Aaron Imholte / Steel Toe Morning/Evening Show / "The Toe Boys" / r/steeltoeboringshow - Disgraced Minnesotan radio host turned racist Internet shock jock. Cuckold chef de Spaghetti-os, "2-2" boxing "coach". Has a legion of a-logs. Lost his wife to a coke addict he played "Strip Twister" with. Fined $50 for sharing nudes of Kayla Rekieta.

[Gobermental Supervisor]

What's the law in Minnesota for hearsay from The persecution using the law enforcement testimony. Geno and Keanu both to investigators it was KR.

If they do not testify nothing they said can come in.

It is what Nick challenged about April's statements during their arrest being used by police.

If something someone said is brought in as evidence, that person has to testify in court as a witness, with a chance for the defense to cross-examine the witness and confront them.

There is a very real possibility that Aaron hopes that Geno and Keanu will not be available as witnesses and is gambling on the prosecution dropping the charges once that becomes clear.

 

[Nova902]

What kind of behavior is it supposed to punish?

Throwing your phone in the lake seems like an admission of guilty to me. ( the day or week before he was arrested )

That's a good answer for him, though. He admitted the stuff he can't deny to maintain credibility but said no more.

If the prosecutor doesn't have Geno and they don't have the photo plus a forensic expect who can make the chain from Aaron to publication to another person I don't see how they could possibly have a case.

Aaron throwing his phone in the lake the day or so before he was arrested is likely an admission of guilty to a jury.

 

[victor lasagna]

Both Nick and Aaron are unlikable degenerate liars. They are both social outcasts with horrible reputations in their respective conservative small town communities. If you think either is going to do well in front of a jury of normal boomers, you are nuts.

Aaron assured us about a week ago that the charges were well on the path of going away due to the gmail cyber-crime. Seems pretty unlikely because prosecutions with weak imploding cases offer extremely favorable pleas or just walk away. That's the opposite of what happened here. Draw your own conclusions.

 

[Gobermental Supervisor]

That's the opposite of what happened here.

orly? Would you happen to have a transcript to support that?

 

[victor lasagna]

orly? Would you happen to have a transcript to support that?

What transcript do I need? The plea negotiations/settlement conference failed and they are scheduled for trial.

 

[Balldo's Gate]

orly? Would you happen to have a transcript to support that?

Aaron's delusions have been debunked by the scheduling of a trial.

 

[Dee Reynolds]

Both Nick and Aaron are unlikable degenerate liars. They are both social outcasts with horrible reputations in their respective conservative small town communities. If you think either is going to do well in front of a jury of normal boomers, you are nuts.

Aaron assured us about a week ago that the charges were well on the path of going away due to the gmail cyber-crime. Seems pretty unlikely because prosecutions with weak imploding cases offer extremely favorable pleas or just walk away. That's the opposite of what happened here. Draw your own conclusions.

I’ve learned the majority of any “matter of fact” statements Aaron says on his show (and probably offline too) regarding any of these legal cases is his own manifestations that he wants to happen. Guy clearly doesn’t know how any of this works. it’s looking like Aaron’s out a ton more $$$ for the upcoming trial regardless of how much he wants to believe Nick is getting charged with anything in the meantime.

 

[Gobermental Supervisor]

The settlement conference is a formal part of every trial in Minnesota, you should read the court rules when you find the time.
It always happens, it does not only take place when a plea is likely.
Unless we get a transcript of the hearing we have no idea what actually happened.

Did Aaron say "I am not pleading guilty to anything, I can beat this in court" or did the prosecution say "we got you dead to rights, you are not getting a plea" or anything in between is possible.

[EDIT] And yes, I am aware that Aaron is also a lying faggot who likes to make up shit that fits his narrative. I am not believing him about anything.

 

[AnOminous]

it’s looking like Aaron’s out a ton more $$$ for the upcoming trial regardless of how much he wants to believe Nick is getting charged with anything in the meantime.

They might not need anything they can get from his devices. That or Aaron has an overly optimistic outlook on what his situation actually is.

Did Aaron say "I am not pleading guilty to anything, I can beat this in court" or did the prosecution say "we got you dead to rights, you are not getting a plea" or anything in between is possible.

