The Porn Revolution and its consequences have been a disaster for the human race. - If only you knew how bad things really are.

[Outer Space Traveller]

The problem is your coomer Aesthetic religion, which not only doesn't forbid you from jerking off, but compels you to impose that vice on everyone around you.

Ban porn.

I remember someone saying something about Adam from YourMovieSucks, and I liked the summary in there. It's basically this:

This video is from a few years ago, and it's Adum explaining that what Nikicado Avocado does is an obvious fat fetish thing. He explains how he knows this not only from just having a general amount of experience with identifying fetishes, but also from people with this fetish directly telling him how it works.

That's not really the interesting part, though—you could obviously see how being a furry would give someone this kind of insight. The interesting part is his attitude towards the concept of someone following their fetish until it kills them. He's totally ambivalent towards it. There's no horror to him. This is the number one, one-hundred-percent most important thing to understand about gay men. It's the exact same attitude that Foucault had when he famously declared that given the choice between life and sex, he'd choose sex. He then died of AIDS.

Gays, as a community, do not have the same attitude towards death that a normal "worldly" person does. The average "worldly" normal person has some hope of immortality, whether that be through religion (even aliens or transhumanism) or childbearing. Gays characteristically have none at all. There are exceptions, but the rule is total despair. It is no surprise at all that they appeared as an identity (rather than a behavior, which has always existed) right around the time in the 1800s that materialism and atheism started popping off. Sex is their religion, as sex produces the subjective feelings of vitality in lieu of any real hope of life.

To a gay man, the highest purpose of man is to masturbate to Scar from the Lion King.

When a gay man supports any political ideology, it is to maximize mankind's ability to masturbate to Scar from the Lion King.

When a gay man wants to explore the universe, it is to masturbate to Scar from the Lion King on other planets.

When a gay man resents religion, it is because religion prevents man from realizing his destiny of masturbating to Scar from the Lion King.

But why would he do any of that, when the end goal of history—masturbating to Scar from the Lion King—has already arrived? What use is there for the womb-havers? The great historical dialectic has reached it's final stage—there is no need for further generations. Now, all that's left to do is watch movies, masturbate to Scar from the Lion King, and die.

At this thread.

 

[California Newt]

Tradsolutions are best solutions.

1. Ban porn

2. Social conditions (isolation, anomie, a collective downward spiral of nearly all men, destruction of family, etc) where proliferation of porn is a symptom, not a cause still exists and gets worse.

3. Women free to be voracious consumers and creators of their own types of porn (ie, social media, "romance" novels, dating apps, collecting simps and oribiters, etc) still fully permissible along with just fucking whoever they want to whenever they want anyway regardless of marital or relationship status. Sooner her body count reaches that of the LAPD in the 90s the sooner she'll realize 'twas all folly' and pickup a bible to become the docile tradwife she always was, amIrite my bible dudes? She can't fuck 100 or 1000 guys in a day for a world record if no one films it.

Rules for men, not women. Fewer freedoms for men, not women. Tradcon prescriptivism is great if you never have to practice it especially in the reality where tradcons already tried and failed. Censor naughty language and swear words in music and movies next. Maybe that big screen sideboob and curse word is the reason you can't get a wife/mommy slave to wash your socks for the rest of her life. Sure traditionalism failed when women were chattal, but there's no reason it won't work when women are out-earning, out-educating, out-witting, out-politicing and out-scheming men on the whole.

Traditionalism didn't "fail". Contemporary society is a union-busting exercise, not the inevitable flight of the arrow of history.

The Rockefellers bankrolled feminism. You think the oligarchs don't practice patriarchy? That "feminism" is for middle managers and slaves, so that they can't form competing power structures. Don't be narrow-sighted.

The problem isn't that there's some unstoppable disease called "feminism"; it's not men vs. women—"feminist" women are just LARPing secretaries for oligarchs. It's men vs. men who own banks and railroads.

I remember someone saying something about Adam from YourMovieSucks, and I liked the summary in there. It's basically this:

I'm glad you enjoyed my post. I'll quote some other relevant ones here; if you're interested, I reccomend going to the threads to view the full posts—these are excerpts:

I go into the origin of the problem here:

Today, the only 'material' way for the average person to satisfy their desire to conquer death is by having kids. The institutionally promoted way, though, is to exploit the lizard-brain to produce feelings of life-generation through various forms of sexuality.

