US US Politics General 2 - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
1737484403279.png
Oh it's not looking good for her.

With all due respect to Quence, I stand by my opinion that she-faggots exist, and this woman is one of them.

1737484491767.png1737484653973.png1737484761716.png

Overexposure to stupid woke cult bullshit turns you into a slug! It isn't Biden exclusive! I get it now. It's so simple.
 

Attachments

  • 1737484582872.png
    1737484582872.png
    151.4 KB · Views: 7
Right but since your solution is not going to happen are you saying nothing should be done and the status quo should be kept or what? You've been saying how if we provoke the cartels then we will shoot ourselves in the foot due to their inevitable retaliation which, in my opinion, is retarded.
"when you kill your enemies, they win!" tier.
 
True, but it would be cheaper, if nothing else, logistics wise. And at least it would actually benefit us, the citizens, by getting rid of them, instead of just the MIC.
Yeah, I'm not inherently disagreeing with the possibility of military action in Mexico, and I think it could be somewhat doable.

I'm just trying to point out the reality that it's not gonna be a Panama, Grenada or even Korea-style op, it's gonna be Guerilla ForeverWar 3: Adobo & Chili.

Fine; I'm just saying before you go in, maybe figure out domestic microchip production and tell Taiwan they'd better start learning Chinese.
Why?
US has the capabilities to fight both wars?
Taiwan would be an air-sea battle anyways, with ships and planes slinging long-range missiles & >100kg+ munitions at each other over water.
Mexico would be more door-kickers riding in on black helicopters with drones support and sub-20kg munitions.

Like I agree there are issues with an invasion of Mexico (especially imagine if a Dem gets into office in 2028 and now the mission is no longer "total CJNG death" but "bring feminism & Our Democracy (TM) to Mexico"); and the situation is A LOT more complicated than just "lol invade the cartels", but expecting Taiwan to fall because of it is not one of them.
 
Enlighten me please.
The US was colonized by religious sects fleeing the Church of England, the official religion of England. The "Establishment Clause" of the very first Amendment says-

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

Source
This clearly restricts the US from making a single religious sect, the official religion of the US.
Worried about the commitment of President Jefferson to this law, the Anabaptists of Danbury, Connecticut engaged the President in a series of letters questioning his position on this topic, and this was his reply-
Jefferson's Letter to the Danbury Baptists
The Final Letter, as Sent
To messers. Nehemiah Dodge, Ephraim Robbins, & Stephen S. Nelson, a committee of the Danbury Baptist association in the state of Connecticut.

Gentlemen

The affectionate sentiments of esteem and approbation which you are so good as to express towards me, on behalf of the Danbury Baptist association, give me the highest satisfaction. my duties dictate a faithful and zealous pursuit of the interests of my constituents, & in proportion as they are persuaded of my fidelity to those duties, the discharge of them becomes more and more pleasing.

Believing with you that religion is a matter which lies solely between Man & his God, that he owes account to none other for his faith or his worship, that the legitimate powers of government reach actions only, & not opinions, I contemplate with sovereign reverence that act of the whole American people which declared that their legislature should "make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof," thus building a wall of separation between Church & State. Adhering to this expression of the supreme will of the nation in behalf of the rights of conscience, I shall see with sincere satisfaction the progress of those sentiments which tend to restore to man all his natural rights, convinced he has no natural right in opposition to his social duties.

I reciprocate your kind prayers for the protection & blessing of the common father and creator of man, and tender you for yourselves & your religious association, assurances of my high respect & esteem.

Th Jefferson
Jan. 1. 1802.
Source
This phrase in a letter has been used to force total neutrality, and isn't actually the law as it was meant, at the time it was written.
 
it was a metaphorical turn of phrase attributed to jefferson. it involves the establishment and free exercise clauses in the first amendment, and it reads, as you should already know, as follows.
So, she has the right to say it, but it was just in extremely poor taste. My bad. She's allowed to practice whatever religion she wants.
 
These Cartel guys are in it for the money and power. The durka durkas in Afghanistan- the caves are their home and they're not fucking leaving nigger. Vastly different mindset. Take their money, fast German cars, drugs, and blow up their infrastructure with 2000 pound bombs, they will flee like rats.
We should flood the internet with satellite footage of us blowing up cartel members the way they flood the internet with them killing people often for no reason.
 
