Seeing as how you are too stupid/from california im going to explain it very slowly with apple's and orange's.
With almost all natural disasters all you can do is keep everything up to standar and pray, that includes hurricanes, earthquakes, floods, tornados, fires, etc.
California is going to burn, its part of the natural cicle/consequence of having a bunch of schizos and thats fine, but buddy, you can take measures so when your state burns its not as devastating.
But guess what, every time that piece of shit state burns nobody does anything, they just shrug and pretend there was nothing they could have done dood, and when asked why they never implemented one of the hundreds of fire prevention policies that have worked across the world they just sperg out and say MUH ENVIROMENT!
California isn't a unicorn enviroment, there are places as equally as shit when it comes to fires and guess what? They don't fucking burn to the ground every week.
Like i said before, they had DECADES to start getting their shit together, they have refused to do so and now they can reap what they have sown.
Fuck.Em
You're talking shit. This isn't some place like it was in the 50s with a fraction of the population - it is a resource intensive state that without provision of resource wouldn't support the populace it has, it has overgrown itself. Sure, there have been poor policies but nothing in those policies created a drought; reduced humidity and turned the forests into tinderboxes.
I don't see you lecturing people for living in tornado alley; or on coast that constantly get wasted by storms.
Fires are going to happen where you have climate like this regardless of your planning. Now you can call it stupid to live in such a lace where fires are going to happen and I'll call that fair and square if you can also admit building house on the coast is equally as stupid.
Surprise surprise that most of these places burning right now have not actually burned in a very long time, so it isn't like every few years a fire breaks out outside of Pasadena or Runyon Canyon that you can point to and say "see, it happens all the time". Much like homes on the coast, maybe it will get hit, maybe not.
They haven't refused to get their shit together - they have had conflicts of interest which all have their points, in a densely populated state that experiences this type of event with some regularity. But keep in mind how little actually burns given the actual size of the state - it's a tiny amount. Much as they manage natural disasters in other parts of the country where it can be expected, planned for, but not avoided.
You talk like fires destroy thousands of square miles of populated areas all the time there, and it isn't so.
Given the size of California, no fires have ever "burned it to the ground" in living memory as you allude to, so do tell em what other parts of the country have their forests, their climate and regularly burn, but don't burn to the ground (not that LA nor California ever actually has?
