US US Politics General 2 - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Fag flag is the progressive flag. It represents climate cucking, black worship and everything else now even if it's just the original rainbow. Everyone who sees it there knows it's not just about buttsex anymore, whoever is flying it is an abortion and vaccine lover too and they are making themself known.

They are flying it or demanding or be flown to show membership in the club to their peers and as a show of occupation to their enemies. To those outside the US, seeing this flown by the US flag is supposed to signify "this is the US, but, Our® US".

Their culture has forced itself pervasive at every level in every person's life who doesn't shack-in-the-woods, it's some nation within a nation shit and every single flag that gets pulled down makes me real happy and I don't even have any hate for normal gays and lesbians.
 
How will tariffs effect high-end electronics not manufactured entirely within the US? Many American companies like Qualcomm, Nvidia, AMD, and Apple are the ones designing the chips manufactured at Samsung and TSMC. Intel's got several plants in the US but these other companies won't cancel decade-long contracts just to switch operations over to a competitor, especially one that has not kept pace with the technology innovations of it's peers. Intel doesn't have the capacity for it anyhow. TSMC has a few plants in the US but most are in Taiwan. It's taken decades to build up America's current fabrication plants after many false-starts and delays. It will take decades more and even then they will all still require massive business operations outside the United States. Maybe I'm thinking about this wrong.
 
I didn't see this posted yet, but the affirmative action ban is on whitehouse.gov now:

ENDING ILLEGAL DISCRIMINATION AND RESTORING MERIT-BASED OPPORTUNITY​

January 21, 2025
By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, it is hereby ordered:

Section 1. Purpose. Longstanding Federal civil-rights laws protect individual Americans from discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. These civil-rights protections serve as a bedrock supporting equality of opportunity for all Americans. As President, I have a solemn duty to ensure that these laws are enforced for the benefit of all Americans.

Yet today, roughly 60 years after the passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, critical and influential institutions of American society, including the Federal Government, major corporations, financial institutions, the medical industry, large commercial airlines, law enforcement agencies, and institutions of higher education have adopted and actively use dangerous, demeaning, and immoral race- and sex-based preferences under the guise of so-called “diversity, equity, and inclusion” (DEI) or “diversity, equity, inclusion, and accessibility” (DEIA) that can violate the civil-rights laws of this Nation.

Illegal DEI and DEIA policies not only violate the text and spirit of our longstanding Federal civil-rights laws, they also undermine our national unity, as they deny, discredit, and undermine the traditional American values of hard work, excellence, and individual achievement in favor of an unlawful, corrosive, and pernicious identity-based spoils system. Hardworking Americans who deserve a shot at the American Dream should not be stigmatized, demeaned, or shut out of opportunities because of their race or sex.

These illegal DEI and DEIA policies also threaten the safety of American men, women, and children across the Nation by diminishing the importance of individual merit, aptitude, hard work, and determination when selecting people for jobs and services in key sectors of American society, including all levels of government, and the medical, aviation, and law-enforcement communities. Yet in case after tragic case, the American people have witnessed first-hand the disastrous consequences of illegal, pernicious discrimination that has prioritized how people were born instead of what they were capable of doing.

The Federal Government is charged with enforcing our civil-rights laws. The purpose of this order is to ensure that it does so by ending illegal preferences and discrimination.

Sec. 2. Policy. It is the policy of the United States to protect the civil rights of all Americans and to promote individual initiative, excellence, and hard work. I therefore order all executive departments and agencies (agencies) to terminate all discriminatory and illegal preferences, mandates, policies, programs, activities, guidance, regulations, enforcement actions, consent orders, and requirements. I further order all agencies to enforce our longstanding civil-rights laws and to combat illegal private-sector DEI preferences, mandates, policies, programs, and activities.

