Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

When will the Judge issue a ruling regarding the Motion to Dismiss?

  • This Month

    Votes: 67 15.3%
  • Next Month

    Votes: 52 11.8%
  • This Year

    Votes: 71 16.2%
  • Next Year

    Votes: 148 33.7%
  • Whenever he issues an update to the sanctions

    Votes: 101 23.0%

  • Total voters
    439
The worst bit is the wait...we know Null has the deets but we can't see it until Russ'tard puts it into his pleadings.
That's why I'm convinced that the end of case Greer stream would be so incredibly fun. Null has to be sitting on a treasure drive of funny shit he can't talk about.
 
That's why I'm convinced that the end of case Greer stream would be so incredibly fun. Null has to be sitting on a treasure drive of funny shit he can't talk about.
Not necessarily, I think every lawyer worth his salt will tell you to shut up about your court case in public because there's nothing good that can come of being a big mouth about it. Having said that, I'm sure you are right, he's probably sitting on pure gold already and itching to share it but knows it wouldn't be wise. The good news is that Rumpelstiltskin is probably still currently spinning a lot more gold so when it does reach us there will be a lot of it in one go.
 
Not necessarily, I think every lawyer worth his salt will tell you to shut up about your court case in public because there's nothing good that can come of being a big mouth about it. Having said that, I'm sure you are right, he's probably sitting on pure gold already and itching to share it but knows it wouldn't be wise. The good news is that Rumpelstiltskin is probably still currently spinning a lot more gold so when it does reach us there will be a lot of it in one go.
You are assuming Russ will even own his car after this. This nigga gonna be broke at this rate. He won't be able to sue a hooker, let alone Josh anymore if the sanctions keep up. I for one am a positive polly at the end of case Greer stream
 
Screenshot 2025-01-18 015932.png
Screenshot 2025-01-18 020001.png
Screenshot 2025-01-18 020127.png
 

Attachments

Second, the court declines to impose “case-ending sanctions” under Rule 37(b)(2) because Mr. Greer has attempted to comply with the court’s order compelling the production of Rule 26(a) information by disclosing the names of two witnesses, and amending his initial disclosures, albeit on a delayed basis.​
🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈
🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈
 
Such faggot shit from this judge. He’s trying to split the baby or some retarded shit to not seem partial to the defense or something. It’s embarrassing the lengths he’s going to keep this shit show alive.
Idk a lot about law, but this seems like the judge is pretty normal here?

From this motion it seems what Hardin tried to do didn't make sense, they can only do this after Greer tried to use undisclosed evidence. So this just couldn't have worked.
 
I mean, I get what the judge is saying. It still never should’ve reached this point. The judge is saying that since sanctions were granted, any undue burden is remedied. So discovery can proceed now.

The case ending sanctions were left open but the judge decided against them since he already imposed sanctions. That’s fair I guess.

This order also states that under the scrutiny of the reference case, it’s premature to throw it out at this time. However “premature” just means file it again as we get closer to trial. This doesn’t seem like a big deal for now considering Greer still needs to cough up the dough and not fuck up from here on out.
 
Seems good enough.
It would be were Greer a honestly-trying-but-failing plaintiff trying to, in good faith, make himself whole. But that isn't the case, as even the Magistrate has noted. Greer's fraud upon the court in Discovery and with addresses goes further than just that, but the Magistrate neglected to look that far.
 
Mr. Greer appears to be attempting to comply with this order by disclosing the names of two witnesses (later withdrawn), and amending his initial disclosures.

So no consideration can be made about the fact that Greer has been lying for years about the witnesses, which the judge sort of acknowledged in the fee sanctions order, or the ludicrous contents of the "amended initial disclosures"? All of this idiotic shit has to keep piling up until a trial can be scheduled?
 
As expected.

Such faggot shit from this judge. He’s trying to split the baby or some retarded shit to not seem partial to the defense or something. It’s embarrassing the lengths he’s going to keep this shit show alive.
Fucking called it. Deathmarch to trial.

When you tell people about retard pro se plaintiffs, never forget to call judges retards too.

No.

Jesus, folks, calm down.

He just ordered attorneys' fees. He's not going to turn around and amp it up for the exact same thing.

I just said this yesterday.

The point of sanctions is to make someone stop doing sanctionable things.
 
tl;dr: we already resolved Greer's bullshit by making him pay you fees, and may do so again if he continues, plus we are required to give him a bit of tard shield as a pro se and he is TRYING HIS BEST so the case-ending sanctions are denied.
Seems good enough.
I don't understand how this judge is able to reconcile the idea that Plaintiff is trying to comply, albeit imperfectly, when he already stated plaintiff's recalcitrance was willful, enough so to justify cost-shifting as sanctions.

Is this what double-think looks like?
 
Back