Culture At a Deluxe Dining Room on the 100th Floor, a Chef Toils in Obscurity - In New York, private restaurants in luxury towers are a popular amenity. The public cannot eat there, and residents only drop in occasionally.

1737604782067.png
Ashley Gilbertson for The New York Times

By Dionne Searcey
Jan. 22, 2025 Updated 8:50 a.m. ET

As the chef at 10 Cubed in New York City, Nduvo Salaam prepares dishes that blend his African-Caribbean roots with classic French technique on the 100th floor of Central Park Tower — one of the tallest residential buildings in the world.

But it can be lonely at the top.

The restaurant, 1,000 feet in the air and overlooking Central Park, is among about a dozen in the city open only to residents of luxury apartment buildings and their guests, a globally elite clientele that many chefs would be thrilled to serve.

But traffic at Mr. Salaam’s restaurant is sometimes slow. And while he toils in relative splendor with views that look down on passing helicopters and other skyscrapers, his work can feel anonymous. After all, this is the age of celebrity chefs on TV and Instagrammable dishes that create long lines outside restaurants. Even some private chefs who work in home kitchens have developed big followings on social media.

“You have public restaurants, and those chefs everyone knows. And then private chefs — they’re starting to make their way out,” said Mr. Salaam, seated at a table in his own restaurant where he sank a spoon into one of his signature dishes: a small square of fluffy honeynut pumpkin custard with sweet garlic, Ossetra gold caviar and a subtle red curry topped with a delicate, latticelike coriander cracker, for $38.

1737604817754.png
Among Chef Salaam’s signature dishes is fluffy honeynut pumpkin custard with sweet garlic, Ossetra gold caviar and a subtle red curry topped with a delicate, latticelike coriander cracker. Ashley Gilbertson for The New York Times

“I’m in this hidden bubble,” he said.

Mr. Salaam occupies a rare position at the intersection of luxury living, fine dining and exclusivity.

The towers that have sprouted along Billionaires’ Row and elsewhere in New York are in competition for buyers among the top slice of the wealthiest 1 percent. Each building tries to outdo the others with spas, cold plunge pools, infinity pools, fleets of Pilates Reformer machines, steam rooms and other amenities tacked onto the cost of apartments that already are in the tens of millions of dollars. A five-bedroom, full-floor unit on the 113th floor of Central Park Tower, for instance, lined by walls of glass and custom millwork and featuring imported stone countertops and dueling showers in the master bath, starts at $59.5 million.

1737604843309.png
A view of Manhattan from an apartment on the 113th floor of Central Park Tower on West 57th Street, part of “Billionaires’ Row.” Ashley Gilbertson for The New York Times

In these buildings, offering a private restaurant where residents can pick from menus developed by Michelin-starred chefs is becoming de rigueur.

“For a certain clientele, they expect a certain level of dining if you’re paying over $3,000 a square foot for your home,” said Kent Wu, a real estate agent at Douglas Elliman who last year was part of a team that sealed a $115 million deal on an apartment at Central Park Tower.

At One Wall Street, residents can enjoy meals by the chef Alejandro Cortez while dining al fresco on the 4,500-square-foot terrace overlooking New York Harbor. The restaurant at the skinny luxury tower at 432 Park Avenue is overseen by the Michelin-starred chef Shaun Hergatt.

“I get to offer the clients a world-class dining experience plus a lifetime memory,” said Mr. Hergatt, who is opening another private restaurant in Miami Beach at the Perigon, a beachfront luxury complex that is under construction.

If they actually sit down for a meal.

Brokers who buy and sell units in the luxury buildings say these restaurants are often empty. That’s largely because their wealthy residents are busy zipping between apartments in other cities and countries. When they do breeze into New York, one of the great restaurant cities of the world, who wants to eat at home?

The restaurants host events to lure residents inside: whiskey night or wine tastings or guest chefs to curate meals. But most of them stay afloat with funding from the buildings’ steep maintenance fees or requirements that residents spend a minimum monthly amount dining there. At 432 Park, residents at one point were required to spend $15,000 a year at the restaurant.

