Crime Neil Gaiman Accused of Sexual Assault, Author Denies Allegations

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Acclaimed author Neil Gaiman is facing multiple allegations of sexual assault, making him the subject of a police complaint in New Zealand. Gaiman has offered a response as well, refuting the accusations.

Per Tortoise Media, two women have accused Gaiman of sexual assault while in consensual relationships with the author. The allegations go back two decades, but they were first reported on in Tortoise's podcast Master: the allegations against Neil Gaiman, which was released on Wednesday. The women describe allegations of "rough and degrading sex," alleging that these instances were not always consensual.

One of the two accusers, a 23-year-old woman named Scarlett, claims she was sexually assaulted in February 2022 just hours after first meeting Gaiman. According to Scarlett, the assault happened in a bath at Gaiman's New Zealand home where she was hired to work as a nanny for his child. Gaiman says that the two merely "cuddled" and "made out" that day, adding that a three-week sexual relationship ensued, but was entirely consensual. Scarlett insists that Gaiman was "rough and degrading," and reportedly, messages, notes, and accounts from friends support her allegations.

Another accuser, identifying herself as K, says she was an 18-year-old fan when she first met Gaiman at a book signing in Sarasota, Florida, in 2003. K claims that she began a romantic relationship with Gaiman after she turned 20, resulting in engaging in rough sex that she "neither wanted nor enjoyed." It's alleged that one particular incident saw Gaimain forcefully penetrating K despite her objections.

Gaiman has denied this claim as well. The Sandman author maintains that his relationship with K was never unlawful and that he's "disturbed" to be accused of such behavior. According to Gaiman, K's allegations stem from "regret" over the relationship she had when it was over. He also attributed Scarlett's allegations to a condition she has that's associated with false memories, but the Tortoise report noted that this isn't supported by the accuser's medical records.

Additionally, Gaiman has strongly denied all allegations of non-consensual sex at any time with the women accusing him of sexual assault. He also claimed that New Zealand police ignored his offer for assistance with one woman's complaint in 2022, suggesting that shows a lack of substance in the investigation. New Zealand officers have responded by saying they made a "number of attempts to speak to key people as part of this investigation and those efforts remain ongoing." It was added that there are "a number of factors to take into consideration with this case, including location of all parties.”

Gaiman has long been one of pop culture's most revered authors, bringing to life acclaimed stories like The Sandman, Good Omens, and American Gods. Just recently, Netflix has been promoting the upcoming second season of The Sandman, which is based on Gaiman's source material; he also executive produces the series.

Source/Archive

________________________________________________________________________

Honestly while Gaiman was not on the top of my "insufferable and terminally overhyped geek culture retards I cant wait to get outed as sex predators for my own amusement" list (currently being topped by Wil Wheaton followed by Alan Moore) I cannot deny feeling that little bit jollier with the thought I may never have to hear him mentioned again
 
Wny are so many male posters on KF, a website that won't let you make an account unless you can prove that you are ugly, poor, and have nothing worth stealing, so convinced that all women are champing at the bit to make up false rape allegations against regular guys for a "payday"? Have they ever had consensual sex and do they know that you don't get paid when a guy who raped you gets arrested?
Gaiman is a "regular guy"?
You get paid if the rape allegation is intended as blackmail against someone like Gaiman who can casually shell out 200 grand for NDA after sex.
IIRC if you get raped the correct course of action is to file a police report, not to announce it on social media.
 
At least Gaiman has some talent. But being so enamored by AMANDA PALMER, the absolute value vacuum, that you become her free servant and the fuckthing of him?
Like we can say this or that about previous abuse, but Amanda Palmer is the least welcome entity on this planet. How is it possible that ANYONE felt better about life when they got attention from the notorious scammer, talentless, pretentious, shrill bitch?

(Then again, I used to have a nutcase friend as a teen who was a huge Emilie Autumn fan, I am not getting over that clownslutcore liar.)

Like this is my fucking issue with the whole feminist pantheon. Maybe I am not molested enough to understand, but if I was in need of something to make my life better... would I go with ugly, mean, loud, dumb women (or whatever combination of those, really)? Like what needs to be wrong with you to feel comforted by Palmer, Lena Dunham, Roxanne Gay, or whichever.
Gaiman... sure, lanky weird sadboy bullshit. There is a market for that, even (or even more so) when he is a sanctimonious lib.
 
