Megathread Trannies posting their L's Online - Heckin valid people posting their funny misfortunes on the internet

[Nero Fiddled]

1. We will always exist, this could all be the dying scream of the last of the patriarchy

The only screaming I've heard has been from the butthurt troons as the public say "enough is enough"

 

[BaldCharles]

Oh boy, we have an absolute disaster brewing here...

reddit post

​

Spoiler: My boyfriend doesn't know I'm trans…

Hi!
Before I tell you everything: I know many people will think what I've done is so bad, and I know that what I did was wrong and unfair to my boyfriend because I didn't give him the chance to decide if he wanted to be with a trans woman or not. I'm not naive or anything and I know how sort of dangerous it is. I didn't mean any harm. Everything just happened, and maybe I was too blind and followed my feelings too quickly.

Half year ago, I was a very shy, lonely 21 yo trans girl. I never talked to anyone, couldn't imagine anyone finding me attractive or loving me. I couldn't even make friends to talk to. I don't know why. Nobody but my family knew I was trans, and I "pass" really well. I never believed people who told me I was pretty. By that time, I had already fully transitioned (started hrt and got bottom surgery few years ago) and was much more confident than before, but still not as confident as others. I can't imagine being like that now. Back then, I was just existing and I wasn’t REALLY living.

One day, in "high school" or "college" (it's in between and I’m not sure what exactly it's called in English since I live in Austria but atm I'm sort of "finishing high school without being in ACTUAL highschool" because I dropped out during my transition), I started talking to a guy. Usually, I hate it when random guys approach me, and I'm always cold and dismissive and so unfriendly to them, but I already knew him from school and liked him and found him attractive. We had similar interests (honestly, I was also curious and so interested in his background in Central Asia and his life story but I'll get to that), and this was all new for me. I didn't know what to think of it. We stayed in the classroom so long that the next group of students came in. Then we were walking around in the city and kept talking. I was super insecure the whole time, and now we both laugh about it. At some point, he asked for my number. And I was so happy, but I didn't show it (he later told me that at the time, he only wanted to be friends, which is why he asked for my number).

We said goodbye, and once I got home, we started texting. Over the next few days, we'd walk and talk after school every day. I really enjoyed it but I kept waiting for the moment he'd figure out my secret or find me too embarrassing. That's how insecure I was.
After some time, we had our first "date". That morning, he spontaneously texted me to ask if I wanted to meet. Honestly, I hadn't been that happy in a long time. We made plans, and I was so nervous and unhappy with how I looked that I ended up being late. We sat on a bench for hours and talked. I liked how reserved he was and how there was this huge physical distance between us. Our second and third dates were the same. Only later did we start to get closer. At some point, I had my first kiss (in the dark). I think it was important to both of us that these things never happened too publicly. He didn't invite me to his place until two or three months later (luckily, his family wasn't home), and I didn't invite him either until later (but I live alone).

When it came to our first time, I wanted to come out to him. I felt he needs to know. But I couldn't. I just couldn't do it and ended up crying instead. I really wanted to answer when he asked why I was crying. During that time, I cried a lot but not so much around him.
One day, we talked about "the trans topic", and he said it was ridiculous. For a moment, I was so shocked, sad and scared. But then I tried to explain it to him in a way he could understand. My boyfriend is from a country in Central Asia (which is like North Korea and starts with T… I'm a little scared he or someone else might find this post), but he mostly consumes Russian speaking content and I guess that's how he gets his information. And ofc he thought trans people were just men who wear dresses or pretend to be women. When I explained what being trans ACTUALLY means, he said it made sense. I thought he understood, but a few minutes later, we were talking about a trans woman, and I asked why he kept referring to her as "he" and he said HE WAS BORN A MAN SO I WILL KEEP CALLING HIM HE

One time, while we were at his place, someone suddenly unlocked the door (his mom), and she said something I coudn't understand (probably asking who was there or something). I was so scared in that moment and hid behind the kitchen door. He told me not to worry, and we said hello to each other briefly (his mom and I). She had to leave quickly, but I felt so insecure. I was wearing "house clothes" (like what you wear at home) and wasn't ready for something like that. A few hours later (when my boyfriend and I were outside), she texted him saying she liked me a lot, and that made me feel a little better. When he got back home, she asked him more questions and said she liked that I was "modest", "feminine", "neat" and "quiet" and so much like "a girl should behave like". My boyfriend never wanted me to meet his family because he said that they will intefere and control me. He has a complicated relationship with them, but I convinced him not to cut ties with them.

