Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

[( ◠‿◠ )]

What are the implications of Nick intentionally targeting viewers who enjoy watching pedophiles? Why would he think that's the audience that will enjoy watching him?

It's just so funny and weird!

 

[Friend of Dorothy Parker]

EDIT] Divorce law and custody generally favors women, I am not sure how Minnesota law is set up exactly, so her rights might differ a bit from what I am expecting.

Divorce law and custody doesn't generally favor women, but that aside, MN is very explicitly gender-neutral. It's been discussed many times here and elsewhere. They prefer kids have 50-50 parenting time. Child support is a mixed calculation of income (real and imputable) and parenting time and coverage of insurance. Child support base calculations max out at about $150k income. Base child support in this case at 100% time, with some plug assumptions for healthcare insurance costs, came to around, iirc, $3300/month. Did the most recent numbers itt not that long ago.

As for spousal support, presumption is 0 for under (iirc) 5 years, transitional (1-2 years, time for getting some training) for up to 20 years, and permanent after 20. I don't know the standard of living expectations, but given that though children are supposed to maintain standard of living after divorce and virtually NEVER do (and base support calculation in no way accomplishes that, given how low it can be even when one spouse has kids 100% of time and does not work (like $50/mo)), I am sceptical that that pans out.

Of course all of that is for plebes who earn a living, and hnw folks often litigate above ...though it appears that now would be a very bad time (for Kayla) to divorce based on Nick's apparent dearth of earning power.

 

[Rick Nekieta]

Divorce law and custody doesn't generally favor women, but that aside, MN is very explicitly gender-neutral. It's been discussed many times here and elsewhere. They prefer kids have 50-50 parenting time. Child support is a mixed calculation of income (real and imputable) and parenting time and coverage of insurance. Child support base calculations max out at about $150k income. Base child support in this case at 100% time, with some plug assumptions for healthcare insurance costs, came to around, iirc, $3300/month. Did the most recent numbers itt not that long ago.

As for spousal support, presumption is 0 for under (iirc) 5 years, transitional (1-2 years, time for getting some training) for up to 20 years, and permanent after 20. I don't know the standard of living expectations, but given that though children are supposed to maintain standard of living after divorce and virtually NEVER do (and base support calculation in no way accomplishes that, given how low it can be even when one spouse has kids 100% of time and does not work (like $50/mo)), I am sceptical that that pans out.

Of course all of that is for plebes who earn a living, and hnw folks often litigate above ...though it appears that now would be a very bad time (for Kayla) to divorce based on Nick's apparent dearth of earning power.

No wonder the manosphere doesn't pull up and analyze the actual verbiage of the legislation. They act as if a divorce in year 2 entitles the woman to 1/2 assets and 1/2 income for life. The reality is much more balanced.

 

[Gobermental Supervisor]

though it appears that now would be a very bad time (for Kayla) to divorce based on Nick's apparent dearth of earning power.

I think she would be entitled to half of the sale of the main house, if they dissolve the trust that owns it.
And if the trustfund income was used by Nick to pay for general expenses during the marriage it should be included in the income calculations.
If it is capped at 150000$ anyway, I would think the trustfund income alone would get there considering Nick's spending habits.

He is also still a lawyer and can be expected to work in that capacity to earn money.
Money is never easy in a divorce, but given Nick's behavior in the past months and that there appears to be no indicator of him fessing up and admitting his guilt and moving on with his life, but rather a continued attempt to explain away his criminal behavior and degeneracy, I would think it might be a great time for a divorce in terms of custody. Nick is clearly unstable in a very public manner.

 

[Rick Nekieta]

He is also still a lawyer and can be expected to work in that capacity to earn money.

Not until he gets reauthorized

 

[Strix454]

I would think it might be a great time for a divorce in terms of custody. Nick is clearly unstable in a very public manner.

It would be better to wait for the sale of the second home and a point where the outcome of the foreclosure on the other house is known. It would be better to have the finances somewhat settled before the divorce. They also have to wait for the resolution of all their cases in the legal system.

 

[Himedall All-seeing Waifu]

ensuing*

English major, btw.

It niggles me, so I am obliged to correct it when I see it, but he was a Creative Writing major--not English. It is somehow more gay.

close the people renters were family or family friends and would make it hard for him to hide his degeneracy

They were a disadvantage close friend (if not distant family), and Nick whinged about not being able to sell in 2022. When it started, it was a temporary arrangement, but they never got back on their feet to afford to buy the home or pay what Nick considered 'fair' rent.

If they divorce she has a right to expect alimony payments that allow her to keep her standard of living for about the same time as the marriage lasted, minor children can extend this period if she is the primary caregiver and she would be entitled to child support as well.

