Plagued 4chan - the Internet hate machine

Will the 4chan hack be the end of it?

  • Yes, goodbye forever 4chan

    Votes: 1,033 18.5%

  • No, they will rise from the ashes, stronger than ever

    Votes: 344 6.1%

  • This will rattle them but it will be forgotten about next week

    Votes: 2,331 41.7%

  • I am just here for the janny phonebooking

    Votes: 1,095 19.6%

  • What the fuck is 4chan

    Votes: 219 3.9%

  • Yotsuba&!

    Votes: 572 10.2%
  • Total voters
    5,594
William F. Clinton said:
But I don't know, there's something about the idea that struck at a nerve for at least a few people.
Click to expand...
Malachi Martin (an exorcist and ex-priest best known for excoriating his former order in his tome The Jesuits) wrote about this in his other well known book, Hostage to the Devil. It’s about possession so one of the big themes is the synergy between the incomprehensible nature of the demonic and a spiritually emaciated society which cannot conceive of it, let alone defend itself from it. Yet there is a native intelligence that humans have, an intuitive understanding that something is wrong.

It’s like watching a tranny teetering around in heels, wig askew. If you feel like he’s got a scalped hooker dying in his basement are you paranoid or perceptive? A lack of spiritual discernment allows evil to be waved off as people being strange, stupid, or crazy. An anon on /pol/ references something similar in this post:
fag_culture_saville.jpeg
The people on /x/ who find the Proboscis Luke story unsettling maybe tapping into that understanding. Or maybe they think he’s schizo and and feel pathos along with a dim worry that they too might suffer the same fate, happy memories disfigured by delusion.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Like
  • Informative
Reactions: Foreverial, Pina Colada, Wright and 10 others
AmpleApricots said:
It's apparently really just a placeholder number, basically "we think it's more than the one we identified more closely, let's see who we can find additionally".
Click to expand...
Reading the lawsuit, they're throwing the book on the plaintiffs, including RICO which is a nuclear level charge. They want to make an example and set a precedent that anyone setting up infrastructure to mooch off their systems constitutes racketeering and a criminal organization. Very unlikely it sticks, even more unlikely they'll find anyone to put to trial anyway since most of them are outside the US, but it's a funny development.
Even weirder is that the actual content of the unlicensed image gens wasn't brought up in the lawsuit at all, other than constituting trademark violation for coming out of DALL-E, so generating loli smut or Taylor Swift covered in honey either didn't matter or just got Microsoft's attention faster but wasn't a crime in itself.
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Reactions: Guy who lurks, AmpleApricots and Melee Bouquet
Female Ejaculation Anon may have departed (for now) but look who's back:
IMG_6466.jpeg IMG_6467.jpeg
That's right, it's JEETSHAKER Anon, the last white man in Canada. A year ago he delighted /pol/ with his marvelous invention, a homemade disruptive device he called The Jeet Shaker. According to anon he was able to run off the Indians in the neighboring townhouse (shared wall) with noise and vibrations:
jeetshaker1.jpg
Once again, the white man's wit and whimsy permeates everything he does-- even a jeet infestation next door is an opportunity for fun if you're white enough.
4plebs link to the initial OP and his recent return
 
  • Winner
  • Like
  • Feels
Reactions: RefurbishedApparatus, Riftrunner, Foreverial and 31 others
ayanamirei said:
Reading the lawsuit, they're throwing the book on the plaintiffs, including RICO which is a nuclear level charge.
Click to expand...
Yeah thought so too at first but even that seems to be routine. I saw one case where the judge told them to specify further how they got to the number in damages as "he can't follow" which I guess is legalese for "I'm not buying it" which made them tone things down. Can you imagine that? Corporate lawyers being knowingly dishonest? Hard to believe but apparently it happens! They also got wrong how the entire thing works. They portrayed it like the end user having to put in a stolen API key into the proxy they connect to to gain access. If that was willfully or a misunderstanding I do not know.

But that seems to be up to the judge so it might as well stick in this case. It's also AI and therefore scary so that probably helps their case also.

How long are IPs saved in burgerland anyways? In my country, ISPs don't have a obligation to save IPs in a way they're connected to customers but if they do, they can only save them for seven days at maximum after which they have to be deleted or anonymized. (This can only be overriden by a court order demanding this data to be saved longer for specific cases where there's a "threat") Some ISPs like vodafone claim they don't save anything and you're basically anonymized the minute you disconnect. So restarting your connection daily is a good privacy measure and it'd be impossible to follow an old trail like this back. Wonder what the burgerland laws are.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Guy who lurks and Melee Bouquet
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back