I think it's important to remember that sexuality as the only vehicle for satisfying the human requirement for immortality is an almost exclusively early-modern phenomenon. It started in the West with the Protestant Reformation, when Luther got rid of monasticism—although you could argue that this was a reaction to the Roman Catholic devaluation and forgetfulness of the authentic Christian mystical tradition (which was already deteriorating in Western Europe before the Great Schism, but accelerated afterwards).

The problem with this is that, while in theory it still has a place for non-reproductive immortality in its worldview, the average person doesn't have a way to participate in that active immortality-process outside of sexuality anymore once ascesis has been removed. In the authentic tradition, life-force and virtue-force are seen as the same thing in a way: "give blood, receive the Spirit". Sexuality is in many ways a lower reflection of ascesis, and Western Christianity gradually lost this as a core part of its experienced tradition.

Prior to this (and inconsistently afterward, though not in a mainstream capacity in the West), every civilization has had its ascetics, celibates, and mystics. Many of these traditions—such as Jewish Kaballah, Hindu Kundalini yoga, and Taoist alchemy—tried to reach or realize their immortality through the manipulation and transmutation of sexual energies: examples of such energies are nefesh (in Kaballah), prana (in Hinduism), and Qi (in Taoist alchemy). In Christianity, rather than transmute created sexual energies, the Holy Spirit gives the life-force directly from outside of the created machinery of sexuality—that being said, the common thread through most of these societies has been the idea that sexual reproduction, while not necessarily evil, is a lower path than the mystical (and often a material analogy and reflection of it).

After Luther dethroned monasticism, and around the time that Deism began to degenerate into Atheism, Charles Darwin re-oriented all of life to center around the sexual drive: in his system, every functional part of the human being—including his psychology or "soul"—is there to help him reproduce.

Less than half a century later, you got Freud (who reduced everything to infantile sexuality)—as well as the sexologists' (particularly Krafft-Ebing's) invention of the category of the "Homosexual". Even French pedophiles like Foucault could tell you how sex-obsessed Europe and America became during the period from the Counter-Reformation up to the twentieth century, finding all kinds of excuses to "multiply discourses" on it and develop their own "science of sexuality".



Today's evolutionary psychologists continue in the ethos of Freud in reducing the human being to a sexual automaton, while today's "queer theorists" continue the work of the nineteenth-century "sexologists" who kickstarted the modern pantheon of "sexual identities". Both of these—while you could argue that evopsych has some legitimate insights—are examples of modern myth-making disguised as rigorous scientific disciplines.

Speculating that men and women's psychological differences arose because men had to fight bears and women had to pick berries is no different from uncontacted tribes talking about how men and women are different because the gods split the primordial hermaphrodite in two or whatever: we weren't there; they're both examples of people telling stories to explain the world around them using the limited categories of thought and experience available to them. It says more about us and how we view things than it does about where we came from.

Queer theory—and the whole "lgbtqia+" as a concept—is religious initiatory psychology applied to deviant sexuality: it posits that your "true self" is hidden and that you need to "uncover" or "realize it" through the particular deviant practice you've chosen (or, alternatively, been given by the group) as your "identity". For them, your "gender" occupies the same same space as the "buddha nature" or "image of God" (not to conflate those two, of course) in other traditions.

All of this, I believe, is to collapse creative and mystical psychology into the sexual drive. I don't even mean in a reproductive sense: I mean purely in the sense of exploiting the lizard-brain to produce life-feelings in lieu of any real hope of enduring life. People don't look for immortality anymore: they look for "self actualization" and take anti-depressants.
The goal isn't to live, but to cope with death. It's the ultimate despair-driven slave religion. The people at the top don't follow it.

I've tried to point to some possible solutions on the individual level:

Once you understand that deviant sexual subcultures are essentially prayer groups (aside from the physical addiction element), the escape route becomes obvious. They need a new God; they need something to replace what that stuff was in their lives—and not in a purely notional sense, either.

Today's "sexuality" is just spirituality collapsed into the lizard-brain.

The absence—or, at best, shallow superficiality—of American religion has given sexuality free reign to declare itself the zenith of all frankness: the bathhouse has the monopoly on naked souls.

It's "for-itself", void of pretense. It's the "what-it's-for"—not yet another "for-the-sake-of".

