Is the Amerimutt Meme Real?

[Briananderson1138]

So I’ve been wondering recently: did the United States colonists racemix like everyone else did and just cover it up with “Indian Princess” myth once white supremacy got going?

 

[THE SUPREME ONION]

all memes are real

 

[Althalus]

The mutt meme is kind of real, but not because of natives. Part of it is that there was far fewer natives in North America compared to central/South America, and also Anglos (and later white immigrants) brought their own women when they settled, hence nowhere near the same demand for native wives. The real mutt-ification was white slave owners producing hordes of mulattos via rape so they didn't have to buy more slaves, and later with marrying Jews/Italians/other European subgroups as they arrived.

And I used the phrase "kind of" real, because the mutts are not evenly distributed, it heavily depends on what area you're in. There are areas where most of the white population is still predominantly one nationality, e.g. Germans in the Midwest, Swedes in Minnesota/Wisconsin, Scots in Appalachia, English in PNW, New England, and Lowland South. And there are other areas where the "whites" are extremely "mutted", e.g. New Jersey, Long Island, SoCal, parts of Louisiana, just to name some places.

But nowadays most American whites, even of "pure" European stock, are a mix of nationalities, have observed that English/German or Scot/German seems to be most common.

 

[Dagoth AMOGUS]

i was going to post something serious but fuck it. Anybody that argues that a child born from a Scot and a Brit are somehow mongrels is simply a shit-stirring hostile entity

Same when they say that the kid from eastern northwest South Dakota with 8% of each different European country that immigrated to the US is some kind of freak. Like how much purity do you want before it becomes inbreeding like Pakistanis?

All that being said, Magda Pegowska has a very weird looking kid.

Spoiler

 

[millais]

Recently I've been reading a lot of Old West memoirs. There is a lot of European race-mixing with the Indians and Mexicans prior to the mass settlement of European population in the West. All of these are pairings of Anglo or (more commonly) French-Canadian frontiersmen and Indian or Mexican women, during the early stages of exploration and exploitation of the western territories.

But the mixed population very quickly got outbred by the pure European settler population as soon as large scale settlement took place. So the race mixing was really confined to that initial 1-2 generations of frontier expansion. The only situations where it become intergenerational seems to be with the French-Canadian/Indian pairings, which no doubt accounts for the persistence of the Metis population.

And from the beginning there seems to be racemixing of European ethnic groups. One of the memoirs I read was written by a cowboy who was born in 1856 south Texas, to an Irish mother and Genoese father.

 

[Althalus]

i was going to post something serious but fuck it. Anybody that argues that a child born from a Scot and a Brit are somehow mongrels is simply a shit-stirring hostile entity

Tell a Scot that he is the same as a Brit and observe his reaction. Yes, its definitely not a mongrel like a mulatto since Scots and Brits are the same race. But ethnic subgroups within race do exist, and in their native countries and in early America they considered themselves different groups.

Same when they say that the kid from eastern northwest South Dakota with 8% of each different European country that immigrated to the US is some kind of freak. Like how much purity do you want before it becomes inbreeding like Pakistanis?

Fair point that purity spiraling is retarded, and literally creates retarded people. That doesn't negate the existence of ethnicity, or the fact that said ethnic groups considered themselves different.

But the mixed population very quickly got outbred by the pure European settler population as soon as large scale settlement took place. So the race mixing was really confined to that initial 1-2 generations of frontier expansion. The only situations where it become intergenerational seems to be with the French-Canadian/Indian pairings, which no doubt accounts for the persistence of the Metis population.

There was quite a bit of this in Louisiana also, but not to the same extent. I have heard (but can't confirm) that many French Acadians moved there after the British takeover of Canada, with the word "Cajun" being a corruption of Acadian.

 

[Althalus]

Apologies for doubleposting, merged my posts. Mods plz delete this one.

 

[millais]

There was quite a bit of this in Louisiana also, but not to the same extent. I have heard (but can't confirm) that many French Acadians moved there after the British takeover of Canada, with the word "Cajun" being a corruption of Acadian.

That's basically the origin of the Cajun population - the recalcitrant French rebels and deportees from Acadia (modern day Nova Scotia), being shipped to Louisiana by the British government.

The geographic isolation of the population did result in frequent race mixing with the existing ethnic groups in that part of Louisiana, like the Spanish and Indian. But Cajun race mixing reached its peak through the absorption/assimilation of later European settler populations in the region, like the German, Irish, Italian, and Anglo.

I don't know that they ever racemixed with the Cajuns, but during that era, coastal Louisiana even boasted a multi-generational population of Filipino fishermen, originally imported by the Spanish.

 

[PovertySprocket]

The only situations where it become intergenerational seems to be with the French-Canadian/Indian pairings, which no doubt accounts for the persistence of the Metis population.

