>IMPLYING
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Dec 14, 2022
I feel like there's multiple ways to interpret the celebration, pre-mature or warranted.
1. Morale. If it feels like nothing has been achieved, or you tell your followers there's still a lot more to do, people might wind up thinking 'What's the point?' and engagement might decrease. If you tell people 'We're winning!' then it'll keep spirits up and keep people invested. If you tell people progress is slow, or actually non-existent, then what's the point in attacking people for putting this shit in media?
2. Grifting. To some people, if you tell them 'the fight's not over' whilst you have donation links plastered to your page, it could be read as 'We're winning, but we haven't won yet - give me shekels to keep up the effort!' Inversely, the victory calls could be seen as the same thing I.E. 'We're winning! See, the money you're giving me is making a dent in DEI - give me more'. This isn't mutually exclusive with the first example.
3. Earnest ignorance. People who see the numerous flops, cancellations, developers coming out as being anti-DEI and not know anything deeper about the subject, so they'll see the win as a win and have no ulterior motive to it. This is probably the case for a the followers of the larger accounts who make a living off of calling this shit out.
1. Morale. If it feels like nothing has been achieved, or you tell your followers there's still a lot more to do, people might wind up thinking 'What's the point?' and engagement might decrease. If you tell people 'We're winning!' then it'll keep spirits up and keep people invested. If you tell people progress is slow, or actually non-existent, then what's the point in attacking people for putting this shit in media?
2. Grifting. To some people, if you tell them 'the fight's not over' whilst you have donation links plastered to your page, it could be read as 'We're winning, but we haven't won yet - give me shekels to keep up the effort!' Inversely, the victory calls could be seen as the same thing I.E. 'We're winning! See, the money you're giving me is making a dent in DEI - give me more'. This isn't mutually exclusive with the first example.
3. Earnest ignorance. People who see the numerous flops, cancellations, developers coming out as being anti-DEI and not know anything deeper about the subject, so they'll see the win as a win and have no ulterior motive to it. This is probably the case for a the followers of the larger accounts who make a living off of calling this shit out.
Who?I'm also seeing right wingers crawling out of the woodwork too early as well, deciding they have the power to censor games when they clearly don't.