That's what prayer is supposed to be. If you told someone you and a guy were meeting up to pray together, they'd probably think you were gay—there's your evidence.

An entire category of male relationship is just gone, and it's as much because of already-vague-and-shallow prayer traditions falling away as it is the active effort to cast fraternity in a gay light.

Need to re-read St. Ignatius Brianchaninov.

Support for the premise that deviant sexual subcultures—and perhaps especially porn-focused ones—are essentially prayer groups:

It's ironic that both groups tend to hate each other when they all, at the highest degree of their initiation, meet at the same basin full of tranny gooner blackmailed openly Satan worshipping (and often posessed; I've come across "prophets of the porn goddess" who claimed to have visions) fed assets and pleasure-through-death-craving annihilationist methheads anyhow.

It's not a fetish for blacks, it's a fetish for death. The people into this feel energized by death. All gooning rabbitholes end here, and they all mix at the same basin at the bottom.

You know what else uses that initiaton-through degrees method? Well, on top of freemasonry, every illegal and evil fetish rabbithole.

Not only that, but the more blind eyes you turn, the more you find out that eventually you lose the ability to see; this is perfect for the regime, because it means that even if you don't climb the ladder to the next degrees, you're still a self-censoring brainwashed automaton dumb stupid idiot cow-thing slave.

So yeah, of course there are a lot of blackpilled chuds who do this. That doesn't mean that it comes from them, or that it's from "fear" or "trauma" or any other gay shit. It's a grooming, blackmailing, and recruitment ring and a direct expression in sexual terms of the fundamental spirit of our society.

What's the name of that spirit? Well, the deeper into this stuff you go, you'll here "the porn god" or the "porn goddess". Eventually they just recognize that it's an antinomian annihilationist hedonic will that they identify as Satan.

Fetishism is poetry. It's all initiatory symbolism; remember the magicians I talked about? It's religious psychology collapsed into the lizard-brain; it's the reduction of mysticism to the sex drive. I don't like Foucault (obviously), but he understood this ( you can read about his Scientia Sexualis in The History of Sexuality, Volume 1). Obviously, the average furry gooner doesn't know he's tapping into this—but neither does the average tulpamancer, who thinks he's just using a "brain-hack".

There are infinitely many forms fetishism can take, but it's all ultimately about creative potency—whether for creation, or for destruction (gravity tending towards the latter). Sexuality, creativity, and religion all use the same grammar. That's what fetishism exploits. It's all symbolism. I'll give an example:

If you want to know the ultimate fetish, it's a man's penis being transformed into a serpent and hypnotically mind-controlling him. I think the specific tag is "snake_penis" or something. It's the fetishization of a man's appetites totally possessing and controlling him. That's what's at the bottom of the well. It's some real evil stuff.

Even the goofiest fetish subculture has at least one guy who can lead you deeper to another circle, until you're at the bottom and it's naked invocations of Satan—they identify him with the rush of energy that comes from the transgression of boundaries and submission to the appetites. You don't even have to go very far. They say they don't believe in it, until they're past the point of backing out. It's a "It's ironic until it's not—it's not happening, and if it is it's a good thing" kind of situation, same as all grooming.

This isn't speculation—this is spelunking. Incidentally, and on-topic, those places are absolutely swarming with trannies.

I have been called a "schizoposter" recently, but this is not accurate. Things are actually just this crazy.

Edit: forgot an important one:

Spoiler: More uplifting

@Forsaken Wanderer the purpose of the practice is to become God-filled. This is done through communion (on the physical side), and through athletic struggle for the virtues (on the spiritual side). I mean "athletic" in the same sense as weight-lifting; it's always about staying on the boundary of the limits of your strength. If you push too far, you injure yourself.

This principle of athleticism is also where all simple pleasure in life is, when you think about it: whether in exercise, sex, food, music, or anything else, pleasure is really an oscillation between tension and release; pleasure is maximized at the peak of our capacity to bear tension, and at the subsequent catharsis of the release that follows. What changes after you brush up against your limits? They shift—you gain the ability to bear more weight. In the traditional Christian ascetic practice, you bear God more fully.

But why would you want to do this, outside of the pleasures of tension and release which are identical for anything? Why bear God?