Sec. 3. Terminating Illegal Discrimination in the Federal Government. (a) The following executive actions are hereby revoked:
(i) Executive Order 12898 of February 11, 1994 (Federal Actions to Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations);
(ii) Executive Order 13583 of August 18, 2011 (Establishing a Coordinated Government-wide Initiative to Promote Diversity and Inclusion in the Federal Workforce);
(iii) Executive Order 13672 of July 21, 2014 (Further Amendments to Executive Order 11478, Equal Employment Opportunity in the Federal Government, and Executive Order 11246, Equal Employment Opportunity); and
(iv) The Presidential Memorandum of October 5, 2016 (Promoting Diversity and Inclusion in the National Security Workforce).
(b) The Federal contracting process shall be streamlined to enhance speed and efficiency, reduce costs, and require Federal contractors and subcontractors to comply with our civil-rights laws. Accordingly:
(i) Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965 (Equal Employment Opportunity), is hereby revoked. For 90 days from the date of this order, Federal contractors may continue to comply with the regulatory scheme in effect on January 20, 2025.
(ii) The Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs within the Department of Labor shall immediately cease:
(A) Promoting “diversity”;
(B) Holding Federal contractors and subcontractors responsible for taking “affirmative action”; and
(C) Allowing or encouraging Federal contractors and subcontractors to engage in workforce balancing based on race, color, sex, sexual preference, religion, or national origin.
(iii) In accordance with Executive Order 13279 of December 12, 2002 (Equal Protection of the Laws for Faith-Based and Community Organizations), the employment, procurement, and contracting practices of Federal contractors and subcontractors shall not consider race, color, sex, sexual preference, religion, or national origin in ways that violate the Nation’s civil rights laws.
(iv) The head of each agency shall include in every contract or grant award:
(A) A term requiring the contractual counterparty or grant recipient to agree that its compliance in all respects with all applicable Federal anti-discrimination laws is material to the government’s payment decisions for purposes of section 3729(b)(4) of title 31, United States Code; and
(B) A term requiring such counterparty or recipient to certify that it does not operate any programs promoting DEI that violate any applicable Federal anti-discrimination laws.
(c) The Director of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), with the assistance of the Attorney General as requested, shall:
(i) Review and revise, as appropriate, all Government-wide processes, directives, and guidance;
(ii) Excise references to DEI and DEIA principles, under whatever name they may appear, from Federal acquisition, contracting, grants, and financial assistance procedures to streamline those procedures, improve speed and efficiency, lower costs, and comply with civil-rights laws; and
(iii) Terminate all “diversity,” “equity,” “equitable decision-making,” “equitable deployment of financial and technical assistance,” “advancing equity,” and like mandates, requirements, programs, or activities, as appropriate.

Sec. 4. Encouraging the Private Sector to End Illegal DEI Discrimination and Preferences. (a) The heads of all agencies, with the assistance of the Attorney General, shall take all appropriate action with respect to the operations of their agencies to advance in the private sector the policy of individual initiative, excellence, and hard work identified in section 2 of this order.
(b) To further inform and advise me so that my Administration may formulate appropriate and effective civil-rights policy, the Attorney General, within 120 days of this order, in consultation with the heads of relevant agencies and in coordination with the Director of OMB, shall submit a report to the Assistant to the President for Domestic Policy containing recommendations for enforcing Federal civil-rights laws and taking other appropriate measures to encourage the private sector to end illegal discrimination and preferences, including DEI. The report shall contain a proposed strategic enforcement plan identifying:
(i) Key sectors of concern within each agency’s jurisdiction;
(ii) The most egregious and discriminatory DEI practitioners in each sector of concern;
(iii) A plan of specific steps or measures to deter DEI programs or principles (whether specifically denominated “DEI” or otherwise) that constitute illegal discrimination or preferences. As a part of this plan, each agency shall identify up to nine potential civil compliance investigations of publicly traded corporations, large non-profit corporations or associations, foundations with assets of 500 million dollars or more, State and local bar and medical associations, and institutions of higher education with endowments over 1 billion dollars;
(iv) Other strategies to encourage the private sector to end illegal DEI discrimination and preferences and comply with all Federal civil-rights laws;
(v) Litigation that would be potentially appropriate for Federal lawsuits, intervention, or statements of interest; and
(vi) Potential regulatory action and sub-regulatory guidance.

Sec. 5. Other Actions. Within 120 days of this order, the Attorney General and the Secretary of Education shall jointly issue guidance to all State and local educational agencies that receive Federal funds, as well as all institutions of higher education that receive Federal grants or participate in the Federal student loan assistance program under Title IV of the Higher Education Act, 20 U.S.C. 1070 et seq., regarding the measures and practices required to comply with Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. President and Fellows of Harvard College, 600 U.S. 181 (2023).

Sec. 6. Severability. If any provision of this order, or the application of any provision to any person or circumstance, is held to be invalid, the remainder of this order and the application of its provisions to any other persons or circumstances shall not be affected thereby.

Sec. 7. Scope. (a) This order does not apply to lawful Federal or private-sector employment and contracting preferences for veterans of the U.S. armed forces or persons protected by the Randolph-Sheppard Act, 20 U.S.C. 107 et seq.
(b) This order does not prevent State or local governments, Federal contractors, or Federally-funded State and local educational agencies or institutions of higher education from engaging in First Amendment-protected speech.
(c) This order does not prohibit persons teaching at a Federally funded institution of higher education as part of a larger course of academic instruction from advocating for, endorsing, or promoting the unlawful employment or contracting practices prohibited by this order.

Sec. 8. General Provisions. (a) Nothing in this order shall be construed to impair or otherwise affect:
(i) the authority granted by law to an executive department, agency, or the head thereof; or
(ii) the functions of the Director of the Office of Management and Budget relating to budgetary, administrative, or legislative proposals.
(b) This order shall be implemented consistent with applicable law and subject to the availability of appropriations.
(c) This order is not intended to and does not create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.

THE WHITE HOUSE,
January 21, 2025.
Source
 
Ok, context: my libcuck friend from Canada got a job at Apple in Cupertino. He signed the job offer right before the election and was seriously considering reneging on the signed offer just because Trump won, if you needed a sign of how cucked he is. He and his wife moved down to Commiefornia this month and he's just started his job.