“It’s the only way to keep them going,” said Kirk Rundhaug, sales director at the realty firm Compass, who has sold units in luxury buildings with private restaurants.

Foie gras for one​

1737604865643.png
10 Cubed is often quiet. On a recent night, a couple finished their meal about 7 p.m. and left the restaurant, which stayed empty the rest of the night. Ashley Gilbertson for The New York Times

On a recent evening, 10 Cubed in Central Park Tower was glowing. The city lights sparkled below, and the room was lit by a swirly Rubelli fiber-optic ceiling designed to mimic the night sky. A couple finished their meal about 7 p.m. and left the restaurant, which stayed empty the rest of the night. Two parties that had reserved tables didn’t turn up. Unlike other high-end restaurants that charge steep fees for no-shows, 10 Cubed does not penalize its residents.

Mr. Salaam, who is 49 and tall with squared shoulders and a quiet presence, looked across the room that seats up to 40 and sighed.

“If you’re at Per Se or Le Bernadin, you can’t not show up without being charged,” he said.

He pulled up a chair for a meal in his own restaurant “to have the full experience and to see how the guys are selling the art,” he said with a laugh, as he sipped from a glass of 2015 Dom Pérignon while he waited to be served.

A waiter approached, hoisting plates, a napkin folded across his forearm just so. A $46 starter had arrived: foie gras terrine with Sicilian pistachio praline, gewürztraminer gelée and toasted brioche.

Mr. Salaam was born in Jamaica to a Jamaican mother and Nigerian father. His mother thought it was important that her three sons learn to cook, not just her daughter, so she gave them lessons. He realized one day that he was alone in the kitchen cooking with his mom; his brothers had lost interest.

In Kingston, Mr. Salaam spent time with his aunt, who was part of the city’s upper crust. By the time he was 4, she had taught him what the British consider proper utensil etiquette: keeping his fork in his left hand while eating.

“There were a portion of Jamaicans I grew up with who still would do some things that they learned from their colonizers,” said Mr. Salaam.

When he was 8, he moved with his mother to Brooklyn and later Harlem, enrolling at Saunders Trade and Technical High School in Yonkers, where he studied culinary arts. He stayed in the same field after getting a scholarship to Johnson & Wales University in Rhode Island.

Afterward, he immersed himself in the world of fine dining with low-level positions at some well-known New York restaurants, including Union Pacific; the Palace Hotel; Le Cirque in the days when young Donald Trump, Martha Stewart and the Hilton family were regulars; and Jean-Yves Schillinger’s restaurant in Colmar, France.

The work was sometimes grueling. Bosses were sometimes cruel. Once, when he was working in the kitchen at Blue Smoke, Danny Meyer’s Battery Park City restaurant, which closed in December, his pay was docked by a head chef for reasons he still doesn’t know, he said.

“When I started, I was usually the only one in the kitchen that looked like me, so the question was always, ‘How did you get here?’ They would try every trick in the book to mess with me,” he said.

Food suppliers would brush past him in the kitchen without a word and talk instead to the head chef. As a young chef, Mr. Salaam was curious to learn what they were hawking.

Only one vendor, a fishmonger named Louis Rozzo, would stop and talk to him. One day he asked him why.

“He said, because I’m going to need your business when you became chef,” Mr. Salaam said. “At that point, I never even saw myself as being a chef.”

It was a transformative moment.

“I knew failure was not an option,” he said. “While everyone would go out drinking after the shift, I would be studying. I just put my head down and really learned the craft. Then one day I picked my head up and was confident.”

He became chef de cuisine at BLT Market in Midtown and had a baby, but he and the baby’s mother split up. He went on to become executive chef at NoMo in SoHo and executive chef at the Roosevelt Hotel.
In 2017, he went out on his own and opened a small restaurant called Cafe on Ralph in Brooklyn. He married one of his customers. A victim of the pandemic, the restaurant closed in 2022.