Beauty is symbolic of virtue. This can even be understood in a secular sense: if something you see aesthetically moves your soul, then obviously your soul perceives an analogical relationship between that thing and something within your soul. The lion tends to work as a symbol of courage, for example.

We understand the authentic virtues to be in a real sense literally divine: the virtues are uncreated energies (operations) of God. They are God in the same sense that your own enegizing/operation is you (although not your essence). They come from your essence, but are still you and reveal you: take a carpenter's energy/operation of building a house, for example—there's the essence of the carpenter (him in himself), his energy (building the house), and the effect (the house).

The point here is that there is no such thing as impersonal beauty, as there are no such things as impersonal virtues. How could something impersonal be virtuous? Persons have virtues, and all virtues are really personal aspects of God. Every deep, true desire of the human soul is a desire to bear God in oneself; He is the one who the soul loves.

When you ask God for courage, you're not asking for an impersonal, abstract "courage": you're saying "give me You; You who I've known in the bottom of my soul since before I was born". Christ, who is the Truth incarnate, said to Pilate: "Every one that is of the truth heareth my voice" (John 18:37). There's this idea that Jesus is a guy that people thought was God because He did a lot of miracles and fulfilled a lot of prophecies—that's definitely part of it, but there's a more important reason: even if they couldn't articulate it, and even if they fought it, they recognized Him.

Wrapping this up, now. "Theosis", the goal of Orthodoxy, is to become maximally filled with God; that doesn't mean, though, that it's all dreary joylessness until you get there. If you're in the gym and put up that poster of Arnold, but are miserable every day that you aren't jacked enough yet to star in "Conan the Barbarian" like he did, you're going to quit. You have to love the process: you have to love the feel of the texture of the weight on your muscles—chewing it and consuming it in the same way that your mouth does food, or your legs a landscape. Even if in this life it's accompanied by pain, there's an immediate and visceral reality of contact with what it is you're after. Everyone feels like Arnold after they've gone to failure on a lift.

I am in no way qualified to give any kind of advice, but that's the concept as I understand it.

 

[⚞⛇⚟]

The solution is way easier than getting the government to ban porn. Just bring back shame/make fun of people that goon, and develop a sense of self respect. The only reason that porn addiction is so common is because everything is over-sexualized and porn is viewed as something that all men use. If the general public can get back to viewing porn as something that is yucky and gross, and if people can respect themselves enough to not goon, then porn addiction will decline heavily.

 

[Outer Space Traveller]

Thank you for your contribution, @California Newt . Indeed, it shows the problem we face is not merely "pornography", it goes into a social, communitarian and even spiritual one. I see society thinking a lot about the community a lot while at the same time thinking a lot about the individual - you could say both do it on the wrong aspects. Meaning: Collective for the wrong reasons and individual for the wrong reasons.

This is one of the reasons why we could also ask "Why are troons annoying? Why can't we fix their 'gender dysphoria'? Why can't we talk about it?" - simple, look at how chaotic at the same time idyllic/meaningless our lives are. Live and CONSOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOM. This is why degeneracy will only increase in the coming years, and the desire "to coom" will do as well. Troons are here because porn-addicted men can't fix up their lives, many use narcotics, and this fucked up their brains. Society is shit, and while they could fix themselves up - many are weak, and just take an easy way out (doing what's trendy and others ACK-ing).

And no doubt, Narcotics and Pornography take a heavy toll within it.

 

[World Famous Quasi Payer]

However, despite the emergence of said discourse in recent years it has done almost seemingly little to nothing to blunt the usage and expansion of online pornography.

That's because neither left or right sides want to actually do anything about this issue. They'll go on and on about the problem, but both are to so commented to their ideological beliefs that they are literally incapable of solving the issue. Its like asking a marxist to solve the problems of low supply with anything other than slavery. Your wasting your time.

 

[grump]

When something is supported by both the far left and the far right than it is generally a very bad idea.

In the past man would either get to bang all the hot chicks left and right or die in the process of trying to reach that position. In this day and age where we are too pussy to do that anymore porn is an important safety valve for biological instincts that cannot otherwise be sated. Trying to stop this instinct tends to lead to all that pent up energy going into even worse places like you'll become an even worse pervert or a nutbar fanatic. Its no surprise porn restrictions are associated with zealotism on the left and right and said zealots being revealed to be perverts.

