Live updates: Brush fire burns in Pacific Palisades as Santa Ana winds blast Southern California - Live video at link

Surely California would be able to pull tankers from somewhere to ferry seawater or a municipal supply from elsewhere. A poor alternative to pulling off hydrants, but an alternative nonetheless.

I’ve performed tanker ops from a pond before in ruralfuckistan, but pulling from the ocean is a new one on me.
One Department I've worked with had a really neat setup for drawing from Long Island Sound. They had a tricked out Unimog with a large pump jutting from the front bumper. They would drive it down the beach and nose it into the water and start pumping. It worked surprisingly well. Granted they weren't dealing with Ocean surf. Another department had an old WW2 surplus Duck with a pump rig. Once it left the fire house it could not climb the steep hill from the harbor to get back. They would have to winch it back up. Scariest thing I ever saw. As it also really did not have anything resembling brakes. But it could float there and feed a couple of 3" supply lines. Assuming it didn't sink... again.
 
Last night, not far from me.
IMG_2582.jpegIMG_2588.jpegIMG_2589.jpeg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The person I was replying to asked a question about California wildfires in general.

Nobody gives a fuck about LA, it should make like the Salton Sea and die of AIDS, and no it doesn’t get a normal amount of rainfall or it wouldn’t need to steal water from the rest of the state, like the part that does agriculture
The agricultural areas use more water than the entirety of LA does.

If we were to restrict populations to areas sustainable from natural rainfall without irrigation the entire southwest would be vacant.
 
I'm hoping for it so bad bros, and that shitty fucking giant sign they have
don't worry, they have a great defense!
1736365799731.png
real talk though, sentiments echo @Bronze Age Baddie's:
Bit hesitant to wish such a death on people but watching them flee their seaside mansions a few months after saying the hollers of appalachia deserved to collapse and drown, best I can do is a "you voted for this".
 
The peasants who just kinda live with their moms to save up and commute to work (ie: serving fruity frappuccinos to wealthy retards, or bagging groceries) are entirely fucked.

Everything is so shit here, alot of those "peasants" are stuck living in that purgatory no matter how hard you try to get out of it. Seriously, I feel bad for the people losing their houses. But this entire state also fucking deserves everything that happens. We created our own hell because 99% of californians are fucking spastic retards who keep voting for the same Crony Capitalist Democrat shit bags every single time and then wondering why most of us live in fucking misery.
 
But California basically doesn't have forests, it has brush that burns bright, and some trees. If it was actually a desert, it'd be much more fire resistant, instead, it gets some rain in spring, grows really green and lush for a short time, and then dies and burns.
Bruh have you ever been north of Santa Rosa or looked at it on a map?

Granted northern California (true north not the bay area) is more philosophically and culturally Oregon but it is still technically California.

21Redwood-national-park-pathway-through-the-redwoods-giants-1358731113.jpg580ce90ef3b18a864f2e93f9cfe765b9-222401975.jpg
 
Can some Burger knowledgeable with the subject educate us Euros why those huge wildfires can't be properly prevented?
There are 3 things I remember off the top of my head.

1. California has crystal-hippie-bitch environmental policy that makes the usual bits of forestry you’d do to stop this shit impossible. This is the most obvious part that helps these massive fires.

2. They’re incredibly hypocritical about said environmental policy particularly in regards to agriculture. They have a nasty habit of growing water hungry crops in the desert and fucking up their water table.

3. They plant a fuckton of eucalyptus trees for some reason. These tend to literally explode of you get them hot enough.

This is the stuff of nightmares, but I can’t really make myself get too attached considering this happens to the state on a very regular basis
 
Last edited:
But California basically doesn't have forests, it has brush that burns bright, and some trees. If it was actually a desert, it'd be much more fire resistant, instead, it gets some rain in spring, grows really green and lush for a short time, and then dies and burns.
Nigger you what, the entire northern half of the state is a forest of the biggest trees on earth. Which are also fire resistant.
They plant a fuckton of eucalyptus trees for some reason. They tend to literally explode of you get the hot enough.
No one has planted a eucalyptus on purpose for like a hundred years, they just grow like weeds by themselves.
 
I was thinking, how is it possible that a fire-prone state could only use seawater in a glorified bucket-line way, from fire truck to fire truck? Why wouldn't they have pulled together a contingency plan after all this time?

Of course, the answer is that they WANT the state to burn in the name of climate change. Welp, be careful what you wish for I guess.
Because generally you don't actually pump seawater inland unless you are cooling a nuclear reactor or digging a shipping canal. Relay Pumping IS the contingency plan. The problem is the high winds are grounding the aerial firefighting teams.
 
Back