Having to deal with peoples indian affairs forms. I'd say the average "first nation" in the southern part of Québec is watered the fuck down. It's a good grift tho, lots of gibs to collect.

 

[Candlelight Desolation]

Ehh... not sure in my case? Because while I'm a Floridian, my ethnic makeup is like majority Slav (pretty much one of every Slav country minus the Baltics if we're including those) while the other big chunk is Finn. I have no LatAm or Hamitic or Asian or Native American blood in me. I'm a Slavmutt. No founding stock, either. Personally, I do not at all care about "muh heritage" other Ellis Island latecomers do, but since I'm part of this specific ethnic demographic while living in the US, I felt like I should elaborate.

However, I did see a guy who looked almost exactly like the Amerimutt meme at a Walmart once maybe two years ago? So I'm not entirely sure.

 

[Romulus augustulus]

the vast, vast majority of the white population in the united states (and probably Canada) are 100% racially white Europeans. Mixing did not happen at a large scale at any time. all the "my grandma was a full blood Cherokee" stories are bullshit based on bad Physiognomy like black hair and high cheek bones among other traits that are all present in native European populations.

blacks, Mexicans and Indians all mix together quite often.

 

[BradeRunna]

No. The whole Amerimutt meme was something started by basement dwelling mouth breating autistic retard Europeans on 4chins /pol. They would spam it because they are butt hurt about America getting to have someone like Trump while they are stuck jerking off over some far right party winning a few seats in their shitty parliamentarian governments.

It's basically just jealous seething by Eurofags.

This also goes for the 56% face meme.

 

[Ughubughughughughughghlug]

Not quite yet but will be.

Until pretty recently the only races of any size in this country were Black and White with Hispanics, regionally, in the Southwest.

American Indians actually interbred with Whites at an insane rate (somewhat of an out-group preference, completely different sexual mores before Christianization), in the South the Indians had a great deal of Scottish blood and most of their leaders were a class of White-looking, majority-Scottish (by ethnicity) bilingual merchant elite. But the thing is, even at the time of the American Revolution they were outnumbered, like, 100 to 1. Miscegenation was only ever going to drown them in White blood, not the other way around. I can't speak so much to the breeding habits of non-Southern Indians, but among the Oklahoma population, just assume they're mestizo by default. Historically, English speakers called mestizo "country-born."

Hispanics, I don't really know much about that. The early Texan colonists intermarried with Mexicans a lot; later, as more Whites moved in to the Southwest, the attitude changed from typical frontiersman openness to other cultures to townie arrogance. Thing is, it doesn't matter: the population of the Southwest almost all came in from the mid-1900s on. Even in California. Texas is the exception and for a while they treated Tejanos like Blacks. These states were built on recent mass internal migration, not

Among Blacks, obviously they got a crazy high amount of BWC, but the reverse (BBC) was pretty much nonexistent and the mulattos were socially regarded as just being Black (except in French Louisiana, where they practiced colorism instead of racism). There's a reason American Blacks are brown-skinned instead of truly black-skinned like many Africans, they're already mulattos. The American Black population was also more or less complete by the time of the Revolution; they came in through the 1700s. The small number that was smuggled in the 1800s didn't contribute meaningfully to the genetic makeup. Until pretty recently miscegenation was a major taboo in both the North and South. It may have been outright illegal in the South, but you can see jokes about parents being pissed as hell about their kids dating Blacks as recently as the 2000s.

Asians (East/Oriental, South, Middle East) were a tiny population until recently and are still tiny compared to the other groups. Irrelevant.

Now, I said it will be. I see tons of Black-White couples, and it's not just White Woman Black Man. That started first, but I've started seeing a fair number of White Man Black Woman. There was a huge propaganda push towards it (it was like a switch flipped one day on the commercials, and then a while later on the porn websites). I don't know if the propaganda push actually started it, in fact, the little kids I see are old enough they had to have predated it, but it's unmistakable. They have mixed kids. They're not uncommon. I see this in the rural Deep South, where conventional wisdom (retardation) would predict it to be unlikely, but if anything it's much more predictable there: the races are more socially mingled. (One thing I've come to notice is that the Deep South is also more de-Confederatized than the Upper South/Appalachia, the exact opposite of what you'd expect; I think it's because the school curricula were overhauled earlier out of respect for the large Black population.) Honestly, I can understand it. Between the propaganda, not scoring enough poon, having a weird interest in slavery and going (for a brief while) to a church with a crazy number of hot Black girls, I started beating off to it.