As for porn causing 'the downfall of society' anyone can pick a random thing and build a thesis around it being the bane of humanity. I'd like to see an good evidence that porn is the factor destroying humanity more than a 100 other things like feminism or socialism.

In conclusion, this is pure nannystatism. This is really just the gynocracy that has infested both sides of the political spectrum with feminist professors on the left and school marms and nuns on the right that seeks to control men's sex lives. After successfully making IRL sex a minefield of potential rape charges they want to go even further and control how you fap. Think you are consuming too little or too much of something? Take charge of your own life and regulate your smoking/shooting/porn habit the way you see fit. The government has no more business controlling your dick than they do your guns.

 

[Rodeo Roadrunner]

Most addictions typically stem from some sort of non-fulfilment in your life. Modern pornography addiction is a symptom of a much bigger issue, which is a lack of fulfilment in modern life generally. One of the most common excuses people use to watch pornography is that they are bored. I genuinely think that because people aren't living fulfilled lives, they fall into vices and addictions, with pornography one of the main ones for men. I don't know how to fix that since you have to somehow make people's lives more fulfilling, and I don't know how to do that.

Ted Kaczynski was ultimately right.

 

[California Newt]

Most addictions typically stem from some sort of non-fulfilment in your life. Modern pornography addiction is a symptom of a much bigger issue, which is a lack of fulfilment in modern life generally. One of the most common excuses people use to watch pornography is that they are bored. I genuinely think that because people aren't living fulfilled lives, they fall into vices and addictions, with pornography one of the main ones for men. I don't know how to fix that since you have to somehow make people's lives more fulfilling, and I don't know how to do that.

Ted Kaczynski was ultimately right.

Ted's power process is shallow vitalism; he knew the diagnosis but not the cure (in the manifesto, at least).

To know what people need, you need to get a grasp of the phenomenology of the gooning experience to see what people are trying to get out of it.

I'm sure that for many people it's closer to a physical habit, like gluttony (when that's not also a psychological addiction).

For the more serious addicts, though, it's something else. It's an injection of raw, authentic, superabundant vitality—or at least the sensation of of it—into a world that's dead and dying.

It's Venus, Priapus, and Sobek—until those masks fall away, and Satan reveals himself naked. The pleasure is only instrumental; pleasure is duty's obstetrician. They want to touch their god.

They might not think that way, but they feel that way; they experience it that way; they describe it that way—if only "in fetish language", which is ritual language: the two share a grammar; they're the same thing.

Nobody is an atheist in the gooncave—not in deed, and not in experience. The atheism there is purely notional; it's the opposite of contemporary religiosity, which is itself purely notional: in deed and experience, it's Atheism—hence the gooning.

The solution is a God that can be touched. A specific God—not the lowest-common-denominator "God" of interfaith dialogue.

fap

Look at these infantilized words you use to describe wasting your seed. Not even "jerking off"—you say "fap". Like "goo goo ga ga"; like you're a baby. Do you think that's a coincidence?

 

[hothead]

all of this yapping and hundreds of clickbait YouTube videos titled HOW PORN DESTROYED MEN, but what's the solution? How do we suddenly throw away a massively prevalent vice? It's not like banning cigarettes or playboys because it's digital and dominates social media. Sex sells, as the old saying goes, so how do we stop porn? Will ID laws work or not? Propose some solutions.

 

[Grog]

Porn addiction is probably much more rare than it's said to be, and is mostly a woman meme coming from the feministic idea that male sexuality should only be allowed to exist so far as it provides women with a way to enslave men. No one is going to jump through hoops to bed a mid girl if they can just turn on the computer.
It's a curious case where man-hating feminists have found an unlikely ally in sex-repressed puritans, as both groups think male sexuality is inherently evil.

 

[YHWH's Strongest Soldier]

all of this yapping and hundreds of clickbait YouTube videos titled HOW PORN DESTROYED MEN, but what's the solution? How do we suddenly throw away a massively prevalent vice? It's not like banning cigarettes or playboys because it's digital and dominates social media. Sex sells, as the old saying goes, so how do we stop porn? Will ID laws work or not? Propose some solutions.

The solution is a God that can be touched. A specific God—not the lowest-common-denominator "God" of interfaith dialogue.

It might be schizo babble, but it's literally one post above yours.