I refuse to believe that all Scientologists come out or turn into fucked in the head sociopaths. Actors like Tom Cruise and Jason Lee (My Name Is Earl) seem like decent professional actors. But why they joined in the first place is anyone's guess. I would think they were sold on the lie that it's elaborate self help and for the Hollywood people they want to get connections to people in the industry.
They start fucked and get blackmailed into it. There's a whole "confession" part you have to do when you join. It's all just standard cult love bombing to broken faggot theater kids with no support system that turns into abuse both financial and not and then it's too late. If you try to leave they'll use everything against you.
 
I’ve been listening to the Tortoise podcast series and here are my takeaways:

- Amanda Palmer acted as Gaiman’s Ghislane Maxwell and procured dumb/vulnerable young BPD women for him to fuck
- Gaiman is a REALLY bad fuck. This is almost universal in the accounts. It’s probably why Palmer got chicks for him: she herself didn’t want to deal with him.
- Gaiman has a ton of unresolved ongoing connections to Scientology. His dad was unpersoned due to allegations of having sex with students. I suspect he was groomed in the church to abuse vulnerable women and this is just the culture of Scientologists.

So yeah. The legal allegations are a separate issue. Not everything is in the scope of the law, obviously. But Gaiman is undoubtedly a sexpest.

TLDR: typical male feminist with an added dash of Scientology
 
Gaiman is a "regular guy"?
You get paid if the rape allegation is intended as blackmail against someone like Gaiman who can casually shell out 200 grand for NDA after sex.
IIRC if you get raped the correct course of action is to file a police report, not to announce it on social media.
Exactly. He is a celebrity and things will apply to him that regular guys on this message board do not need to be afraid of. So they don't need to defend celebrity rapists out of fear that some sort of witch hunt will target them.
 
At least Gaiman has some talent. But being so enamored by AMANDA PALMER, the absolute value vacuum, that you become her free servant and the fuckthing of him?
Like we can say this or that about previous abuse, but Amanda Palmer is the least welcome entity on this planet. How is it possible that ANYONE felt better about life when they got attention from the notorious scammer, talentless, pretentious, shrill bitch?

(Then again, I used to have a nutcase friend as a teen who was a huge Emilie Autumn fan, I am not getting over that clownslutcore liar.)

Like this is my fucking issue with the whole feminist pantheon. Maybe I am not molested enough to understand, but if I was in need of something to make my life better... would I go with ugly, mean, loud, dumb women (or whatever combination of those, really)? Like what needs to be wrong with you to feel comforted by Palmer, Lena Dunham, Roxanne Gay, or whichever.
Gaiman... sure, lanky weird sadboy bullshit. There is a market for that, even (or even more so) when he is a sanctimonious lib.
I really assume the only people who listen to Amanda Palmer are dorks who take Pitchfork.com as a source to constantly find new music and avoid hearing anything fun. The people who would call classic rock "dadrock" derisively like it meant anything.
 
AMANDA PALMER, the absolute value vacuum
I don't trust men who speak this way. You're not angry that she has no "morals" or "code" and just lives out her life as a degen. You're angry that you put in so much work to perform and preach morals and values but yet receive no benefit from them.
You only benefit from morals and values if you truly believe them and would live by them even if no one was watching. You can't be angry that drugged-up fat whores get more girls, money and attention than you do. The people giving her those things know she's a vacuum and given the choice between someone openly trying to steal as much as possible at all times, and some guy going "reeee I got a JOB and pretend to want KIDS why haven't you people given me what I DESERVE yet" they're gonna go with the party slut.
 
Exactly. He is a celebrity and things will apply to him that regular guys on this message board do not need to be afraid of. So they don't need to defend celebrity rapists out of fear that some sort of witch hunt will target them.

Anyone who is defending him is misguided. He couldn’t be arsed to put on a condom, lick a little pussy, use some lube, nor even wait for a chick’s painful vagina infection to get better.

One woman described it as “never pleasurable, always uncomfortable”.

Male feminism in action!!

I think we should all break out the popcorn and enjoy this man being planted for being so shite in bed lol.
 