Enlighten me please

The initial context for separation of church and state was rooted in the founder's experiences with the church of England and it's interaction with politics as well as non CoE sects of Christianity.

To put it succinctly, the CoE was the state church of England and thus the head of state (the King of England) was also the head of the church. This meant if there was political repression or persecution it also extended into the realm of the church, which irked the founder's who believed politics should not corrupt the church.

The original context of separation was to prevent the state from fucking with people and their faith, not the modern interpretation of preventing religious representation within the government.
 
Why?
US has the capabilities to fight both wars?
Taiwan would be an air-sea battle anyways, with ships and planes slinging long-range missiles & >100kg+ munitions at each other over water.
Mexico would be more door-kickers riding in on black helicopters with drones support and sub-20kg munitions.

Like I agree there are issues with an invasion of Mexico (especially imagine if a Dem gets into office in 2028 and now the mission is no longer "total CJNG death" but "bring feminism & Our Democracy (TM) to Mexico"); and the situation is A LOT more complicated than just "lol invade the cartels", but expecting Taiwan to fall because of it is not one of them.
to add to this, we've been using spooky boys to basically do black ops on cartels, its basically an open secret that we already help them.
with them being designated as terrorists, we no longer have to hide, we can also put forth more material to fighting them.

We have the capability to fight both, because we HAVE been fighting both
 
It does benefit Mexicans but I saw this strange comment by someone on a left leaning subreddit that claimed if the U.S went to war with the cartels that Mexicans in the U.S would start rioting and burning down cities. I could understand if it was members of the cartels who did that, but why the hell would the average mexican american riot because Trump wanted to get rid of the reason you fled the country? Unless a majority of Mexicans support the cartels, there's no reason to burn down a city because Trump declared war on the cartels and not Mexico itself. Hell, the average Mexican would probably go "Sign me up Trump" and want to help out.
Left wing Mexicans and their sympathizers have not only been fantasizing, but planning for a genocidal race war to exterminate the damn gringos as another step in their long-running master plan to reclaim Aztlán for the glory of La Raza, for a long fucking time.

Of course back in 1915 this genius masterstroke would have pitted a basketcase torn by revolution against an American population that still had the balls to destroy entire towns of darkies for chimping out at whitey. Today, the same genius masterstroke would pit a basketcase hollowed out by cartels against an America that, for all its faults, is still the #1 military superpower on the planet (which was not the case whatsoever in 1915, the US military barely existed back between the Civil War and the World Wars). Either way I expect the outcome of their :optimistic: strategy to be the same: one race is going to get exterminated all right, but far from the one they're counting on, it will end in Total Beaner Death instead.
 
A full-scale military invasion of Mexico. Trump has already talked about taking Canada, I bet you he wants to expand southward as well.

It's literally the 9/11 playbook, except instead of a historically unconquerable mountain range full of psychotic goatfuckers, it's a failed state that's right next door, plump and ripe for the taking.

Even if it doesn't go that far, it's going to be so satisfying to see US soldiers actually defending the US border and fighting pieces of shit who fully deserve it. Rock and Roll!
Amazing how after 20 years of failed wars like those there are retards who still think we should get into another foreign quagmire, you better fucking enlist and be on the frontlines of juarez city ready to take a bullet in the face for uncle Sam, had enough of you chickenhawk shits back in the dubya years. Seriously are you people retarded? we can just turn the entire border into an unpassable DMZ for a fraction of a fraction of the money and lives it would take to intervene in Mexico. We literally have nothing to gain from another forever war and with latinos now being the first minority and the bulk of them being mexicans you have to be eating lead paint chips to believe the violence is gonna stay south of the border. Mexico is not on the other side of the planet like the middle east, and we hardly had any Iraqis and Afghans living here back then. Our borders are so full of holes its not even funny and instead of actually reinforcing them and doing basic stuff like filling them with landmines we're sending more Americans to die abroad? is this 5-dimensional checkers again?
 
DEI strikes again

Arrington, who was cooperative during the traffic stop, informed Officer Lowry that he was armed with a firearm. Officer Lowry directed Arrington to exit his vehicle, and he cooperated. Officer Cardwell then attempted to remove the firearm from the waist of Arrington.

While Officer Cardwell was attempting to remove the firearm, it discharged, striking Arrington in the leg. The bullet struck Arrington in his upper thigh and came out his inner thigh on his right side.

woman-cop.jpg

 
Back