@California Newt Mind expanding on some portions of your post such as "Nobody is an atheist in the gooncave—not in deed, and not in experience" and the concept of a God that can be touched? It sounds like you are comparing the act of fapping and ga ga, spanking the monkey or doing the five-knuckle shuffle if you will, with a spiritual experience like those experienced by mystics the type of Faustina Kowalska. Also, maybe I'm reading too much into your use of specific words, but does God have personhood in your view?

 

[hothead]

It might be schizo babble, but it's literally one post above yours.

I agree; I think faith is a good thing, but in modern secular society, how do we convince somebody to drop their porn habits and go to church when many people now are scared to even order food in person?

 

[Get the rope Macaulay!]

This is why degeneracy will only increase in the coming years, and the desire "to coom" will do as well.

exactly, this is what hitler was referring to by "deaths of despair" How many whores on OnlyFans would be doing that if they could find a job that 1. pays better 2. has better or similar hours 3. doesn't involve being sexualized?

people will joke but ultimately the answer is 0, enough former pornstar-turned-streamer types have admitted it for it to be true. Same thing with porn addiction, studies showed it basically vanishes the second regular sex enters the picture, which is why porn addiction happens mostly happens to people in dead bedroom relationships or incels. obviously because of the site we're on everyone focuses on the autismo loser gooning, but a huge chunk of porn addicts are these guys that have wives that don't fuck them anymore. such as Terry Crews.

Same thing with fetishes, the reason they're popping up is because sex itself isn't enough, if sex suddenly became enough then it goes away. its also why the most ugly, autistic people seem to be into sex fetishes while models seem like they don't even masturbate. I'll admit, as much as fun as embracing my fetishes' were, fucking a woman i'm passionately attracted to outclassed it. Fetishes and porn are the restaurants of sex, like they're good and tasty but can't remotely beat a home cooked meal from someone that knows what they're doing.

bringing it back to the 300 pound ladies that @WelperHelper99 and @ZeCommissar enjoy fucking. the reason most people go to restaurants instead of making their own food is because they suck at cooking or only know how to make pasta or boxed dinners. so they settle for stuff they know is bad for them. You're seeing the same thing with porn, if porn vanished it doesn't suddenly make wives want to fuck their husbands or have people stop being like Marty from the film Marty. It just leads it underground.

if you want to defeat porn give people the chances and opportunities that don't lead to that. that was mostly why Nazi Germany was able to thrive, so many people suddenly had great jobs and lives that they were practically feeling too good to resort to their fetishes anymore. Why Troon out when you have a wife to dress up and the sort of adoration AGPs crave but they get by being a man with a good job and home.

No one is going to jump through hoops to bed a mid girl if they can just turn on the computer.

exactly guys like that @WelperHelper99 and @ZeCommissar love fucking ugly fat women that look like Andrea Dworkin so they don't realize its a problem for most men.

But its fairly obvious why 99% of women over 200lbs have had boyfriends or sex with some dude with a porn addiction and that's the only reason he couldn't get aroused by them vs 1% of women under 100lbs having boyfriends or sex with some dude with a porn addiction.

plenty of bitches out there hot enough to get guys bricked up, but because of how ugly most women are now they blame porn instead of the fact they spend too much time on kiwifarms beauty parlor.

 

[Max Caulfield]

No guys, you don't understand. Porn is bad because the JEWS CONTROL IT. BLACKED.COM SHOULD BE RAN BY PUREBRED ARYAN CVCKOLDS. WE NEED TO SAVE THE WHITE RACE AND CREATE A FUTURE FOR CHEATING WHORES. WE NEED TO GO BVCK TO THE GOOD OLD DAYS AS DEPICTED IN 1950S TUPPERWARE ADS WHERE THERE WAS NO PORN. NO NUDIE MAGAZINES. JUST GOOD OLD FASHION PRIESTS RAPING KIDS, FATHERS RAPING DAUGHTERS, UNCLES RAPING NEPHEWS. THATS WHAT AMERICA IS ABOUT. WE NEED TO STOP ALL THESE ONLYFANS WHORES FROM SINNING BY SENDING THEM TO A CONVENT WHERE THEYLL BE RAPED BY TRUE AND HONEST MEN AND WOMEN OF THE CLOTH. IM SO MORALLY SOUND AND MENTALLY STABLE. VOTE JOE ROGAN 2028.

 

[Male Idiot]

IM SO MORALLY SOUND AND MENTALLY STABLE. VOTE JOE ROGAN 2028.

