‘They Should Not Have Been Prosecuted’: Trump Pardons 23 Pro-Lifers Targeted By Biden DOJ - Doomers BTFO

article/archive

President Donald Trump signed an executive order on Thursday pardoning 23 of the pro-life activists targeted by President Joe Biden’s Justice Department.

“They should not have been prosecuted,” Trump said as he signed the order. “Many of them are elderly people. They should not have been prosecuted. This is a great honor to sign this.”


The pardons are for 23 “peaceful pro-life protesters who were prosecuted by the Biden administration for exercising their First Amendment rights.” They were prosecuted under the FACE Act and a Reconstruction-era felony conspiracy charge first used for the first time against pro-life activists by the Biden administration.

The Thomas More Society, the law firm representing the activists, had asked Trump to pardon 21 pro-lifers: Joan Bell, Coleman Boyd, Joel Curry, Jonathan Darnel, Eva Edl, Chester Gallagher, William Goodman, Dennis Green, Lauren Handy, Paulette Harlow, John Hinshaw, Heather Idoni, Jean Marshall, Fr. Fidelis Moscinski, Justin Phillips, Paul Place, Paul Vaughn, Bevelyn Beatty Williams, Calvin Zastrow, Eva Zastrow, and James Zastrow.

“Today, freedom rings in our great nation,” said Steve Crampton, senior counsel for the Thomas More Society. “The heroic peaceful pro-lifers unjustly imprisoned by Biden’s Justice Department will now be freed and able to return home to their families, eat a family meal, and enjoy the freedom that should have never been taken from them in the first place.”

Peter Breen, the executive vice president of the firm, added: “Today is a new day for the pardoned pro-life advocates who have suffered FBI raids, federal prosecutions, and severe punishment for peacefully and courageously witnessing for life. We thank President Trump for keeping his promise to these pro-life mothers, fathers, grandparents, pastors, and priests.”

“What happened to these peaceful pro-life individuals must never happen again,” he said in a statement. “We urge Congress to act swiftly in repealing the FACE Act to make sure that the Justice Department can never again weaponize this law to target peaceful pro-lifers with severe charges.”

Many of those pardoned were convicted multiple times in trials in Washington, D.C., Nashville, Manhattan, and Detroit. While sentencing has not been completed in each case, several pro-lifers were already serving lengthy prison sentences.

In D.C., a group of pro-life protesters sang songs, prayed, locked arms in front of the facility’s staff entrance, and attached themselves with ropes and chains to block doors inside the infamous Surgi-Clinic in October 2020, a late-term abortion facility.

Those who were imprisoned over the D.C. protest include Lauren Handy (57 months in prison), John Hinshaw (21 months), William Goodman (27 months), Jonathan Darnell (34 months), Herb Geraghty (27 months), Jean Marshall (24 months), Joan Bell (27 months), Paulette Harlow (24 months), and Heather Idoni (24 months).

In Tennessee, a group of pro-life Christians gathered in a hall outside the Carafem Health Center in Mt. Juliet where they sang hymns, prayed, and urged women not to get abortions in March 2021. Calvin Zastrow, 63, is currently serving a six-month prison sentence over the protest and 75-year-old Chester Gallagher was sentenced to 16 months though he has not had to report to prison yet.

In New York, Bevelyn Beatty Williams was sentenced to serve 41 months in prison after she was convicted of violating the FACE Act after she blocked the entrance to an abortion facility in Manhattan.

The pardons also bring relief to those who were awaiting sentencing, including 89-year-old Eva Edl. Edl, who survived a World War II-era Yugoslavian concentration camp, was convicted in both Nashville and Detroit and could have been sentenced to over a decade in prison over her convictions on FACE and a felony conspiracy charge.

When passed in 1994, the FACE Act was supposed to protect both churches and clinics, but the law has almost exclusively been used to prosecute pro-lifers. Data obtained by Roy shows that 97% of FACE Act cases brought by the Justice Department have been against pro-life Americans. Sen. Mike Lee (R-UT) and Rep. Chip Roy (R-TX) renewed an effort to repeal the FACE Act this week, pointing out how it has been disproportionately used against pro-lifers.

The response to the pardons has already been positive with Republican lawmakers and conservative activists praising the decision.

“President Trump’s pardon today of pro-life activists unjustly imprisoned under President Biden is a great credit to his legacy,” CatholicVote’s Tommy Valentine said. “We hope he will go a step further in undoing Biden’s unjust legacy by directing his Department of Justice to evenly enforce the FACE Act, for as long as it is on the books, against violent pro-abortion extremists who have been attacking pregnancy resource centers and churches for years.”

The news came shortly after the Daily Wire reported that Trump would pardon the pro-life activists within a matter of days. The plight of the imprisoned pro-lifers is an immediate priority to Trump’s team, two sources with knowledge of the matter shared with The Daily Wire.

Friday is the 52nd annual March for Life, where Vice President JD Vance will publicly speak for the first time since he was sworn into office, as The Daily Wire first reported on Thursday.
 
The pardons are for 23 “peaceful pro-life protesters who were prosecuted by the Biden administration for exercising their First Amendment rights.” They were prosecuted under the FACE Act and a Reconstruction-era felony conspiracy charge first used for the first time against pro-life activists by the Biden administration.
This was such bullshit, someone actually needs to go to jail for doing this.