Or they could already have worked out a deal but have a few details to work out. I'd expect them to schedule an actual plea hearing in that event, but maybe they're scheduling a trial as an "incentive" to get the ink on paper.

 

[Gobermental Supervisor]

They might not need anything they can get from his devices. That or Aaron has an overly optimistic outlook on what his situation actually is.

It also depends on a lot on what the state does with that information.

If they hand it over to the feds, which is possible due to the type of crime, people involved in multiple jurisdictions, etc.
It might have zero impact on the states case against anyone.

It might still fuck Nick and Melton up the ass down the line, but it won't help Aaron.

 

[MunsterCheeseJr]

Unless they managed to get that photo from the phone company I really don't see what they could hope to prove.

Bingo. Aaron likely sent the photo via the phone's text messaging application. He cell phone carrier would have a record of that transmission.

The chain of custody on any evidence on Aaron's devices is broken. It was accessed by a relative of the "victim." So unless they can prove specifically what was sent entirely from uncompromised devices, the "evidence" is worthless.

Nick didn't compromise Aaron's devices. Nick compromised Aaron's google account.

Of course, now that you mention it, since Melton admitted that he had access to Aaron's cameras inside of his house and was watching his children sleep, Aaron's defense lawyer can make a good case that Nick and Melton had compromised Aaron's home computer network. That may be enough to confuse a jury or provide enough F.U.D. that the jury might not be fully certain that Nick did more.

Nick cannot take the stand in this case. If he does, he would have to perjure himself, or plea the fifth amendment. That would ruin the prosecution's case.

Now imagine Kayla taking the stand. Let's assume she didn't do any of the hacking. Maybe Nick showed off some of what he found to Kayla. That might still put Nick at significant risk. Kayla cannot plea the fifth since she would have only observed the fruits of Nick's crime. Kayla lying on the stand? Community theater or not, I don't think she is stupid enough to think she can get away with it. Rightful fear will kick in.

Aaron's defense will have the complete right to fully investigate EVERY angle of Nick's hacking. Nick and Melton accessed computer devices (cameras) inside Aaron's home.

 

[Desktop User2]

This is a feud between two complete and total faggots. It's the equivalent of two trailer park residents screaming from their respective porches at each other and each reporting the other for drug use to the cops. Wait until one puts the other in the hospital. There are criminals out there harming decent people and tax payer money as well as investigator's time should not be wasted on these two.

And one of these morons may have broken several laws. It would be equivalent of one of those trailer trash breaking in on the other´s trailer, stealing important docs and installing a camera because the door was unlocked. I dont know about the resources of the county and if they are drowning on tibetan rape gang cases but one of the trailer trash may have displayed criminal behavior to the point of having an investigation opened on him, if Aaron is to be trusted.

Of course, now that you mention it, since Melton admitted that he had access to Aaron's cameras inside of his house and was watching his children sleep, Aaron's defense lawyer can make a good case that Nick and Melton had compromised Aaron's home computer network. That may be enough to confuse a jury or provide enough F.U.D. that the jury might not be fully certain that Nick did more.

Aaron is on video sending the alleged picture, there is no way you can confuse a jury to the point of claiming Nick sent the picture in question to Geno instead of Aaron. I dont know if Geno can rescind his testimony of receiving the pic or if the context of the stream didn´t necessarily imply that was definitively Kayla but that seems bonkers.

 

[Balldo's Gate]

Or they could already have worked out a deal but have a few details to work out. I'd expect them to schedule an actual plea hearing in that event, but maybe they're scheduling a trial as an "incentive" to get the ink on paper.

Aaron explicitly stated that his goal for yesterday was for the case to be dismissed and it didn't happen. In other words, he lost.

Could he end up accepting a deal? Sure. That doesn't mean he didn't totally fail with his gambit of using Rekieta's interference to get his case dismissed, just like Rekieta failed with "muh watermark".

Unless we get a transcript of the hearing we have no idea what actually happened.