“I tried to hang on as much as I could,” he said.

Cooking for the 1 percent​

1737604905332.png
There are about a dozen private restaurants in Manhattan. At Boulud Privé, at the Mandarin Oriental Residences on Fifth Avenue, residents are offered room service with a menu designed by the Michelin-starred chef Daniel Boulud. Ashley Gilbertson for The New York Times

Mr. Salaam signed onto 10 Cubed initially just for its opening. The kitchen, a relatively small, windowless space, was built around him as the tower shot upward, joining the ranks of other luxury apartment buildings, including those known as “supertalls” on Billionaires’ Row.

“I have some people who have specifically bought into these buildings I sell because of the restaurant,” said Jade Chan, sales director of the Mandarin Oriental Residence who is one of the stars of the new Netflix reality show “Selling the City.” The building is home of Boulud Privé, a private restaurant that even offers room service to residents with a menu designed by the Michelin-starred chef Daniel Boulud, where roasted chicken breast with rosemary-smashed potatoes is on the lunch menu for $31. “The definition of luxury has evolved into simple ease and convenience. The most important thing to all of us, no matter how much money you have, is time.”

Private restaurants in residential buildings were popular during an earlier period that parallels the extraordinary wealth and inequality in New York City of today: the late 1800s and early 1900s, known as the Gilded Age. The Dakota, one of the city’s first luxury apartment buildings, had a private dining room. So did the Ansonia, which also featured a fountain in the lobby with actual baby seals.

“When the luxury apartment buildings became a trend in the 1880s, they were seen as suspect and déclassé compared to having a brownstone,” said Vincent DiGirolamo, an associate professor of history at Baruch College.

The exclusive dining rooms were part of what helped establish the buildings’ allure in a city that back then had a thriving elite class, even as two-thirds of the rest of the population crowded into tenements.

At 10 Cubed, other chefs from Michelin-starred restaurants — Alfred Portale, Laurent Tourondel and Gabriel Kreuther — lent their names to the first menu to help create buzz.

Mr. Salaam stayed on. The outlook for the post-pandemic restaurant industry was still murky. He had a new baby at home.

He built a team around him, pulling in workers he had met at prior restaurant jobs or who were celebrated in New York’s fine dining scene. Louie McCullagh, the former fine dining captain of the Four Seasons restaurant, is one.

At 10 Cubed, everything is made on the spot, partly to adhere to quality but also because it’s wasteful to stock a kitchen with food that goes uneaten. Workers and Chef Salaam himself make frequent trips down the elevator and downtown to the farmers’ market at Union Square, to Chinatown or to a nearby Whole Foods.

1737604929821.png
David Libespere, the head bartender at 10 Cubed, prepares a drink. Ashley Gilbertson for The New York Times

Mr. Salaam is often awakened in the middle of the night with calls from his fishmonger — Mr. Rozzo — advising him on the catch of the day. But work-life balance is reasonable at 10 Cubed, as it is not for chefs at other “public restaurants,” as Mr. Salaam calls them. Evening service wraps up relatively early. He didn’t have to work on New Year’s Eve.

Paul Freedman, a cuisine historian at Yale University, likened chefs at private restaurants to those at country clubs or upscale corporate dining rooms.

“A lot of chefs take these jobs because they’re less pressure and they pay well,” he said. “But I would imagine you get tired of it. Your customers don’t change; you get an idea of what they like. It’s all kind of predictable. This has always been a kind of stepping away from the high pressure.”

But Mr. Salaam is under pressure to please the wealthy and powerful residents of Central Park Tower. As he wandered through the cigar room in his chef’s whites the other evening, a man rose from the poker table, past the private lockers where residents can store cigars and expensive bottles of liquor, and approached him.

“You should put a bit more breakfast food on the brunch menu,” said the man. That morning, he had asked the chef to make him eggs for breakfast, off menu.

Mr. Salaam smiled and nodded.

