Artcow SamanthaPrater / EruzaArto / DefyingGravityAgain / Emily Nicole Cassidy / Willowtheway / Uniloax - Special Ed Art Thief and "Big Bonned" Attention Whore; Perpetual Liar; Cucumber Princess; Negligent Animal Abuser; Twice Investigated for Murder


You all are just mad I draw on my own. have MORE custom art in my normal style.

line work with NO images behind my art.
just because it's bad doesn't mean I'm not an Artist.

googles very definition proves your logic wrong.

what your argument SHOULD be is that I am not PAID.

which is infact true, I am not and don't want to be.
per merriam webster.
"
a
: a person who creates art (such as painting, sculpture, music, or writing) using conscious skill and creative imagination
the great artists of the Renaissance


an artist specializing in watercolors"

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/artist

that video is a completely custom ORIGINAL character. above post.

Was the centaur supposed to look like it has down syndrome? Because that's a centaur with down syndrome.
What is with you all and Downsyndrome people? They have feelings to ya know. :| I bet you actually have downsyndrome and use humor and jokes to deflect it. I DO NOT have Down-syndrome and have never been diagnosed such. I am Autistic with 22 Deletion syndrome, which can be mistaken for it.

stop accusing my art of being Downsyndrome when it's actually meant to represent MY Disorder.
 
Please stop editing my art or I WILL privately DMCA you! it is NOT yours.
We all know that you're too poor to maintain an DMCA lawsuit.
So it's okay for you all to steal my art work and it's not okay for me?
Yes, solely because we're having fun doing it instead of using it to gangstalk an group of artists
one of these day's your going to take someones art that is a BIG artist and piss them off, they'll come after you. what then , will you do ? :|
Point and laugh?
 
I am Autistic with 22 Deletion syndrome, which can be mistaken for it.
A reminder:
AUTISM.PNG
Emily isn't autistic; she's just an idiot.

How kind of Emily to provide a fresh input; while it's still doing funny things with proportions I find it's a massive improvement compared to the input and it's time to move on.
00008-1623720537.jpg00009-1623720538.jpg
00013-2120162544.jpg00014-3259495119.jpg
00016-3259495121.jpg00020-3259495125.jpg
34 steps at .68 denoising strength; to give those numbers context, generally when I'm upscaling something AI generated to a higher resolution, after the upscaler model is done it generally gets about 8 steps at .35 to .45 denoising depending on what model I happen to be using. I'm not bothering with upscaling this time; that's just what it needs to turn it into something a bit more pleasant to look at and generally not have too many flaws carried over from the input.
yoink.PNG
2025-01-12 01.PNG
I fear I'll need to crank up those numbers again...
 
I think this will be appropriate for this thread' main theme
By remarkable coincidence I've just found the newest addition to the "Expanding the Collage AGAIN" playlist, right next to such hits like She's An Art Thief, The Sound of Silence, Trash Can Song and Nobody Cares: The Musical.
I don't know how, I don't know when
But something sparkled in a garbage can
It happens now, it happened then
Is it a dream or someone's twisted plan?


Edit: This batch actually turned out okay on the first attempt.
00022-3777881727.jpg00025-3777881730.jpg00028-3777881733.jpg
 
A reminder:
View attachment 6849679
Emily isn't autistic; she's just an idiot.

How kind of Emily to provide a fresh input; while it's still doing funny things with proportions I find it's a massive improvement compared to the input and it's time to move on.
View attachment 6849702View attachment 6849703
View attachment 6849704View attachment 6849705
View attachment 6849707View attachment 6849716
34 steps at .68 denoising strength; to give those numbers context, generally when I'm upscaling something AI generated to a higher resolution, after the upscaler model is done it generally gets about 8 steps at .35 to .45 denoising depending on what model I happen to be using. I'm not bothering with upscaling this time; that's just what it needs to turn it into something a bit more pleasant to look at and generally not have too many flaws carried over from the input.
View attachment 6849701
View attachment 6849723
I fear I'll need to crank up those numbers again...
Screenshot_20250112_111909_Brave.jpg
I fixed it, now it's a proper dr who!
 
She has added a new banner to her DA
1736705961202.png
I wonder if the pills simply aren't working or she isn't taking them?

using conscious skill and creative imagination
which you do not have. Therefore, you are not an artist.

Oh. She's drawing them retarded looking on purpose. I thought she just had a poor grasp on human anatomy.
No no no you see, she was pretending to be a bad artist just to troll us. Its very complicated trolling that us peons couldn't even begin to comprehend!
 
I just finished going through this thread, and all I can think is, holy shit, I can't believe how amazingly stupid yet horrifying Emily is. There's a lot going on in this thread, but I’d like to contribute something I didn’t see brought up: Emily is clearly living in some sort of assisted living facility. I’ve seen a lot of people ask, “Where on earth is her guardian or wrangler? Why haven’t they removed her internet access yet?”

Minor powerlevel here, but at one point in my life, I worked as a wrangler at one of these facilities, so I can offer some insight into why they haven’t taken Emily’s computer away. While specific rules vary between facilities, it’s generally established nowadays that internet access is considered a basic right, much like having a safe living environment or the ability to report abuse or neglect. As someone who often had to deal with the fallout of this “freedom,” I can’t stress enough how frustrating it was when someone acted as recklessly as Emily and people like me had to clean up the mess.

For example, I once helped oversee a person (who I’ll keep vague for obvious reasons) who obsessively posted on Facebook about how everyone was out to get him. He would harass people online and cause all kinds of problems. Even though I was well aware of his behavior, I wasn’t allowed to intervene. Things came to a head when, one day, a police officer showed up at our facility. Apparently, this person had used Facebook to make violent threats against a random woman in town, who understandably called the cops. The officer at that point wasn't really allowed to do much more than sit him down and ask him to stop.

I remember asking my boss if there was any way to limit his internet access to prevent further incidents. My boss told me, “No, that would infringe on his rights. He bought the phone and the mobile plan, and we’re not allowed to take it away from him, even if he is doing really questionable things with them.”

This ultimately resulted in police showing up several more times over the next few weeks due to his constant threats online. You have no idea how frustrating it was to deal with cops repeatedly showing up, telling him, “Can you please stop doing that?”, him ignoring them, and me having to explain the situation to the police yet again. And you can bet that every single time, I would have the same argument with my boss and get told the same thing (despite my boss agreeing with me that letting him on the internet unrestricted was a terrible idea). It didn’t stop until Facebook finally banned his account for the constant threats, and he was too dumb to figure out how to register a new account.

I guess my point with this story is this: I am 99.9% sure that the staff at Emily's facility are fully aware of her internet activities and constant stalking and harassment. I wouldn’t be shocked if they share similar sentiments about wanting to get her off the internet. Unfortunately, they’re probably not allowed to because it "infringes on her rights", even though I’m sure most of them would love to smash her PC with a hammer.
 
Back