I don't want to share too much personal information about him in THIS post, but he's told me about so many terrible things. I think he's traumatized. His whole life he's been surrounded by violence and he has both witnessed it and experienced it and he sort of "learned" it like that a man has to be "strong" and "dangerous" to be respected. The reasons he's living in Austria now are complicated, but he has never fully integrated I guess and found it hard to connect with people so he would get violent and "live in that role" to be respected. He used to be a "fighter" (martial arts), but two or three years ago, he became very depressed and lonely until he met me. I think he's so intelligent and also kind of rejects parts of his culture I've described. He has never been violent towards me. He once said he trusts me more than anyone else, and that made me feel so guilty and awful.
I don’t know where this is going. I can see how much pain and potential for aggression is inside him. I always feel protected by him, but at the same time, I feel like I need to protect him and I can't just break up.

I think I've shared enough. I hope this was somewhat understandable. I don't even know why I'm posting this. My family is very accepting and I have a close relationship with them but I feel like I need to find people who can relate to me <3

Our "lady" here has managed to trick someone from Central Asia (possibly Turkmenistan based on the story), a heavily conservative, post-Soviet, muslim majority region, that he's a true and honest woman and has been dating him for months now, not telling him that he actually has a rothole down there. The boyfriend has been practicing martial arts before and doesn't believe that trannies are real women (the hero of our story believes it's because he "mostly consumes Russian speaking content and I guess that's how he gets his information"), not to mention that the troon has already managed to trick his parents that he's a "real woman" too. This could turn out into an absolute shitshow.

DON'T WORRY GUYS, I CAN FIX HIM!!!

 

[Izdaja Slika]

"Coping mechanisms for political anxiety"
The pooner's own words, not some snarky analysis.
View attachment 6835628

Reddit -- Archive
No answers yet.
I'm guessing this is from the USA in the aftermath of the popular vote for genocide.

Listed in ascending order of laughability.
The notion of other countries "having their backs"?

Well obviously they can't mean TERF island, even though part of TERF island (Scotland) has fallen ass over tit to deify trans women and provide sacrifices to their newly-minted goddesses.

They might mean Australia, where you don't need anything like a 'gender recognition certificate' - you can just get your birth certificate changed to be false, the government punishes people who 'misgender', the government has banned single-sex spaces, puberty blockers and wrong-sex hormones are available to those under 18, including on the taxpayer dollar.

I also came across this tidbit (emphasis on beclowning words mine):

Your prescribing doctor will use the authority indication “androgen deficiency due to an established testicular disorder”, which is accurate since our bodies don’t naturally produce enough testosterone on their own. You don’t need to be listed with Medicare as male in order to access PBS-listed testosterone.

God I've now started my morning learning about new insane trans shit in my own country, but that girls get taxpayer-funded testosterone because they have 'an established testicular disorder' takes the 1984-cake today.

Do not ever imagine sanity has made advances against trans ideology, let alone won the battle.

 

[Scrumption]

Oh boy, we have an absolute disaster brewing here...

Unless the boyfriend and his mom were dropped on their heads as infants I have a difficult time believing that this isn’t an elaborate larp.

 

[Screamer_2]

Venturing into the discussion

 

[RIPRhongoBongo]

YEAH!!!! LYING TO A POTENTIAL PARTNER IS AWESOME!!!11 Can't see THAT ending well when the man behind the curtain is exposed

 

[Dr. Butt]

Our "lady" here has managed to trick someone from Central Asia (possibly Turkmenistan based on the story), a heavily conservative, post-Soviet, muslim majority region, that he's a true and honest woman and has been dating him for months now, not telling him that he actually has a rothole down there.

Fake and gay Austrian wank fantasy.

 

[Chappell's Lost Earring]

We have a whole thread dedicated to transbians on dating sites.

I don't want to revive that thread for no reason, but I wonder how many of them swipe no on each other...

 

[batteredpancakes]

One of our manly man doods over on r/ftmmen is upset over an LGBT podcast making fun of stereotypical transman names and the examples they gave included her own. tea-is-illegal

Link | Archive

Spoiler: Text

My name was used in a joke about trans male names and it's fucking me up
It was some clip from a podcast a friend sent me of a comedian making a joke about how trans people name themselves. He jokes that trans men always have "cute little proper" names and gave mine as an example. I know it shouldn't get to me but it makes me so ashamed of the name I picked.

