Horrorcow Tommy Tooter / Thomas Wasserberg - Dog-Abusing, Trash-Eating Pedo, Neo-Nazi, Fake Tranny, "1st-Wave Incel", Hounded YouTuber to Suicide

[Anonymus Fluhre]

Someone should remind our learned hobo Tom that "phobia" means fear, not hatred.

It also means to dislike something. However disliking something doesn't mean you have a strong hatred for it. Hatred takes a disliking of something to the extreme. Disliking is just an aversion to something. It's why aporophobia is just the aversion to the poor. Unlike what the retards on Wikipedia say. Phobos does not mean hatred, it's fear or panic (it's proto form meant "to flee"). The word for hatred of the poor would be something like miseo ptochos I think, ptochos is poor people and miseo is hate. Echthra can be used if you have animosty for the poor instead. Aporo is confussion, or being at a loss for words. Aporo me to thrasos sou means something like "I can't believe your cheek".

Now mind you that's only from research, I don't speak Greek, however Psychologists don't either, don't know what they're doing and can't be bothered to crack open a book, even their own DSM 5.

 

[Sexy Senior Citizen]

Yeah it's not our fault that Tom looks like an angry muppet with a permascowl

He's the horrific clone/love child of Waldorf and Statler!

 

[DSP's Tax Lawyer]

Good news guys, @Miss Tommie Jayne Wasserberg is a fan of the Bearable Thomas YouTube channel. I hope he tunes in to see more antics from the baffoonery

 

[Sexy Senior Citizen]

@Miss Tommie Jayne Wasserberg Defamation and False Light are two separate causes of action. We have not defamed you in any way: insults are not defamation. Nor have we portrayed your actions in False Light: we've reacted the way any reasonable person would to a filthy old man talking about raping a dog and a minor. Please, do us all a favor and take a long walk into the desert; don't bother coming back.

 

[DSP's Tax Lawyer]

@Miss Tommie Jayne Wasserberg Defamation and False Light are two separate causes of action. We have not defamed you in any way: insults are not defamation. Nor have we portrayed your actions in False Light: we've reacted the way any reasonable person would to a filthy old man talking about raping a dog and a minor. Please, do us all a favor and take a long walk into the desert; don't bother coming back.

Hey now, Tom is a fan of the Bearable Thomas Wasserberg channel. That makes him family and as family we need to intervene and make him see the errors of his way before he can begin to heal, serve his time, and peaceful fly away with the Space Jews

 

[Tragi-Chan]

View attachment 6855724


Good news guys, @Miss Tommie Jayne Wasserberg is a fan of the Bearable Thomas YouTube channel. I hope he tunes in to see more antics from the baffoonery

Hasn’t the fat fool just shot himself through the foot by communicating with the channel? What a fat fool.

@Miss Tommie Jayne Wasserberg Defamation and False Light are two separate causes of action. We have not defamed you in any way: insults are not defamation. Nor have we portrayed your actions in False Light: we've reacted the way any reasonable person would to a filthy old man talking about raping a dog and a minor. Please, do us all a favor and take a long walk into the desert; don't bother coming back.

I suppose you could argue false light if there was some missing context for the allegations. But he has never provided any, other than that which makes him look worse. He has never gone back on his confessions in any way. He has not expressed any remorse and when asked how he would react in similar situations today, he has refused to answer.

He has provided enough context to enable Sabrina to be tracked down, if it ever came to that, so she could be questioned if necessary. Unfortunately, the dog in question is long deceased, likely having been raped to death in a dogsex frenzy.

 

[True Boss of this Gym]

Checking in yet again- dead yet?

 

[Uncle Buck]

Checking in yet again- dead yet?

No, unfortunately.

 

[True Boss of this Gym]

What a grim world.

 

[DSP's Tax Lawyer]

Hasn’t the fat fool just shot himself through the foot by communicating with the channel? What a fat fool.

He's commented thousands of times on AMB that both that forum and kiwi farms is insignificant to him and his business. Which ruins his entire RICO civil case lol

 

[BigTodd]

He's commented thousands of times on AMB that both that forum and kiwi farms is insignificant to him and his business. Which ruins his entire RICO civil case lol

His own case ruins his own case. He admits multiple times in his filings that there are no damages, yet somehow comes to $20m in damages that YouTube is somehow responsible for.

