Woman suffers major injuries after 'mistakenly' wearing a sex toy to an MRI scan - she escaped with her life - woman or "woman"?

JOHN ELY DEPUTY HEALTH EDITOR FOR MAILONLINE

Published: 15:28, 8 January 2025 | Updated: 15:59, 8 January 2025

A patient suffered horrific injuries after leaving a sex toy inserted in their rectum during a medical procedure.
The device was inside the patient's back passage during a routine MRI scan, resulting in a hazardous reaction between the powerful magnets and the metal parts of the toy.
According to a horrific scan image the result was the object being dragged up through the patient, potentially damaging organs and tissue along the way.

Images circulating on social media that have been viewed millions of times show the item lodged inside the patient.
The picture was shared in May last year by X user, 'DreadPirateZero', who captioned it: 'Never wear a butt plug to your MRI appointment. My god....'
The post detailed how powerful magnetic forces used to create an MRI's detailed scans reportedly pulled the metallic core of the silicone toy through the patient's rectum and up into their chest cavity at the 'speed of sound'.
The patient reportedly purchased the sex toy on the basis it was'100 per cent silicone' which — while still unadvised to have inserted during a scan — would have been safe for interaction with magnetic energy.
But unbeknownst to purchaser the toy had a metal 'core' that reacted to these magnetic forces.
Pluf (5).jpg
An image shared on a now deleted post on the internet forum Reddit shows the apparent aftermath of a patient suffering horrific injuries from wearing a sex toy to an MRI scan
Pluf (4).jpg
MRI stands for 'magnetic resonance imaging' and, unfortunately for the patient, powerful magnetic forces reportedly pulled the metallic core of the silicone toy through their rectum and up into their chest cavity at the 'speed of sound'. Stock image of an MRI

While the details remain unclear, a case flagged to health officials sheds light on what may have occured.

This report, filed a day before the scan image started being shared on the internet, tells of 22 year-old patient who was left 'screaming' after undergoing an MRI scan, and rushed to hospital.

The unnamed health professional who filed the report said the patient hadn't disclosed she had the sex toy inside her before the scan started.

They said: 'She went in for the MRI and when the MRI was over and the tech was pulling the table out the patient started to scream.

'The patient stated that she felt nauseous, was in pain, and felt like she was going to pass out.

'An ambulance was called for this patient and she was sent to the hospital.

'The patient was checked out by the radiologist at the site before transport to ensure the patient was doing okay.

'The patient has not returned any of our calls yet to try and follow up to see how she is doing.'
Pluf (1).jpg
A butt plug is a sex toy people insert into their back passage for pleasure but they can become 'lost' inside which can necessitates an awkward visit to hospital
Experts told MailOnline a person could theoretically suffer significant injuries from such an event and similar scenarios have happened in the past.

Professor Adam Taylor, an expert in human anatomy at Lancaster University, told MailOnline the sex toy moving 'at the speed of sound' was unlikely.

'The speed at which ferromagnetic materials move in an MRI field is proportional to the mass of the object and how far away from the magnetic field it is,' he said.

'Things such as paper clips or hairpins would easily reach 40mph if within the field.

'As this “toy” was predominantly silicone with a metallic core, there is potential that it moved at speed but not close to the speed of sound.'

He added that such an event, if it did occur, could be very serious.

'Internal objects that have ferromagnetic interaction could move within the body and damage major blood vessels, nerves or organs causing traumatic injury and potentially even death,' he said.

Professor Taylor said there had been previous cases involving patients with serious mental health problems who, unbeknownst to staff, had swallowed metal objects and been horrifically injured during an MRI.

One such case involved a 65-year-old man with schizophrenia who had swallowed items like metal sockets and a hinge pin, and saw his stomach torn open during an MRI.

In a similar incident a young child who had swallowed 11 small magnets suffered a serious bowel perforation during a scan.
Pluf (2).jpg
The study found the incidence of objects having to be removed from rectums is on the rise with cases particularly growing in men. There were 514 procedures to remove items out of rectums between April 2021 and March 2022, according to NHS data
Pluf (3).jpg
People in their early 50s were the most likely to get an object stuck in their rectum followed by people in their 20s
Other incidents where patients have hidden guns on their person before going in an MRI have also resulted in injury or death as magnetic forces cause the firearm to discharge with deadly results.

Professor Taylor said medics were well aware of the dangers metal objects pose in MRIs and ask patients if they have devices like pacemakers or regularly work with metal as part of minimising the risks.

'People with certain occupations may also need additional checks, individuals who work with metal may have small shards in and around their eyes or under their skin, these can be problematic if they move during the scan,' he said.

Professor Taylor advised people to avoid inserting a sex toy, or any other object, inside themselves before an MR,I even one that wasn't metallic.

'Inserting anything sex toys or otherwise into the body is advised against, it may cause complications during the procedure and if medical staff are unaware of it, it may delay treatment,' he said.

'Placing sex toys or other things into the body during an imaging procedure may cause artifacts on the image, which may mean whoever is looking at the scan may miss something important.'