No one would ever talk about cis men with these names like that, but if a trans guy has a very normal but slightly uncommon name cis allies are like "Awwww that's so cute you have a proper little man name " like they're talking to a baby or a cat.

Turns out it's a clip from a podcast called So True with Caleb Hearon, who is the most poonery man I've ever seen. He's just gay.

I tried looking for the clip myself but it's insufferable so no dice. Nevermind someone linked it in the comments

The examples given were Liam, Preston, Emmett and Neo lol.
Also their observation about TIMs is also on the mark.

Cunt Goddess Amethyst of the mystical river forest works for a tech company.

 

[Character from a movie]

There's people who try to use @ to replace the variable letter (as in, "amig@s" rather than "amigos/amigas")

Aww I'd say the use of @ dates from old blogging culture.
I'm not sure when it started, but back in the mid-2000s I used to read blogs and forums where "amig@s" and such was pretty common. But it wasn't a feminist statement, just a way of shortening "amigos y amigas". It was quirky and friendly, or at least that's how I remember it.
Or for example, a forum user would address you as "amig@" because they didn't know if you were a boy or a girl, not because you were non-binary.
That's why I'm very fond the @ and it's the only "gender-neutral grammar" I accept.

 

[Layton Mysteries]

I tried looking for the clip myself but it's insufferable so no dice. Nevermind someone linked it in the comments

https://youtu.be/Zb4wBJ9mM30?t=394

This is the timestamp. Youtube has an AI transcript feature now, so if you load the transcript you can just search for whatever you are looking for then click on it to jump to that point. The FTM names are "Liam", "Emmett", and "Preston", and the example for MTFs is "Cunt Goddess Amythist of the Mystical River Forest", which sounds like some troon's twitter handle.

 

[Amber the Hedgehog]

No one would ever talk about cis men with these names like that, but if a trans guy has a very normal but slightly uncommon name cis allies are like "Awwww that's so cute you have a proper little man name " like they're talking to a baby or a cat.

Come on. These girls do realize that those cis guys get different treatment because it's unlikely that they have chosen that special name to themselves? People always treat differently when you make a decision and when a decision was made for you.

Most people get named by their parents, primarily by mom, but trannies choose their own names. If your given name is odd people are going to think your parents are wierd but if your chose an odd name people are going to think you're wierd. One of those deserves much more mockery than the other.

 

[Nick Obre]

Aww I'd say the use of @ dates from old blogging culture.
I'm not sure when it started, but back in the mid-2000s I used to read blogs and forums where "amig@s" and such was pretty common. But it wasn't a feminist statement, just a way of shortening "amigos y amigas". It was quirky and friendly, or at least that's how I remember it.
Or for example, a forum user would address you as "amig@" because they didn't know if you were a boy or a girl, not because you were non-binary.
That's why I'm very fond the @ and it's the only "gender-neutral grammar" I accept.

I remember it being used in that way as well, as a friendly, polite abbreviation; but aside from the nonbinary shit, it's also always been pushed (along with the other alternatives, like universal feminine, using an "e", or even using an "x") from the "using the masculine form as neutral is patriarchal and misogynist and offensive and is used to subjugate women" angle.

It's no different from someone getting offended because you said "hey guys" to a mixed group.

 

[California Newt]

there's probably some conditions in which this is true. maybe we could give em funny clothes to wear or call them, idk something to distinguish them. but only if it matters, which for 99% of things it doesn't

and vice versa, by symmetry

I appreciate it, but I'm sorry to say that I don't understand what you're saying at all; could you please elaborate? Where what (exactly) is true? Give who clothes? Distinguish them from what? I don't mean to be rude; I would like to understand.

That may be a result of aphantasia, or an inability to visualize things in their head. The rates of aphantasia amongst autistics are much higher than in the general population (see Dance et al. 2021 archived below)

Maybe, but definitely not to a degree that it'd be the source of the problem. You don't get stuff like My Little Pony Hypnosis or Tulpas without visualization (chaos and/or ceremonial magicians in both of those communities, not coincidentally—keep reading this post to see why). Out of the probably thousands of autistic fetishists I've known, few-to-none of them seemed to have problems with visualization.

