Crime Neil Gaiman Accused of Sexual Assault, Author Denies Allegations

Acclaimed author Neil Gaiman is facing multiple allegations of sexual assault, making him the subject of a police complaint in New Zealand. Gaiman has offered a response as well, refuting the accusations.

Per Tortoise Media, two women have accused Gaiman of sexual assault while in consensual relationships with the author. The allegations go back two decades, but they were first reported on in Tortoise's podcast Master: the allegations against Neil Gaiman, which was released on Wednesday. The women describe allegations of "rough and degrading sex," alleging that these instances were not always consensual.

One of the two accusers, a 23-year-old woman named Scarlett, claims she was sexually assaulted in February 2022 just hours after first meeting Gaiman. According to Scarlett, the assault happened in a bath at Gaiman's New Zealand home where she was hired to work as a nanny for his child. Gaiman says that the two merely "cuddled" and "made out" that day, adding that a three-week sexual relationship ensued, but was entirely consensual. Scarlett insists that Gaiman was "rough and degrading," and reportedly, messages, notes, and accounts from friends support her allegations.

Another accuser, identifying herself as K, says she was an 18-year-old fan when she first met Gaiman at a book signing in Sarasota, Florida, in 2003. K claims that she began a romantic relationship with Gaiman after she turned 20, resulting in engaging in rough sex that she "neither wanted nor enjoyed." It's alleged that one particular incident saw Gaimain forcefully penetrating K despite her objections.

Gaiman has denied this claim as well. The Sandman author maintains that his relationship with K was never unlawful and that he's "disturbed" to be accused of such behavior. According to Gaiman, K's allegations stem from "regret" over the relationship she had when it was over. He also attributed Scarlett's allegations to a condition she has that's associated with false memories, but the Tortoise report noted that this isn't supported by the accuser's medical records.

Additionally, Gaiman has strongly denied all allegations of non-consensual sex at any time with the women accusing him of sexual assault. He also claimed that New Zealand police ignored his offer for assistance with one woman's complaint in 2022, suggesting that shows a lack of substance in the investigation. New Zealand officers have responded by saying they made a "number of attempts to speak to key people as part of this investigation and those efforts remain ongoing." It was added that there are "a number of factors to take into consideration with this case, including location of all parties.”

Gaiman has long been one of pop culture's most revered authors, bringing to life acclaimed stories like The Sandman, Good Omens, and American Gods. Just recently, Netflix has been promoting the upcoming second season of The Sandman, which is based on Gaiman's source material; he also executive produces the series.

Source/Archive

________________________________________________________________________

Honestly while Gaiman was not on the top of my "insufferable and terminally overhyped geek culture retards I cant wait to get outed as sex predators for my own amusement" list (currently being topped by Wil Wheaton followed by Alan Moore) I cannot deny feeling that little bit jollier with the thought I may never have to hear him mentioned again
 
I read one collection of his Sandman stories a friend loaned me back in like 1992 or so. I recall there was something where people were trapped in a diner and being driven insane by Sandman, and a character decides to cure a little lesiban punk rocker of her lesbianism and thus rapes her. That's all of his work I ever had to read to know he was fucked in the head.
Corrective rape, how feminist. It's OK to be gay unless you won't get Neil Gamon's PP wet
 
Corrective rape, how feminist. It's OK to be gay unless you won't get Neil Gamon's PP wet

Interestingly the main character in one of those turgid Hubbard novels does exactly the same thing.

I'm not saying he copied it because he was a scieno and that's a scieno ethic but...yeah I'm saying he copied the idea. Granted the people in the diner were all being driven insane but still.

Also, since I don't want to double post, Amanda Palmer is cancer too. She's a cunt of the first water, make no mistake. Just like Ghillane Maxwell, she fed little girls to her hubby. I don't care how insufferable that hippiechick (or any of them) might have been, I'm not so soulless as to say "lawl u deserve to got raped" - Palmer, just like Maxwell, and interestingly just like Marion Zimmer Bradley before them (and lets be honest probably lots of women with powerful men who had fucked up appetites) fed those girls to Gaiman.
 
His greater crime was being friends with Hbomberguy

View attachment 6854296
"""Guys""" who deliberately neglect capitalizing the start of their sentences but use it elsewhere are fucking psychos who are either trying to appear aloof and not caring about things, or trying to imitate women who do the same thing but better

Stay the fuck away from them, especially if you're a woman
 
Interestingly the main character in one of those turgid Hubbard novels does exactly the same thing.