When passed in 1994, the FACE Act was supposed to protect both churches and clinics, but Data obtained by Roy shows that 97% of FACE Act cases brought by the Justice Department have been against pro-life Americans.
 
They were prosecuted under the FACE Act and a Reconstruction-era felony conspiracy charge first used for the first time against pro-life activists by the Biden administration.

Great writing, journoscum. How many times was this felony conspiracy charge used before Biden?

Anyway, enough nitpicking. This is great, I'm actually happier about this than the J6 pardons. You have a right to protest until you touch the sacred cow of the Left, abortion, then you get thrown in jail. Just like you have the right to assemble and petition the government for redress, unless it's the 2020 election you're upset about and you scare legislatowhores, then you get thrown into solitary for years and refused basic rights that all prisoners are supposed to have, like proper medical attention and mail and visitation and easy access to a legal representation.
 
The pardons also bring relief to those who were awaiting sentencing, including 89-year-old Eva Edl. Edl, who survived a World War II-era Yugoslavian concentration camp, was convicted in both Nashville and Detroit and could have been sentenced to over a decade in prison over her convictions on FACE and a felony conspiracy charge
Illegal immigrants running around committing crimes with no consequences, but they put an old lady in jail until she's one hundred years old for protesting abortion. Trump is righting the wrongs.
 
This was such bullshit, someone actually needs to go to jail for doing this.
The story of Paula Harlow was particularly upsetting. Elderly woman with lots of health problems, husband pleaded to be allowed to go with her to jail to keep caring for her. But the judge laughed in her face, forbade her attending church while under house arrest awaiting sentencing, and then taunted her that she had better not die in jail because lol wouldn't that be against your religion? :smug:

Harlow, who has extensive medical issues, worries incarceration could further cause her health to decline.

"I'm 76, and I have a lot of conditions," she said. "Incarceration would be detrimental because I won't have access to the things I have now. And I won't have John, who's here just helping me with everything.

"There's a lot to take care of."

The husband asked if he could go to prison to take care of his ailing wife. And the prosecutor demanded that she not be permitted to attend church while awaiting her sentence. At the end of the hearing, Kotelly advised Harlow to honor the "tenets" of her religion and not die in jail.
1737673016856.png1737673051191.png1737673073965.png1737673090542.png
 
The story of Paula Harlow was particularly upsetting. Elderly woman with lots of health problems, husband pleaded to be allowed to go with her to jail to keep caring for her. But the judge laughed in her face, forbade her attending church while under house arrest awaiting sentencing, and then taunted her that she had better not die in jail because lol wouldn't that be against your religion? :smug:




View attachment 6896578View attachment 6896583View attachment 6896584View attachment 6896586
Kotelly is a huge piece of work:

IMG_5317.jpeg

IMG_5318.jpeg

She was also in charge of the FISA court, so obviously your civil rights didn’t really matter to her at all.
 
The fact this happened at all is fucking disgusting. Yet I see many violent pro-aborts be allowed to threaten and even put their hands on peaceful anti-abortion protesters. Lots of men and "women" especially physically threatening anti-abortion women because they know they can and nothing will happen to them. I'm genuinely filled with dread at the thought of what would life be like if Kamala had won.
 
The fact this happened at all is fucking disgusting. Yet I see many violent pro-aborts be allowed to threaten and even put their hands on peaceful anti-abortion protesters. Lots of men and "women" especially physically threatening anti-abortion women because they know they can and nothing will happen to them. I'm genuinely filled with dread at the thought of what would life be like if Kamala had won.
A few pro-abortion people were recently convicted and sentenced in South Florida (under the FACE Act) for graffitiing pregnancy centers. But obviously that's an exception.
 
The story of Paula Harlow was particularly upsetting. Elderly woman with lots of health problems, husband pleaded to be allowed to go with her to jail to keep caring for her. But the judge laughed in her face, forbade her attending church while under house arrest awaiting sentencing, and then taunted her that she had better not die in jail because lol wouldn't that be against your religion? :smug:




View attachment 6896578View attachment 6896583View attachment 6896584View attachment 6896586
I guess the term "cruel and unusual punishment" means nothing regarding "social justice."
 
Good.

I never understood why the left shills for abortion so hard. They’re essentially telling the world that their ideology is deeply anti-human and they want the West to commit collective suicide. If you want support, try to not be so mask off about it.
They literally tell you who they are, and you still can't figure it out? They are anti-life. They hate living in God's creation.
 
r/Political Humor is having a field day with Elon Musk and the typical anti-Trump fallacies. I say "humor," but it's more spite. I'm trying my hardest to get it, but it just hurts to look.
 
The police were going after a lady in the uk who was simply stood near an abortion clinic, by herself, praying quietly in her head. Not aloud, simply standing and praying close by.
I am glad to see this EO. Win after win, the man has the energy of a twenty five year old. Maybe I should start eating Macdonalds?
 
Good.

I never understood why the left shills for abortion so hard. They’re essentially telling the world that their ideology is deeply anti-human and they want the West to commit collective suicide. If you want support, try to not be so mask off about it.
But how else can you spit in the faces of the unenlightened who are destined to be left behind by History? To do so would be denying them a Basic Human Right ™️!
 
Back