Why do you say that? Elon owns X/Twitter, which is part of Big Tech in the social commerce world. What, Tesla? It's practically a meme than anything else.
BigTech the faction, the consolidated group of interests. Yes, Musk owns Twitter and Tesla but he is not part of the BigTech faction. This is like saying "Because Donald Trump is a republican he and Mitch McConnell are part of the same faction"
I mean, technically yes but only in the loosest, broadest, and most useless possible way.
On what marks him as different:
The creature you're looking for is called a 'sociopath'.
He's a globalist which defacto marks him as their ally.
Musk isn't actually a globalist. He has pushed several ideas that are very much America First. What he -is-, is a Transhumanist. Someone who believes that anything which brings us further away from our human limitations is for the better. Again, this overlaps with the globalists but doesn't make him one. Stop thinking of the world as a series of "Either ors", people can have similar ends, reasoning's, and policies as a faction without being part of that faction.
Mind, to both you and The Last Stand, this is not a defense of Musk but rather making sure his actual positions are more clearly noted. It is, in this specific case, why Musk was willing to backtrack and aknowledge issues with H1-Bs while Vivek doubled down and got ousted. Musk,. in the end, was more willing to bend because he was not part of the same factions as Vivek.
Trump already put in that 30 days deadline in his eo. While Barrett is the emotional woman, she's going to let it pass through as none of it is retroactive. Plus it fits her hard-line conservative angle too.
I do not trust her. She has proven willing in the past to put aside her claimed views on law when her emotions were played on well enough. Frankly, I trust -Roberts- more than her because that man, as odious and repulsive as his "Judicial Philosophy" is, at least is consistent in its application.
back in
Semper Fidelis, Donald Trump.