And CAPSLOCK is cruise control for COOOOOOOL too!

 

[Dang dirty Pidgeons!]

if you want to defeat porn give people the chances and opportunities that don't lead to that. that was mostly why Nazi Germany was able to thrive, so many people suddenly had great jobs and lives that they were practically feeling too good to resort to their fetishes anymore. Why Troon out when you have a wife to dress up and the sort of adoration AGPs crave but they get by being a man with a good job and home.

Yeah, that's why nazi germany was totally not renown for unprecedented crimes against humanity, nazis didn't have incel murder squats with a homosexual leader (ernst roehm) going around beating up people who just enjoyed swing dancing (the very kind of healthy, romantic activity you enshrined) and didn't break up marriages by force for being racially unclean - totally the behaviors of society, which isn't cucked and repressed to begin with. They also totally didn't have rape borthels in their concentration camps or ran tighly controller red light districts in hamburg und other large cities, so trve. And marrying captured slavic (but totally ayrian because blonde) brides for for breeding pure blood aryan warriors in the lebensborn program is sooo romantic and loving as a concept.

exactly, this is what hitler was referring to by "deaths of despair" How many whores on OnlyFans would be doing that if they could find a job that 1. pays better 2. has better or similar hours 3. doesn't involve being sexualized?

people will joke but ultimately the answer is 0, enough former pornstar-turned-streamer types have admitted it for it to be true. Same thing with porn addiction, studies showed it basically vanishes the second regular sex enters the picture, which is why porn addiction happens mostly happens to people in dead bedroom relationships or incels. obviously because of the site we're on everyone focuses on the autismo loser gooning, but a huge chunk of porn addicts are these guys that have wives that don't fuck them anymore. such as Terry Crews.

Good post - that part.

 

[SSj_Ness (Yiffed)]

I remember someone saying something about Adam from YourMovieSucks, and I liked the summary in there. It's basically this:

Well, at least it's Scar and not Simba, I suppose...

The solution is way easier than getting the government to ban porn. Just bring back shame/make fun of people that goon, and develop a sense of self respect. The only reason that porn addiction is so common is because everything is over-sexualized and porn is viewed as something that all men use. If the general public can get back to viewing porn as something that is yucky and gross, and if people can respect themselves enough to not goon, then porn addiction will decline heavily.

Not gonna magically happen, gotta ban it. At least ban it on social media to start. Porn is just prostitution, which is already illegal. That won't effect hentai, but you can just pass a new law about that, banning it.

 

[WelperHelper99]

exactly guys like that @WelperHelper99 and @ZeCommissar love fucking ugly fat women that look like Andrea Dworkin so they don't realize its a problem for most men.

Literally what nigga?

 

[soup peddler]

How do we suddenly throw away a massively prevalent vice?

Personally I think what would help a lot is to make allowing children unsupervised access to the internet criminal child neglect... once it's not a physical addiction established from a young age, then adults can figure it out for themselves via the sexual marketplace. Porn addicted men are physically gross, abusive in bed, and can't perform.

Frankly the fact that men have been able to spin porn addiction as normal and something "cool girlfriends" abide speaks to the absolute crock of shit that is female socialization. Like fuck, society, either produce men who can protect us or don't enable girls to grow up so wishy-washy. Anyway, we need awareness campaigns reminding women that it's not actually Fun, Cool, and Progressive to have a porn-addicted boyfriend.

And yeah, I use the word addicted to distinguish from people who just kind of enjoy it occasionally. Like any other vice, some people are fine with associating with casual users and some aren't, but it's a personal preference.

 

[Facts and Fallacies]

But its fairly obvious why 99% of women over 200lbs have had boyfriends or sex with some dude with a porn addiction and that's the only reason he couldn't get aroused by them vs 1% of women under 100lbs having boyfriends or sex with some dude with a porn addiction.

A woman under 100lbs is a child. The term you are looking for is child.

This and your insistence men are dropping out of society to coom because "women fat and ugly" is rather gay. Most hetro men with a shred of social ability and blood flowing to their peepees would infact rather work to bed the "mid" woman than pull their dicks to Animal Crossing porn.

According to ai google overlord, men in the usa are also more obese than ever before.

Women in the same age demographic are at 39% obesity so the repulsion is actually mutual.