I'm not saying he copied it because he was a scieno and that's a scieno ethic but...yeah I'm saying he copied the idea. Granted the people in the diner were all being driven insane but still.
He copied it, then tested it out IRL it seems.
Also, since I don't want to double post, Amanda Palmer is cancer too. She's a cunt of the first water, make no mistake. Just like Ghillane Maxwell, she fed little girls to her hubby. I don't care how insufferable that hippiechick (or any of them) might have been, I'm not so soulless as to say "lawl u deserve to got raped" - Palmer, just like Maxwell, and interestingly just like Marion Zimmer Bradley before them (and lets be honest probably lots of women with powerful men who had fucked up appetites) fed those girls to Gaiman.
Why wouldn't any woman he's close to not be as sexually depraved as him? You'd kinda have to be.
 
He copied it, then tested it out IRL it seems.

Why wouldn't any woman he's close to not be as sexually depraved as him? You'd kinda have to be.

I was talking to my idiot sister in law about this, and she actually had a pretty level headed take. These women are with rich and powerful men. They're not going to go away, they don't have leverage against them yet, they haven't worked an angle. But they hate the women their degenerate husband/boyfriend/partners are into because they're something that she can never fulfill. For whatever reason. How to hurt them? Feed them to hubby/boyfriend/partner and get them raped, and then turn around and stand by her man. Young groupie or whatever forever bears that trauma, they'll feel disgusted, marked for life, might not even ever be able to have normal sexual function again at least psychologically. Plus it now starts a whole host of stuff that she can use against him if he ever turns her out.

 
tl;dr
>Neil gayman is a jew scientologist, and was mega molested as a kid
>got fame, fucked his groupies
>married a libtard arthoe
> wife finds out he's a sadomasochistic freak
>still pimps out her sloppy seconds to him
>ego and decades of fangirl pussy hit critical mass
>basically decides he can rape any arthoe he wants
Another shining example of male feminism.
 
If you spend 3 years having an online relationship and travel to see a man repeatedly you're not being raped. Even if he does something you don't want in the moment, if you keep returning to the situation you are consenting by continuing the relationship. If you didn't like your pussy whipped and you said "STOP" and he didn't, why are you returning knowing he will physically hurt you and not listen to you telling him to stop? People need to learn if you know someone will ignore your requests and you willingly enter a situation where they will ignore what you tell them, you are consenting to being ignored and having any actions they take done to you.

If you don't want someone to hurt you and you know they will hurt you if you go near them. Don't go near them. Don't engage with them. Don't travel across a country and complain he fucked you if you knew he was going to fuck you when you got on the plane. It's not rape at that point. It's consensual abuse.
 
I'm not reading all that, and I swear it's not just because Gaiman is one of my favorite authors. TLDR?

In return, I offer this insight about "Gaiman groupies" which may explain a few things, or confirm your biases, or whatever:
Excerpt taken from the author interview at the end of the American Gods audiobook.
 
Here's some more reddit stuff:
1736809730198.png
1736809813433.png
1736809988216.png

He copied it, then tested it out IRL it seems.
Like Chris emulating what he sees on TV.
Speaking of:
1736809877582.png
1736810254471.png
1736810284832.png
 
Last edited:
I'm not a Gaiman fan at all I have always found his work kinda "meh" some good ideas poorly executed, but I hope Pratchett comes out of this unscathed. When I was growing up I loved the Discworld and I still do go back an read them every now an then just because of the memories of having fun reading them or talking to my dad about them etc.

But honestly I've read this latest bunch and honestly this guy is almost a walking stereotype male feminist, who I'd quite like to feed into a wood chipper or bacon slicer, and if TP knew anything about this and didn't speek up I will be very upset and have to leave those memories in the past because this is honestly vile.
 
If you spend 3 years having an online relationship and travel to see a man repeatedly you're not being raped. Even if he does something you don't want in the moment, if you keep returning to the situation you are consenting by continuing the relationship. If you didn't like your pussy whipped and you said "STOP" and he didn't, why are you returning knowing he will physically hurt you and not listen to you telling him to stop? People need to learn if you know someone will ignore your requests and you willingly enter a situation where they will ignore what you tell them, you are consenting to being ignored and having any actions they take done to you.

If you don't want someone to hurt you and you know they will hurt you if you go near them. Don't go near them. Don't engage with them. Don't travel across a country and complain he fucked you if you knew he was going to fuck you when you got on the plane. It's not rape at that point. It's consensual abuse.
Women have less capacity to understand the consequences of their actions than most dogs I know.
 
Back