It also means that autistic people struggle to imagine the future, specifically their own future. They may have a harder time picturing themselves out of time and space, and this can affect their level of motivation. If you can’t visualize something like, say, you and your spouse standing in front of a newly purchased home, it can be difficult to pursue such a thing. Why do you think normies like “vision boards” so much? It’s a way to reignite one’s sense of motivation. Autistics often lack this capacity, and, combined with their apathy towards social measures of success, can sit around doing nothing for decades at a time.

It's true that they have these problems; that being said, I'd ascribe that more to being too "locked in". Their attention is too focused; their brain is graphite; they're in the clouds and can't touch down—they can't ground themselves in a way where they feel their lives as actually happening to them; they're shielded from their own intuition by a wall of calcified thought. They can't prioritize the mental resources necessary to plan the future, because those resources are being used to run a virtual machine on top of the hardware.

I think a simpler way to say this would be, “autistics spend a lot of time online so their sense of self is rooted in their online persona”. If you don’t have a job or IRL friends, who will know you as Joe Blow? If you stream on Twitch, make furry porn, and have some caché in a remote Internet community, then you have a bunch of people referring to you as Lily Alice Athena Romanov III. Autistics may lack the social awareness of neurotypicals, but group consensus does affect them. If everyone you know treats you like XYZ, why wouldn’t that affect your self-concept?

That's also a real effect, but it's unrelated to my point. That's a good insight, but a separate phenomenon. I'm talking about innate attention-regulation problems and how they impact a person's sense of self and reality.

You can think of autistic people as though they're constantly playing a game that they're deeply immersed in. That's why they always either seem like they're half somewhere else, or else they're LARPing as themselves. To use a computer analogy, you could say that they run their operating system on a virtual machine, without access to the real hardware.

In the past I've been able to access the hardware in brief flashes after waking up, before the virtual machine boots up and the brain calcifies. There's a few moments of emotional and intuitive lucidity.

You can also think of it like your brain is a swimming pool, where the water is attention/dopamine. You're in an inner-tube on top of the water; if you let the water-level drain by staying away from dopaminergic activities and stimuli, your feet can touch the ground. Scientists have tried to do this chemically by giving autists MDMA.

As for fetishes… well, that’s complicated. I’ve seen lots of psychoanalytic breakdowns of fetishistic behaviour, and those can wax pretty poetic.

Edit:
Regarding your overall point, there's definitely things people do because it's easier or limits competition. You're describing a very real thing, and I want to acknowledge that because I re-read my post and I realized I hadn't done that. I just think fetishism as a whole is much broader than that, however much overlap there might be. /edit

Fetishism is poetry. It's all initiatory symbolism; remember the magicians I talked about? It's religious psychology collapsed into the lizard-brain; it's the reduction of mysticism to the sex drive. I don't like Foucault (obviously), but he understood this ( you can read about his Scientia Sexualis in The History of Sexuality, Volume 1). Obviously, the average furry gooner doesn't know he's tapping into this—but neither does the average tulpamancer, who thinks he's just using a "brain-hack".

There are infinitely many forms fetishism can take, but it's all ultimately about creative potency—whether for creation, or for destruction (gravity tending towards the latter). Sexuality, creativity, and religion all use the same grammar. That's what fetishism exploits. It's all symbolism. I'll give an example:

If you want to know the ultimate fetish, it's a man's penis being transformed into a serpent and hypnotically mind-controlling him. I think the specific tag is "snake_penis" or something. It's the fetishization of a man's appetites totally possessing and controlling him. That's what's at the bottom of the well. It's some real evil stuff.

Even the goofiest fetish subculture has at least one guy who can lead you deeper to another circle, until you're at the bottom and it's naked invocations of Satan—they identify him with the rush of energy that comes from the transgression of boundaries and submission to the appetites. You don't even have to go very far. They say they don't believe in it, until they're past the point of backing out. It's a "It's ironic until it's not—it's not happening, and if it is it's a good thing" kind of situation, same as all grooming.

This isn't speculation—this is spelunking. Incidentally, and on-topic, those places are absolutely swarming with trannies.

Honestly? I think that evolutionary psychology is the best explanation of this sort of behaviour in male autists. I know evolpsych has been bastardized by midwit cunts looking to rationalize why they want to fuck barely legal blondes, but that doesn’t render the ideas stupid post-hoc. The fact that females have higher reproductive fitness than males means that the men have a good incentive to find visual shorthand for “available vagina”.