I can't say as I've seen the same with Hispanics, but I say there will be an explosion of it in these coming decades. There's more of a distance when a population lives in fear (historically) of deportation, when there are practical legal barriers, even modest ones, in your way. Even if a Hispanic is themselves legal, there's still their whole family and social circle. Where at the point where that big Mexican population, which I think first started booming (I could be totally wrong) around the 1990s, has raised entire generations in this country in regular schools and those kids grew up/are growing up around White kids. There's no way they're not going to miscegenate at very high levels. I've become convinced, in past years, that the "redneck" rural population of the South is going to merge with the Mexicans into an uber-Texas and the culture of the US is going to be transformed by it. I can't speak so much for elsewhere in the country, but I have no reason to expect it to be different. These kids go to school, play with the White kids, go to "Batista" and "Pentecostalica" churches (they drop Catholicism like a bad habit, which it is), they will be as assimilated into the American mainstream as Italians are.

So in summary, the White population are not "el goblina" or whatever the fuck, but they will be within 10-20 years. I consider this a good thing as I believe these Mexicans will ultimately be the solution to the Yankee Question, which is the question that is the cause of all other questions. I think of myself as being kind of like (for the very shallow, surface-level, skimmed the Wikipedia once level) a Brazilian integralist in my view of it: the future is pardo, but it WILL NOT work out the way Brooklyn expects.

 

[Briananderson1138]

I thought the early Texan treatment of Mexicans was a bit more like the Turks and the peoples they conquered in Eastern Europe, in that there were both intermittent raids and massacres and abuse as peons, but also an ability for women and their children to be assimilated. I interpreted the Texan classification of Mexicans as technically white, despite all the talk of racial inferiority, as being a case of never asking a white supremacist what color his girlfriend is.

 

[Dawdler]

White man having sex with mexicans/indians just destroys their culture and nation since the offspring is genetically more fit than the natives and in turn, wipes it out.

Mixed slaves were better workers than imported ones and that destroyed the entire market.

 

[Ughubughughughughughghlug]

I thought the early Texan treatment of Mexicans was a bit more like the Turks and the peoples they conquered in Eastern Europe, in that there were both intermittent raids and massacres and abuse as peons, but also an ability for women and their children to be assimilated. I interpreted the Texan classification of Mexicans as technically white, despite all the talk of racial inferiority, as being a case of never asking a white supremacist what color his girlfriend is.

Well, they didn't actually treat Tejanos like Blacks in the sense of having a formal caste system, but it's a lazy shorthand (like comparing the Protestant-Catholics in Ireland to Whites-Blacks) to convey the idea of a discriminated ethnic group that's occasionally terrorized (lynching Mexicans and Chinese in the Southwest) and usually marginalized. Which you're already familiar with.

I'm not sure to what extent it wasn't just the same as colorism/Spanish casta in the colonies. There's also a pretty big religious divide (Texan Protestants vs Tejano Catholics) that people still cared about as late as the mid-1900s. But yeah, there wasn't any hard barrier to miscegenation and intermarriage like in the South with Blacks.

The Texan Revolution had an unfortunate effect in that when volunteers started pouring in from the rest of the South, particularly Tennessee, they tended to see all Mexicans as enemies, unlike the old Texan settlers who had mingled with them. The Tejanos were largely supportive of the Revolution, but by the end of it many of them (like Juan Seguin) had been forced out of the territory by their own side.

 

[RandomTwitterGuy]

Yes, why do you think you look so different from us in Europe?
You are overall shorter, more dark-skinned, have dark eyes and dark hair, are fatter, and so on.

 

[Judas Connor Moon]

I'M A PROUD AMERIMUTT! WE DIDN'T LAND ON PLYMOUTH ROCK! PLYMOUTH ROCK LANDED ON US!!!


AMERIMUTTS RISE UP

 

[9th year in hell]

“I don't see much future for the Americans ... it's a decayed country. And they have their racial problem, and the problem of social inequalities ... my feelings against Americanism are feelings of hatred and deep repugnance ... everything about the behaviour of American society reveals that it's half Judaised, and the other half negrified. How can one expect a State like that to hold together?”

Pretty much sums it up, this was a quote from almost 100 years ago. One can only imagine how bad it is today. There are men who thinks they are women, ther are individuals who think they are fit when they are fat... and there are Americans who thinks they are not mutts.

No. The whole Amerimutt meme was something started by basement dwelling mouth breating autistic retard Europeans on 4chins /pol. They would spam it because they are butt hurt about America getting to have someone like Trump while they are stuck jerking off over some far right party winning a few seats in their shitty parliamentarian governments.

It's basically just jealous seething by Eurofags.

This also goes for the 56% face meme.

Found the Amerimutt in the thread. The la creatura is seething.

 

[BradeRunna]

Pretty much sums it up, this was a quote from almost 100 years ago. One can only imagine how bad it is today. There are men who thinks they are women, ther are individuals who think they are fit when they are fat... and there are Americans who thinks they are not mutts.



Found the Amerimutt in the thread. The la creatura is seething.

Found the butthurt Eurofag in the thread. Keep seething Eurofag. LOL