Yeah guys please dont do that. Please i mean it do not let anyone know that ANDY WARSKI LIVESTREAMED CP ON 2/28/2019. IT COULD REALLY HURT THE SHOW IF PEOPLE WERE TO LEARN THAT ANDY WARSKI LIVESTREAMED CP ON 2/28/2019.
What is it? What I gathered is he blocked Milo on Twitter and *nearly* got into it with Diddler Dax. Am I missing something?
OOOOOOOOOOOAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHH!!!!!!!RETARD ALERT!PEDOPHILE ALERT!ZOOSADIST ALERT!
This is like when EDP got outed as a pedo and his subreddit turned from a fansub into a pure a-logging sub. In fact I can't think of any other instance of an eceleb having their fan community hub turning to an a-log hub like this.It's also telling how thoroughly the tone of this thread has changed since page 883, when the Kyler accusations came forth but prior to the Liana confirmations. Then start looking at the followup to the Liana confirmation on page 893, prior to the MM information expository. Then just pick any random pages between then and now and you will see many things at play.
1) Many of the current alogs were withholding judgment for more information/confirmation at that time, myself included. Many of the alogs who are quite active now were defenders at that time.
2) The thread was overwhelmingly saying "nothingburger" and the alogs were getting massively negatively stickered
3) Over the course of the next 100 pages or so, debate rages.
4) CAPS LOCK MAGIC COMPLETELY AND UTTERLY TURNS THE TIDE AND GETS THE ALOGS TO WORK IN TANDEM
5) Slowly, defenders defect or withdraw, alogs multiply.
6) Several alog accounts have been registered in the first two weeks of 2025 and they've come out swinging
7) The culture of the thread has completely reversed from overwhelmingly fan thread to overwhelmingly alog thread because of overwhelming evidence.
It has been 2144 days since ANDY WARSKI LIVESTREAMED CP
I was simply fitting different equations to find the diminishing point (taking limits to infinity) and then summing it all up (cumulative over a lifetime) to try and find the average paypig donations. I chose the best model (exponential) and even that was just middle class wagie pay, or flipping burgers after a 50/50 split. So it was better for them to work at McDonald's.
If i may, trying to use models of linear progression/regression is going to be something that will definitely not provide accurate results. Every sektur based show was always a show of mountains and valleys donationwise. I propose a different outlook to estimate instead the performance of the show: F(x) = x/y where x = (monetary sum of a show)-(parasocial paypig money) and y = aggregate viewership ( unique chatters to combat the bot anomaly, engagement the topic generated ). My reasoning for removing the paypig funds from the performance estimate is because these fags will donate despite of the show's performance and therefore would require a different function to fit in their anomalous model or even they can be set aside as a constant. Also:
It also bears noting that the time frame being referenceD was not 2 years,
Yeah the crux of the issue is that PPP isn't the kind of person that will go work a job. Now the one card he holds against all that is that literally everyone prefers him over Tardski and many are in favor of TOTAL TARDSKI DEATH even because of just straight up how unwatchable he makes the show. At the end of the day even in his current turbocucked version he is just miles ahead of Tardski which again who isn't, it's Tardski. He literally sucks anything funny out of the room and he is sitting there with his homosexual paypigs discussing about them buying his used underwear. It was a terrible decision from the start to go in business with this person.
An EXTREMELY rare unironic use of this statement.
It's actually way simpler than that. Just put between you and him a freight of stairs and he will be completely stunlocked trying to figure out how to reach you.
= .91782. This means that over the first 9 data points excluding the extreme outlier that is the 2500, the next point in the progression is 91.782% of the one before it. Conveniently, 774/1537 is almost exactly .5, as it is .5036. I am going to slightly inflate the data points to make an upper bound on our prediction. Presume that data point 2 was actually 1600, data point 10 was 800 and that every data point decreased by 8.3%. The sum of data points 2 through 9 would be 1600(1 + .917 + .917^2 + .... .917^7), which we are going to call y for now. This would give us the sum of the first 8 data points that exclude our extreme outlier. Every subsequent sum would be half the original. We are going to continue this until we model all paypigs that have contributed 100+ subs. We are stopping on data point 37, which is going to be about 100 by this modeling. So we are looking at y(1+1/2+1/4+1/8+1/16), or 31/16 y. So, now let's find y. You can trust my result or you can ask for an even more autistic and precise breakdown and I'll provide it, but for sake of brevity, I am going to just amend to the result. (1+.917+... +.917 ^ 7) = 6.02. We now have 6.02*1600*31/16, which is an estimated 18662 subs for all paypigs at 100+ subs. Add the 2500 outlier in, we have 21162 subs. With no basis whatsoever, let's assume that the sum total of the 100- subs is 25% of the total of the high rollers. I legitimately have NO basis by which to make a ballpark guess as to how to count the 100- subs, as that has far more than 37 people in the list by this modeling metric, so I'm just going to make it an even 4700 subs (more than 25% of 21162), to give us an estimated 25862. This is earned over less than 18 months (but more than 17 months), but let's make it 18 months. If you want to run with 17 instead, multiply final result by 18/17 or 1.059. In any case, 25862 X 5 = 129310. Take out 5% for Kick, we have 122845. Split by two, we have 61422 each. Multiply by 2/3s to account for the fact that this was over 1.5 years, we have 40948 per person per year, before taxes, after Kick's cut. Add 6% if you want to adjust it to a 17 month span. This is my method of estimation given the data available on 11/25/24.