Crime Neil Gaiman Accused of Sexual Assault, Author Denies Allegations

  • 🔧 At about Midnight EST I am going to completely fuck up the site trying to fix something.
Acclaimed author Neil Gaiman is facing multiple allegations of sexual assault, making him the subject of a police complaint in New Zealand. Gaiman has offered a response as well, refuting the accusations.

Per Tortoise Media, two women have accused Gaiman of sexual assault while in consensual relationships with the author. The allegations go back two decades, but they were first reported on in Tortoise's podcast Master: the allegations against Neil Gaiman, which was released on Wednesday. The women describe allegations of "rough and degrading sex," alleging that these instances were not always consensual.

One of the two accusers, a 23-year-old woman named Scarlett, claims she was sexually assaulted in February 2022 just hours after first meeting Gaiman. According to Scarlett, the assault happened in a bath at Gaiman's New Zealand home where she was hired to work as a nanny for his child. Gaiman says that the two merely "cuddled" and "made out" that day, adding that a three-week sexual relationship ensued, but was entirely consensual. Scarlett insists that Gaiman was "rough and degrading," and reportedly, messages, notes, and accounts from friends support her allegations.

Another accuser, identifying herself as K, says she was an 18-year-old fan when she first met Gaiman at a book signing in Sarasota, Florida, in 2003. K claims that she began a romantic relationship with Gaiman after she turned 20, resulting in engaging in rough sex that she "neither wanted nor enjoyed." It's alleged that one particular incident saw Gaimain forcefully penetrating K despite her objections.

Gaiman has denied this claim as well. The Sandman author maintains that his relationship with K was never unlawful and that he's "disturbed" to be accused of such behavior. According to Gaiman, K's allegations stem from "regret" over the relationship she had when it was over. He also attributed Scarlett's allegations to a condition she has that's associated with false memories, but the Tortoise report noted that this isn't supported by the accuser's medical records.

Additionally, Gaiman has strongly denied all allegations of non-consensual sex at any time with the women accusing him of sexual assault. He also claimed that New Zealand police ignored his offer for assistance with one woman's complaint in 2022, suggesting that shows a lack of substance in the investigation. New Zealand officers have responded by saying they made a "number of attempts to speak to key people as part of this investigation and those efforts remain ongoing." It was added that there are "a number of factors to take into consideration with this case, including location of all parties.”

Gaiman has long been one of pop culture's most revered authors, bringing to life acclaimed stories like The Sandman, Good Omens, and American Gods. Just recently, Netflix has been promoting the upcoming second season of The Sandman, which is based on Gaiman's source material; he also executive produces the series.

Source/Archive

________________________________________________________________________

Honestly while Gaiman was not on the top of my "insufferable and terminally overhyped geek culture retards I cant wait to get outed as sex predators for my own amusement" list (currently being topped by Wil Wheaton followed by Alan Moore) I cannot deny feeling that little bit jollier with the thought I may never have to hear him mentioned again
 
1736799400363.png
"This is for Sneed you sick fuck...."

Also I just double checked, and it seems that he became massively fucking inescapable in nurd culture some point in 2010-2011 which is when he started appearing in absolutely fucking everything. Nothing of note here, just a weird phenomena that the moment tumblr took off he was showing up everywhere
 
If Gaiman had left his wife for one of these sluts then there wouldn’t be a story and they wouldn’t be playing the victim.
if you did enough digging i'm sure both sides of the story would be true. Gaiman is a creep that sexually assaulted women he had working for him (and probably his child by the sounds of it), and this led to a multi-week relationship with each woman. #MeToo didn't fall apart because people are fine with rape, it fell apart because it was obviously being used by women to get back at men that didn't give them what they wanted after selling their bodies to them

if Gaiman had left his wife for any of these women they'd be bragging about how it was a whirlwind romance where they took control of a rich and powerful man just like in their 50 Shades Of Grey porn novel. but it didn't work out that way so now they're whining to news agencies
 
>Named Nail Gay Man
>Makes them eat da poo poo


Such foreshadowing. Every morbidly obese gender-confused Hot Topic/Spencer's aficionado wept.
Off topic but when I searched for this vid I found ole Martin Ssempa has an active youtube account to this day
1736799968981.png

Nice to see he has still got a smile on his face after all this time and all that POO POO
 
I have always and instinctively disliked Gaiman's work. There is something hollow and soulless about it, which is made far worse than other pablum because Gaiman's medium of choice is myth and legend. He moves around mythic elements without actually feeling the underlying emotions of such. He's the equivalent of a preacher who doesn't have any faith himself but makes money off those who do. My friend said it was because he was raised as a scientologist. I don't know or care what the reason is, I just feel my skin crawl whenever I read or see anything by him. Perhaps "cargo cult" is better analogy than the preacher. He builds his stories out of known archetypes and symbolism into something resembling human myths but always a facsimile. Tolkien understood myth and meaning. Even bad authors feel emotional about what they write even if their language choice is clumsy. But Gaiman is just rearranging the blocks like some wetware AI. His whole shtick is creating the appearance of being profound. I loathe his work.

As to his behaviour, well he sounds like an awful person. But some of his victims don't really help themselves:

After Palmer’s offer, Pavlovich texted Gaiman: “I am consumed by thoughts of you, the things you will do to me. I’m so hungry. What a terrible creature you’ve turned me into.” The following weekend, she packed up her sublet and boarded the ferry to Waiheke.

For the love of God, if a man rapes you or tries to, get the Hell away from him. Don't text him the above.

