Snowden support threatens Tulsi Gabbard's Senate confirmation - Some Senate Republicans are zeroing in on Tulsi Gabbard's 2020 call for the U.S. to drop charges against Edward Snowden, a man many of them still consider a traitor.

Source: https://www.axios.com/2025/01/23/tulsi-gabbard-edward-snowden-trump-senate

Some Senate Republicans are zeroing in on Tulsi Gabbard's 2020 call for the U.S. to drop charges Edward Snowden, a man many of them still consider a traitor.

Why it matters: Gabbard is quickly becoming the most endangered Trump nominee.

"There's definitely a risk that she won't even survive the committee process," one Republican senator told Axios, speaking on the condition of anonymity.
Gabbard is Trump's nominee to be director of national intelligence.
Zoom in: Most of the concerns about Gabbard have so far been sparked by a trip she took to Syria, her references to U.S. bio labs in Ukraine and a history of questioning the findings of the U.S. intelligence community.

Now it's her stance on Snowden, a former NSA contractor who was charged in 2013 with leaking classified documents revealing global surveillance programs. He became a naturalized Russian citizen in 2022.

As a member of Congress, Gabbard sponsored a House resolution with former Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-Fla.) "expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the Federal Government should drop all charges against Edward Snowden."

Only recently has this come to the attention of Republicans sitting on the Senate Intelligence Committee — and elsewhere in the conference, multiple sources familiar told Axios.
Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine) told Axios she is concerned about the legislation, adding that "it's something that came up in my own review of [Gabbard's] record."
Between the lines: "There is not one GOP senator on record opposing Lt. Col. Gabbard's nomination," Gabbard spokesperson Alexa Henning told us in a statement.

Henning pointed to bipartisan senators on Intel "who have shown positive support for her nomination and qualifications."
The bottom line: Even if Gabbard were to fail to get the votes necessary to be recommended by the Intel committee, there would be ways for her nomination to still be considered on the floor.

Those processes would be more complicated — and in some cases, highly unlikely to succeed.
Gabbard's team has already written off Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.), as we told you last week.
 
It'd be so funny to watch the libs jump through hoops to call him evil because Trump pardoned him after spending a decade singing his praises and having him on their late night shows. I bet it'd make John Oliver stop fucking kids long enough to kill himself.
Is John Oliver a pedophile. Though he was only an annoyong british guy.

Anyway. If Snowden gets pardoned, it would be great.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: repentance
No, he's a traitor because he violated his oath of office
What "oath of office"? He was a contractor, not sworn into some political office. This glaring error makes everything else you say lose credibility.


damaged US national security, and lied about US intelligence activities to get on TV. It's honestly embarrassing that so many people still take him seriously. I can only conclude it's because of the media blitz, the journalists and Hollywood movie that set him up as some kind of hero.
Great, now do Manning. Surely that faggot releasing un-redacted material after getting into a spat with his faggot fucktoy is even worse, right?
 
Is John Oliver a pedophile. Though he was only an annoyong british guy.
As another annoying British guy, I can confirm John Oliver fucks kids.

Why do you think we sent him to New York? We didn't want him.
 
  • Feels
Reactions: Hitman One
Your points invalid. All the 3 letter agencies have violated their oaths as public servants and to the citizens of this country for years. If your not a hypocrite you want them all locked up too.
If he watched the Snowden movie, he might have remembered the scene when the director of the CIA swore under oath the United States doesn't spy on anyone but terrorists. This actually happened, so if he wants to talk about oathbreakers, start with the three-letter agencies.
 
Snowden was attempting to seek asylum in Ecuador, but the glowies fucked things up for him, and he had to settle for Russia.

Trump should pardon Snowden, but now is not the right time - if he were pardoned tomorrow, he'd simply be detained by the Russian authorities, and they'd use the conditions of his release to weaken Trump's hand in negotiating the end of the Russia-Ukraine war. Trump needs to prioritise the end of the Russia-Ukraine war first, and hopefully Snowden's pardon and repatriation can come later.
 
What "oath of office"? He was a contractor, not sworn into some political office. This glaring error makes everything else you say lose credibility.



Great, now do Manning. Surely that faggot releasing un-redacted material after getting into a spat with his faggot fucktoy is even worse, right?
It still chaps my ass that Bradley Fucking Manning is a free man while Snowden languishes in Russia. Manning's crimes were far more egregious and less well-intentioned.
 
Back