“I’ve cooked for the 1 percent my whole career,” he said. “That’s part of why I ended up here. Not everyone can walk in off the street and do this.”

What has he learned from his years serving the elite?

“I don’t take anything personally,” he said, as a waiter offered plates of another of his creations, a dessert that was somewhere between brownie and cake, with light notes of hazelnut, topped with gold leaf beside a dollop of not-too-sweet vanilla gelato.

“People that look like me in these positions 30 years ago — it didn’t happen,” he said. By the time I got here, that thick skin had already been there.”

Mr. Salaam appreciates the perks of his position, including the view. Sometimes only the tops of other skyscrapers are visible, poking through the clouds in an otherworldly tableau. He has learned that it takes exactly four days in autumn for the leaves in Central Park to go from green to golden. Among the privileged few to eat at the restaurant is his 4-year-old daughter, who likes to point to the tower from the family’s apartment window in Long Island City, Queens.

But for chefs, being so far out of the public eye can be difficult.

“There’s a trade-off with ego,” said Stephen Zagor, a restaurant consultant and adjunct professor in food studies at New York University.

The dynamic has been tough for Mr. Salaam. He is known in the industry — but it’s not the same as if his crispy king oyster mushroom, atop a perfectly spongy bao bun with delightfully tangy pickled ginger, was subject to critical reviews and eligible for awards.

“I’m in all the rooms with all the other chefs, but obviously I don’t really look like a typical chef, and my peers are like, ‘Oh, chef, we’ve never heard of you,’” he said.

Alexander Smalls, a James Beard-award winning chef, discovered Mr. Salaam when he was scrolling through social media 10 years ago. Mr. Smalls messaged him, and the men have since become friendly. Mr. Smalls has eaten at 10 Cubed and is impressed by the food, as well as by Mr. Salaam’s humility, he said. He called him “a culinary practitioner and an artisan.”

“He is so gifted, and he isn’t getting the affirmation that most chefs get because he’s laboring in a vacuum of privilege,” Mr. Smalls said. “I would eat his food in a basement.”

Mr. Salaam said he longs for a critical eye.

“I would love to be reviewed,” he said. “Obviously, this is curated for the residents, but there’s that competitive side that would love to know what it’s like to be up against the others.”

A correction was made on Jan. 22, 2025: An earlier version of this article misspelled the name of Nduvo Salaam’s fishmonger. It is Louis Rozzo, not Louis Razzo.

Source (Archive)
 
Chefs make fuck all and money isn't even the driving power, cause if it was, they'd be in IT. I've seen a lot of shorts from private chefs and it honestly sounds like a cozy gig. Likewise i've heard of a 'real chef' moving to a retirement home and just making whatever he feel like with 2 other dudes. I can't imagine the hellish experience of preparing all this food and shit for someone who'll eat half and leave, even if it paid $50k a month

Being a private chef would mean you would could make actual food and not abstract art. A good chef can make good versions of any common food.
 
This is something for one-percenters, not point one–percenters. People who are really, really rich will have an apartment with a big kitchen and a private chef. These places are actually economizing. You have an apartment with too small of a kitchen or you’re too poor for an actual private chef, so you share one with an hundred other people in a big ass tower.
The people who can afford this building can afford private chefs. The units are huge and start in the tens of millions with hundreds of thousands in taxes and HOA fees a year. Many of them have multiple kitchens: a prominent and elaborately decorated one for the owners to use, and a commercial kitchen hidden away for the private chef to use.

This restaurant exists just to check a box on a real estate listing, which is why the chef is complaining about being bored. The owners are rarely there (because they own several other homes around the world) and when they visit, they want to go out to public restaurants instead of eating at their building’s restaurant.

Ironically, they’d probably use it more if it was open to the public and won prestigious awards. Plenty of people with private chefs still go out to eat at fancy restaurants for the experience even though their chef can cook everything on the menu.
 
It is kind of a strange existence. Like he's getting to basically run a nice restaurant, but it's all kinda fake as it probably was just meant to be a selling point to make the building look fancier to outsiders.