Divorce law and custody doesn't generally favor women, but that aside, MN is very explicitly gender-neutral. It's been discussed many times here and elsewhere. They prefer kids have 50-50 parenting time. Child support is a mixed calculation of income (real and imputable) and parenting time and coverage of insurance. Child support base calculations max out at about $150k income. Base child support in this case at 100% time, with some plug assumptions for healthcare insurance costs, came to around, iirc, $3300/month. Did the most recent numbers itt not that long ago.

As for spousal support, presumption is 0 for under (iirc) 5 years, transitional (1-2 years, time for getting some training) for up to 20 years, and permanent after 20. I don't know the standard of living expectations, but given that though children are supposed to maintain standard of living after divorce and virtually NEVER do (and base support calculation in no way accomplishes that, given how low it can be even when one spouse has kids 100% of time and does not work (like $50/mo)), I am sceptical that that pans out.

Of course all of that is for plebes who earn a living, and hnw folks often litigate above ...though it appears that now would be a very bad time (for Kayla) to divorce based on Nick's apparent dearth of earning power.

FoDP did the calculations and the online calculators for Minnesota are freely available, as noted above.

I will add the note that. Nick did his 18 year anniversary stream from Hedo II in August of 2022, so they are past the 20 year mark now in 2025.

No wonder the manosphere doesn't pull up and analyze the actual verbiage of the legislation. They act as if a divorce in year 2 entitles the woman to 1/2 assets and 1/2 income for life. The reality is much more balanced.

It is highly dependent on the local laws, but I believe someone in LawTube covered it years ago that alimony is falling more and more out of favour with American courts--though comingled liquid funds are still largely 50-50.

 

[Strix454]

It is highly dependent on the local laws, but I believe someone in LawTube covered it years ago that alimony is falling more and more out of favour with American courts--though comingled liquid funds are still largely 50-50.

Minnesota made big changes to its laws in this area in 2024. Under the old system of alimony, the system was often rather arbitrary and unpredictable. The new law makes things much more fixed and gives courts less arbitrary power either way in divorce cases.

The new law is favorable in terms of alimony for marriages of 20+ years. Not so good for shorter marriages. As far as I understand it, there is no alimony at all for marriages under 5 years and no more than 10 years of alimony for someone married between 5 and 20 years.

The maybe bad thing for Kayla in the new law is that the standard for alimony is no longer based on the standard of living during the marriage. But based both on the standard of living and the extent to which that standard of living was maintained by debt. A wife in a couple living beyond their means is no longer entitled to a lifestyle that was beyond their means.

 

[SargonF00t]

A nanny (from my experience) is like a third parent, minus some authority. My sister nannied in high school, and my mother had to teach her laundry basics because the parents she worked for asked her to do the kids' laundry for them, and clean the house from time to time = mop floors, wipe counters, the basics.

Made me think of the "piles of laundry" Aaron talked about, along with the filth. Proves Nick's nanny was worked to death. I'm sure she left not just because she saw drugs, the workload got to be too much. A nanny can't do laundry for 5 kids, drive them around, and clean an entire house while two degenerate parents do nothing but sit around doing drugs all day. A nanny also doesn't up and quit unless there's problems. Before my sister went off to university, the family threw her a fucking send-off party w/their kids and my family, because she was like part of their family. For his nanny to up and quit, RED FLAG.

Rekieta likely tried to get the Nanny involved in some sex stuff, probably trying to get her to join either himself and Kayla in the hot tub, or when Aaron & April were over.

He probably tried to sell the idea to the nanny, saying she could drink as much as she wanted and stay the night.

 

[Gobermental Supervisor]

The maybe bad thing for Kayla in the new law is that the standard for alimony is no longer based on the standard of living during the marriage. But based both on the standard of living and the extent to which that standard of living was maintained by debt. A wife in a couple living beyond their means is no longer entitled to a lifestyle that was beyond their means.

If the income from the trustfund is considered, then I don't think she would have much to fear.
Nick buying his Rustang and spending 5 figures on drugs every months are his expenses, I do not really see how Kayla contributed to "living above their means".

Nick bought the cringe artwork and visits the cringe paypig events of that artist he got them from.
Considering that Kayla seems to have a functioning familiar support structure, I'd say she would have a good chance to move into a better situation.

Nick on the other hand was already planning his Las Vegas escapades months ago and I don't really see him getting better. The degen lifestyle has taken root.

They are both equally responsible for the situation they ended up in, they could have both looked for and found themselves outside help to get out of the addiction and situation they put themselves in, but none did until they were forced by the long arm of the courts. The only question is, which of the two manages to stay clean and become a productive parent again and who relapses?

 

[Desktop User2]

If the income from the trustfund is considered,

Which income of the trust? Do we even know if he is a beneficiary of the trust?