What makes evopsych stupid (not saying that you're being stupid) is that it's post-hoc modern myth-making. It's just making up a plausible-sounding story about cavemen bonking each other on the head, in lieu of any deeper understanding. If you want to understand fetishism—or any psychological process—you have to get into the phenomenology. You need to get into the guts; get your hands dirty; put in some elbow grease.

If you couldn't see yourself getting turned on by something, then you don't understand it. You have to be careful, though—once you wrap your head around something, the seed is in your head. Attention causes it to grow, positive or negative—a plant doesn't care if you're smiling or frowning when you water it. This is why "ironic" fetishism is such an effective recruitment tool, as are cringe compilations. It's probably why a number of mods here troon out.

The key is to wrap your head around it, but not allow yourself to think about it nor interact with it. That way, you don't habituate. Very dangerous; I don't recommend trying unless you have a very good reason.

I think that, from an evolutionary perspective, going after a girl with a more divisive appearance helps the man to limit competition. If most men and women concede that your girlfriend is “cute”, then there’s a world of potential threats. If half the male population goes, “ew, she has tattoos, yuck!” then you have half the competition you would have otherwise. I always assumed that the obsession with “big tiddy goth gfs” was rooted in the belief that such girls are unappealing to “chad” - males they can’t compete against - but amenable to nerds like themselves.

It's because they have aura. I'm pretty sure all men find the dark, lunar female aesthetic attractive, but in the case of simps it's because they worship women. They want to be conquered by Artemis. They need a lunar hunter-goddess; they want to see Diana naked and be transformed into the stag. You may enjoy the book "Eros and Magic in the Renaissance", which goes into this regarding Queen Elizabeth.

You also might want to look into René Girard (specifically regarding sexual practices, especially BDSM and the need for the humiliant—I'm coining that word right now—to be insulted and denied in order to reinforce the image of the humiliator as a god). I think a lot of his "scapegoat" anthropological talk is bunk, but his sexuality stuff seems to be gold from what I've read in secondary sources.

As for female autists, I think the Tumblr Sexyman fits this theory well. They see a bunch of cartoons where the skinny beanpole boy with a metrosexual haircut is the nice, accessible guy… and then wonder why so many other women want to fuck Timothy Charlamagne or Jughead or whatever. They’re looking for visual cues, but troll themselves by focusing on representations of reality rather than reality itself.

Those guys are typically powerful in some way, on top of being confident and "charismatic". They're a young girl or autistic woman's understanding of what that would be like in practice—which is what makes them funny—but the appeal is understandable.

And those would be? Post on my profile or DM me if you think it’s off-topic.

Anything and everything involving a bell-curve: autists need to understand the actual rules, not tabula-rasa platitudes that obscure the realities of human behavior. This is especially important regarding differences in the ways that men and women think. If you want evidence that there's intentional dishonesty around the tabula-rasa question, check this excerpt out from a textbook I had lying around. Here's the source for the block-quote:

Hagen, E. (2005).Controversial issues in evolutionary psychology. In D. Buss (Ed.), The handbook of evolutionary psychology (pp. 145–176). New York: John Wiley & Sons

Edit: if you read nothing else from my long post, I want anyone passing-by to read the above image; here's the text:

“More worrisome, EP challenges the foundations of crucial enlightenment values, values we undermine at our peril. Perhaps the mix of secular and religious values on which the priceless institutions of democracy rest are like a tablecloth that can be quickly yanked out, leaving everything standing on some solid, though as yet unknown, base. But I wouldn’t bet on it. We are at a crossroads. A vibrant science of human thought and behavior must always be able to question its own premises and is thus utterly unsuited to be that solid base. Yet, if we discard the secular, quasiscientific notion of the blank slate, or even subject it to genuine scientific scrutiny, we may threaten institutions far more valuable than a science of human nature. The vital question is not, as most critics seem to think, whether EP is correct, but whether any real science of the brain is prudent”

He said, "more valuable than a science of human nature".

This is one of the most disgusting things I've ever read. What could possibly be more valuable than an understanding of human nature? To anybody? To stand in the way of self-knowledge is to stand in the way of knowledge of others; to make love in any real form impossible. How many elections are the soul worth? One of the more hideous things I've ever read.

This is how you get tranny dogma, by the way. By intentionally obfuscating human nature.

 

[Paper Machete]

Man, Cali Newt, your posts are so weird because while you ultimately sort of jive with what everyone else here thinks in your conclusions "tranny is about being anti-human" you have your own really weird crystal rubbing logic that is very esoteric and sounds kind of insane if I'm being honest.

