I have never been a janny or website owner, but I would say it's a warranted discussion if Null is intent on making Lolcow LLC his lifetime career company.
similar things have been said to the sharty admin evendoe they dont listen. albeit nully null isn't a retardGOD unlike froot and doesn't have a raid board.I agree with a lot of your post. You can't post someone's address in a thread and expect anything good to come from it. Null is worried about legal terminology while threads like Boogie2988 have his dox in the opener and every 3rd post is wishing for his death. It doesn't matter how cute you get. If you post someone's address and have posters calling for blood you're going to look bad in the eyes of the law. You can't talk your way out of a cyber crime by using different slang for it.
tsmtNull fucked up hard making this post because it's now evident he wants to rebrand doxing to something else. Any lawyer with 2 working eyes can see this post and say "Your honour, this is Mr. Moon saying they should replace the word dox with unmasking. He is aware every use of unmasking really means doxxing and told his users to do this". There is no way around that so any language policing enforced from on high does nothing to change the situation. It makes it worse because then the admins look like they're trying to hide crimes through word play.
Maybe it would be useful to add this language to the "terms and rules" page:But I'm going to start treating, at a certain point, "I'm doxing this guy" as "I'm harassing this guy" and that is against the rules.
Terms and Rules said:You agree to not use the Service to submit or link to any Content which violates any laws, including but not limited to "doxing" (as defined in, for example, Alabama Code § 13A-11-38, Illinois Public Act 103-0439, and Washington Code § 4.24.790). You are entirely responsible for the content of, and any harm resulting from, that Content or your conduct.
so you want him to ban post of content like home addresses and phone numbers?Maybe it would be useful to add this language to the "terms and rules" page:
You seem upset.BECAUSE
THE WORD
STILL
EXISTS