US US Politics General 2 - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
H-1B isn't going away, but hopefully the abuse will get cracked down on.
Lets not eat blackpills over his ramblings. Lets wait and see what the admin actually does.
I agree, our focus right now should be on the Dems and their stalling of Trump’s appointments.

Thune must call recess.

P.S.: Birthright Citizenship clarification kneecaps the “point” of these non-immigrant visas.
 
I didn't like Trump's answer about H-1Bs in his press conference.
Agreed. However;
BREAKING: All federal employees who work in DEI positions will be placed on leave starting tomorrow at 5:00 pm as their positions and offices will be terminated.
wait and see seems like a fair reaction at this moment.
Personally I find vivek and co very troublesome but it seems completely at odds with trumps harsh DEI stance. I would think it would be a matter of time until Trump is more well informed on the matter. Atleast, I hope.
 

AFUERA!!!!!

View attachment 6885395
Fetterman shoots down party switch rumors: ‘Not going to happen’



Grug no become Republican. Grug no live in Palookaville. Grug no be bluedog.

Who starts these rumors anyway.

Fetterman doesn't really need to switch parties, he can take over the role Joe Manchin had, occasionally voting with Republicans. Getting his own little base of supporters that see him as a "common sense" Democrat.
 
Idk if it was posted here, but this is an excerpt from one of the executive orders, titled "DEFENDING WOMEN FROM GENDER IDEOLOGY EXTREMISM AND RESTORING BIOLOGICAL TRUTH TO THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT".
View attachment 6886427
The issue with it is, it is unable to tell the gender of a child until it is six weeks old, since that's when the male sexual characteristics form and replace the ones coded by the X chromosome (female characteristics).
If this was the case and sex was decided at conception, all human beings would be female.

Good job, people, you are now identified by the US goverment as women. Blame this discriminatory DEI gender policy on Trump.

This might be one of the most pig ignorant things I've ever read
 
Remember seeing some agreeable and grounded takes from you a while back, now you're just another seething leftoid. Unfortunate.
He's part of the hhh sycophant crew that hangs out in the cope threads. You know those threads that if you go to and try to debunk their talk points the tranny mod bans you from? Meanwhile they are allowed to drive by post all day on the rest of the forum an NOT have their posts deleted. But God help you if you respond.
 
I didn't like Trump's answer about H-1Bs in his press conference. It doesn't sound like he understands that these programs are being abused to hire cheap labor and he's bought the bullshit line from his tech donors that we have a shortage of qualified workers. NGL I'm pretty fucking blackpilled about this ever ending and I'm already dramatically cutting back my expenses.
HOW MANY TIMES DO I HAVE TO TELL YOU FUCKERS THAT TRUMP SUPPORTS LEGAL IMMIGRATION?
 
View attachment 6886208

What constitutional rights? That amendment only covered Civil War-era slaves. I hope this meets the same fate Roe v. Wade did

Remembering that much like Roe v. Wade, "Birthright Citizenship for Illegals" is a similar activist SCOTUS dropping that was citeogenesised into existence, wikipedia style:

Well, reading
https://anncoulter.com/2010/08/04/justice-brennans-footnote-gave-us-anchor-babies1/
another Supreme Court decision could easily overturn it, and it, birthright citizenship, might not be legally proper in the first place:

"And then, writing for the 5-4 majority in the 1982 case, Plyler v. Doe, Justice Brennan snuck in a footnote...."
"This point of view had nothing to do with the case and, therefore, constituted mere dicta, of no legal importance."
 
Back