You are coping and shifting the goal posts.
This game of all games truly deserves the sharp eye and criticism it's been getting. It's not like this is some fantasy game where you could hand wave off changes and have a decent explaination for it. The first game established exactly what we were getting. Not only was it established but it was reinforced by the creator time and time again. To see what Fagvra has become is sad and ruins everything he's ever been involved with.
The context was people wanting native blacks in Bohemia, He didn't need to specify that's exactly what he meant when he said it. Musa is explicitly a traveler who is fictional, it isn't revisionist to have a fictional foreign traveler travel, it is revisionist to say "Oh this slave who a Japanese noble kept around as a status symbol was totally a bad ass samurai."
It's fantasy, why can't you accept a 2021 BMW 5 Series 530i with optional heated seating?
African Mythology and folklore is full of pretty gnarly and awesome stuff. Where are all the games centered around that?
Oh this Sub-Saharan African noble who a Hungarian king kept around as a good luck charm was totally a bad ass renaissance man.
In Musa's leaked dialogue he mentions Timbuktu, which at the time was a education hotspot and had a massive college. Wouldn't it make a lot of sense for Sigsmund to have this guy tag along since he was actually pretty knowledgeable? Hell he joined them after being part of Bayezid I's court.
How do you know we can't?
It has been explained in this thread multiple times why it is unlikely someone could have made such travels at the time. Sigismund was at war with the Ottomans, he wasn't exactly a fan of Muslims, he had no reason to keep one around, as a designated smartass, in his military camp. People suggested multiple brown skinned ethnicities, whose presence would have been far more feasible, but they were clearly ignored, in favour of an African black person.
It wouldn't. It's like Hitler inviting an educated soviet jew into the Eagle's Nest. Him being a renaissance man isn't the problem, him being around at all is the problem. If they wanted to add an african scholar they should have added an egyptian copt instead of a sub saharan muslim.
No it wouldn't for the same exact reason there shouldn't and wouldn't be niggers in Bohemia and because Bayezid is the Ottoman Sultan Sigismund waged a crusade on.
Then if thats true and isn't patched out all of the backlash is just set dressing for politisperging and history autism, although I believe people are correct about their intolerance for this faggotry, and you're a faggot for pissing on our shoulders and saying it's raining. It depends on how they write it, if it is portrayed as an evil act that negatively affects your playthrough it is disingenuous and made with hindsight because back then there would be next to no consequences for framing a foreign nigger into getting killed, if anything it would get you further and be rewarded.
I mean you're not entirely wrong, but it depends on how it's done. In both cases here it is revisionist, this nignog is in the company of Sigismund "Fuck those Ottomans" of Luxemburg, no one with even the slightest grasp of history is going to believe that.
Someone put that in Random.txt.