Cue him freaking the fuck out and doomering to me this morning because of this: https://archive.is/pDKeC I guess Donald wants to double taxes on foreign nationals? No indication if this will actually happen, or what the timeline would be.

Now this stupid nigger wants to drop everything, cancel his move, quit his job, and scurry back to Cuckada. Just to drill in how retarded a move this would be, there are 0 jobs in his field back in Canada, so he'd be a jobless NEET. He would also fucking destroy his credibility on the job market forever if he did this.

I can't penetrate his shield of liberal doomerism so I'm just egging him on at this point. Why am I even friends with this idiot?
Let him. He's an adult. His family may resent him, but he's a grown ass man. Maybe somebody else that would value the position/opportunity would appreciate the job opening. Now, tell me that TDS is not a cult.
 
1737565854451.webp

Some works of art cannot be improved upon, thats how I feel trying to add commentary to this photo

I pray its not a /pol/ agent

also pampmelater once you get inside you will know its official when you hear the audio cue of the bald eagle screech then if you are on the west coast the welcome committee has a pretty fast response time, but the east coast has regional offices you have to walk to, id defiantly try for the west if I was you. :)
 
View attachment 6889908
You want things to be satire, to be so out of the world insane that it is funny.
But then you look, and it is not a satire. It is really how these retards think.
I fucking hate journoscum. I would fucking hang the lot of them if i could.
They are whinging that "you could not truly get and kill every member" "It will disrupt trade"
They are basically admitting that the Mexican government is the fucking Cartels.
"Speak truth to power" they cry. While running damage control for the biggest drug and death dealers around.
I understand why the Saudis regularly kill journoscums now. Defending the Cartels to pwn the Drumpf.
Archive in progress.
Link to the insane shit
If these were Russian mafia orgs, the NYT would be saying no cost is too high to destroy these lawless miscreants.
 
How will tariffs effect high-end electronics not manufactured entirely within the US? [...] TSMC has a few plants in the US but most are in Taiwan. It's taken decades to build up America's current fabrication plants after many false-starts and delays. It will take decades more and even then they will all still require massive business operations outside the United States. Maybe I'm thinking about this wrong.
I wouldn't be surprised if there are tariff exceptions for Taiwan, both from a practicality and "fuck China" standpoint. They could even be exchanged for a sweetheart deal with the US or help with kickstarting production at home.
 
Last edited:
Last edited by a moderator:
I wasn’t sold on Vance until I saw that video of him walking into the Oval Office. Dude was nobody from nothing, and now he’s something. He’s very humbled by the opportunity and very grateful. Very human.

Maybe that’s why Reddit et al dislike him. He’s just like them, a nobody, but dared to make something of himself.
 
Last edited:
Let him. He's an adult. His family may resent him, but he's a grown ass man. Maybe somebody else that would value the position/opportunity would appreciate the job opening. Now, tell me that TDS is not a cult.
Yeah, like I said, I'm just sarcastically telling him to do it. More likely, he just stays and does his fucking job and whines about it forever to me.

Ironically, the fella in question has an acquaintance who's even more of a libtard NEET than him. Said NEET also doomers endlessly to my friend and drives him up the fucking wall. Like, this NEET is so stupid that he's kind of our personal lolcow. I have pointed out to my friend that his annoying doomering is sounding a lot like the NEET. Doubt he'll get what I'm saying, but one can live in hope.
 
I think this is a good indicator of how serious Trump is about his agenda. He's not just hitting the big policies, he's hitting all the small indignities most of us forgot about.

If I had a month to plan out "things to reverse in the first week", the embassy flag issue never would have made it on the list. But we all would have been pissed when it popped up in a month from some salty State Department bitch trying to make a statement. Instead, Trump or someone on his team is being extremely proactive on locking down every aspect of the federal government, even down to the symbolic stuff.

Semper fi, Orange Man, may your vengeance burn a bright path through the history books.
This is exactly how I feel about the architecture EO. Everybody sees things getting uglier, but I think for a lot of people, it just isn’t a big enough deal to do anything about, especially when people are struggling to afford food. Yet, he still did it, and while I am not entirely sure how much power he will have to actually make things pretty again, at least we know he cares about it and can try. Also, THANK FUCK he will be president for the World Cup and Olympics.
 
No fucking way, nobody wants to deal with the fallout from that.
I'd rather have Kim Potter than Chauvin. The ol desk jockey grandma that got pushed into the front lines due to budget cuts (thanks DEFUND THE POLICE retards) who accidentally shot a dude who was resisting arrest and fighting the cops instead of tazing him. Because she was white she got hit hard.
 
If Democrats would've allowed Trump a second term in 2020, he would've likely had a disastrous second term. All the load of COVID would have been dropped on him and Democrat governors would've been much more restrictive, then blame Trump when they themselves wrecked their economies. He would've been impeached for Russia and had a manufactured Watergate scandal, and Pence would've been president by the mid-terms. Except Pence wouldn't have pardoned Trump.

I think the 2024 elections would've been between Pence and Newsom, and Newsom would have likely won. Democrats really fucked themselves by not letting the man have a second term in 2020.
 
Back