I know there's been stories of some of these big apartment buildings even being largely empty due to having investors from other countries just wanting to purchase places they could sit on. A sort of Potemkin village that the guy is inhabiting to play pretend in.

Would think it'd make more sense to design a place that could be open to the public, then just having a day or two a week it's closed to the public so people in the building can have priority. Would give them exclusivity, but also let it be a normal business.
 
$15k per year isn't even a rounding error for the kind of people who would buy a 20 million dollar apartment and then not even live there. These are the new rich globohomoalists, the top of the ponzi pyramid, just because YOUR wages haven't kept up doesn't mean theirs haven't. They are "earning" 10s if not 100s of millions of dollars a year pushing paper investments, or I should say paying someone else to push paper and collect interest. In that context, why not pay dues like this. It's the equivalent of a normal person paying like $1 per month for a subscription. This kind of spending isn't something that a normal person can REALLY understand. I can only understand it in theory, just like I can only understand paying 50k for a few hours on a private jet in theory (something these people do regularly, maybe even multiple times a week).

It's also a total misunderstanding of character, and a feeble-minded one at that, to just say "oh fuck this guy for bitching about it". He's an actual craftsman, an artisan, and when you are that kind of person you need a challenge, you need to always better yourself, you need to feel like you're doing something important. It's the difference between the retail jockey and the best mechanic in town, or at a higher level the generic lawyer and the big time nationally recognized trial attorney. One is a loser with no talent who is just fine putting in hours and going home to play video games (or whatever generic lawyers do in their spare time). The other is the guy who was smarter and funnier and stronger than you and your friends, top of the class, always winning and striving.

I'm no top 1% achiever and even I get it. You can realize that you have it just fine while also being suicidally bored and unmotivated working below your own skill set. I have walked away from jobs not because they were particularly bad, but because my skills were decaying doing work that any hack could do.
 
It is kind of a strange existence. Like he's getting to basically run a nice restaurant, but it's all kinda fake as it probably was just meant to be a selling point to make the building look fancier to outsiders.

I know there's been stories of some of these big apartment buildings even being largely empty due to having investors from other countries just wanting to purchase places they could sit on. A sort of Potemkin village that the guy is inhabiting to play pretend in.

Would think it'd make more sense to design a place that could be open to the public, then just having a day or two a week it's closed to the public so people in the building can have priority. Would give them exclusivity, but also let it be a normal business.
It sounds like he's in the culinary equivalent of the friend zone. If you were a private chef you'd be networking with someone who can afford a private chef and have a regular schedule, if you ran a restaurant you'd have those responsibilities, but here he doesn't do either of those things.
 
It sounds like he's in the culinary equivalent of the friend zone. If you were a private chef you'd be networking with someone who can afford a private chef and have a regular schedule, if you ran a restaurant you'd have those responsibilities, but here he doesn't do either of those things.
And I could imagine him taking on the job thinking he'd be getting chummy with all these wealthy people living in the building, only to instead be ignored for the most part since they can likely either have private chefs in their homes or dine out at a place where they can more easily brag about.
 
I'm pretty sure a lot of chefs would be happy being able to create whatever they want and are not beholden to actually making money.

You can get as crazy as you want. Social media is right there for showing off if you need validation from your peers.
 
There were a portion of Jamaicans I grew up with who still would do some things that they learned from their colonizers,” said Mr. Salaam.
The dark chappies are just as much colonizers as the Anglos. But that aside, this guy needs to use all this free time to start his own YouTube channel to get his name out there if he wants the visibility.
 
I get the idea that a residents-only restaurant is useful, filtering out the riff-raff and everything, but why not have something useful if it's going to be subsidized by my rent anyway? Can I waltz in at 2:05 in the morning and order a good, real steak with Caesar salad and a loaded baked potato? Can you make me a cheesesteak sandwich with onions and jalapeños with crusty bread cooked that morning and be at my door within five minutes of it leaving the kitchen? Can I just hang out in the bar and drink "free" margaritas until I can barely stand up?
They allude to it in the article. The poker player ordered eggs off menu (although it's a bit ambiguous if that order was made) and the chef talks about how he doesn't really keep his kitchen stocked since it'd be so wasteful, therefore his staff are constantly running out to go buy more ingredients. He also mentions learning what his guests like.

