Megathread SRS and GRS surgeons and associated horrors - the medical community of experimental surgeons, the secret community of home butchers

[Breadbear]

Do we know how she communicates/uses the internet? Is this a case of eye gaze/has enough motor control to use a tablet, or is this one of those "facilitated communication" or "only her mom can understand her speech" puppets?

You see her communication device in one of her videos. She can communicate independently.

 

[Hellblazer]

Had me wondering the same and indeed there is. Happy posting! We really have everything on here, haven't we?

But maybe it would actually be better to have one on the gender quackery and one on the actual surgeries... like there's trans thougts/tranny Ls and this very SRS thread. Hmm.

Awesome. Maybe I'll crosspost? I do still think an index would be worthwhile though. I'd be happy to volunteer.

 

[Otterly]

Do we know how she communicates/uses the internet? Is this a case of eye gaze/has enough motor control to use a tablet, or is this one of those "facilitated communication" or "only her mom can understand her speech" puppets?

I was wondering the same.

 

[TismFarmer]

What The.. and I really mean what?! The?! Actual?! FUCK?! is going on here!!!
Why? WHY WHY WHY??? Would anyone think this is in any way acceptable?
This is SO MUCH WORSE than even a SHARK ATTACK!!
I'm not a newbie in this thread, but this is just fucking ridiculous!

Spoiler: NSFW

 

[Aunt Carol]

Awesome. Maybe I'll crosspost? I do still think an index would be worthwhile though. I'd be happy to volunteer.

My vote is for crossposting; "Scientific" Studies regarding Transpeople is an attempt to put academic papers, the rare occasions that trans-related data are allowed to be gathered and risk objective review, in one place for reference.

This thread is more "show" than "tell"--and that's also valuable and has saved at least one crotch, anecdotally. A lot of people reading this thread are probably interested in reading specifics about how the sausage is made, on an industrial scale, but that'd be nice to have in a different place. Looking at a page of hideous crotches is something you can do over breakfast, while reading a pdf of a scientific article takes a different amount of time and focus, maybe a switch from mobile to desktop. Meanwhile the people who don't care about articles keep posting mournful chests and the thread gets away from potential discussion of the article.

Bloody crotch and article summary here, linking to the whole paper posted in "Scientific" Studies. In my opinion.

 

[Precocious Halfwit]

What The.. and I really mean what?! The?! Actual?! FUCK?! is going on here!!!
Why? WHY WHY WHY??? Would anyone think this is in any way acceptable?
This is SO MUCH WORSE than even a SHARK ATTACK!!
I'm not a newbie in this thread, but this is just fucking ridiculous!
View attachment 6871694

Jesus Christ - I was scrolling up from the bottom of this thread and thought this was some sort of art piece. First it looked like a photo collage and then it looked like a mangled clay statue!

 

[and I must scream]

Jamie, remember, got her PhD so quickly because she pulled the trans card and does not do any research or work in psychology, which normally takes ten years of study. She hates her PhD advisors, including J. Michael Bailey, and never read his work "because he's a transphobe" despite his dozens of papers in sexual behaviour.

I didn't know these details, do you have sources for that? Not that I doubt that - but I would like sources so I could throw them right in her fans' face. I doubt it would help any, but still. I'll try to look into it myself at any rate.

I wrote a few paragraphs explaining why what you said fits what I've seen from her videos, but I'll put it under a spoiler because I don't want to spam this theard too much talking about Jamie.

Spoiler: It fits.

What you said fits exactly what I have seen again and again in her videos. It makes perfect sense. I already got to the following conclusion a while ago: either she plays dumb, really dumb, or she wrote her PhD with little to no understanding of what she is writing, because no way this woman has the understanding a PhD is supposed to require in this subject if her YouTube channel is any indication to go by.

She rarely brings up actual studies, and when she does she does it in a very unprofessional and biased way - only telling the parts she thinks support her claims without giving the whole context of the article, which actually tells a whole different story with completely different conclusions, and she doesn't even bother to tell you the full name of the article, the name of the authors or link to it. Nada. You are supposed to blindly believe her, which her fans obviously do. She sometimes say she doesn't disclose the name of the article or give link because she "doesn't want to let transphobic misinformation more exposure". Maria MacLachlan, in her YouTube channel Peak Trans has a few videos in which she tries to track the articles Jamie is talking about and tell what they are really about- what they tried to prove, the method and the actual conclusions, plus providing the links to these articles.

Jamie's constant twisting of studies and giving partial information makes me wonder if she even fully understands what these articles are saying. It seriously looks like a case of academic illiteracy. I know she is an advocate and activist and therefore is prone to lie and present things in a very biased way, but still I get the sense that she doesn't even fully understands herself what she is talking about, like she doesn't know how to read these articles properly, as someone who has PhD should. Like she understands these articles in a very shallow way and doesn't fully understand the methodologies used, or how the sample's size and population effect the conclusions you can draw from the article. My guess is that it's a combination of the two - she is purposely misleading, but also doesn't fully understand these articles at the same time.

Apart from the few times Jamie attempts to use her expertise on the subject, she only ever raises the most worn out false statistics, for example repeatedly mention the lie of 1% regret rate of transition, without providing any evidence or say from where she took this figure. Other than that, she just repeating the mantras "trans women are women, trans men are men, every trans person deserves gender affirming care" etc. etc. over and over again, the most basic TRA "arguments". Her many logical fallacies and lack of evidence are also called out by King Critical. All of this doesn't prevent her from claiming to be an expert on the subject when it suits or, or her fan children to refer to her as on an authority on the subject.