 

[soup peddler]

Every time I check in on /r/GayTransGuys it just gets more and more depressing. Like what the fuck, I keep joking that it's a femcel subreddit, but it just turns more and more into an actual femcel subreddit.

Spoiler: Warning: big image (screenshot of the current front page)

It's just rejections, insecurity, despair, depravity, and loneliness. Out of curiosity I looked through the profile of the first poster on the page, /u/non-binary_prince. It's absolutely horrifying, it's like a cautionary tale about what will happen to you if you poon out. Her mastectomy results are kind of familiar... I think they might have been posted in the SRS thread. Anyway she has no nipples and they're weirdly wrinkly. Apparently immediately after she got them cut off, her "dysphoria" suddenly reappeared with a vengeance in her lower half, so she's getting a metoidioplasty in six weeks, Hopefully she has some sort of come to jesus moment before they go through with it, although physically + mentally she's pretty far gone. She looks like neckbeard hobbit Uncle Ted and only posts about her silicone penis replica collection, horrifying photos of her hirsuit undercarriage, getting high on poppers, and about all her stuffed animals. Also apparently she cares for a child. Whatever Divine was to women, this person is to men.

Is this just one minute piece of the femcel fractal that is /r/gaytransguys? Just the other women on this one random page are fantisizing about having their first kiss at 23 and despairing about being gross and unwanted.

Spoiler: /u/non-binary_prince

I just poured over her internet history, and she revealed that she has some kind of sexual trauma and that vaginal sex makes her feel weak and vulnerable. So... she was possibly raped, and she cut off her tits, became obese and hairy, and now gets high on poppers to hook up with guys from Grindr, then goes home to sleep with children's toys. What the fuck is society letting happen? And she's just the very first profile I clicked on.

My only explanation is that we are already all in hell.

 

[California Newt]

Man, Cali Newt, your posts are so weird because while you ultimately sort of jive with what everyone else here thinks in your conclusions "tranny is about being anti-human" you have your own really weird crystal rubbing logic that is very esoteric and sounds kind of insane if I'm being honest.

"You mean the nature of this conversation?"

Really though, if you can point to anything specific I can try to smooth it out. Is it the logic itself, or just that I keep bringing up sorcery? That's the nicest anyone's ever called me a schizoposter, though.

 

[90 Day Beyonce]

I think that, from an evolutionary perspective, going after a girl with a more divisive appearance helps the man to limit competition. If most men and women concede that your girlfriend is “cute”, then there’s a world of potential threats. If half the male population goes, “ew, she has tattoos, yuck!” then you have half the competition you would have otherwise. I always assumed that the obsession with “big tiddy goth gfs” was rooted in the belief that such girls are unappealing to “chad” - males they can’t compete against - but amenable to nerds like themselves.

Some dating site did some research on the flipside of this (the women's perspective). Take two users with the same average "hotness" rating out of 5 - the woman who gets a lot of extreme opinions because of something like tattoos or piercings ends up getting more/better matches than her more "normie" counterpart.

The troon version of this is probably chasers, but of course they don't want a chaser lol.

Imo the goth gf thing is more to do with imprinting on some sexy cartoon character. Or thinking girls who wear fishnets will be into kinky shit.

 

[California Newt]

Imo the goth gf thing is more to do with imprinting on some sexy cartoon character. Or thinking girls who wear fishnets will be into kinky shit.

Are women not also into the male version of that archetype? Maybe not the exact genderswap, but the similar vibe? That'd be a surprise to me, as they seem to be pretty popular.

Something left out here is also that meme fetishes are a big thing these days. A lot of guys (and presumably women) will get into something just because they hear that other guys are into it in their proximity, like they're all charging each other in a big grid. Sometimes this lets bad actors astroturf fetishes by forcing them through the network—i'm half-convinced that that's where all the armpit stuff came from. No way that's organic; stuff's disgusting.

It's basic advertising principles, and it can overinflate the presence of a fetish relative to how appealing it actually is. This is especially true in cartoon porn circles, where everyone's chasing trends and trying to mint fetishes to corner the market.

Goth girls are one of those basic "things you're told you're supposed to find attractive", which through Girardian principles actually does make them more attractive. It's the same way everyone kept talking about Megan Fox.

 

[SnergenFlergen]

Link

LA Fires: trannies most effected.

All the people who have lost their homes need to check their privilege- at least they weren't forced to wait slightly longer to get their dick turned inside-out.