'Checklists and protocols for medical procedures and scans are there for a reason, to make sure that you get the best treatment. Anything that reduces this efficiency may result in the need for additional surgery, repeat imaging or worse.'
 
I guess my question to a medical Kiwi would be, do they run someone through a metal detector before putting you in one of these? Obviously this person didn't, but is that unheard of?
Both me and some family members have gone to MRI outpatient, never had metal detectors but they are pretty serious and ask about 10 times if you have anything metal at all.
You strip down before, take off all watches, jewelry, earrings, etc., and they're pretty clear about it.

Also a bit more context, if something metallic get stuck in a mri, especially in a patient, the only way to drop the magnet field and get them out is to quash, which means aggressively vent all the liquid helium out. Once the retard is out of the machine, that helium needs to be refilled, and calibrated, which take weeks, and causes massive headaches ( and likely hundreds of cancellations)

Dumb fucker probably made life worse for hundreds of people by being a coomer degenerate
Damn thats fucking depressing. Hope they sue this troon and make him pay for the fix and the medical bills for everyone he put on hold. At least the perv got a railgun round through the chest, hopefully that'll dissuade other coomers in the future from doing stupid shit.
 
Fuck that. I wouldn't trust anyone this day and age to adjust an MRI for something like that!

You can trust those, we do multiple each day. They are being anal (get it) but the risk is basically nil in that case. Medical supply companies test those rigorously because if they fuck up the lawsuit would be in the tens of millions.
BUT, it has to be a known device. Somebody shows up without his card he doesn't get in. Techs are ruthless about this because if a fucking retard gets hurt they are the ones on the hook
 
Last edited:
Why can't patients be run through a bespoke medical metal detector prior to MRIs? Why bother with questionaires up-front?
Not in Imaging, but my understanding is that in the US, Joint Commission now requires new MRI suites to include a stationary metal detector, or a protocol for use of a handheld wand, but that was only 10 years or so ago and most facilities are grandfathered in. This is the FDMS, a specialty detector that only alarms for ferrous metals.

There are still false alarms, though, and the concern that that leads to alarm fatigue--darn thing, whatever, you're fine. Or missed metal; a small metal shaving can still have an adventure. When the FMDS is in place, it's not supposed to substitute for the screening questions; it's an additional layer in the Swiss cheese model. Ultimately it's an additional tool that the MRI tech can use to protect the extremely expensive, glass cannon machine from the patients.

BUT, it has to be a known device. Somebody shows up without his card he doesn't get in. Techs are ruthless about this because if a fucking retard gets hurt they are the ones on the hook
I think a lot of people don't understand the degree to which DI techs are actively protecting them from themselves (and from magnets, and radiation, and kidney damage), and assume the job is basically like working at Kinko's. Put the patient in the machine, press the button. Ben-wa balls in the MRI are just a paper jam, y'know?
 
The dangly bit at the bottom suggests that this was a 'woman.'

According to Google Image, the foreign object that caused all of the trouble.
View attachment 6844741
It’s fucking weighted, with a pretty clear indication that there are metal balls inside it. This is 100% user error & I really hope he doesn’t win his case against the company.
 
According to Google Image, the foreign object that caused all of the trouble.
1736573903506.png
Did some brief, very rough math.
It looks like from the x-ray, this is either a 3 or a 4 based on how big the nodes are.

With some shitty Googled values and eyeballed math, this means that when the machine was turned on, the plug accelerated to...
Plug TypeSpeed (m/s)Speed (ft/s)Speed (mph)
180g1.344.43
257g1.123.72.5

I was hoping it would be a bit faster, but honestly at those speeds this troon is incredibly lucky to be alive. A roughly half-pound chunk of metal and plastic traveling up your anus at ~4 fps is some brutal shit.
 
Did some brief, very rough math.
It looks like from the x-ray, this is either a 3 or a 4 based on how big the nodes are.

With some shitty Googled values and eyeballed math, this means that when the machine was turned on, the plug accelerated to...
Plug TypeSpeed (m/s)Speed (ft/s)Speed (mph)
180g1.344.43
257g1.123.72.5

I was hoping it would be a bit faster, but honestly at those speeds this troon is incredibly lucky to be alive. A roughly half-pound chunk of metal and plastic traveling up your anus at ~4 fps is some brutal shit.
Appreciate the analysis, even if it’s for the speed at which a sex toy obliterated a mentally ill man’s rectum.
 
Why would someone do that? Oh well, dumb bitch should have used a glass plastic or rubber plug. It only takes a second to do a google search and find out what MRI stands for and to know that magnets are involved, and a metal butt plug wouldn't be a good idea.
 
Until actual proof comes out. It's a dumb bitch to me.
Take a look at the MRI scan.
-angle of pelvis especially as it comes together in the symphysis
- shape of torso
-width of hips
-length of catheter
-lacking female reproductive organs or any space to put them.
98% sure this is a bloke, even before we get to the fetish aspect
Tranny. Has to be.
Wouldn’t bet against you
 
Back