 

[Pelican Bones]

If the income from the trustfund is considered, then I don't think she would have much to fear.
Nick buying his Rustang and spending 5 figures on drugs every months are his expenses, I do not really see how Kayla contributed to "living above their means".

Nick bought the cringe artwork and visits the cringe paypig events of that artist he got them from.
Considering that Kayla seems to have a functioning familiar support structure, I'd say she would have a good chance to move into a better situation.

Nick on the other hand was already planning his Las Vegas escapades months ago and I don't really see him getting better. The degen lifestyle has taken root.

They are both equally responsible for the situation they ended up in, they could have both looked for and found themselves outside help to get out of the addiction and situation they put themselves in, but none did until they were forced by the long arm of the courts. The only question is, which of the two manages to stay clean and become a productive parent again and who relapses?

Which income of the trust? Do we even know if he is a beneficiary of the trust?

Although it is undeniable he is getting money from somewhere (borne out by the fact of NO JOB) we still have nothing to show that the trust from the grandparents is paying out to Nick. My theory is that some investment was made on Nick's behalf (or company stocks, etc.) that he's getting interest from, but that's pure speculation on my part.

 

[AnOminous]

He is also still a lawyer and can be expected to work in that capacity to earn money.

Lmao no he isn't. His license is gone. And he'll soon be a convicted felon.

It niggles me, so I am obliged to correct it when I see it, but he was a Creative Writing major--not English. It is somehow more gay.

He literally majored in lying.

 

[Catgirl Tyranid]

Although it is undeniable he is getting money from somewhere (borne out by the fact of NO JOB) we still have nothing to show that the trust from the grandparents is paying out to Nick. My theory is that some investment was made on Nick's behalf (or company stocks, etc.) that he's getting interest from, but that's pure speculation on my part.

I think it's way more likely that his parents are just paying his bills.

I bet that's why the mortgage defaulted, Nick didn't tell his parents about it so it wasn't even on their radar. And of course Nick was too busy smoking hookers and blow while building the quover to make the payments himself.

 

[Gobermental Supervisor]

Lmao no he isn't. His license is suspended.

Easily corrected by taking the required educational courses.
He does not even have to take a test, he just has to provide proof he took the courses. Just a formality really.

My point was more that he has a profession he could be expected to work in.
There is no good reason why he could argue to a court why he is unable to.

 

[Strix454]

Although it is undeniable he is getting money from somewhere (borne out by the fact of NO JOB) we still have nothing to show that the trust from the grandparents is paying out to Nick. My theory is that some investment was made on Nick's behalf (or company stocks, etc.) that he's getting interest from, but that's pure speculation on my part.

There are any number of different ways that income can be transferred under this sort of arrangement. One way beyond what has been mentioned so far is nominal employment by a trust. The person is given some form of paid employment within the trust which can in cases require very little to no effort or responsibility. The advantage of giving family members jobs within a trust is the benefit (the job and the income) can be terminated far more easily than direct payments from a trust.

 

[AnOminous]

Easily corrected by taking the required educational courses.

Being a convicted felon is not so easily corrected and he'll soon be that.

And if he's several years behind on the CLE, and he has probably done absolutely zero, it will take a considerable period of time to fix. Not "easily corrected" at all. Especially for a wet-brained retard whose every utterance makes it clear that basic mental functions are now beyond his ability.

 

[RudyRayMoore]

Rekieta is identified as an expert witness for the defense in Texas v Riley Dalton with a jury trial scheduled for 1/21/2025. This is three days before crackieta's plea hearing on 1/24/2025. Unknown if a Zoom appearance is allowed, or if he must travel to Texas to participate. So what subject matter is he qualified to be an expert to testify given his own situation, and how could his testimony be used against him in his own case? Also of note, April has her in-person contested Ominbus hearing on 1/21/2024.

Additional court filings for Riley's case: https://kiwifarms.net/threads/state...on-mix-a-k-a-youngclippa.205836/post-20196642

 

[Desktop User2]

Although it is undeniable he is getting money from somewhere (borne out by the fact of NO JOB) we still have nothing to show that the trust from the grandparents is paying out to Nick. My theory is that some investment was made on Nick's behalf (or company stocks, etc.) that he's getting interest from, but that's pure speculation on my part.

Since I´m not a Niggieta guy, I dont know about his beginnings. Did he use to live with anything close to this largesse before blowing up on Youtube? I know the house was (most) certainly paid by his mother and given to them but are there any indications he received any other funds to get by?

 

[Oliver Onions]

It niggles me, so I am obliged to correct it when I see it, but he was a Creative Writing major--not English. It is somehow more gay.

That certainly explains why he's constantly making shit up.