I don't trust men who speak this way. You're not angry that she has no "morals" or "code" and just lives out her life as a degen. You're angry that you put in so much work to perform and preach morals and values but yet receive no benefit from them.
You only benefit from morals and values if you truly believe them and would live by them even if no one was watching. You can't be angry that drugged-up fat whores get more girls, money and attention than you do. The people giving her those things know she's a vacuum and given the choice between someone openly trying to steal as much as possible at all times, and some guy going "reeee I got a JOB and pretend to want KIDS why haven't you people given me what I DESERVE yet" they're gonna go with the party slut.
Her music is horrendous. I mean literal trash. I don't even think she's fat the music is just shit. Amanda Palmer is basically the Zoe Quinn of 2000s alternative.
 
Exactly. He is a celebrity and things will apply to him that regular guys on this message board do not need to be afraid of. So they don't need to defend celebrity rapists out of fear that some sort of witch hunt will target them.
Gaiman is hollywood degenerate whose wife brings him BPD prostitutes to take advantage of. You don't have to be afraid (projecting a womanly emotion here) to make inferences from incomplete and conflicting stories from a sex pest and a BPD prostitute.
 
Wasn't Scientology a result of Hubbard making a bet with some other SF writer that he can start a cult from scratch? I 'member reading that somewhere.
No, that's apocryphal, there's actually been a fair amount of research into this and he just said things to the gist of "if you want to make money start a religion" for years to multiple people.


 
Like this is my fucking issue with the whole feminist pantheon. Maybe I am not molested enough to understand, but if I was in need of something to make my life better... would I go with ugly, mean, loud, dumb women (or whatever combination of those, really)? Like what needs to be wrong with you to feel comforted by Palmer, Lena Dunham, Roxanne Gay, or whichever.

Its difficult to explain the appeal of sticking yourself into crazy. It always seems like a good idea at the time but eventually it all degenerates into a horror show. In the early days, they are more mean and loud to other people rather than you. The first fatal mistake is not seeing that all that mean and loud will be turned on you eventually. The second mistake is not recognizing that she is usually very apt at hiding her true self from you and will be very successful at doing so in the early days. Knowing her will come as a series of hideous revelations in sequence over time. If you knew it all up front, you would have run away. But since it comes over time, you convince yourself its all ok. You make excuses. You look for whatever good there is in what you have with her. Sometimes they can be both dumb and smart at the same time. And the smart person can be fun to be around....until the dumb person comes out and stays out.

Then there is a whole bunch of other stuff. Like if she is 20 years younger than you are. If she is so messed up in the head herself that she serves to unleash every degenerate impulse in your own head or gives you implicit permission to do it.

Honestly as well, all this stuff has female versions of it. The women who are attracted to "bad boys", the women who are into serial killers, the whole "I can fix him" thing and so on. There are two sides to the coin.

Sometimes you just have to make really bad choices to understand why you shouldn't make bad choices. But most people go through that when they are young. Not when they are in their mid-50s and early 60s like Neil Gaiman.
 
I don't trust men who speak this way. You're not angry that she has no "morals" or "code" and just lives out her life as a degen. You're angry that you put in so much work to perform and preach morals and values but yet receive no benefit from them.
You only benefit from morals and values if you truly believe them and would live by them even if no one was watching. You can't be angry that drugged-up fat whores get more girls, money and attention than you do. The people giving her those things know she's a vacuum and given the choice between someone openly trying to steal as much as possible at all times, and some guy going "reeee I got a JOB and pretend to want KIDS why haven't you people given me what I DESERVE yet" they're gonna go with the party slut.
Friend.
I am a woman. One that has zero interest in getting girls.

There is something delicious about the fact that you are not only totally wrong about what I am, but also go into this o fantasy speculation about my relationships that are totally wrong. Like... I am just a bit insulte by you NOT saying how small my dick I don't have is. :D

But no. My problem with Amanda Palmer is that she is actively making life worse for artists AND her fellow women, while her weirdass Upside Down world fans pretend she is actually our hero.
Art is cool. It's great. But she fucked over and cheated other artists, making them do free work for her, meanwhile she pocketed donations AND wrote a book patting her own back for being so brave to e-beg.
 
Back