Assuming the story is true I still blame Gaiman. People like him seek out vulnerable people who lack the experience to know how to deal with such situations. Sexual assault can really confuse people, especially if they don't have someone close they can talk to because it leaves them only with two perspectives - their own and their abuser's. And they lack confidence in their own, wondering "is he right? Was this my fault?"

But please, if a man is trying to force himself on you, scream, run, scratch him with your nails, anything. Just fight and keep fighting. You're not going to win a boxing match with a man (normally) but someone like Gaiman (in this story) will back off because they've realised you're not the vulnerable person they thought and aren't going to break down the way they want you to and there'll be police at their door if they keep going.
 
1736800536548.png



I should really do a mumbled pretentious britbong version of the ole buckbreaking copypasta...

People like him seek out vulnerable people who lack the experience to know how to deal with such situations
I guess this is also mystery solved on why he was so obsessed with getting into intimate asspat terms with his autistic fangirls on tumblr.
 
Oh, the other thing in the article that sets me off is repeating the myth about "real BDSM is consensual". No. BDSM may or may not be consensual but the No True Scotsman notion that if it's not consensual you're not part of the BDSM community and some sort of aberration is bullshit. Same sort of deal when a trans-identifying man raped a woman and the trans lobby were all "he was just pretending to be trans".

BDSM practice is filled with abusers. Like flies to honey.
 
Calling it, Gamian touched his kid. This is too fucking weird
He may very well have done so. But even if he did not, this by itself constitutes sexual abuse of a child. One of the terms professionals use for it is "non-contact abuse."


Non-contact abuse is where a child is abused without being touched by the abuser. This can be in person or online and includes:

  • exposing or flashing
  • showing pornography
  • exposing a child to sexual acts
  • making them masturbate
  • forcing a child to make, view or share child abuse images or videos
  • making, viewing or distributing child abuse images or videos
  • forcing a child to take part in sexual activities or conversations online or through a smartphone.


It will have a serious negative impact on his son's emotional and mental development. It will be something burdening the boy as he tries to form normal relationships with peers and get on with his life. Even if it's "only" this it's still bad enough for us to say officially that Neil Gaiman is a child abuser.
 
The only thing this cuck made that I liked was Coraline.
And Good Omens (the book, not the AmaZOG TV show), although that was co-written by the GOAT Terry Pratchett, so that probably doesn't even count
Male feminist turns out to be degenerate peepeepoopoo rapist.

Many such cases.
1736802090100.png
 
“He didn’t have boundaries,” Caroline says. “I remember thinking that there was something really wrong with him.”
1736801526243.png

Well shit. Always looked to reading into the guy, see if he was worth the hype.
Do it anyway and report back. I'm super curious about your thoughts as someone who would be reading his work for the very first time knowing all this in advance.

I have always and instinctively disliked Gaiman's work. There is something hollow and soulless about it, which is made far worse than other pablum because Gaiman's medium of choice is myth and legend. He moves around mythic elements without actually feeling the underlying emotions of such. He's the equivalent of a preacher who doesn't have any faith himself but makes money off those who do. My friend said it was because he was raised as a scientologist. I don't know or care what the reason is, I just feel my skin crawl whenever I read or see anything by him.
I agree with your friend. I mentioned Scientology a while back in this thread, but I stand by it. That whole world is absolutely bizarre, and the "religion" really does an extreme number on how you think and how you interact with the world.
The South Park episode on Scientology was a blessing in that it basically killed any "cool factor" they had left, but it also downplayed how truly dangerous they were and how fucked up their mental programming is.

Perhaps "cargo cult" is better analogy than the preacher. He builds his stories out of known archetypes and symbolism into something resembling human myths but always a facsimile. Tolkien understood myth and meaning. Even bad authors feel emotional about what they write even if their language choice is clumsy. But Gaiman is just rearranging the blocks like some wetware AI. His whole shtick is creating the appearance of being profound. I loathe his work.
Also Scientological. It was L Ron's whole thing, too.
 
Male feminist turns out to be degenerate peepeepoopoo rapist.

Many such cases.
tumblr_or7wboZXZw1vecl32o1_r2_500.gif
....Yep.

I mean....what else really is there to say? This shit was predicted a fuckin decade ago in circles like kiwifarms and beyond. Whole terminology webs about "goony beard men" and "male allies" and such were wove as we waited for the penny to drop and....well it dropped. Its been dropping for fucking years now.

It was the most obvious fucking shit imaginable that tryhard self declared "male feminist allies" who liked to scream at the top of their lungs against the bigot misogynist boogieman of the day and loudly remind everyone every five seconds they actually rly respect women guiz were in fact sickfuck predators trying to get their targets guard down and also make them scared to snitch for fear of "hurting the cause" while also deflecting suspicion onto easy scapegoats.

We called it....it happened.....here we are now.
 
He may very well have done so. But even if he did not, this by itself constitutes sexual abuse of a child. One of the terms professionals use for it is "non-contact abuse."





It will have a serious negative impact on his son's emotional and mental development. It will be something burdening the boy as he tries to form normal relationships with peers and get on with his life. Even if it's "only" this it's still bad enough for us to say officially that Neil Gaiman is a child abuser.
Oh yeah, the kid is going to be fucked in the head, weather he was diddled or not. Worst case he ends up like his dad. That is nightmare fuel.
 
Back in the 1990s, I always kind of had the sense that he was into men too. Starting with Alan Moore, there were a whole series of rather unusual and odd male friendships which advanced his career.
Good. Keep talking and thinking about Alan Moore. Try to Oprah manifest an expose on him next. If we all concentrate hard enough we can summon this shit into reality and I will never have to hear/read some linkara wannabe jerking off about watchmen and killing hoke again.
 
Back