 

[Breadbear]

What The.. and I really mean what?! The?! Actual?! FUCK?! is going on here!!!
Why? WHY WHY WHY??? Would anyone think this is in any way acceptable?
This is SO MUCH WORSE than even a SHARK ATTACK!!
I'm not a newbie in this thread, but this is just fucking ridiculous!
View attachment 6871694

Lmao but please use a spoiler

 

[Stupid Sexy Flanders]

What The.. and I really mean what?! The?! Actual?! FUCK?! is going on here!!!
Why? WHY WHY WHY??? Would anyone think this is in any way acceptable?
This is SO MUCH WORSE than even a SHARK ATTACK!!
I'm not a newbie in this thread, but this is just fucking ridiculous!
View attachment 6871694

Now, what true and honest woman wouldn't love to have this inside them?

 

[and I must scream]

Now, what true and honest woman wouldn't love to have this inside them?

To be fair, they debulk these monstrous things later. I don't know how and how much, though. I wouldn't put these things inside of me at any case. Gross.

 

[Maldavius Figtree]

Since she is a completely helpless potato, as it is she is a sitting duck for rape and you have to worry about pregnancy. Mean old normal doctors won't let you sterilize your disabled daughter just for fun, but troon doctors will do it and throw in a tit chop too.

Unfortunately real. Retards get raped all the fucking time. If you think having a daughter requires vigilance, it requires 1,000x as much when there is any secondary characteristic of vulnerability to your child.

Another thing nobody tells you when you start that job is that as a tard wrangler, a sizeable portion of the day is spent stopping retards from fucking each other all day long. They're so fucking horny all the time.

Still far less disgusting and disturbing than normal otherwise healthy care personell just raping their patients. Remember that one nurse (obviously black btw) rawdogging a near-brainless potato, a retard so retarded it does not get more helpless, repeatedly over years, so hard and relentless he eventually tore the space between her vagina and asshole, and it was only noticed after there was a baby's head in her diaper?

I keep going off about this, but even here on KF people barely realize the depths of human depravity. This will get worse, with foreigners, who could not care less about your kind and are actively told to hate you, imported en masse to take on exactly these kind of healthcare jobs.
Remember the flood of hidden cam videos of diversity nurses beating up old people a few years ago? Watch out for your elderly and retarded family members.

Ever since WW2 ended and everybody had to act like 1) eugenics was invented by Hitler and 2) eugenics was a bad thing, tard wranglers often are not really allowed to "force" retards to not procreate. Not even forcing them on birth control.
Thankfully it's easy enough to get them to "consent" and then you just gotta diligently feed them the pill every day.

Long story short, she's probably even more likely to be raped now, but at least less likely to get preggo.

 

[Mad_Dog]

Now, what true and honest woman wouldn't love to have this inside them?

Someone, somewhere, has made post-op pooner porn. And you just know there's also a video of a post-op pooner clumsily humping a post-op troon. May the Lord receive my spirit before my eyes witness such wickedness.

 

[Coily the Spring Sprite]

Doesn't the "Mycah" situation have a lot of overlap with the "Ashley Treatment"? Except one was to improve the quality of life of a profoundly disabled child and the other to cater to a profoundly disabled child and handlers delusion? At least in the "treatment" situation people could openly discuss the pros and cons of medical intervention in puberty and growth. Something that's no longer acceptable in modern troon discourse.

 

[JohnnyG]

Highlights, presented without comment.

Your annoying opsec reminder of the day: couple of the screenshots have your whole phone screen, which can include stuff you don't want to share. I try to make it a habit to crop menu bars etc. out as soon as I take one so there's nothing extraneous in future poasts.

 

[Mad_Dog]

Your annoying opsec reminder of the day: couple of the screenshots have your whole phone screen, which can include stuff you don't want to share. I try to make it a habit to crop menu bars etc. out as soon as I take one so there's nothing extraneous in future poasts.

Does the site remove EXIF data and filenames?

 

[JohnnyG]

Does the site remove EXIF data and filenames?

I would assume exif data, since most sites do these days, but not filenames. If you're on PC and hover over those docs, for example, you can see names like "screenshot_YYYYMMDD.png" which are probably what the phone names them. Probably not a big deal for screenshots or publicly-acquired stuff, but good to be aware of if sharing originals of personal docs etc.

 

[Näkki]

I would assume exif data, since most sites do these days, but not filenames. If you're on PC and hover over those docs, for example, you can see names like "screenshot_YYYYMMDD.png" which are probably what the phone names them. Probably not a big deal for screenshots or publicly-acquired stuff, but good to be aware of if sharing originals of personal docs etc.

But doesn't that just tell you their operating system, which one can see from screenshots like that anyway?

I like having my phone battery super low when I take screenshots just for giggles..

 

[2mm and 99 others]

Windows 7 and some later versions' default snipping tool leaves the account username in exif, and everyone can see it! And no, unlike fb, farms don't shave it off.

 

[JohnnyG]

But doesn't that just tell you their operating system, which one can see from screenshots like that anyway?
I like having my phone battery super low when I take screenshots just for giggles..

Yes, it's probably harmless most of the time, but depending on what notifications you have, it could inadvertently reveal too much. At the very least, it's extra unnecessary info. A similar concern exists for screenshotting your whole desktop, or even your full browser, where applications, file names, other open tabs, or bookmarks can have personal info.

Windows 7 default snipping tool leaves the account username in exif, and everyone can see it!

Just in the original file, or you're saying it persists when uploading here?

Edit: am not a photogfag but downloaded a couple attachments to check exif which was bare, and a quick search seems to confirm xenforo removes it by default. Maybe not definitive as some devices remove before upload, but I don't think it persists.

 

[2mm and 99 others]

Just in the original file, or you're saying it persists when uploading here?

It was there even after I downloaded it from kf into a different folder, but this only happens when it's saved as .jpg. I think it's set on .png by default and that looks safe.