- Joined
- Mar 24, 2013
Even that is crossing the line. It is unacceptable to disrespect the noble Kirby like that.
Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)
- Thread starter AnOminous
- Start date
Even that is crossing the line. It is unacceptable to disrespect the noble Kirby like that.
- Joined
- May 4, 2020
In this motion Russ admits to having no idea what the Standard Protective Order he agreed to even is, nor has he ever seen or read it.
- Joined
- May 22, 2019
"Your Honor, I don't have a copy of the SPO, I'm too retarded to figure out what it means, but I'm definitely sure the Defendants violated it."
This fucking retard.
- Joined
- Jul 24, 2022
holy shit, he's fucking retarded
- Joined
- Nov 14, 2022
Is Plaintiff Russell Greer russtarded or am I mistaken?
Surely "standard protective order" means https://www.utd.uscourts.gov/sites/utd/files/Standard Protective Order .pdf this thing which is the first result when i google for "standard protective order USA"
He's coming to kill you
In real life
- Joined
- May 4, 2020
He is either lying, or he is a massive retard.
- Joined
- Jan 1, 2021
JFC. Lazy and stupid.
I'm sure half this thread has read the standard protective order, because it's not hard to find.
- Joined
- May 22, 2019
Can't it be both? Malicious retardation.
- Joined
- Jan 19, 2021
"If I'm being punished, then YOU should be punished too"
- Joined
- May 4, 2020
I rather think it's mutually exclusive in this case.
- Joined
- Jul 18, 2017
it can very easily be both at the same time.
- Joined
- Jun 16, 2023
"Waaaah daddy judge how come I have to get sanctioned but mean ol' Hardin doesn't! It's not faaaaaair!"
Just pathetic behavior from shitlips. Can't wait for him to be reminded that the protective order needed Greer to mark the witnesses as confidential, not for Hardin to do it for him.
Oh fuck I got sniped, damn you @somevan712 lmao.
Just pathetic behavior from shitlips. Can't wait for him to be reminded that the protective order needed Greer to mark the witnesses as confidential, not for Hardin to do it for him.
Oh fuck I got sniped, damn you @somevan712 lmao.
- Joined
- May 4, 2020
Fun fact, the court literally spelled it out for him (as did the Defense, but that's a separate issue)
- Joined
- Jun 16, 2023
Clearly Russ hasn't read this particular docket entry. It has likely been sitting in his inbox/mailbox for weeks because he's just to gosh darn busy to deal with the court case he started!
Edit: Or he did and he's a malicious retard, but that doesn't sound like our drooly boy now does it?
- Joined
- Dec 16, 2019
I file this as my only ebidance that Russell Greer, Queer Fear, thinks this is high-school principal's office.
I think everyone can agree no further discussion will be needed.
OK I CAN'T TAKE IT ANYMORE THE WHOLE FUCKING POINT OF SANCTIONS IS TO REESTABLISH A FAIR PLAYING FIELD AFTER ONE SIDE FUCKED UP MAJORLY IF SANCTIONS ARE ON THE TABLE IT'S BECAUSE ONE SIDE FUCKED UP SO BAD IT HAS TO BE ADDRESSED, NOT SOMETHING THAT GETS DOLED OUT EQUALLY TO ALL SIDES HOLY FUCKING SHIT DEALING WITH THIS RETARD SHOULD QUALIFY NULL FOR SAINTHOOD IN 12 OF THE 24 VALID CHURCHES
Ahem. Reading the SPO I immediately spy three or four other ways Retard could fuck it up even if he had actually tried to, you know, prosecute his case. Two (in my estimation) would be so minor even Hardin would ignore them (a snide footnote might appear at most) and one would get a snort from the bench but have no material effect. At least one would be (and is!) a major fuckup. I won't list them all here, because they're so obvious ...
- Joined
- May 4, 2020
He responded to that docket entry here:
In it he pretended that the specific footnote did not exist
and six goriilion others
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2023
Now this is a great motion. Short, but somehow still absolutely filled with lunacy. Thank you Russel.
The judge linked him some videos on how to do discovery right? Did those include something about the SPO, because I can only assume that would piss the judge off.
- Joined
- Dec 16, 2019
I don't recall that it did, and I don't know how much of my "DYO research" on SPOs I should post, but it's literally just asking a search engine or AI lol.
But Russ asked for a thing, not a standard thing but a thing that's pretty normally granted for any reason whatsoever (e.g, Null could ask and probably receive an SPO on which version of MySQL he runs, if that were included in a discovery response), but he has no idea what the thing is.
What he's done is so batshit hilarious that I'm finding it hard to find analogies. Perhaps it's like asking for a prenup, having the girl agree, and then never actually, you know, getting one hammered out. But it's even worse than that.
- Joined
- May 16, 2019
So the court entered the SPO on 11-18-2024, and Russ doesn't ask the court for a copy until 12-30-2024. In the intervening month and a half, he was the one sending sensitive information under the SPO and filing complaints about its violation. Then when he didn't get a copy on 12-30, he waited 4 weeks to file this request for a copy of this super important SPO.
Does this sound like someone actively pursuing his case? Or does it sound like the same lazy asshole from the Gilman suit, who checks his mail every 2 weeks and doesn't read motions until the day he thinks a response is due?
Does this sound like someone actively pursuing his case? Or does it sound like the same lazy asshole from the Gilman suit, who checks his mail every 2 weeks and doesn't read motions until the day he thinks a response is due?
- Joined
- Jun 23, 2021
True, but as we have already determined, Russ's disability makes him unable to read footnotes (see also the "seven months" trauma from footnote 18, same document).