US US Politics General 2 - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Who is that Playboy model? She has an okay figure and great hair.
Shit's moving too fast for me too keep up on a weekend, but assuming no one answered and because I'm a kind and generous soul, the name you're looking for is Bridget Marks.

Southerners shouldn't really tell Northerners about how great the South. Don't encourage them to migrate. Just tell them it's a fascist shit hole with Trump supporters everywhere, rednecks with AR-15s, and that they wouldn't survive there with all the racism. Just don't defend the South. Just accept what they say and move on.
This is what Ohio does, we're perfectly happy to amplify the suck if it'll keep out of state people from ruining the good parts. Whatever has to be done to keep the Californians and Massholes out. You're all correct, there's nothing nice here, you should stay out, we agree.
 
Personally I liked when Obama had celebrities worshiping his very existence, won a Nobel Peace Prize for reasons no one knows to this day, stoked racial division and authorized ten times more drone strikes then Bush did while no liberals complained about him doing it.
You just made me realize that I still have no idea why Obama got a Nobel Peace Prize. So I decided to look it up.

Obama Nobel.png
(https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/peace/2009/obama/facts/) (A)
“for his extraordinary efforts to strengthen international diplomacy and cooperation between peoples”

For anyone who wants to read the full text:

Inspires Hope for a Better Future​


Barack H. Obama, the 44th President of the United States, had been in power for less than eight months when he was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize for 2009. Among the reasons it gave, the Nobel Committee lauded Obama for his “extraordinary efforts to strengthen international diplomacy and cooperation between peoples”. Emphasis was also given to his support - in word and deed - for the vision of a world free from nuclear weapons.

Even before the election, Obama had advocated dialogue and cooperation across national, ethnic, religious and political dividing lines. As President, he called for a new start to relations between the Muslim world and the West based on common interests and mutual understanding and respect. In accordance with a promise he made during his election campaign, he set in motion a plan for the withdrawal of U.S. occupying forces from Iraq.

During his first year in power, President Obama showed himself to be a strong spokesman for human rights and democracy, and as a constructive supporter of the work being done to put effective measures in place to combat the climate crisis. This is in line with his appeal: “Now is the time for all of us to take our share of responsibility for a global response to global challenges”.

And, after reading all that, I... still can't explain why he got it.
 
He's no Ahmadinejad, Maduro, or Kim Jong Un. He still talks with the US, has relations with the US, hasn't closed any embassies, nor is arming himself with Russian WMDs.
He's only saying such things to appeal to commies. He hates Capitalism so much that he hasn't nationalized anything, hasn't passed any pro-worker law, and constantly bows down to the market.

If you talk to any commie, they will call him a centrist because that's all he is. A centrist boomer who sometimes used soviet-like language to appeal to retards.

Also, sucking Americans off won't make you white, by the way. They'd carpet bomb your entire family tree if they wanted to. Americans of any political ideology—yes, even Liberals think you're a subhuman who deserves to be 6 feet under.
Sir this is the US Politics thread and the only topics that are allowed concern American politics like policies, immigration, Trump, traps, Fate, Captain Planet, weed, and Stargate so I'm sorry but your defending of Brazilian communists is off topic.
 
Last edited:
Interested in hearing what you all think about this story. Think the Khosla guy is kinda coping, but also I get his perspective. Could we (the west generally, christendom, USA) lose the "AI arms race"?

Curai CEO Neal Khosla offered a simpler explanation, claiming that the company is a “ccp state psyop” that’s “faking the cost was low to justify setting price low and hoping everyone switches to it [to] damage AI competitiveness in the us.” (A Community Note has been attached to his post pointing out that Khosla offers no evidence for this, and that his father Vinod is an OpenAI investor.)

Meanwhile, journalist Holger Zschaepitz suggested DeepSeek could “could represent the biggest threat to US equity markets” — if a Chinese company can build a cutting-edge model at low cost, without access to advanced chips, it would call into question “the utility of the hundreds of billions worth of capex being poured into this industry.”
 
He's only saying such things to appeal to commies. He hates Capitalism so much that he hasn't nationalized anything, hasn't passed any pro-worker law, and constantly bows down to the market.

If you talk to any commie, they will call him a centrist because that's all he is. A centrist boomer who sometimes used soviet-like language to appeal to retards.

Because he is a kleptocract who only ever got to power because in the early 2000s a bunch of fat cats decided that social democracy would be a amazing way to steal money. His vice president in 2002 was one of the richest men in Brazil and single handedly bankrolled his election by lying about Lula's past, putting him on a suit and having him wave a little brazilian flag instead of a red one as to fool retards into thinking he was a ordinary democrat and not a first rate soviet apologist.

The reason he hasn't tried nationalizations is simply because that would mean he would lose his share of the spoils, and why would he nationalize it when he can pretend that the market is "free" and have foreign money come in by instead having a oligopoly of companies who are all friends of his government run everything and crush competition with lawfare and regulations? And nowadays he only exists as a shell of a man whose only purpose is to get enough votes to pretend Brazil has elections since the people actually running the country are the Supreme Court and a thousand kleptocrat bureacrats.
 
Sir this is the US Politics thread and the only topics are allowed concern American politics like policies, immigration, Trump, traps, Fate, Captain Planet, weed, and Stargate so I'm sorry but your defending of Brazilian communists is off topic.
America has multiple military bases around the world, the UN, IMF, and weaponizes the US dollar for their own goals, so it's still on topic. Unless the US turns into an isolated nation like the DPRK.
 
So as a guy, especially if you're an old soul that is more mature for your age, which type of women would you rather be acquainted with? The young ones that are all over the place and will attack you at the drop of a hat? Or the older ones that you can actually have a conversation with and stay in one lane?
Closest one I know that fits that description here is @Friend of Dorothy Parker and maybe @Suspicious Activity. Great ladies to talk to, I'm just so busy to get invested with my low attention span.
 
These countries shouldn't even be independent states anyways. By force or through peaceful means all of the Americas should be absorbed into the United States of America. Make Peru (excl. Lima), Bolivia, Paraguay and various other parts of the South American interior into a giant Indian reservation. Set up separate internal nationalities like we did with the Philippines to prevent internal migration from wrecking the country. Annex northern parts of Mexico as directly administered territories. Set up new internal governing structures in the rest of America. All part of the United States of America.
 
I can't tell if they're actually that ignorant of the powers of the executive branch or if they're just coping so hard what they wish were true must actually be true, but either way these people couldn't pass a sixth grade civics class.
in their defense, given the state of schools they probably never had a civics class, and if it was pretty lousy with lots of TDS after 2015.

There's 21 and a halfish million women aged 20-29 in Murica, they can't all be crammed into a couple categories
class and background are still a thing, there's a reason for studies with "college-educated women" for example.
how high do you think the distribution of each type is, especially when you break it down by field?

or in other words, what type of women do you expect in a gender studies class?
 
Last edited:
Back