 

[FinnSven]

His own case ruins his own case. He admits multiple times in his filings that there are no damages, yet somehow comes to $20m in damages that YouTube is somehow responsible for.

This is the fundamental element of every suit surely?

That whatever you are contesting, at its core it should have a measurable financial impact on the casebringer.

Obvious things are having lost proven business, or been physically harmed and at least temporarily disabled and unable to earn a wage as a result.

Of course,”potential” earnings and business can be hard to sue for because you have to prove without a shadow of a doubt that the earnings or business were all but guaranteed.

For instance, suing a man who raped your stud dog so now it is traumatized and refuses to mate with females for the purpose of making pedigree puppies.

Suing over YouTube doing what it is set up to do and proving that he lost 20 million worth of business or earnings is a hard sell when you are a busker and peddler of gravel based trinkets.

 

[Uncle Buck]

This is the fundamental element of every suit surely?

That whatever you are contesting, at its core it should have a measurable financial impact on the casebringer.

Obvious things are having lost proven business, or been physically harmed and at least temporarily disabled and unable to earn a wage as a result.

Of course,”potential” earnings and business can be hard to sue for because you have to prove without a shadow of a doubt that the earnings or business were all but guaranteed.

For instance, suing a man who raped your stud dog so now it is traumatized and refuses to mate with females for the purpose of making pedigree puppies.

Suing over YouTube doing what it is set up to do and proving that he lost 20 million worth of business or earnings is a hard sell when you are a busker and peddler of gravel based trinkets.

He's even more ill-informed on the subject of copyright matters than the Were-Turkey, which is really saying something. He believes the mere mention of his name in a way that he hasn't authorized is both civil copyright infringement and criminal incitement to violence, cyber-terrorism and "stalking". You only need watch the first ten minutes of the MATI "Conversation with Tommy Tooter" to realize that you're dealing with the LOLcow that is, possibly, the most out of touch with reality of them all.

 

[Anonymus Fluhre]

It's rather hard to lose $20 million dollars of sales when your rocks are worth pennies. Not to mention everyone knows gemstones and shit have a fixed value and anything worth a good amount is something he can't afford.

 

[FinnSven]

It's rather hard to lose $20 million dollars of sales when your rocks are worth pennies. Not to mention everyone knows gemstones and shit have a fixed value and anything worth a good amount is something he can't afford.

The tiny diamonds in cheap jewelry, even if they are genuine diamonds are really really inexpensive and resell for pretty much nothing.

So crappy “semi” precious stones really are not worth what he seems to believe.

Why does he think that the only jewelry one typically sees these stones in are usually sold in those esoteric “magic” shops, selling tarot cards and other related woo-woo nonsense?

These stores are also renowned for massively overcharging for their wares, so they certainly are not an indicator of the relative value of the various trinkets and tat they flog.

All respect to anyone who runs such a woo store here.
I don’t believe in that stuff, but kudos for exploiting the old saying, “a fool and his money”.

 

[Bookwork]

Tommy's just hoping for go-away money. He'd settle for 10 cents on the dollar next Tuesday and, barring that, 1 cent on the dollar on Wednesday.

 

[Sparkletor 2.0]

Let me explain this to you slow kids in the back.

Tom made $20 a day busking and selling rocks.
Tom is approximately 2740 years old which is about a million days. $20/day times a million days = $20,000,000. It's simple arithmetic.

 

[AnOminous]

Of course,”potential” earnings and business can be hard to sue for because you have to prove without a shadow of a doubt that the earnings or business were all but guaranteed.

It's a preponderance standard, like most other civil standards. However, you usually have to prove you've actually earned money in the past, and Tom-Bomb can't even do that, much less that it is "reasonably certain" he'd have made earnings had people not committed some civil tort against him. And repeating what he has said about himself, repeatedly, for years, that he molested a child and diddled a dog, is not a tort. That's just what he's admitted to.

 

[repentance]

It's rather hard to lose $20 million dollars of sales when your rocks are worth pennies. Not to mention everyone knows gemstones and shit have a fixed value and anything worth a good amount is something he can't afford.

He's anticipating punitive damages in that amount. No, he doesn't understand punitive damages.

 

[Anonymus Fluhre]

He's anticipating punitive damages in that amount. No, he doesn't understand punitive damages.

I don't think Thomas has ever proven to understand anything.