We know what Aaron wanted to achieve based on what he said publicly before and after the settlement conference (he wanted the case dismissed based on Nick's interference) and that clearly hasn't happened. He has now had over two months and two conferences to demonstrate that Nick's actions jeopardized this case and so far the result has been absolutely nothing.

[EDIT] And yes, I am aware that Aaron is also a lying faggot who likes to make up shit that fits his narrative. I am not believing him about anything.

I'm going to be honest, a lot of the posts in this thread over recent weeks and months have the appearance of sweeping for Aaron Imholte.

I get that Aaron has disgusting people like Melton against him, but Aaron has decided not only not lift a finger to stop Melton, but also publicly negotiate a paid appearance at Melton's event as a clown pretending to be a boxer.

 

[AnOminous]

Nick cannot take the stand in this case. If he does, he would have to perjure himself, or plea the fifth amendment. That would ruin the prosecution's case.

They could give him immunity, but probably not from the feds, so as long as that remains potentially on the table, he probably can't take the stand. Possibly Kayla could, but I have no idea whether the prosecution intends to call her or whether she's too much of a pill zombie even to give intelligible testimony.

I could see Aaron trying to have her excluded if they did, arguing he'd have to be able to cross examine her about Nick and that obviously she would refuse and presumably Nick himself could also block it. Voluntarily testifying would open the door to that.

The thing is unless they have the picture itself and from some clean chain of custody (which they may), Aaron could just testify it was a bit, and without Geno to contradict that, who do they have to prove he really did send a nude of Kayla and not a picture of a cat?

 

[Desktop User2]

So unless they can prove specifically what was sent entirely from uncompromised devices, the "evidence" is worthless.

Only if the message sharing app is logged in via his Google account.

They could give him immunity, but probably not from the feds, so as long as that remains potentially on the table, he probably can't take the stand.

If they are really trying to build a case against Aaron, they should never call Nick and their shitflinging because they miss to suck each other off. It would only hurt the prosecution´s case.

 

[repentance]

Aaron is on video sending the alleged picture, there is no way you can confuse a jury to the point of claiming Nick sent the picture in question to Geno instead of Aaron. I dont know if Geno can rescind his testimony of receiving the pic or if the context of the stream didn´t necessarily imply that was definitively Kayla but that seems bonkers.

Aaron's "ya boy done good" comment implies that the picture is of Kayla. Nothing Aaron said implies that the picture is a nude, though, so either Geno's testimony or carrier records would be needed to establish that and it's not certain that the carrier retains the content of SMS/MMS.

 

[Desktop User2]

Aaron's "ya boy done good" comment implies that the picture is of Kayla. Nothing Aaron said implies that the picture is a nude, though, so either Geno's testimony or carrier records would be needed to establish that and it's not certain that the carrier retains the content of SMS/MMS.

I dont believe the prosecutor would present the case if they didn´t know for sure and had a way to prove it was a nude, given what he is accused of.

 

[cdhill17]

There is a very real possibility that Aaron hopes that Geno and Keanu will not be available as witnesses and is gambling on the prosecution dropping the charges once that becomes clear.

I could totally see Kiki flip-flopping again over something and flying herself out to Minnesota to testify against him.

 

[MunsterCheeseJr]

I dont believe the prosecutor would present the case if they didn´t know for sure and had a way to prove it was a nude, given what he is accused of.

I agree. They might have been hoping that they could get Geno or Keanu to testify.

I had assumed they have the text records from Aaron's cell phone provider. Of course the prosecution would have to reveal that information to Aaron's defense attorney. So Aaron's attorney should KNOW if their case is sunk.

I don't know of the defense attorney can poke any good holes in the cell phone provider's records. I doubt it. But I am not a lawyer.

 

[Gobermental Supervisor]

I could totally see Kiki flip-flopping again over something and flying herself out to Minnesota to testify against him.

They are unreliable in the worst ways for everyone involved.
They might be holding out their hands and waiting on who will give them the bigger payout.

I dont believe the prosecutor would present the case if they didn´t know for sure and had a way to prove it was a nude, given what he is accused of.

They can, if the person who confirmed this testifies as a witness. If the person who saw the picture, Geno, does not testify, they have nothing.