So you might not get bread baked in house but I imagine ordering off menu isn't going to take that much longer than just ordering what he's got in stock. It's not like they're busy. The website seems to indicate that it's only open 5pm - 10pm but that can't be right if they've got a brunch menu, and his restaurant has a cigar humidor and private wine cellar; when you're dealing with rich rich people, you don't say "no", especially if they're clicking their fingers at 4am for their bottle of 1982 Bordeaux they've entrusted you with. Denying some of the wealthiest people in the world service because you want them to try your pumpkin custard will result in them ringing down to the concierge to get whatever they want delivered, followed by a word with building management that the chef is uppity they'll happily take their money elsewhere if the problem isn't fixed.

It's frankly odd that this chef decided to complain about it to a journalist. It's part of the gig, and the super rich won't like that "the help" had the gall to say something negative about them. You don't see private chefs complaining that their clients don't ask for anything fun.
 
That's REALLY stupid. I don't think very highly of Manhattan's ultra-wealthy and they're to blame for a lot of New York's issues, but being obliged to spend money at some snooty upscale restaurant is the worst way to keep it running.

I get the idea that a residents-only restaurant is useful, filtering out the riff-raff and everything, but why not have something useful if it's going to be subsidized by my rent anyway? Can I waltz in at 2:05 in the morning and order a good, real steak with Caesar salad and a loaded baked potato? Can you make me a cheesesteak sandwich with onions and jalapeños with crusty bread cooked that morning and be at my door within five minutes of it leaving the kitchen? Can I just hang out in the bar and drink "free" margaritas until I can barely stand up?
As others have said already, it's more about prestige and a dick waving/measuring contest for these ultra-upscale apartments to be able to brag about their onsite private restaurants and chefs even if few of the tenants go there or take advantage of the fees they pay to subsidize these places.

I also think to some extent that even the rich don't eat froufrou type food all of the time and many would be happy to have a nice steak, prime rib, etc. and be willing to pay upper-crust NYC-tier prices for it. Sure, a $50 appetizer is a drop in the bucket for them, but I can't see them interested in eating this kind of stuff all the time whether it's being sold for $1, $1 million, or something in between.

He's got it made as far as food service goes but I can imagine he's bored out of his skull. He worked his ass off for decades and now he basically just sits there with all of that knowledge and nothing to do but occasionally serve some boring asshole nibbling for novelty while his peers run cooking shows, get on TV and have busy restaurants with a dozen staff and celebrities in the clientele. It's a waste.
If anything, I feel for him for this reason. He's worked so hard to become such a good chef, but his most reliable patron most nights ends up being himself. While it sucks to see his talent be squandered, he also made the decision to be where he's at now. It's hard to complain when he freely made the choice to work and stay at 10 Cubed when it's obviously the high-end equivalent of a dead-end job in terms of his culinary skills and expertise.
(Edited for spelling.)
 
Last edited:
I'm pretty sure a lot of chefs would be happy being able to create whatever they want and are not beholden to actually making money.

You can get as crazy as you want. Social media is right there for showing off if you need validation from your peers.
Problem is how does it look on your resume or portfolio to be able to brag you were making all this great food in an empty restaurant.

Which I imagine is why he was happy to be part of this article, can show a couple dishes he's done and how nice it looks, while commenting on how he's actually in a goofy position with these people that live in the building yet choose not to come up.

I've looked into this stuff in the past too and there is also a slight problem where chefs can get funneled into different fields. Like being the hotel chef, caterer, private chef, restaurant chef, and so on. So just being able to cook is irrelevant if no one knows what basket to really put you in. So could also be a problem for people that try doing work in fast food for a while to get by then just having it look like they're a "fast food" guy on their resume and never being able to get work in a regular restaurant. Not the greatest predicament to get into.
 
I wonder if they would let you bring your own food in and eat just to enjoy the view. Like you walk in devour a couple of Big Macs and leave the wrappers for him to clean up. What's the worst that can happen? They ban you?

In all seriousness though. This entire thing is performative. It's the billionaire equivalent of your condo having a pool. No one uses the condo pool. Except for maybe two people and maybe once in a while. Just like this place, no one uses the building restaurant, they are just happy it exists. They get a warm fuzzy knowing it is there. The coal black chef also helps because now they can say they are diverse.
 
Problem is how does it look on your resume or portfolio to be able to brag you were making all this great food in an empty restaurant.

Which I imagine is why he was happy to be part of this article, can show a couple dishes he's done and how nice it looks, while commenting on how he's actually in a goofy position with these people that live in the building yet choose not to come up.

I've looked into this stuff in the past too and there is also a slight problem where chefs can get funneled into different fields. Like being the hotel chef, caterer, private chef, restaurant chef, and so on. So just being able to cook is irrelevant if no one knows what basket to really put you in. So could also be a problem for people that try doing work in fast food for a while to get by then just having it look like they're a "fast food" guy on their resume and never being able to get work in a regular restaurant. Not the greatest predicament to get into.

The main problem with fast food is you don't actually do anything cooking there. The stories tell of a time when that was different, when even at Taco Bell, lettuce was sliced and beans came in dry, but nowadays every fast food restaurant has things already coming in to the point where you just have to put them in the oven/fryer and assemble them. (The same goes for even "nicer" fast casual restaurants, Panera Bread is one such example). I imagine if you want to go anywhere with your cooking career you need to start with something that actually involves real food somehow, so the "low end" would be something like diners or an inexpensive hotel restaurant.
 
The main problem with fast food is you don't actually do anything cooking there. The stories tell of a time when that was different, when even at Taco Bell, lettuce was sliced and beans came in dry, but nowadays every fast food restaurant has things already coming in to the point where you just have to put them in the oven/fryer and assemble them. (The same goes for even "nicer" fast casual restaurants, Panera Bread is one such example). I imagine if you want to go anywhere with your cooking career you need to start with something that actually involves real food somehow, so the "low end" would be something like diners or an inexpensive hotel restaurant.
Think hotel restaurants will even do some funky stuff like with breakfast doing the bag-o-eggs that they heat up in water to prepare it really fast, rather than just cracking eggs. Then you also have all these places that are basically getting frozen foods brought in that they just nuke in a microwave.

Ends up making it easy to have a restaurant seem 'nice' just by using real fresh ingredients, since it's way too routine in the food industry to avoid that stuff like the plague. Did make it kinda funny though during the Rona lockdowns when some bars in my city tried opening up as semi-restaurants. One place pretty much required anyone coming in order some mozzarella sticks that they just cooked up in the microwave.

2025-01-24.png
 
But it can be lonely at the top.

The restaurant, 1,000 feet in the air and overlooking Central Park, is among about a dozen in the city open only to residents of luxury apartment buildings and their guests, a globally elite clientele that many chefs would be thrilled to serve.

But traffic at Mr. Salaam’s restaurant is sometimes slow. And while he toils in relative splendor with views that look down on passing helicopters and other skyscrapers, his work can feel anonymous.
I get vertigo just thinking about working like this on a daily basis, never mind live in something like this.
 
People in the NYT comments pointed out that part of the appeal of a restaurant is being around other people. Probably moreso with an "exclusive" place.

I feel like if they opened it up as an 8-seat prix fixe dealio with guaranteed seating for residents and $500 for the other spots, it would be packed every night.
 
I wonder if part of the appeal is having a "captive" house negro to cook on demand.
 
A building this luxurious probably has violinists in retinue, who can accompany this pinnacled chef's lamentable plight.
 
Back